Eliciting patients' preferences for epilepsy diagnostics: a discrete choice experiment.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosing epilepsy is a lengthy and burdensome process for patients and their family. Although the need for a more patient-centered approach in clinical practice is widely acknowledged, empirical evidence regarding patient preferences for diagnostic modalities in epilepsy is missing. The objectives of this study were 1) to identify to what extent important attributes of diagnostic procedures in epilepsy affect preferences for a procedure, 2) to determine the relative importance of these attributes, and 3) to calculate overall utility scores for routine electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) recordings. METHODS: A discrete choice experiment was performed to determine patients' preferences, which involved presentation of pairwise choice tasks regarding hypothetical scenarios. Scenarios varied along six attributes: "way of measuring brain activity", "duration", "freedom of movement", "travel time", "type of additional examination", and "chance of additional examination". Choice tasks were constructed using a statistically efficient design, and the questionnaire contained 15 unique unlabeled choice tasks. Mixed multinomial logistic regression was used to estimate patients' preferences. RESULTS: A total of 289 questionnaires were included in the analysis. McFadden's pseudo R(2) showed a model fit of 0.28, and all attributes were statistically significant. Heterogeneity in preferences was present for all attributes. "Freedom of movement" and "Chance of additional examination" were perceived as the most important attributes. Overall utility scores did not substantially differ between routine EEG and MEG. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the identified attributes are important in determining patients' preference for epilepsy diagnostics. It can be concluded that MEG is not necessarily more patient-friendly than a routine EEG in primary diagnostics and, regarding additional diagnostics, patients have a strong preference for long-term 24-h EEG over EEG after sleep deprivation. Furthermore, barring substantial heterogeneity within the parameters in mind, our study suggests that it is important to take individual preferences into account in medical decision-making.

A framework to integrate EEG-correlated fMRI and intracerebral recordings.

EEG-correlated functional MRI (EEG-fMRI) has been used to indicate brain regions associated with interictal epileptiform discharges (IEDs). This technique enables the delineation of the complete epileptiform network, including multifocal and deeply situated cortical areas. Before EEG-fMRI can be used as an additional diagnostic tool in the preoperative work-up, its added value should be assessed in relation to intracranial EEG recorded from depth electrodes (SEEG) or from the cortex (ECoG), currently the clinical standard. In this study, we propose a framework for the analysis of the SEEG data to investigate in a quantitative way whether EEG-fMRI reflects the same cortical areas as identified by the IEDs present in SEEG recordings. For that purpose, the data of both modalities were analyzed with a general linear model at the same time scale and within the same spatial domain. The IEDs were used as predictors in the model, yielding for EEG-fMRI the brain voxels that were related to the IEDs and, similarly for SEEG, the electrodes that were involved. Finally, the results of the regression analysis were projected on the anatomical MRI of the patients. To explore the usefulness of this quantitative approach, a sample of five patients was studied who both underwent EEG-fMRI and SEEG recordings. For clinical validation, the results of the SEEG analysis were compared to the standard visual review of IEDs in SEEG and to the identified seizure onset zone, the resected area, and outcome of surgery. SEEG analysis revealed a spatial pattern for the most frequent and dominant IEDs present in the data of all patients. The electrodes with the highest correlation values were in good concordance with the electrodes that showed maximal amplitude during those events in the SEEG recordings. These results indicate that the analysis of SEEG data at the time scale of EEG-fMRI, using the same type of regression model, is a promising way to validate EEG-fMRI data. In fact, the BOLD areas with a positive hemodynamic response function were closely related to the spatial pattern of IEDs in the SEEG recordings in four of the five patients. The areas of significant BOLD that were not located in the vicinity of depth electrodes, were mainly characterized by negative hemodynamic responses. Furthermore, the area with a positive hemodynamic response function overlapped with the resected area in three patients, while it was located at the edge of the resection area for one. To conclude, the results of this study encourage the application of EEG-fMRI to guide the implantation of depth electrodes as prerequisite for successful epilepsy surgery.

Automatic breath-to-breath analysis of nocturnal polysomnographic recordings.

Diagnosis of sleep-disordered breathing is based on the presence of an abnormal breathing pattern during sleep. In this study, an algorithm was developed for the offline breath-to-breath analysis of the nocturnal respiratory recordings. For that purpose, respiratory signals (nasal airway pressure, thoracic and abdominal movements) were divided into half waves using period amplitude analysis. Individual breaths were characterized by the parameters of the half waves (duration, amplitude, and slope). These values can be used to discriminate between normal and abnormal breaths. This algorithm was applied to six polysomnographic recordings to distinguish abnormal breathing events (apneas and hypopneas). The algorithm was robust for the identification of breaths (sensitivity = 96.8%, positive prediction value (PPV) = 99.5%). The detection of apneas and hypopneas was compared to the manual scoring of two experienced sleep technicians: sensitivity was, respectively, 89.2 and 88.9%, PPV was 54.1 and 59.3%. The classification of apneas into central, obstructive, or mixed was in concordance with the observers in 68% of the apneas. Although the algorithm tended to detect more hypopneas than the clinical standard, this study shows that the extraction of breath-to-breath parameters is useful for detection of abnormal respiratory events and provides a basis for further characterization of these events.

MRS-lateralisation index in patients with epilepsy and focal cortical dysplasia or a MEG-focus using bilateral single voxels.

PURPOSE: To evaluate if single voxel proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (SV-MRS) can help in lateralising and sometimes in localizing an epileptogenic focus. The assumption is that in MRI negative patients the underlying pathology most often is focal cortical dysplasia (FCD). Several studies have shown that in the presence of FCD there are also (1)H-MRS abnormalities on the contralateral side. However, in most cases the studied group was not homogeneous and included different forms of dysplasias, including band heterotopias and polymicrogyria, and the studies used different spectroscopy protocols. In the present study, using bilateral SV-MRS we investigated the presence of a lateralisation index in two groups of patients with localisation related epilepsy: patients with focal cortical dysplasia on MRI and patients without MRI abnormalities with a focus identified by MEG. Aim of the study was to show that in both groups the expected epileptogenic side shows more pronounced metabolic alterations, making MRS a possible screening tool for clarifying lateralisation questions in patients with cryptogenic localisation related epilepsy. METHODS: In ten patients a single voxel was placed over the FCD and in nine patients over the region of interest (ROI) as indicated by MEG. In all patients a voxel was also placed in the contralateral homologus location. We used metabolite concentrations as peak ratios relative to the creatine (Cr) peak to calculate a lateralisation index. RESULTS: In both groups NAA/Cr was significantly lower on the affected side whereas the results for Cho/Cr were more diverse. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The limitations of the used methods and the implications of the findings are discussed.