Inferior vena cava reconstruction with a superficial femoral vein graft after resection of a venous leiomyosarcoma.

Leiomyosarcoma is a rare malign neoplasm, representing about 5-7% of all tissue sarcomas while inferior vena cava leiomyosarcomas accounts for only 1%. This paper presents the case of a 74 years old patient that was diagnosed with an abdominal venous leiomyosarcoma involving the inter-renal segment of the inferior vena cava. Tumor was treated by complete in bloc resection. Reconstruction of the vascular axis was performed with an autologous venous tube graft achieved with segments of the right superficial femoral vein. Recurrent free survival and freedom from local or systemic recurrence was observed at 2 years after the intervention thanks to the aggressive radical surgical management.

Impact of preoperative fractional flow reserve on arterial bypass graft anastomotic function: the IMPAG trial.

AIMS: Visual estimation is the most commonly used method to evaluate the degree of coronary artery stenosis prior to coronary artery bypass grafting. In interventional cardiology, the use of fractional flow reserve (FFR) to guide revascularization decisions has become routine. We investigated whether the preoperative FFR measurement of coronary lesions is associated with anastomosis function 6 months after surgical revascularization using a multiarterial grafting strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prospective double-blind study, 67 patients were enrolled from two institutions in Europe and Canada. From these patients, 199 coronary lesions were assessed visually and with FFR at the time of the preoperative angiogram. All patients received coronary revascularization using multiple arterial grafts. A post-operative 6-month angiogram was performed to assess anastomosis functionality using a described angiographic method. The primary outcome was the association between preoperative FFR values and anastomosis function 6 months after surgery. Preoperative FFR was significantly associated with 6-months anastomotic function for all conduits and for all targets (P < 0.001). An FFR value of ≤0.78 was associated with an anastomotic occlusion rate of 3%. CONCLUSION: We found a significant association between the preoperative FFR measurement of the target vessel and the anastomotic functionality at 6 months, with a cut-off of 0.78. Integration of FFR measurement into the preoperative diagnostic workup before multiarterial coronary surgical revascularization leads to improved anastomotic graft function. CLINICAL TRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02527044.

Bilateral internal mammary artery Y construct with multiple sequential grafting improves survival compared to bilateral internal mammary artery with additional vein grafts: 10-year experience at 2 different institutions†.

OBJECTIVES: Utilization of bilateral internal mammary arteries (BIMAs) has been shown to improve long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. To achieve complete revascularization, BIMAs may be used as either sole conduits for revascularization through a Y-graft configuration (BIMA-Y) or deployed with additional grafts used in conjunction with BIMAs. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term outcomes of two institutions that predominantly used either the BIMA-Y configuration or BIMA plus additional grafts to achieve optimal revascularization. METHODS: From 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2010, 436 patients were revascularized using a non-sequential BIMA grafting at one institution (Group A), with veins being used for additional targets. At the second institution (Group B), 771 patients were revascularized using a BIMA-Y graft for all distal targets. Kaplan­Meier analysis was used to compare unadjusted survival between the groups. Cox proportional hazards regression modelling was used to provide an adjusted comparison of survival between the groups. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the average number of anastomotic sites used in Group A and Group B (A = 4.0 ± 0.7 vs B = 4.0 ± 0.7; P = 0.24). Group A did not have a significantly greater in-hospital mortality (0.7% vs 1.0% P = 0.39), stroke (0.5% vs 0.8% P = 0.40), deep sternal wound infection (0.0% vs 0.6% P = 0.11) or reoperation for bleeding (1.6% vs 0.6% P = 0.10) than Group B. Cox proportional hazards analyses demonstrated that at 14 years, Group B had a significantly improved survival compared to Group A (Group B = 88% vs Group A = 81%) with an overall reduction in mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 0.780, 95% confidence interval 0.448­0.849; P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: Utilization of the BIMA-Y configuration was associated with improved survival when compared to BIMA grafting with additional vein grafts. Further studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy of BIMA-Y grafting against other means of providing complete arterial revascularization.

Long-Term Survival and Quality of Life of Patients Undergoing Emergency Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Postinfarction Cardiogenic Shock.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the long-term outcome of patients undergoing emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (eCABG) for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: Sixty-seven consecutive patients underwent eCABG for cardiogenic shock at 2 European institutions during an 11-year period. Preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative, and long-term follow-up data of all patients were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Hospital survival was 86% (58 of 67), with all deaths due to cardiac causes. At a mean follow-up of 78 ± 48 months (range, 1 to 153 months), 43 of the 58 patients (74%) discharged from the hospital were alive. Causes of death in 9 of the 15 follow-up deaths (60%) were noncardiac. Overall survival rate at the end of follow-up was 64% (43 of 67). Of the 43 survivors, 41 (95%) were in New York Heart Association Functional Classification I to II, ischemia free, had a Karnofsky performance status exceeding 80, and an excellent quality of life as assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire. The use of cardiopulmonary bypass and the internal thoracic artery were associated with significantly better long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term survival and quality of life of patients who undergo eCABG for cardiogenic shock after acute myocardial infarction are good, and eCABG should be considered a valuable therapeutic option in this setting. The use of cardiopulmonary bypass and the internal thoracic artery at the time of the operation are strongly advocated.

Complete myocardial revascularization using only bilateral internal thoracic arteries provides a low-risk and durable 10-year clinical outcome.

OBJECTIVES: Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) bypass provides long-term survival benefits over strategies that use single internal mammary arteries during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the rate of adoption of this strategy remains very low. Moreover, optimal BITA configuration and the use of cardiopulmonary bypass still remain a matter of debate. We investigated the long-term results of a coronary revascularization strategy, utilising exclusively BITA-Y composite grafts using off-pump platform and sequential anastomoses. METHODS: From March 2000 to November 2010, all isolated CABGs (n = 2057 patients) were performed using an off-pump platform. Of these, 1240 patients had three-vessel coronary disease (60.3%), with severe coronary disease defined as >70% stenosis and three-vessel disease defined as the presence of 3 vessels with >70% stenosis, of which 784 (63.2%) were treated with two internal thoracic artery grafts in a composite fashion with a no-touch technique avoiding any manipulation of the ascending aorta. The primary end-point was the long-term survival and freedom from major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events (MACCEs). The follow-up was completed using the annual anniversary method. RESULTS: The mean number of anastomoses per patient was 4.0. Hospital mortality occurred in 8 patients (1%). Ninety-day stroke, myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization rates were respectively 0.7, 0.6 and 0.3%. The mean follow-up was 6.6 ± 3.2 years and was obtained for 99% of the patients. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 93.1 ± 1.6 and 83.8 ± 3.2%, respectively. Freedom from major adverse cardiac and cardiovascular event (MACCE) at 5 and 10 years was: cardiovascular event: 98.7 ± 1.6 and 96.1 ± 1.7%, documented ischaemia: 90.5 ± 2 and 80.2 ± 3.8%, revascularization: 94.0 ± 1.5 and 89.7 ± 2.5%, infarction: 98.1 ± 0.8 and 96.0 ± 1.6%. The patency of left and right internal thoracic artery in a BITA-Y configuration was 91.1 and 88.8% at 5 ± 3 years, respectively. CONCLUSION: Performance of an exclusive composite BITA off-pump revascularization strategy optimal and sustained long-term protection from MACCE.

Interruption of patent ductus arteriosus in children: robotically assisted versus videothoracoscopic surgery.

OBJECTIVES: If robotic surgery is to be widely used, the risks must be equivalent to those of standard techniques. This study analyzes the feasibility, safety, and efficiency of a robotically assisted technique for patent ductus arteriosus closure and compares the results with those of the videothoracoscopic technique. METHODS: During 2000, 56 children weighing 2.3 to 57 kg (mean, 12 kg) underwent surgical closure of a patent ductus arteriosus. They were distributed into 2 groups: 28 patients (group 1) underwent the videothoracoscopic technique, and 28 (group 2) underwent a robotically assisted (Zeus; Computer Motion, Inc, Goleta, Calif) approach. Operative and postoperative surgical data were studied. RESULTS: Operative time was significantly higher in the robotically assisted group. One conversion in videothoracoscopy was necessary, but no thoracotomy was required. Three persistent shunts were detected at postoperative echocardiography and were treated by means of application of a new clip with videothoracoscopy (1 in group 1 and 2 in group 2). No permanent laryngeal nerve injury and no hemorrhage were noted. The mean hospital stay was 3 days in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Robotically assisted closure of a patent ductus arteriosus is comparable with closure by means of the videothoracoscopic technique. However, it requires a longer operative time because of the increment in complexity.

Five-year follow-up of drug-eluting stents implantation vs minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for left anterior descending artery disease: a propensity score analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The spread of drug-eluting stents (DES) has reduced the incidence of early restenosis following percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). Meanwhile, development of minimally invasive coronary artery bypass surgery (MIDCAB) has offered a valuable alternative to conventional sternotomy with preservation of the benefit of the internal mammary artery use. Therefore, the revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) artery is suitable for both techniques. However, few data with long-term comparison of these two techniques exist. METHODS: Prospective data were collected for 456 patients undergoing isolated LAD revascularization between 1997 and 2011. Two hundred and sixty patients were treated with MIDCAB and 196 with first-generation DES implantation. A propensity score model was created to adjust for 19 relevant confounding variables. Primary and secondary end-points were, respectively, 5-year survival and freedom from major adverse cerebro-cardiovascular events (MACCE). RESULTS: Both groups were similar in age, EuroSCORE and mean duration of follow-up. Five-year survival was similar after MIDCAB or DES (hazard ratio (HR): 0.95; P = 0.89). Freedom from MACCE was significantly in favour of the MIDCAB group (HR: 0.32, P < 0.0001), mainly triggered by high subsequent need for revascularization of the targeted vessel in the DES group (HR: 0.17, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: MIDCAB and DES implantation showed similar rates of survival but despite an expected lower rate of reintervention on the targeted vessel with DES use, a highly significant higher MACCE rate was observed in the PCI group at 5-year follow-up.

Exclusive percutaneous approach for surgical transaortic transcatheter valve replacement.

Direct transaortic implantation (TAo) has been described as a new alternative approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with unsuitable transfemoral access. TAo is usually achieved through an upper ministernotomy or, more recently, through a right thoracotomy in the second intercostal space. We describe here our first experience with a fully thoracoscopic approach that allowed successful deployment of a 23-mm Edwards SAPIEN valve.

Transaortic transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards SAPIEN valve: feasibility, technical considerations, and clinical advantages.

The randomized Partner study [1] has recently shown superiority of transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation, in patients who are not candidates for surgical aortic valve replacement, when compared with conventional nonsurgical therapies. In patients who are not candidates for the transfemoral approach because of peripheral vascular disease or other contraindications, deployment of the SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) in an antegrade fashion can be achieved through the apex of the left ventricle. However this valuable technique carries specific risks inherent to the access route. Transaortic implantation, through an upper ministernotomy, offers a new alternative that could avoid complications related to the transapical approach.

Embol-X intraaortic filter and transaortic approach for improved cerebral protection in transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Techniques for transcatheter aortic valve implantation involve manipulation of the native aortic valve and the aortic arch. As a result, excellent technical outcomes of this technique remain counterbalanced by a level of neurologic complications that remain unacceptably high. We present here a report of a new potential combined approach to reduce periprocedural neurologic events. After a 6-cm J-shaped upper-mini-sternotomy, 26-mm Sapien valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) was deployed through a transaortic approach. In addition, the Embol-X device (Edwards Lifescience) was directly inserted in the distal ascending aorta was deployed during all the procedure. Postoperative evolution was clinically uneventful. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging revealed no new ischemic lesions in this first patient.

Recycling of internal thoracic arteries in reoperative coronary surgery: in-hospital and midterm results.

BACKGROUND: Selected patients, presenting for reoperative coronary surgery with patent internal thoracic arteries (ITAs), may benefit from techniques to salvage and reuse these ITA grafts. We have termed this practice the recycling of ITAs. The purpose of this study is to report our short-term and midterm results using various recycling techniques. METHODS: Between April 1996 and February 2009, 60 patients underwent ITA recycling at our institution. Information regarding survival and cardiac events was obtained from a prospectively maintained, institutional database. Survival and freedom from major adverse cardiac events were calculated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Mean follow-up duration was 60 ± 36 months. RESULTS: Mean age was 64 ± 9 years and the mean time to reoperation was 117 ± 68 months. The patent ITA served as an inflow for a composite Y graft in 39 patients and was distally reimplanted on the same coronary vessel in 9 patients. A combination of these two techniques was used in 8 patients. Other techniques were used in the remaining 4 patients. Freedom from cardiac death was 93% ± 7% and 85% ± 9% at 1 and 5 years and freedom from major adverse cardiac events was 93% ± 7% and 81% ± 11% at 1 and 5 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Recycling of ITA grafts during reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting is safe and feasible in selected patients. These techniques can be useful in selected young patients to avoid saphenous vein graft or in patients with a lack of graft conduits.

Comparison of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass surgery with implantation of drug-eluting stentsin patients with left anterior descending coronary artery disease.

OBJECTIVE: : Bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions improve the clinical status of patients with left anterior descending coronary artery disease. However, these techniques differ in invasiveness and in the need for subsequent reinterventions. The development of minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) surgery and of drug-eluting stents (DES) offers perspectives to close this gap. METHODS: : We compared the long-term clinical outcome of 308 patients after revascularization for isolated left anterior descending coronary artery disease. One hundred fifty-four patients were treated with MIDCAB and 154 with percutaneous coronary interventions and DES implantation. RESULTS: : Both groups were similar in age (63 ± 13 and 62 ± 10 years), Euroscore (3.3 ± 2.8 and 3.4 ± 2.6), and mean duration of follow-up (30 ± 17 and 24 ± 10 months). Two-year survival was similar after MIDCAB and after DES (97.4% and 94.8%). During follow-up, four patients (2.6%) of the MIDCAB group and 21 patients (13.6%) of the DES group needed subsequent revascularization of the target vessel (P = 0.001). Revascularization of a nontarget vessel was needed in 11 patients (7%) of the MIDCAB group and in 17 patients (11%) of the DES group (NS). Neurologic complications included two transient ischemic accidents and two strokes in the MIDCAB group but three fatal cerebral hemorrhages and one stroke in the DES group. Major adverse coronary and cerebrovascular events rates were 14% in the MIDCAB and 31% in the DES group. CONCLUSIONS: : MIDCAB and DES implantation showed similar rates of mortality but a higher reintervention rate after DES. Anticoagulation implications remain critical for the future of DES.

Reduced mortality in high-risk coronary patients operated off pump with preoperative intraaortic balloon counterpulsation.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) counterpulsation has better outcomes compared with perioperative or postoperative insertion in critical patients, and off-pump surgical procedures have been advocated to reduce mortality in high-risk patients. However, some surgeons are reluctant to perform beating heart operations in specific patient subgroups, including those with unstable angina or patients with low ejection fraction, because of their possible perioperative hemodynamic instability. METHODS: We evaluated combined beating heart procedures and preoperative IABP in selected high-risk patients and compared our results with the predictive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) model. Fifty-five high-risk patients with a mean logistic EuroSCORE of 24 were prospectively enrolled and then divided into emergency (group 1, n = 25) and nonemergency (group 2, n = 30) groups. IABP was inserted immediately before operation in group 1 and the day before the procedure in group 2. RESULTS: Compared with the EuroSCORE predictive model, a dramatic decrease in mortality occurred in both groups. Group I predicted mortality was 36.8%, and observed was 20%; and group 2 predicted mortality was 15.2% and observed was 0%. No specific complications from the use of IABP were encountered. During mid-term (2 years) follow-up, no patient died from a cardiac cause or required percutaneous coronary intervention or subsequent reoperation due to incomplete revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of preoperative intraaortic counterpulsation and beating heart intervention allows complete revascularization in high-risk patients with a important reduction in operative mortality and excellent mid-term results.