Comparative Analysis of the Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairments in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Community-Based Research.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of two common chemotherapy regimens on breast cancer (BC) survivors' cognition. The participants comprised 35 patients with BC who underwent two chemotherapy regimens, AC-T and TAC, and 24 matched healthy volunteers. The participants were assessed regarding cognitive function through Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination and Cambridge Brain Science tests. The results represent the AC-T regimen to be more toxic than the TAC in domains of language, concentration, and visuospatial working memory (P-value = 0.036, 0.008, and 0.031, respectively) and should be prescribed with caution in patients with BC suffering from baseline cognitive impairments.

Neural correlates in functional brain mapping among breast cancer survivors receiving different chemotherapy regimens: a qEEG/HEG-based investigation.

BACKGROUND: Post-chemotherapy cognitive impairment commonly known as 'chemobrain' or 'chemofog' is a well-established clinical disorder affecting various cognitive domains including attention, visuospatial working memory, executive function, etc. Although several studies have confirmed the chemobrain in recent years, scant experiments have evaluated the potential neurotoxicity of different chemotherapy regimens and agents. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the extent of attention deficits, one of the commonly affected cognitive domains, among breast cancer patients treated with different chemotherapy regimens through neuroimaging techniques. METHODS: Breast cancer patients treated with two commonly prescribed chemotherapy regimens, Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide and Taxol and Taxotere, Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide, and healthy volunteers were recruited. Near-infrared hemoencephalography and quantitative electroencephalography assessments were recorded for each participant at rest and during task performance to compare the functional cortical changes associated with each chemotherapy regimen. RESULTS: Although no differences were observed in hemoencephalography results across groups, the quantitative electroencephalography analysis revealed increased power of high alpha/low beta in left fronto-centro-parietal regions involved in dorsal and ventral attention networks in the Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide and Taxol-treated group compared with the Taxotere, Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide and control group. The Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide and Taxol-treated cases had the highest current source density values in dorsal attention network and ventral attention network and ventral attention network-related centers in 10 and 15 Hz associated with the lowest Z-scored Fast Fourier Transform coherence in the mentioned regions. CONCLUSIONS: The negatively affected neurocognitive profile in breast cancer patients treated with the Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide and Taxol regimen proposes presumably neurotoxic sequelae of this chemotherapy regimen as compared with the Taxotere, Adriamycin and Cyclophosphamide regimen.