Self-reported auditory problems are associated with adverse mental health outcomes and alcohol misuse in the UK Armed Forces.

PURPOSE: Auditory problems, such as hearing loss and tinnitus, have been associated with mental health problems and alcohol misuse in the UK general population and in the US Armed Forces; however, few studies have examined these associations within the UK Armed Forces. The present study examined the association between auditory problems and probable common mental disorders, post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol misuse. METHODS: 5474 serving and ex-service personnel from the UK Armed Forces were examined, selected from those who responded to phase two (data collection 2007-09) and phase three (2014-16) of a military cohort study. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between auditory problems at phase two and mental health problems at phase three. RESULTS: 9.7% of participants reported ever experiencing hearing problems alone, 7.9% reported tinnitus within the last month alone, and 7.8% reported hearing problems with tinnitus. After adjustment, hearing problems with tinnitus at phase two was associated with increased odds of probable common mental disorders (AOR = 1.50, 95% CI 1.09-2.08), post-traumatic stress disorder (AOR = 2.30, 95% CI 1.41-3.76), and alcohol misuse (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI 1.28-2.96) at phase three. Tinnitus alone was associated with probable post-traumatic stress disorder (AOR = 1.80, 95% CI 1.03-3.15); however, hearing problems alone were not associated with any outcomes of interest. CONCLUSIONS: The association between auditory problems and mental health problems emphasises the importance of the prevention of auditory problems in the Armed Forces: through enhanced audiometric screening, improved hearing protection equipment, and greater levels of utilisation of such equipment.

Chest Wall Reconstruction Using 3-Dimensional Printing: Functional and Mechanical Results.

BACKGROUND: Tumors involving the chest wall may require extensive resection and reconstruction. This study aims to evaluate functional, cosmetic results, and quality of life (QoL) in patients who had a reconstruction based on patient-specific 3-dimensional (3D) printing. METHODS: The patient-specific chest wall prosthesis was created for 10 patients. The anatomical models were 3D printed and used to produce a silicone mold that was filled with methyl methacrylate to create the customized prosthesis. Evaluation of the reconstruction was completed with a QoL assessment and postoperative tracking of patients' chest motion, using infrared markers. The distance between plot points representing markers on the operated and contralateral sides was measured to assess symmetrical motion. RESULTS: Twenty-three consecutive patients were enrolled, with the median age of 64 years. Thirteen patients underwent a nonrigid reconstruction, and 10 had a patient-specific rigid reconstruction with methyl methacrylate. The median number of ribs resected was 3. No postoperative complications or morbidity related to the prostheses were reported. The median hospital stay in the nonrigid reconstruction group was 8.5 days compared with 7.5 days (p = .167) in the rigid reconstruction group. Postoperatively, most patients had low levels of symptoms, with 82% experiencing chest pain and 53% experiencing dyspnea. Rigid reconstruction patients demonstrated more symmetrical breathing motion compared with nonrigid reconstruction patients. The mean distances were 2.32 ± 2.18 and 7.28 ± 5.87 (P < .00001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that a 3D patient-specific prosthesis is feasible and safe, suggesting a possible trend toward improved breathing mechanics, QoL, and cosmetic results.