Systemic therapy for salivary gland malignancy: current status and future perspectives.

Salivary gland malignancies are rare neoplasms that have a broad histological spectrum and a variety of biologic behaviors. Salivary gland malignancies are known as chemo-resistant tumors, which render optimal treatment challenging. This review summarizes the role of systemic therapy for salivary gland malignancies. To date, the advantage of adding concurrent chemotherapy has remained undefined for both postoperative and inoperable locally advanced salivary gland malignancy patients undergoing radiotherapy. For recurrent/metastatic disease, local and/or systemic treatment options should be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting with consideration to both patient needs and tumor factors. For symptomatic patients or those who may compromise organ function, palliative systemic therapy can be a reasonable option based on the results of phase II studies. Platinum combination regimens as first-line therapy have been widely accepted. Personalized therapies have become established options, particularly for androgen receptor-positive, HER2-positive and NTRK fusion-positive salivary gland malignancies (i.e. androgen receptor and HER2 in salivary duct carcinoma and NTRK3 in secretory carcinoma). For patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma, multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors have also been developed. Anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors have shown limited activity to date. Investigation of active systemic treatments for salivary gland malignancy remains a significant unmet need. Future directions might include a more comprehensive genomic screening approach (usually next-generation sequencing-based) and combination strategies using immune checkpoint inhibitors. These are rare malignancies that require ongoing effort in the conduct of high-quality clinical trials.

Human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma.

It was not until around 2000 that human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma was recognized as carcinoma with clinical presentations different from nonrelated head and neck carcinoma. Twenty years after and with the revision of the tumor-node-metastasis classification in 2017, various clinical trials focused on human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma to improve the prognosis and quality of life of patients with this disease. However, the incidence of human papillomavirus-related cancers is increasing, which is expected to be particularly prominent in Japan, where human papillomavirus vaccination is not widely available. In this review, we describe the current status of clinical trials (mainly focused on initial surgery and radiation dose reduction) for, primary and secondary prevention of, and the present status of human papillomavirus-related oropharyngeal carcinoma in Japan.

Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

In order to maximize the benefit of induction chemotherapy, practice based on a comprehensive interpretation of a large number of clinical trials, as in this review, is essential. The standard treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is surgery or chemoradiation. However, induction chemotherapy followed by (chemo) radiotherapy may be used in some circumstances. Although many clinical trials of induction chemotherapy have been conducted, a rationale other than to preserve the larynx is still controversial. Selection of this modality should therefore be made with care. The current standard regimen for induction chemotherapy is docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU, but concerns remain about toxicity, cost and the duration of treatment. Regarding treatment after induction chemotherapy, it is also unclear whether radiation alone or chemoradiation is the better option. Furthermore, there is no answer as to what drugs should be used in combination with radiation therapy after induction chemotherapy. Several new induction chemotherapy treatment developments are currently underway, and future developments are expected. This review article summarizes the current position of induction chemotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, based on the evidence produced to date, and discusses the future prospects for this treatment.

4-step, 2-h carboplatin desensitization in Japanese patients with ovarian cancer: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Carboplatin is a key drug for ovarian cancer. However, it sometimes induces hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) that result in the discontinuation of the treatment. Although various desensitization protocols have been reported in previous retrospective studies, a limited number of prospective studies have analyzed these protocols. METHODS: Patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who experienced carboplatin-induced HSRs were treated with diluted solutions of 1/1000, 1/100, 1/10 and an undiluted solution of carboplatin over a 1-h period. If no HSRs occurred within the first two cycles, a short protocol regimen over a 30-min period per solution was followed. The primary endpoint was treatment completion rate. RESULTS: Between May 2015 and September 2018, 21 patients were enrolled from two institutions. One patient experienced platinum-sensitive recurrence after the desensitization protocol; thus, 22 sessions were analyzed. Epinephrine use, treatment-related death, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions did not occur. The median number of desensitization cycles was 6 (range 1-6). Two sessions were discontinued early because of grade 2 dysgeusia and grade 2 malaise. Treatment in two (9.1%) patients was discontinued because of HSR development. The treatment completion rate was 90.9%. Six (27.3%) sessions met the criteria for transition to the short protocol regimen. In 14 (63.6%) sessions, HSRs were observed during infusion of the undiluted solution. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.8 and 23.8 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This 4-step, 2-h carboplatin desensitization protocol is safe and feasible. Patients require careful monitoring with a rapid response to HSRs, especially during the administration of undiluted solutions.

Immunotherapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is characterized by an immunosuppressive environment and evades immune responses through multiple resistance mechanisms. A breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy employing immune checkpoint inhibitors has evolved into a number of clinical trials with antibodies against programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1 and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. CheckMate141 and KEYNOTE-048 were practice-changing randomized phase 3 trials for patients with platinum-refractory and platinum-sensitive recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, respectively. Furthermore, many combination therapies using anti-CTLA-4 inhibitors, tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immune accelerators are currently under investigation. Thus, the treatment strategy of recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is becoming more heterogeneous and complicated in the new era of individualized medicine. Ongoing trials are investigating immunotherapeutic approaches in the curative setting for locoregionally advanced disease. This review article summarizes knowledge of the role of the immune system in the development and progression of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, and provides a comprehensive overview on the development of immunotherapeutic approaches in both recurrent/metastatic and locoregionally advanced diseases.

PARP inhibitors for BRCA wild type ovarian cancer; gene alterations, homologous recombination deficiency and combination therapy.

After a brief summary of the current status of poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors for ovarian cancer, we summarize the current status of PARP inhibitors for BRCA wild type ovarian cancer, especially regarding gene alterations other than BRCA, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD), and combinations. Discussion of gene alterations other than BRCA include the results of multiple gene panels studying homologous recombination repair deficiency genes and cancer susceptibility genes, and influences of these alterations on efficacy of PARP inhibitors and cancer susceptibility. Discussions of HRD include the results of phase three trials using HRD assay, the definition of HRD assays, and the latest assays. Discussions of combinations include early phase trial results and ongoing trials combining PARP inhibitors with immune checkpoint inhibitors, anti-angiogenic agents, and triplets.

Induction TPF chemotherapy followed by CRT with fractionated administration of cisplatin in patients with unresectable locally advanced head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: In treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN), the use of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) followed by high-dose cisplatin chemoradiotherapy (CRT) carries concerns over toxicity. We evaluated the feasibility of TPF as induction chemotherapy (IC) to Japanese patients and the tolerability of CRT with fractionated administration of cisplatin after IC. METHODS: Patients with unresectable stage III, IV SCCHN received IC followed by CRT. IC consisted of three 3-week cycles of docetaxel 70-75 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 70-75 mg/m2 on day 1, and 5-fluorouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5. Patients subsequently received IMRT concomitant with fractionated administration of cisplatin (20 mg/m2) on days 1-4, repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was completion of the three cycles of IC. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were enrolled. The IC treatment completion rate was 85%. Grade 3-4 toxicities of TPF were neutropenia (79%) and febrile neutropenia (15%). Thirty-eight patients (79%) achieved a response after IC. Forty patients subsequently underwent CRT. Thirty-three patients (83%) completed the planned cycles of fractionated administration of cisplatin, but seven (18%) did not. Grade 3-4 toxicities during CRT were neutropenia (23%), mucositis (53%), and dysphagia (33%). With a median follow-up of 36.1 months, 3-year overall survival was 65%. CONCLUSION: TPF IC is feasible and CRT with fractionated administration of cisplatin after IC is tolerable. IC followed by CRT appears to be a useful and safe sequential treatment. (Trial registration no. UMIN000024686).

Phase 1 dose-escalation study of single-agent veliparib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors.

Veliparib (ABT-888) is a potent, orally bioavailable poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 and -2 inhibitor. This phase 1 study evaluated the tolerability, pharmacokinetic profile, safety, and preliminary antitumor activity of single-agent veliparib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Eligible patients were assigned to treatment with veliparib at 200 or 400 mg dose; veliparib was self-administered orally twice daily on days 1-28 of 28-day cycles. Dose escalation, following a 3 + 3 design, defined dose-limiting toxicities, the maximum tolerated dose, and the recommended phase 2 dose. Sixteen patients were enrolled (median age, 59 years). Fourteen patients had high-grade serous ovarian cancer, one had primary peritoneal cancer, and one had BRCA-mutated breast cancer. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were nausea and vomiting (93.8% each), decreased appetite (62.5%), abdominal pain, diarrhea, and malaise (31.3% each). A grade ≥3 toxicity was observed in 50% of patients; one patient each in the 200 mg (n = 4) and 400 mg (n = 12) cohorts experienced serious adverse events. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed for one patient at the 400 mg dose. No toxicities leading to death were reported. The recommended phase 2 dose was defined as 400 mg twice daily. The veliparib pharmacokinetic profile was consistent with that reported for the Western population. Two patients, both with ovarian cancer, had a RECIST partial response. Veliparib monotherapy showed manageable tolerability and safety profiles and a predictable pharmacokinetic profile at a 400 mg twice-daily dose, and supports the inclusion of Japanese patients in the multinational phase 3 study (NCT02470585).

4-step 4-h carboplatin desensitization protocol for patients with gynecological malignancies showing platinum hypersensitivity: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Platinum agents are essential for treating gynecological malignancies, particularly ovarian cancer. However, multiple carboplatin doses may cause hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs). Carboplatin desensitization prevents life-threatening HSRs and promotes the successful completion of planned chemotherapy. METHODS: Since January 2010, carboplatin desensitization was performed at our institution. Solutions with 1/1000, 1/100, and 1/10 dilutions of carboplatin and an undiluted solution were prepared in 250 mL of 5% glucose. Each solution was administered as a 1-h intravenous infusion (4-step 4-h protocol). This retrospective analysis was approved by the institutional review board. RESULTS: From January 2010 to December 2013, 20 patients with gynecological malignancies (median age 62 years, range 43-74 years) received desensitization treatment. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages at presentation were I, II, III, and IV in 1, 1, 15, 13 patients, respectively. During first-line and second-line treatments, 3 and 17 patients, respectively, experienced carboplatin-induced HSRs. The median carboplatin cycle number was 11 (range 2-16). In the first desensitization cycle, 17 (85%) patients completed treatment without adverse events, 2 experienced Grade 1 HSRs but completed treatment, and 1 experienced Grade 3 HSR and discontinued treatment. The first desensitization cycle completion rate was 95%. Of 83 desensitization cycles administered, 79 (95.2%) were completed. No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients completed the planned chemotherapy. Our protocol could be conducted safely with shorter duration and simpler procedures than previous protocols. Carboplatin desensitization seems beneficial for patients with a history of carboplatin-induced HSRs; however, the risk of HSR recurrence still remains. Desensitization should therefore be performed only by well-trained staff.

Clinical benefit of treatment after trastuzumab emtansine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world multi-centre cohort study in Japan (WJOG12519B).

BACKGROUND: Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) treatment for human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer after taxane with trastuzumab and pertuzumab is standard therapy. However, treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 are still in development with insufficient evidence of their effectiveness. Here, we aimed to evaluate real-world treatment choice and efficacy of treatments after T-DM1 for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: In this multi-centre retrospective cohort study involving 17 hospitals, 325 female HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients whose post-T-DM1 treatment began between April 15, 2014 and December 31, 2018 were enrolled. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR) of post-T-DM1 treatments. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The median number of prior treatments of post-T-DM1 treatment was four. The types of post-T-DM1 treatments included (1) chemotherapy in combination with trastuzumab and pertuzumab (n = 102; 31.4%), (2) chemotherapy concomitant with trastuzumab (n = 78; 24.0%), (3), lapatinib with capecitabine (n = 63; 19.4%), and (4) others (n = 82; 25.2%). ORR was 22.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 18.1-28.0], DCR = 66.6% (95% CI 60.8-72.0), median PFS = 6.1 months (95% CI 5.3-6.7), median TTF = 5.1 months (95% CI 4.4-5.6), and median OS = 23.7 months (95% CI 20.7-27.4). CONCLUSION: The benefits of treatments after T-DM1 are limited. Further investigation of new treatment strategies beyond T-DM1 is awaited for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

Safety and Relative Dose Intensity of Dose-dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide Followed by Dose-dense Paclitaxel.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (ddAC) followed by dose-dense paclitaxel (ddP) (ddAC-P) has improved disease-free survival of patients with breast cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and relative dose intensity (RDI) of ddAC-P administered together with pegfilgrastim. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2015 and Aug 2017, 44 patients were retrospectively reviewed; they were administered 4 cycles of ddAC, followed by 4 cycles of ddP. Pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg) was administered in every cycle. RESULTS: The mean RDIs for ddAC-P, ddAC, and ddP were 95.0%, 94.5%, and 93.3%, respectively. The prevalence of high RDIs (≥85%) for ddAC-P, ddAC, and ddP was 90.9%, 84.1%, and 88.6%, respectively. Seven of the 10 patients with low RDIs experienced grade 1 or 2 fever. CONCLUSION: DdAC-P administered together with pegfilgrastim (3.6 mg) appears to be feasible and maintains RDI in most of Japanese patients with breast cancer. Rapid evaluation and proper management of fever may prevent low RDI.

Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing Site-Specific Treatment Based on Gene Expression Profiling With Carboplatin and Paclitaxel for Patients With Cancer of Unknown Primary Site.

PURPOSE: Although gene expression profiling is a promising diagnostic technique to determine the tissue of origin for patients with cancer of unknown primary site (CUP), no clinical trial has evaluated yet site-specific therapy directed by this approach compared with empirical chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized study to assess whether such site-specific therapy improves outcome compared with empirical chemotherapy in previously untreated patients with CUP. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Comprehensive gene expression profiling was performed by microarray analysis, and an established algorithm was applied to predict tumor origin. Patients with CUP were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard site-specific therapy or empirical paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC). The primary end point was 1-year survival rate. RESULTS: One hundred thirty patients were randomly assigned and had sufficient biopsy tissue for molecular analysis. Efficacy analysis was performed for 50 and 51 patients in the site-specific therapy and empirical PC arms, respectively. Cancer types most commonly predicted were pancreatic (21%), gastric (21%), and lymphoma (20%). The 1-year survival rate was 44.0% and 54.9% for site-specific treatment and empirical PC ( P = .264), respectively. Median overall and progression-free survival were 9.8 and 5.1 months, respectively, for site-specific treatment versus 12.5 and 4.8 months for empirical PC ( P = .896 and .550, respectively). Median overall survival (16.7 v 10.6 months; P = .116) and progression-free survival (5.5 v 3.9 months; P = .018) were better for predicted more-responsive than less-responsive tumor types. CONCLUSION: Site-specific treatment that was based on microarray profiling did not result in a significant improvement in 1-year survival compared with empirical PC, although prediction of the original site seemed to be of prognostic value.