Outcomes following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation relapse in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Improved first progression-free survival following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation relapse with the use of immunotherapy.

Toxicities associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor maintenance following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a potential cure in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); nonetheless, relapses are common and the major cause of mortality. One strategy to prevent relapse is tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) maintenance post-HCT, but published clinical experience is primarily with the first-generation TKI imatinib while data with newer generation TKIs are limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 185 Ph+ ALL patients who underwent HCT followed by TKI maintenance from 2003 to 2021 at City of Hope. Initially, 50 (27.0%) received imatinib, 118 (63.8%) received a second-generation TKI (2G-TKI), and 17 (9.2%) received ponatinib. A total of 77 patients (41.6%) required a dose reduction of their initial TKI due to toxicity. Sixty-six patients (35.7%) did not complete maintenance due to toxicity; 69 patients (37.3%) discontinued 1 TKI, and 11 (5.9%) discontinued 2 TKIs due to toxicity. Initial imatinib versus 2G-TKI versus ponatinib maintenance was discontinued in 19 (38.0%) versus 68 (57.6%) versus 3 (17.6%) patients due to toxicity (p = .003), respectively. Patients on ponatinib as their initial TKI had a longer duration of TKI maintenance versus 2G-TKI: 576.0 days (range, 72-921) versus 254.5 days (range, 3-2740; p = .02). The most common reasons for initial TKI discontinuation include gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance (15.1%), cytopenia (8.6%), and fluid retention (3.8%). The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival for the total population were 78% and 71%, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the challenges of delivering post-HCT TKI maintenance in a large real-world cohort as toxicities leading to TKI interruptions, discontinuation, and dose reduction were common.

Venetoclax-based combinations for the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Elderly and/or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia have historically been challenging to manage as they were ineligible for what was considered standard of care treatment with induction chemotherapy. The emergence of venetoclax with hypomethylating agents or low-dose cytarabine has substantially improved outcomes in the frontline setting with manageable toxicity. However, this regimen can be challenging to deliver given its differences from standard intensive chemotherapy. In this review, we summarize the landmark trials that established venetoclax-based combinations as a new standard of care for patients with acute myeloid leukemia not suitable for intense chemotherapy, provide practical clinical pearls for managing patients on these therapies, and offer a brief overview of modifications to these regimens under development to improve their efficacy and/or applicability.

Lay abstract Older and/or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have historically had bad outcomes with standard therapies and an overall dismal prognosis. The advent of venetoclax (VEN)-based regimens has led to significantly improved responses for patients with untreated AML with an acceptable safety profile. However, delivering these therapies are associated with their own unique challenges. In this review, we summarize the key trials that demonstrated the success of VEN-based combinations in this particular AML population, provide practical considerations for managing patients on these therapies, and discuss ongoing studies to further improve VEN-based therapy.

Guardant360 Circulating Tumor DNA Assay Is Concordant with FoundationOne Next-Generation Sequencing in Detecting Actionable Driver Mutations in Anti-EGFR Naive Metastatic Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Direct comparisons between Guardant360 (G360) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and FoundationOne (F1) tumor biopsy genomic profiling in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are limited. We aim to assess the concordance across overlapping genes tested in both F1 and G360 in patients with mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 75 patients with mCRC who underwent G360 and F1 testing. We evaluated the concordance among gene mutations tested by both G360 and F1 among three categories of patients: untreated, treated without, and treated with EGFR inhibitors, while considering the clonal and/or subclonal nature of each genomic alteration. RESULTS: There was a high rate of concordance in APC, TP53, KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF mutations in the treatment-naive and non-anti-EGFR-treated cohorts. There was increased discordance in the anti-EGFR treated patients in three drivers of anti-EGFR resistance: KRAS, NRAS, and EGFR somatic mutations. Based on percentage of ctDNA, discordant somatic mutations were mostly subclonal instead of clonal and may have limited clinical significance. Most discordant amplifications noted on G360 showed the magnitude below the top decile, occurred in all three cohorts of patients, and were of unknown clinical significance. Serial ctDNA in anti-EGFR treated patients showed the emergence of multiple new alterations that affected the EGFR pathway: EGFR and RAS mutations and MET, RAS, and BRAF amplifications. CONCLUSION: G360 Next-Generation Sequencing platform may be used as an alternative to F1 to detect targetable somatic alterations in non-anti-EGFR treated mCRC, but larger prospective studies are needed to further validate our findings. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Genomic analysis of tissue biopsy is currently the optimal method for identifying DNA genomic alterations to help physicians target specific genes but has many disadvantages that may be mitigated by a circulating free tumor DNA (ctDNA) assay. This study showed a high concordance rate in certain gene mutations in patients who were treatment naive and treated with non-anti-EGFR therapy prior to ctDNA testing. This suggests that ctDNA genomic analysis may potentially be used as an alternative to tumor biopsy to identify appropriate patients for treatment selection in mCRC, but larger prospective studies are needed to further validate concordance among tissue and ctDNA tumor profiling.

Impact of Thiotepa-Based Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma in First Complete Remission: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The choice between nonmyeloablative chemotherapy (NMA-C) or autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) as consolidation in primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL), and timing of autoHCT differs among centers. We aimed to clarify these points. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed PCNSL adult patients who received consolidation in CR1 or underwent autoHCT during their treatment course. Cohort A included those who underwent autoHCT in CR1, cohort B included those who underwent NMA-C in CR1, and cohort C included patients who underwent autoHCT in CR2+. We compared cohorts A and B, and cohorts A and C. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), treatment-related mortality (TRM) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR). RESULTS: 36 patients were included in cohort A, 30 in cohort B, and 14 in cohort C. The 5-year OS for cohorts A vs B and vs C were 90.7% vs 62.8% (P = .045) and vs 77.9% (P = .32), respectively. The 5-year PFS from diagnosis for cohorts A vs B was 87.8% vs 37.3% (P < .001). The 5-year PFS from autoHCT for cohorts A vs C was 87.6% vs 58.4% (P = .023). The 5-year TRM and CIR in cohorts A vs B was 9.4% vs 9.5% (P = .674), and 2.9% vs 53.2% (P < .001), respectively. The 5-year TRM and CIR in cohorts A vs C from the time of autoHCT was 9.5% vs 22.1% (P = .188), and 2.9% vs 19.5% (P = .104), respectively. CONCLUSION: Despite the limitations, thiotepa-based autoHCT in CR1 appears to improve outcomes in eligible patients with PCNSL.

Role of Salvage Radiation Treatment of Relapses in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma Post-Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.

PURPOSE: Approximately 50% of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B cell lymphoma (R/R DLBCL) will relapse post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and the role of salvage therapy is not well defined. We examined radiation therapy (RT) as salvage treatment in this patient population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of patients with DLBCL who had an ASCT during 2004 to 2016 and subsequently relapsed was performed. Clinical and pathologic characteristics were collected, including detailed information regarding post-ASCT treatment. Response rates were tabulated and survival analysis was performed, stratified by salvage modality. RESULTS: A total of 165 patients with R/R DLBCL who relapsed after ASCT were identified; 91 of these patients received salvage chemotherapy as their first line of relapse therapy, and 14 received salvage radiation. Median salvage RT dose was 36 Gy (range, 24-50). The objective response rate with salvage chemotherapy and RT was 53.0% and 78.5%, respectively (P = 0.07), and the complete response rate was 31.3% and 57.1%, respectively (P = 0.06). Median follow-up among living patients was 48.9 months (range, 4.8-136.17). Among patients with one site of relapse post-ASCT, median overall survival in patients who received salvage RT was significantly improved (P = 0.008) relative to chemotherapy (not reached [95% confidence interval {CI}, 8.4-not reached] versus 10.0 months [95% CI, 5.3-17.8]). Median progression-free survival in patients who received salvage RT was not significantly different (P = 0.16) relative to chemotherapy (8.4 months [95% CI, 2.5-47.7] versus 3.9 months [95% CI, 2.4-8.5]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who received RT as first salvage therapy post-ASCT, particularly with localized disease, had favorable oncologic outcomes. Future studies are needed to understand which patients with R/R DLBCL who relapse after ASCT may benefit from early salvage RT versus chemotherapy.

R-CHOP Vs DA-EPOCH-R for Double-Expressor Lymphoma: A University of California Hematologic Malignancies Consortium Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Managing double-expressor lymphomas (DEL) is controversial given the dearth of data and lack of standardized guidelines on this high-risk subset of lymphomas. No prospective and few retrospective studies limited by either their sample size or short follow-up address the question of initial treatment of choice for DEL. We performed the largest analysis to date exploring R-CHOP vs DA-EPOCH-R in DEL. METHODS: Adults with DEL diagnosed from 6/2012-2/2021 at 4 unique sites were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Key secondary endpoints include overall survival (OS), overall and complete response rates (ORR and CRR), cumulative incidence of relapse, and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (autoHCT) utilization. RESULTS: 155 patients were included, 61 treated with R-CHOP and 94 with DA-EPOCH-R. 3-year PFS and OS were similar between R-CHOP and DA-EPOCH-R, 33.2% vs 57.2%,(P = .063), and 72.2% vs 71.6% (P = .43) after median follow-up times of 2.43 and 2.89 years, respectively. Patients <65 had improved PFS with DA-EPOCH-R, hazard ratio 0.41 (P = .01). CRR and ORR rates were also similar. Relapse rates were not statistically different, 51.9% vs 28.6% (P = .069). AutoHCT utilization was higher with R-CHOP vs DA-EPOCH-R, 23.0% vs 8.5% (P = .017). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings do not support the use of DA-EPOCH-R over R-CHOP for DEL. Patients <65 years may experience longer PFS with DA-EPOCH-R, but limitations to the analysis make this interpretation difficult.

Clinical experience with frontline Hyper-CVAD-based regimens, including Hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib, in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated at a comprehensive cancer center.

BACKGROUND: Hyper-CVAD is an established regimen for adult ALL that was developed at the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC). However, results can vary across different institutions given the heterogeneity of patient populations and institutional practices. Moreover, while a MDACC study demonstrated that the combination of ponatinib plus hyper-CVAD produced remarkable activity in untreated Ph+ ALL, it remains to be externally validated. We sought to validate those findings in previously untreated adult patients with Ph+ ALL. METHODS: This was a retrospective study analyzing the outcomes of previously untreated adult ALL patients treated with hyper-CVAD, with a focus on Ph+ ALL patients treated with ponatinib plus hyper-CVAD. RESULTS: 82 patients were included. The median age was 51 years. The median follow-up was 2.62 years. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event-free survival (EFS) were 39.5 % and 28.2 %, respectively. For Ph+ ALL patients (n = 13) receiving ponatinib plus hyper-CVAD, 3-year OS and EFS were both 92.3 %. Univariate analysis showed a high WBC and poor-risk cytogenetics to be associated with inferior outcomes, while CD20 + predicted favorable outcomes in B-ALL patients. On multivariate analysis, CD20 + retained significance for Philadelphia-negative (Ph-) ALL. For Ph+ ALL, ponatinib was associated with better OS and EFS on univariate and multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Our data supports the use of ponatinib plus hyper-CVAD as a standard of care regimen for Ph+ ALL. Our outcomes for Ph-ALL and T-cell ALL (T-ALL) show that advances are still needed in the frontline setting, and clinical trial enrollment is recommended.

Emerging Therapies in Relapsed and Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: What Comes Next After Brentuximab Vedotin and PD-1 Inhibition?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The standard of care for relapsed/refractory (r/r) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients is autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients in a first or second relapse. However, a significant number of patients with r/r HL are either medically ineligible for ASCT or relapse post-ASCT. In recent years, significant advances have been made in the management of r/r HL with the introduction of the anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the anti-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors (CPI) nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Nonetheless, despite excellent tolerability and high response rates, the large majority of patients will ultimately progress on these agents. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) has offered a potentially curative option for these patients, but high rates of morbidity and mortality have limited its application, and disease relapse is also common post-alloHCT. Thus, effective therapy for HL patients who fail BV and CPI therapy remains an unmet need. This review will cover different treatment strategies for HL patients in this setting with a focus on emerging new therapies. RECENT FINDINGS: Investigators have explored methods with the potential to restore sensitivity to BV and CPIs in patients who develop resistance. Additionally, promising new therapeutics are emerging, such as CD25-directed ADC therapy and CD30-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. While no consensus guidelines exist for the management of HL patients refractory to BV and checkpoint blockade, potential novel strategies and therapeutics are currently under investigation in hopes of expanding the treatment landscape for this challenging patient population.

An evaluation of venetoclax in combination with azacitidine, decitabine, or low-dose cytarabine as therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) ineligible for conventional chemotherapy have historically received low-intensity treatments, if any, and have had dismal outcomes. Recent phase III data have demonstrated significant efficacy of venetoclax-based combinations and have begun to address the unmet need in this patient population. As venetoclax-based combinations become increasingly used in the clinical setting, it is important to understand their development, current use, and future directions. AREAS COVERED: This review covers the clinical development of venetoclax-based combinations for the management of AML, and their current and future use. A search of PubMed and ashpublications.org using the keywords 'venetoclax', 'AML', and 'hypomethylating agents' as the search terms was undertaken to identify the most pertinent publications. EXPERT OPINION: While venetoclax-based combinations have shown excellent responses and improved survival in patients with untreated AML, further studies are required to understand how to expand on their frontline use, manage patients who fail venetoclax-based combinations, and their true efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting. Management of AML with venetoclax-based combinations is expected to evolve over the next few years.

Combined Cerebellar and Spinal Cord Deficits Caused by an Underlying Gynecologic Malignancy.

Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration (PCD) is an uncommon autoimmune disorder targeting antigens within the nervous system and is usually associated with an underlying malignancy. Neurologic symptoms frequently precede the cancer diagnosis, which is most often seen in women with breast or gynecologic tumors. Anti-Yo-related PCD is the most common PCD syndrome, and one of the best understood. Although cerebellar signs are characteristic of anti-Yo PCD, myelopathy is an unusual presentation of anti-Yo PCD based on published case series and reports. Unfortunately, the prognosis for anti-Yo PCD is often poor, and most patients become bedridden. We report a case highlighting a severe presentation of cerebellar degeneration along with an unusual finding of myelopathy in a patient with a newly diagnosed gynecologic cancer.

Characteristics and Trends of Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in a Large, Public Safety-Net Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Management of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in a socioeconomically vulnerable population without ready access to a hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) center and clinical trials is challenging. Data regarding the outcomes of such patients are sparse. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included 90 consecutive patients with ALL who presented to Harbor-UCLA between 2003 and 2018. The primary objective was overall survival (OS), whereas secondary objectives included leukemia-free survival, toxicities of therapy, and referral for HCT and incidence of successful HCT. RESULTS: Most patients were male (56.7%) and Hispanic (72.2%). The median age of diagnosis was 36 years (range, 18-63 years). The median OS was 26.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.4-59.0 months). In patients who achieved complete remission with therapy, the median leukemia-free survival was 16.4 months. Fifty percent of patients experienced at least 1 episode of bacteremia, and nearly 25% of patients developed an invasive fungal infection. Thirty-six percent (n = 32) of patients were referred for HCT. The referral rate increased over time, which led to improved OS in patients who underwent evaluation at a tertiary cancer center (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.89; P = .02). Patients who underwent HCT had significantly better OS compared with those who did not (OS not reached vs. 21.9 months; hazard ratio, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.68; P = .01). CONCLUSION: Risk stratification and evidence-based treatment approaches are important for patients with ALL treated in a resource-limited setting. Most patients can be induced successfully and achieve complete remission with therapy. Partnership with a cancer center with early referral for HCT can facilitate curative HCT to be performed.

Inherited Moderate Factor X Deficiency Presenting as Cardiac Tamponade.

Factor X deficiency is a rare bleeding disorder that varies in the severity of its clinical manifestations. The symptoms of this disorder can occur at any age, although most severe cases appear in childhood. The rarity of this condition has not allowed for the establishment of evidence-based management guidelines, and thus, individuals afflicted with factor X deficiency are treated based on limited literature and the opinions of clinicians with extensive experience. In this case report, we discuss a unique presentation of a 38-year-old male who was found to have cardiac tamponade as a result of his newly diagnosed inherited moderate factor X deficiency. This was discovered by obtaining a factor X activity assay and confirmed with genetic testing which demonstrated a missense variant on the factor X gene on chromosome 13. His management involved correction of his factor X deficiency with fresh frozen plasma, a pericardiocentesis, and placement of a pericardial window. He has been asymptomatic and without hemorrhagic episodes for the 10 months following his discharge.