Kinetic Imaging in Lower Extremity Arteriography: Comparison to Digital Subtraction Angiography.

Purpose To compare the image quality produced by kinetic imaging in x-ray angiography and the current reference standard digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Materials and Methods This prospective observational crossover study enrolled 42 patients undergoing lower limb x-ray angiography between February and June 2017 (mean age, 68.7 years; age range, 49-89 years; 32 men [mean age, 67.1 years; age range, 49-89 years] and 10 women [mean age, 75 years; age range, 57-85 years]). Signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of DSA and kinetic image pairs were compared. Visual quality comparisons were also performed by specialists who used an online questionnaire. Interrater agreement was characterized by percent agreement and Fleiss k. Results A total of 1902 regions of interest were carefully selected in 110 image pairs to calculate and compare the SNRs. Median SNR in raw kinetic images was 3.3-fold and 2.3-fold higher than raw and postprocessed DSA images, respectively. A total of 232 pairs of raw and postprocessed kinetic images were compared. It was indicated that postprocessing improved the quality of kinetic images in 63.9% (2668 of 4176) of the comparisons. Interrater agreement was 75% and Fleiss k was 0.12 (P < .001). Also, 238 pairs of kinetic and DSA images were compared. Kinetic imaging was judged to have provided higher quality images than DSA in 69.0% (2462 of 3570) of the comparisons. The interrater agreement was 81% and Fleiss k was 0.17 (P < .001). Conclusion Kinetic imaging helps to view the same structures as digital subtraction angiography but offers better image quality. The improved signal-to-noise ratio suggests that this approach could reduce radiation exposure and improve the ability to view smaller vessels. © RSNA, 2018 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Rational and design of the INtentional COronary revascularization versus conservative therapy in patients undergOing successful peripheRAl arTEry revascularization due to critical limb ischemia trial (INCORPORATE trial).

Critical limb ischemia is associated with excessively high risk for cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction and death. Additionally, in this patient population non-invasive evaluation of coronary artery disease is limited due to (1) inability of exercise testing, (2) frequent occurrence of balanced ischemia and (3) frequent occurrence of diffuse coronary calcification. Intentional Coronary Revascularization Versus Conservative Therapy in Patients Undergoing Peripheral Artery Revascularization Due to Critical Limb Ischemia trial (INCORPORATE trial) is a multicentric international randomized open label clinical trial. Trial will recruit patients, who underwent successful peripheral artery revascularization due to critical limb ischemia and randomize 1:1 to conservative medical therapy versus an immediate invasive strategy to investigate and treat coronary artery disease. The objective is to evaluate whether intentional invasive strategy with ischemia targeted reasonably complete coronary revascularization is superior as compared to conventional primarily conservative approach in terms of spontaneous myocardial infarction and overall survival at 12 months follow-up. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03712644).

Digital variance angiography allows about 70% decrease of DSA-related radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography.

Our aim was to investigate whether the previously observed higher contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and better image quality of Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) - compared to Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) - can be used to reduce radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography. This prospective study enrolled 30 peripheral artery disease patients (mean ± SD age 70 ± 8 years) undergoing diagnostic angiography. In all patients, both normal (1.2 µGy/frame; 100%) and low-dose (0.36 µGy/frame; 30%) protocols were used for the acquisition of images in three anatomical regions (abdominal, femoral, crural). The CNR of DSA and DVA images were calculated, and the visual quality was evaluated by seven specialists using a 5-grade Likert scale. For investigating non-inferiority, the difference of low-dose DVA and normal dose DSA scores (DVA30-DSA100) was analyzed. DVA produced two- to three-fold CNR and significantly higher visual score than DSA. DVA30 proved to be superior to DSA100 in the crural region (difference 0.25 ± 0.07, p < 0.001), and there was no significant difference in the femoral (- 0.08 ± 0.06, p = 0.435) and abdominal (- 0.10 ± 0.09, p = 0.350) regions. Our data show that DVA allows about 70% reduction of DSA-related radiation exposure in lower limb X-ray angiography, providing a potential new radiation protection tool for the patients and the medical staff.

Initial evidence of a 50% reduction of contrast media using digital variance angiography in endovascular carotid interventions.

PURPOSE: In previous clinical studies Digital Variance Angiography (DVA) provided higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and better image quality than Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA). Our aim was to investigate whether this quality reserve of DVA provides an opportunity for the reduction of iodinated contrast media (ICM) in carotid X-ray angiography (CXA). METHOD: Our prospective study enrolled 26 patients (67.0 ±â€¯8.1 years) undergoing carotid percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. The SNR of DSA and DVA image pairs obtained by a standard (100 %, 6 mL ICM) or a low-dose (50 %, 3 mL ICM) protocol were compared. Visual evaluation of all images was performed by five specialists using a 5-grade rating scale. The quality of DSA100 and DVA50 videos was also compared. RESULTS: DVA provided more than two-fold SNR, the median SNRDVA/SNRDSA ratio was 2.06 (100 %) and 2.25 (50 %). In the visual evaluation, the DVA100 score (3.73 ±â€¯0.06) was significantly higher than the DSA100 score (3.52 ±â€¯0.07, Wilcoxon p < 0.001), and the DVA50 score (3.64 ±â€¯0.13) was also significantly higher than the DSA50 score (3.01 ±â€¯0.17, Wilcoxon p < 0.001). While the low-dose protocol significantly decreased the DSA score (Mann-Whitney p < 0.01, DSA100 vs DSA50), it had no effect on the DVA score (DVA100 vs DVA50). There was no statistical difference between the DSA100 and DVA50 scores. Evaluators preferred the diagnostic value of DVA50 to DSA100 videos in 61% of comparisons, the interrater agreement was 69 % (Fleiss' kappa 0.35, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that DVA allows a substantial (50 %) ICM reduction in CXA without affecting the quality and diagnostic value of angiograms.

Mortality and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients treated with endovascular revascularization of the infra-inguinal lower limb arteries from retrograde access.

BACKGROUND: In this trial, our objective was to evaluate the relationship between long-term clinical outcomes in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) treated with retrograde endovascular recanalization (ER) of chronic total occlusions (CTOs) regarding the infra-inguinal lower limb arteries and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: A total of 834 consecutive subjects were enrolled in the study. The mean age was 67.8±10.6 years (62.6% males). COPD was diagnosed in 98 patients (11.7%). The infra-inguinal location included the deep, superficial and common femoral artery, popliteal artery or below the knee arteries. During follow-up, we evaluated major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). MACCE was considered as death, stroke/transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting operation, while MALE regarded amputation, target lesion re-intervention, target vessel re-intervention and surgical action. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 1,144.9±664.3 days and the interquartile range was 1,110.5 (504.5-1,734.7). Data were collected between 2006 and 2016. We noticed significant differences in death rates among the COPD and non-COPD groups. The cumulative number of events (deaths) was 12.2%, 17.3%, 18.4%, 22.4%, 23.5%, 23.5% and 23.5% in the COPD group and 6.1%, 7.5%, 10.5%, 11.3%, 11.4% 11.5% and 11.5% in the non-COPD group after 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 years of follow-up, and was notably greater for COPD (P=0.0007). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with COPD and PAD treated with the ER and retrograde approach due to CTOs are related to higher mortality than non-COPD patients.

Gender differences and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with chronic total occlusions of infrainguinal lower limb arteries treated from retrograde access with peripheral vascular interventions.

PURPOSE: We sought to investigate gender-related differences in clinical outcomes after peripheral vascular interventions (PVIs) from retrograde access in patients with chronic total occlusions (CTOs) of the infrainguinal arteries. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 939 consecutive patients undergoing PVI were enrolled in the study. Patients with peripheral artery diseases (PAD) and CTOs were treated with PVI from retrograde access according to the local protocol. The participants were divided according to gender. Retrograde access included distal puncturing to reach the CTO. The mean follow-up lasted 1,144.9 ± 664.3 days. Baseline characteristics, procedural and long-term outcomes were compared according to gender. RESULTS: Women represented 37.4% of the study population, and more frequently suffered from hypertension (92% vs. 86%, p = 0.001) and diabetes (54% vs. 46%, p = 0.02). Males more often presented with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (14.8% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.0003), coronary artery disease (45.4% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.0001), smoking (60.4% vs. 45%, p = 0.007) and prior PVI (25% vs. 17%, p = 0.005). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves at 5 years did not reveal gender-related differences in mortality (p = 0.8), whereas men were at a significantly higher risk of re-PVI during the follow-up period (p = 0.047). Male gender was an independent predictor of re-PVI (Hazard ratio: 1.276; 95% confidence interval: 1.015-1.614, p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Males are at increased risk of re-PVI compared to females with PAD and CTOs of infrainguinal arteries treated with PVI from retrograde access.

Digital Variance Angiography as a Paradigm Shift in Carbon Dioxide Angiography.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to investigate the feasibility of digital variance angiography (DVA) in lower extremity CO2 angiography and to compare the quantitative and qualitative performance of the new image processing technique with that of the current reference standard digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study enrolled 24 patients (mean age ± SD, 65.5 ± 9.2 years; 14 males, 65.1 ± 7.5 years; 10 females, 66.1 ± 11.6 years) undergoing lower-limb CO2 angiography between December 2017 and April 2018 at 2 clinical centers: The Heart and Vascular Center (HVC) of Semmelweis University, Budapest (7 patients), and the Bács-Kiskun County Hospital (BKCH) in Kecskemét (17 patients). The interventional protocol was similar at both sites, but the image acquisition instruments and protocols were different, which allowed us to investigate DVA in different settings. For comparison, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of DSA and DVA images were calculated. The visual quality of DSA and DVA images were compared by independent clinical specialists using an online questionnaire. Interrater agreement was characterized by percent agreement and Fleiss kappa. The specialists also evaluated in a random and blinded manner the individual DSA and DVA images on a 5-grade scale ranging from poor (1) to outstanding (5) image quality, and the mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) was calculated. RESULTS: A total of 4912 regions of interest were carefully selected in 110 image pairs to determine the SNRs. The ratio of SNRDVA/SNRDSA was calculated. At HVC, it ranged between 2.58 and 4.16 in the anatomical regions (abdominal, iliac, femoral, popliteal, crural, talar), and the overall median value was 3.53, whereas at BKCH the range was 2.71 to 4.92 and the overall median value was 4.52. During the visual evaluation, 120 DSA and DVA image pairs were compared. At HVC in 78%, although at BKCH in 90% of comparisons, it was judged that DVA provided higher quality images. The interrater agreement was 88% (P < 0.001) and 90% (P < 0.01), respectively. DVA images received consistently higher individual rating than DSA images, regardless of the research site and anatomical region. At HVC, the overall DSA and DVA scores (mean ± SEM) were 2.75 ± 0.12 and 3.23 ± 0.16, respectively (P < 0.05), whereas at BKCH these values were 2.49 ± 0.10 and 3.03 ± 0.09, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data show that lower-limb CO2 angiography DVA, regardless of the image acquisition instruments and protocols, produces higher SNR and significantly better image quality than DSA; therefore this new image processing technique might help the widespread use of CO2 as a safer contrast agent in clinical practice.