Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Pharmacogenomics J ; 17(3): 258-264, 2017 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26927284

RESUMO

Production of lactate even in the presence of sufficient levels of oxygen (aerobic glycolysis) seems the prevalent energy metabolism pathway in cancer cells. The analysis of altered expression of effectors causing redirection of glucose metabolism would help to characterize this phenomenon with possible therapeutic implications. We analyzed mRNA expression of the key enzymes involved in aerobic glycolysis in normal mucosa (NM), primary tumor (PT) and liver metastasis (LM) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (pts) who underwent primary tumor surgery and liver metastasectomy. Tissues of 48 CRC pts were analyzed by RT-qPCR for mRNA expression of the following genes: hexokinase-1 (HK-1) and 2 (HK-2), embryonic pyruvate kinase (PKM-2), lactate dehydrogenase-A (LDH-A), glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1), voltage-dependent anion-selective channel protein-1 (VDAC-1). Differences in the expression of the candidate genes between tissues and associations with clinical/pathologic features were studied. GLUT-1, LDH-A, HK-1, PKM-2 and VDAC-1 mRNA expression levels were significantly higher in PT/LM tissues compared with NM. There was a trend for higher expression of these genes in LM compared with PT tissues, but differences were statistically significant for LDH-A expression only. RAS mutation-positive disease was associated with high GLUT-1 mRNA expression levels only. Right-sided colon tumors showed significantly higher GLUT-1, PKM-2 and LDH-A mRNA expression levels. High glycolytic profile was significantly associated with poor prognosis in 20 metastatic, RAS-mutated pts treated with first-line chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab. Altered expression of effectors associated with upregulated glucose uptake and aerobic glycolysis occurs in CRC tissues. Additional analyses are warranted for addressing the role of these changes in anti-angiogenic resistance and for developing novel therapeutics.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Neoplasias Colorretais/genética , Glicólise/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Colectomia , Neoplasias Colorretais/enzimologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Progressão da Doença , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética , Feminino , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Enzimológica da Expressão Gênica , Regulação Neoplásica da Expressão Gênica , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Hepatectomia , Humanos , Itália , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Hepáticas/enzimologia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Metastasectomia/métodos , Mutação , Farmacogenética , Variantes Farmacogenômicos , Fenótipo , RNA Mensageiro/genética , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Int J Cancer ; 139(12): 2859-2864, 2016 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27578417

RESUMO

Mechanisms of acquired resistance to trastuzumab-based treatment in gastric cancer are largely unknown. In this study, we analyzed 22 pairs of tumor samples taken at baseline and post-progression in patients receiving chemotherapy and trastuzumab for advanced HER2-positive [immunohistochemistry (IHC) 3+ or 2+ with in-situ hybridization (ISH) amplification] gastric or gastroesophageal cancers. Strict clinical criteria for defining acquired trastuzumab resistance were adopted. Loss of HER2 positivity and loss of HER2 over-expression were defined as post-trastuzumab IHC score <3+ and absence of ISH amplification, and IHC "downscoring" from 2+/3+ to 0/1+, respectively. HER2 IHC was always performed, while ISH was missing in 3 post-progression samples. Patients with initial HER2 IHC score 3+ and 2+ were 14 (64%) and 8 (36%), respectively. Loss of HER2 positivity and HER2 over-expression was observed in 32 and 32% samples, respectively. The chance of HER2 loss was not associated with any of the baseline clinicopathological variables. The only exception was in patients with initial IHC score 2+ versus 3+, for both endpoints of HER2 positivity (80 vs. 14%; p = 0.008) and HER2 over-expression (63 vs. 14%; p = 0.025). As already shown in breast cancer, loss of HER2 may be observed also in gastric cancers patients treated with trastuzumab-based chemotherapy in the clinical practice. This phenomenon may be one of the biological reasons explaining the failure of anti-HER2 second-line strategies in initially HER2-positive disease.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/metabolismo , Receptor ErbB-2/metabolismo , Neoplasias Gástricas/metabolismo , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Receptor ErbB-2/antagonistas & inibidores , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/genética , Trastuzumab/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Dig Liver Dis ; 2023 Aug 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37586908

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal strategy for second-line (IIL) treatment in KRAS wt metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is not determined yet. METHODS: A random-effect NMA of phase II/III RCTs was conducted to evaluate IIL treatment for all-RAS wt mCRC, comparing anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF, and chemotherapy (CT). RESULTS: Overall, 11 RCTs (3613 patients) were included. In KRAS wt patients, PFS was improved with anti-VEGF (HR 0.43) and anti-EGFR (HR 0.63) vs CT. However, anti-VEGF based therapy had the highest likelihood of being ranked as the best treatment in terms of PFS (SUCRA 99.3%) and OS (SUCRA 99.4%). Bevacizumab-based treatment is most likely to be the best treatment in terms of PFS (SUCRA 89.1%) and OS (SUCRA 86.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Second line treatment with anti-VEGF and anti-EGFR improved PFS in mCRC patients, however, anti-VEGF based therapy, particularly CT plus bevacizumab, is the best treatment according to SUCRA in terms of PFS and OS.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA