RESUMO
We discuss the experience of some Pacific island countries in introducing the new WHO-recommended treatment protocol for lymphatic filariasis-a triple-drug therapy composed of ivermectin, diethylcarbamazine, and albendazole. The successful rollout of the new treatment protocol was dependent on strong partnerships among these countries' ministries of health, WHO, and other stakeholders. Effective communication among these partners allowed for lessons learned to cross borders and have a positive impact on the experiences of other countries. We also describe various challenges confronted during this process and the ways these countries overcame them.
Assuntos
Filariose Linfática , Filaricidas , Humanos , Filariose Linfática/tratamento farmacológico , Filariose Linfática/epidemiologia , Filariose Linfática/prevenção & controle , Filaricidas/uso terapêutico , Dietilcarbamazina/uso terapêutico , Albendazol/uso terapêutico , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia CombinadaRESUMO
Infection with soil-transmitted helminths (STH) is a major public health problem in many developing countries, with pregnant women and children particularly at risk. Preventive chemotherapy, which is the intervention currently recommended by the WHO against the main helminth infections including those caused by STHs, aims at reducing morbidity through periodical administration of anthelminthic drugs either alone or in combination. The Expanded Programme on Immunization is one of the most widely implemented health programmes in the world and has well established access to children and women. The present study investigated the cost of the provision of anthelminthic drugs during existing immunisation campaigns. In Lao PDR, use of this integrated approach compared with implementation of the vertical deworming campaign alone allowed a reduction of the individual cost of deworming by 10 times (from US$0.23 in the vertical deworming campaign to US$0.03 in the integrated campaign). When drug cost was excluded, the cost of deworming an individual was US$0.007, implying that deworming 100 children would cost less than US$1 if drug donation was in place. The burden posed on health workers by the integration process was perceived as minimal and manageable. Moreover, delivery of anthelminthic drugs during immunisation campaigns enabled campaign teams to observe drug intake directly, which assured safety. These findings prove that integration is an opportunity to maximise health benefits through the delivery of multiple health products and the attainment of high coverage.
RESUMO
Previous surveys in Myanmar indicate that soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are a significant public health problem. However the majority of these surveys are small scale or hospital based. To date there has been no countrywide assessment of the prevalence and intensity of STH infection. We conducted a survey (June 2002-June 2003) to assess the magnitude of STH infection in school age children in each of the different ecological areas of the country. In each area, five schools were selected and from each one, 50 children were randomly chosen. Parasitological and nutritional data were collected from each child. We found an overall prevalence of infection of 69%: 18% had a moderate-heavy intensity of infection, 22% were anaemic. A pilot exercise to treat 25,000 school age children in the 200 schools of Nyangdone Township tested the strategy before scaling up and to generate some rough costings. A crude calculation of the expenditure to buy and deliver the drugs, including the costs incurred in the teacher training, concluded that the cost per child was approximately 0.05 USD.