Outcomes of Salvage Surgery Versus Non-Salvage Surgery for Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Conversion Therapy with Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined with Lenvatinib Plus Anti-PD-1 Antibody: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Combination treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE), lenvatinib, and anti-programmed death-1 (anti-PD-1) antibodies (triple therapy) has a high rate of tumor response and converted resection for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients. This study aimed to assess the outcomes of salvage surgery in uHCC patients after conversion therapy with triple therapy. METHODS: uHCC patients who met the criteria for hepatectomy after receiving triple therapy as first-line treatment were eligible for inclusion in this study. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates in patients who received salvage surgery (SR group) and those who did not (non-SR group) were compared. RESULTS: Of the 144 patients assessed, 91 patients underwent salvage surgery and 53 did not. The OS rates in the SR group were significantly better than those in the non-SR group. The 1- and 2-year OS rates in the SR group were 92.0% and 79.9%, respectively, whereas those in the non-SR group were 85.5% and 39.6 %, respectively (p = 0.007); however, there was no significant difference in the PFS rates. Upon further stratification, OS and PFS were significantly better in the SR group than in the non-SR group in patients who were assessed as partial responses (PR), while there was no significant difference in patients who were assessed as complete response (CR). CONCLUSIONS: Salvage surgery is recommended and is associated with a favorable prognosis for uHCC patients who were assessed as PR after conversion therapy, however it may not be necessary for uHCC if CR was achieved.

The TAE score predicts prognosis of unresectable HCC patients treated with TACE plus lenvatinib with PD-1 inhibitors.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (triple therapy) exhibits promising efficacy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). We aimed to evaluate the prognosis of patients with uHCC who received triple therapy and develop a prognostic scoring model to identify patients who benefit the most from triple therapy. METHODS: A total of 246 patients with uHCC who received triple therapy at eight centers were included and assigned to the training and validation cohorts. Prognosis was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier curves. The prognostic model was developed by utilizing predictors of overall survival (OS), which were identified through the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In the training cohort, the 3-year OS was 52.0%, with a corresponding progression-free survival (PFS) of 30.6%. The median PFS was 13.2 months [95% confidence interval, 9.7-16.7]. Three variables (total bilirubin ≥ 17 µmol/L, alpha-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL, and extrahepatic metastasis) were predictors of poor survival and were used for developing a prognostic model (TAE score). The 2-year OS rates in the favorable (0 points), intermediate (1 point), and dismal groups (2-3 points) were 96.9%, 61.4%, and 11.4%, respectively (p < 0.001). The PFS was also stratified according to the TAE score. These findings were confirmed in an external validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy showed encouraging clinical outcomes, and the TAE score aids in identifying patients who would benefit the most from triple therapy.

Combination Therapy Consisting of Transarterial Chemoembolization, Lenvatinib, and Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Blockade for Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus: A Case Series Study and Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombus (IVCTT) have poor prognosis. Combination therapy involving the blockade of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors is an efficient treatment strategy for advanced HCC. However, surgical treatment after a combination of systemic therapy and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for HCC with IVCTT has not been widely reported, and the efficacy and safety of this treatment have not been studied. METHODS: In the 21 cases reported herein, the patients were treated with TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 blockade. The treatment responses, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, and toxicities were evaluated, and the related literature was reviewed. RESULTS: The overall response and disease control rates were 66.7% and 85.7%, respectively. The median PFS time was 16.0 months, with a 1-year PFS rate of 55.60%. The median OS was not reached, with a 1-year OS rate of 66.70%. Four patients underwent hepatectomy without serious complications and survived for 29.1, 24.7, 14.2, and 13.8 months. Three patients survived tumor-free, and 1 patient experienced intrahepatic recurrence. Pathological complete response and major pathological responses were observed in 1 and 3 patients, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 8/9 patients (88.9%), and grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 1 patient. CONCLUSION: The combination of TACE, lenvatinib, and PD-1 is effective for HCC with IVCTT and has acceptable adverse effects.

Impact of Duration of Adjuvant Therapy on Patients with Initially Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Conversion Surgery: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Background: This study aimed to assess the effect of adjuvant therapy with different durations in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) after conversion surgery. Methods: This study included 85 patients with initially uHCC who received conversion surgery between May 2019 and November 2022. They were divided into the long duration group (n = 57) and short duration group (n = 28) based on postoperative medication duration. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and compared between the cohorts. Results: No significant difference in RFS or OS was found between the two groups [RFS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.486; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.229-1.034, P = 0.061; OS: HR = 0.377; 95% CI, 0.119-1.196, P = 0.098]. Patients without major pathologic response (MPR) in the long duration group had better RFS and OS results compared to those in the short duration group (RFS: HR = 0.242; 95% CI, 0.092-0.634, P = 0.004; OS: HR = 0.264; 95% CI, 0.079-0.882, P = 0.031). No significant difference was detected in RFS or OS between the two groups in patients with MPR (RFS: HR = 1.250; 95% CI, 0.373-4.183, P = 0.718; OS: HR = 7.389; 95% CI, 0.147-372.4, P = 0.317). After propensity score matching, 25 pairs of patients were selected and the results remained consistent. Conclusion: At least 6 months of adjuvant therapy may be beneficial for patients without MPR after conversion surgery. However, in patients with MPR, the effect of adjuvant therapy remains unclear. Further studies are needed to confirm the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy.