Supporting data on in vitro cardioprotective and proliferative paracrine effects by the human amniotic fluid stem cell secretome.

The data and information presented here refer to the research article entitled: "Reactivating endogenous mechanisms of cardiac regeneration via paracrine boosting with the human amniotic fluid stem cell secretome" (Balbi et al., 2019, Apr 04). This dataset illustrates the in vitro paracrine effect exerted by the human amniotic fluid stem cell secretome on rodent neonatal cardiomyocytes, human endothelial progenitors and different subsets of cardiac progenitor cells. Cytokine/chemokine profiling of the human amniotic fluid stem cell secretome is provided as well. This data can provide useful insights in regenerative medicine as demonstrating the in vitro cardioprotective and proliferative secretory paracrine potential of human fetal stem cells.

Reactivating endogenous mechanisms of cardiac regeneration via paracrine boosting using the human amniotic fluid stem cell secretome.

BACKGROUND: The adult mammalian heart retains residual regenerative capability via endogenous cardiac progenitor cell (CPC) activation and cardiomyocyte proliferation. We previously reported the paracrine cardioprotective capacity of human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells (hAFS) following ischemia or cardiotoxicity. Here we analyse the potential of hAFS secretome fractions for cardiac regeneration and future clinical translation. METHODS: hAFS were isolated from amniotic fluid leftover samples from prenatal screening. hAFS conditioned medium (hAFS-CM) was obtained following hypoxic preconditioning. Anti-apoptotic, angiogenic and proliferative effects were evaluated on rodent neonatal cardiomyocytes (r/mNVCM), human endothelial colony forming cells (hECFC) and human CPC. Mice undergoing myocardial infarction (MI) were treated with hAFS-CM, hAFS-extracellular vesicles (hAFS-EV), or EV-depleted hAFS-CM (hAFS-DM) by single intra-myocardial administration and evaluated in the short and long term. RESULTS: hAFS-CM improved mNVCM survival under oxidative and hypoxic damage, induced Ca2+-dependent angiogenesis in hECFC and triggered hCPC and rNVCM proliferation. hAFS-CM treatment after MI counteracted scarring, supported cardiac function, angiogenesis and cardiomyocyte cell cycle progression in the long term. hAFS-DM had no effect. hAFS-CM and hAFS-EV equally induced epicardium WT1+ CPC reactivation. Although no CPC cardiovascular differentiation was observed, our data suggests contribution to local angiogenesis by paracrine modulation. hAFS-EV alone were able to recapitulate all the beneficial effects exerted by hAFS-CM, except for stimulation of vessel formation. CONCLUSIONS: hAFS-CM and hAFS-EV can improve cardiac repair and trigger cardiac regeneration via paracrine modulation of endogenous mechanisms. While both formulations are effective in sustaining myocardial renewal, hAFS-CM retains higher pro-angiogenic potential, while hAFS-EV particularly enhances cardiac function.