Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Arch Esp Urol ; 66(9): 851-8, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24231295

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The Gold Standard treatment for a non-metastatic, invasive bladder cancer is an open radical cystoprostatectomy (ORCP). Laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy (LRCP) is still an experimental technique in evaluation. We describe our perioperative results defined as surgical and safety oncology variables. METHODS: Every patient who underwent a LRCP between January 2007 and July 2011 in the urology department of the University Public Hospital was evaluated. We perform a descriptive retrospective analysis. RESULTS: We evaluated 84 patients, 72 males and 12 females, with a mean age of 68 (44-79). A Bricker diversion was performed in 80 patients, a Camey II bladder replacement was performed in 3 patients, and a Studer bladder replacement was performed in 1 patient. Seventeen patients (20.23%) presented with previous abdominal surgery, and 6 patients (7.14%) presented a medical history of urological surgery. The mean surgery time was 257.57 minutes (180-420). The mean hospital stay was 11.875 days (standard deviation (SD): 6.28). The onset of tolerance to surgery occurred after 3.7 days (SD: 2.21).The transfusion rate after surgical intervention was 20.2%. The mean number of nodes removed, by means of ilio-obturator lymphadenectomy, was 17 (13-19). There were no intraoperative complications. Early complications (less than 1 month after the intervention) occurred in 28 patients (33.3% ).There were no post-operative deaths. There were late complications (starting one month after the intervention) in 7 patients (8.3% ). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that LRCP is safe and reproducible and represents a minimally invasive option for patients with infiltrative bladder cancer.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/métodos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/epidemiologia , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Intestinos/transplante , Complicações Intraoperatórias/terapia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Longevidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/terapia , Medição de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento , Ureter/cirurgia
2.
Arch Esp Urol ; 70(3): 357-360, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Espanhol, Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28422038

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The present study analyzes cases of urachal abnormalities treated with laparoscopic approach in our hospital. CASE DESCRIPTION: A retrospective descriptive study of urachal disorders with laparoscopic surgery approach performed at our hospital in the period 1999-2015. Patients' clinical data are presented (radiological findings, surgical data, pathology findings, complications and a follow-up of each patient). RESULTS: 7 Adults presented complicated urachal disorders treated laparoscopically. The average age was 43.1 years old (DE ±11). The mean surgical time of laparoscopic management was 154.2 minutes (range 120-240). Mean hospital stay was 4.9 days (DE ±1.1). There were no early or late postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic removal of urachal remnants is a safe and reproducible technique.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Laparoscopia , Cisto do Úraco/cirurgia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA