A bio-behavioral model of systemic inflammation at breast cancer diagnosis and fatigue of clinical importance 2 years later.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to generate a model of cancer-related fatigue (CRF) of clinical importance 2 years after diagnosis of breast cancer building on clinical and behavioral factors and integrating pre-treatment markers of systemic inflammation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women with stage I-III hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer were included from the multimodal, prospective CANTO cohort (NCT01993498). The primary outcome was global CRF of clinical importance [European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 ≥40/100] 2 years after diagnosis (year 2). Secondary outcomes included physical, emotional, and cognitive CRF (EORTC QLQ-FA12). All pre-treatment candidate variables were assessed at diagnosis, including inflammatory markers [interleukin (IL)-1α, IL-1ß, IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, interferon γ, IL-1 receptor antagonist, tumor necrosis factor-α, and C-reactive protein], and were tested in multivariable logistic regression models implementing multiple imputation and validation by 100-fold bootstrap resampling. RESULTS: Among 1208 patients, 415 (34.4%) reported global CRF of clinical importance at year 2. High pre-treatment levels of IL-6 (quartile 4 versus 1) were associated with global CRF at year 2 [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 2.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.40-3.03); P = 0.0002; area under the receiver operating characteristic curve = 0.74]. Patients with high pre-treatment IL-6 had unhealthier behaviors, including being frequently either overweight or obese [62.4%; mean body mass index 28.0 (standard deviation 6.3 kg/m2)] and physically inactive (53.5% did not meet World Health Organization recommendations). Clinical and behavioral associations with CRF at year 2 included pre-treatment CRF [aOR versus no pre-treatment CRF: 3.99 (95% CI 2.81-5.66)], younger age [aOR per 1-year decrement: 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.03)], current tobacco smoking [aOR versus never: 1.81 (95% CI 1.26-2.58)], and worse insomnia or pain [aOR per 10-unit increment: 1.08 (95% CI 1.04-1.13), and 1.12 (95% CI 1.04-1.21), respectively]. Secondary analyses indicated additional associations of IL-2 [aOR per log-unit increment: 1.32 (95% CI 1.03-1.70)] and IL-10 [0.73 (95% CI 0.57-0.93)] with global CRF and of C-reactive protein [1.42 (95% CI 1.13-1.78)] with cognitive CRF at year 2. Emotional distress was consistently associated with physical, emotional, and cognitive CRF. CONCLUSIONS: This study proposes a bio-behavioral framework linking pre-treatment systemic inflammation with CRF of clinical importance 2 years later among a large prospective sample of survivors of breast cancer.

Impact of hormone receptor status and tumor subtypes of breast cancer in young BRCA carriers.

BACKGROUND: Hormone receptor expression is a known positive prognostic and predictive factor in breast cancer; however, limited evidence exists on its prognostic impact on prognosis of young patients harboring a pathogenic variant (PV) in the BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included young patients (aged ≤40 years) diagnosed with invasive breast cancer and harboring germline PVs in BRCA genes. We investigated the impact of hormone receptor status on clinical behavior and outcomes of breast cancer. Outcomes of interest [disease-free survival (DFS), breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS), and overall survival (OS)] were first investigated according to hormone receptor expression (positive versus negative), and then according to breast cancer subtype [luminal A-like versus luminal B-like versus triple-negative versus human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer]. RESULTS: From 78 centers worldwide, 4709 BRCA carriers were included, of whom 2143 (45.5%) had hormone receptor-positive and 2566 (54.5%) hormone receptor-negative breast cancer. Median follow-up was 7.9 years. The rate of distant recurrences was higher in patients with hormone receptor-positive disease (13.1% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001), while the rate of second primary breast cancer was lower (9.1% versus 14.7%, P < 0.001) compared to patients with hormone receptor-negative disease. The 8-year DFS was 65.8% and 63.4% in patients with hormone receptor-positive and negative disease, respectively. The hazard ratio of hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease changed over time for DFS, BCSS, and OS (P < 0.05 for interaction of hormone receptor status and survival time). Patients with luminal A-like breast cancer had the worst long-term prognosis in terms of DFS compared to all the other subgroups (8-year DFS: 60.8% in luminal A-like versus 63.5% in triple-negative versus 65.5% in HER2-positive and 69.7% in luminal B-like subtype). CONCLUSIONS: In young BRCA carriers, differences in recurrence pattern and second primary breast cancer among hormone receptor-positive versus negative disease warrant consideration in counseling patients on treatment, follow-up, and risk-reducing surgery.

ESO-ESMO fifth international consensus guidelines for breast cancer in young women (BCY5).

We dedicate this manuscript in memory of a dear friend and colleague Bella Kaufman. The fifth International Consensus Symposium for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY5) took place virtually in October 2020, organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women were updated from BCY4 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines. Areas of research priorities as well as specificities in different geographic and minority populations were identified. This manuscript summarizes the ESO-ESMO international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

ESMO Expert Consensus Statements on Cancer Survivorship: promoting high-quality survivorship care and research in Europe.

BACKGROUND: The increased number of cancer survivors and the recognition of physical and psychosocial challenges, present from cancer diagnosis through active treatment and beyond, led to the discipline of cancer survivorship. DESIGN AND METHODS: Herein, we reflected on the different components of survivorship care, existing models and priorities, in order to facilitate the promotion of high-quality European survivorship care and research. RESULTS: We identified five main components of survivorship care: (i) physical effects of cancer and chronic medical conditions; (ii) psychological effects of cancer; (iii) social, work and financial effects of cancer; (iv) surveillance for recurrences and second cancers; and (v) cancer prevention and overall health and well-being promotion. Survivorship care can be delivered by structured care models including but not limited to shared models integrating primary care and oncology services. The choice of the care model to be implemented has to be adapted to local realities. High-quality care should be expedited by the generation of: (i) focused and shared European recommendations, (ii) creation of tools to facilitate implementation of coordinated care and (iii) survivorship educational programs for health care teams and patients. The research agenda should be defined with the participation of health care providers, researchers, policy makers, patients and caregivers. The following patient-centered survivorship research areas were highlighted: (i) generation of a big data platform to collect long-term real-world data in survivors and healthy controls to (a) understand the resources, needs and preferences of patients with cancer, and (b) understand biological determinants of survivorship issues, and (ii) develop innovative effective interventions focused on the main components of survivorship care. CONCLUSIONS: The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) can actively contribute in the efforts of the oncology community toward (a) promoting the development of high-quality survivorship care programs, (b) providing educational material and (c) aiding groundbreaking research by reflecting on priorities and by supporting research networking.

ESO-ESMO 4th International Consensus Guidelines for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4).

The 4th International Consensus Conference for Breast Cancer in Young Women (BCY4) took place in October 2018, in Lugano, Switzerland, organized by the European School of Oncology (ESO) and the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO). Consensus recommendations for the management of breast cancer in young women were updated from BCY3 with incorporation of new evidence to inform the guidelines. Areas of research priorities were also identified. This article summarizes the ESO-ESMO international consensus recommendations, which are also endorsed by the European Society of Breast Specialists (EUSOMA).

Differential impact of endocrine therapy and chemotherapy on quality of life of breast cancer survivors: a prospective patient-reported outcomes analysis.

BACKGROUND: In early breast cancer (BC), there has been a trend to escalate endocrine therapy (ET) and to de-escalate chemotherapy (CT). However, the impact of ET versus CT on the quality of life (QoL) of early BC patients is unknown. Here, we characterize the independent contribution of ET and CT on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at 2 years after diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We prospectively collected PROs in 4262 eligible patients using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30/BR23 questionnaires inside CANTO trial (NCT01993498). The primary outcome was the C30 summary score (C30-SumSc) at 2 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: From eligible patients, 37.2% were premenopausal and 62.8% postmenopausal; 81.9% received ET and 52.8% CT. In the overall cohort, QoL worsened by 2 years after diagnosis in multiple functions and symptoms; exceptions included emotional function and future perspective, which improved over time. ET (Pint = 0.004), but not CT (Pint = 0.924), had a persistent negative impact on the C30-SumSc. In addition, ET negatively impacted role and social function, pain, insomnia, systemic therapy side-effects, breast symptoms and further limited emotional function and future perspective recovery. Although CT had no impact on the C30-SumSc at 2-years it was associated with deteriorated physical and cognitive function, dyspnea, financial difficulties, body image and breast symptoms. We found a differential effect of treatment by menopausal status; in premenopausal patients, CT, despite only a non-significant trend for deteriorated C30-SumSc (Pint = 0.100), was more frequently associated with QoL domains deterioration than ET, whereas in postmenopausal patients, ET was more frequently associated with QoL deterioration, namely using the C30-SumSc (Pint = 0.004). CONCLUSION(S): QoL deterioration persisted at 2 years after diagnosis with different trajectories by treatment received. ET, but not CT, had a major detrimental impact on C30-SumSc, especially in postmenopausal women. These findings highlight the need to properly select patients for adjuvant ET escalation.

Effectiveness of systemic treatments for pyoderma gangrenosum: a systematic review of observational studies and clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a neutrophilic dermatosis with substantial morbidity. There is no consensus on gold-standard treatments. OBJECTIVES: To review the effectiveness of systemic therapy for PG. METHODS: We searched six databases for 24 systemic therapies for PG. Primary outcomes were complete healing and clinical improvement; secondary outcomes were time to healing and adverse effects. RESULTS: We found 3326 citations and 375 articles underwent full-text review; 41 studies met the inclusion criteria. There were 704 participants in 26 retrospective cohort studies, three prospective cohort studies, seven case series, one case-control study, two open-label trials and two randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Systemic corticosteroids were the most studied (32 studies), followed by ciclosporin (21 studies), biologics (16 studies) and oral dapsone (11 studies). One RCT (STOP-GAP, n = 121) showed that prednisolone and ciclosporin were similar: 15-20% of patients showed complete healing at 6 weeks and 47% at 6 months. Another RCT (n = 30) found that infliximab was superior to placebo at 2 weeks (46% vs. 6% response), with a 21% complete healing rate at 6 weeks. Two uncontrolled trials showed 60% and 37% healing within 4 months for canakinumab and infliximab, respectively; other data suggest that patients with concurrent inflammatory bowel disease may benefit from biologics. The remaining studies were poor quality and had small sample sizes but supported the use of corticosteroids, ciclosporin and biologics. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic corticosteroids, ciclosporin, infliximab and canakinumab had the most evidence in treating PG. However, current literature is limited to small and lower-quality studies with substantial heterogeneity.

Effect of a one-off sporidesmin challenge on the milk production of dairy cows.

AIMS To investigate the effects on milk yield in lactating dairy cows of a single dose of sporidesmin, and to categorise the responses based on clinical signs and differing degrees of liver damage, as assessed by activities of γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) and post-mortem liver histopathology. METHODS Adult lactating dairy cows (n=17) were given a single intra-ruminal dose of 0.24 mg/kg of sporidesmin dissolved in ethanol and diluted in water on Day 0; an additional three cows served as untreated controls. Weekly serum samples were collected between Days -14 and 42 and analysed for activities of GGT. Milk yields were measured daily over the same period. Cows were subjected to euthanasia due to severe clinical signs (n=2) or were slaughtered at the end of the trial. Samples of livers were examined histologically and were scored for lesions on a scale from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe). Based on GGT activities and clinical observations, cows that were treated with sporidesmin were categorised as non-responders (no clinical signs and normal GGT), subclinical (elevated GGT and no clinical signs) or clinical. Outcomes were compared between these three groups and control cows using generalised additive models. RESULTS Seven cows were classified as clinical, and had median liver scores of 22 (95% CI=20.6-23.4), six were subclinical with median liver scores of 8.7 (95% CI=3.8-13.5) and four were non-responders with median liver scores of 2.5 (95% CI=1.2-4.3). Median liver scores for the three control cows were 1 (95% CI=-0.8-2.1). Activities of GGT increased in subclinical and clinical cows around Day 7. The milk yield of all cows treated with sporidesmin, including non-responder cows, started to decrease on Day 1, and reached a nadir (a drop of between 9 and 85%) on Day 7. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE It is likely that the overall effects of sporidesmin consumption on milk production by the national herd in New Zealand are hugely underestimated, especially considering its effects on non-responder and subclinical cows as shown in this trial. In view of the results presented here, the authors are suggesting a change to the definition of response to sporidesmin from non-responder, subclinical, and clinical, to subclinical-low, subclinical-high, and clinical, when measuring a combination of GGT activities, clinical signs and milk yields during facial eczema-risk seasons (summer-autumn).