Gender Differences in Entrustable Professional Activity Evaluations of General Surgery Residents.

OBJECTIVE: To determine differences in entrustable professional activity (EPA) assessments between male and female general surgery residents. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Evaluations play a critical role in career advancement for physicians. However, female physicians in training receive lower evaluations and underrate their own performance. Competency-based assessment frameworks, such as EPAs, may help address gender bias in surgery by linking evaluations to specific, observable behaviors. METHODS: In this cohort study, EPA assessments were collected from July 2018 to May 2020. The effect of resident sex on EPA entrustment levels was analyzed using multiple linear and ordered logistic regressions. Narrative comments were analyzed using latent dirichlet allocation to identify topics correlated with resident sex. RESULTS: Of the 2480 EPAs, 1230 EPAs were submitted by faculty and 1250 were submitted by residents. After controlling for confounding factors, faculty evaluations of residents were not impacted by resident sex (estimate = 0.09, P = 0.08). However, female residents rated themselves lower by 0.29 (on a 0-4 scale) compared to their male counterparts (P < 0.001). Within narrative assessments, topics associated with resident sex demonstrated that female residents focus on the "guidance" and "supervision" they received while performing an EPA, while male residents were more likely to report "independent" action. CONCLUSIONS: Faculty assessments showed no difference in EPA levels between male and female residents. Female residents rate themselves lower by nearly an entire post graduate year (PGY) level compared to male residents. Latent dirichlet allocation -identified topics suggest this difference in self-assessment is related to differences in perception of autonomy.

A Unique Presentation of Multicentric Myofibromatosis in the Masseter Muscle of a Pediatric Patient.

A 12-year-old female with a history of multicentric infantile myofibromatosis (IM) presented with a tender, enlarging cheek mass and trismus. Imaging identified an intramasseteric tumor. Given the unknown etiology of the tumor and her bothersome symptoms, the mass was excised using a transoral approach with concurrent facial nerve monitoring. Her pathology report confirmed the diagnosis of a myofibromatosis lesion embedded within the masseter muscle. While IM can often present with lesions in the head and neck region, the intramasseteric location is rare and presents unique considerations for surgical approach. Myofibromatosis lesions typically occur before two years of age, although there are some rare documented cases of multicentric myofibromatosis lesions presenting at older ages. Furthermore, this patient's family history of similar lesions suggests a familial variant, which may have implications for disease behavior and need for further work-up, monitoring, and management. Overall, this was an unusual presentation of IM given the patient's age, prevalent family history, and the location of the mass. This case report adds to the literature and discusses the clinical differential of a pediatric cheek mass, the surgical considerations for an intramasseteric tumor, and the natural history of infantile myofibromatosis.