Reducing the carbon footprint of general anaesthesia: a comparison of total intravenous anaesthesia vs. a mixed anaesthetic strategy in 47,157 adult patients.

Global warming is a major public health concern. Volatile anaesthetics are greenhouse gases that increase the carbon footprint of healthcare. Modelling studies indicate that total intravenous anaesthesia is less carbon intensive than volatile anaesthesia, with equivalent quality of care. In this observational study, we aimed to apply the findings of previous modelling studies to compare the carbon footprint per general anaesthetic of an exclusive TIVA strategy vs. a mixed TIVA-volatile strategy. This comparative retrospective study was conducted over 2 years in two French hospitals, one using total intravenous anaesthesia only and one using a mixed strategy including both intravenous and inhalation anaesthetic techniques. Based on pharmacy procurement records, the quantity of anaesthetic sedative drugs was converted to carbon dioxide equivalents. The primary outcome was the difference in carbon footprint of hypnotic drugs per intervention between the two strategies. From 1 January 2021 to 31 December 2022, 25,137 patients received general anaesthesia in the hospital using the total intravenous anaesthesia strategy and 22,020 in the hospital using the mixed strategy. The carbon dioxide equivalent footprint of hypnotic drugs per intervention in the hospital using the total intravenous anaesthesia strategy was 20 times lower than in the hospital using the mixed strategy (emissions of 2.42 kg vs. 48.85 kg carbon dioxide equivalent per intervention, respectively). The total intravenous anaesthesia strategy significantly reduces the carbon footprint of hypnotic drugs in general anaesthesia in adult patients compared with a mixed strategy. Further research is warranted to assess the risk-benefit ratio of the widespread adoption of total intravenous anaesthesia.

Mediastinitis in the intensive care unit patient: a narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Mediastinitis is a rare but severe infection, defined as an inflammation of the connective tissues and structures within the mediastinum. Due to its proximity to vital structures, mediastinitis represents a highly morbid pathological process associated with a high risk of mortality. In most cases mediastinitis requires treatment in the intensive care unit. OBJECTIVES: To highlight to the reader the clinical features of mediastinitis, to attempt to define each clinical scenario, to describe the responsible pathogens and finally to depict both the medical and surgical treatments. SOURCES: We performed a literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane libraries, limited for articles published between January 2003 and December 2018, reporting on acute mediastinitis. CONTENT: The term covers different entities of different aetiologies including deep sternal wound infection related to sternotomy; oesophageal perforation or anastomosis leakage; and finally descending necrotizing mediastinitis, often secondary to oropharyngeal abscess. The responsible pathogens and therefore subsequent management depends on the underlying aetiology. Empirical antimicrobial therapy should cover the suspected microorganisms while surgery and supportive measures should aim to reduce the inoculum of pathogens by providing adequate drainage and debridement. IMPLICATIONS: Literature concerning mediastinitis in the intensive care unit is relatively scarce. We have collated the evidence and reviewed the different causes and treatment options of acute mediastinitis with a particular focus on microbiological epidemiology. Future research in larger cohorts is needed to better understand the treatment of this difficult disease.