Characteristics and Outcomes of COVID-19 Patients Supported by Venoarterial or Veno-Arterial-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiac injury has been reported in up to 20%-to-30% of patients with COVID-19, and severe disease can lead to cardiopulmonary failure. The role of mechanical circulatory support in these patients remains undetermined. The authors here aimed to determine the characteristics and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 requiring venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) or veno-arterial-venous (VAV) ECMO support. DESIGN AND SETTING: A multicenter, retrospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: The cohort consisted of adult patients (18 years of age and older) with confirmed COVID-19 requiring VA ECMO or VAV ECMO support in the period from March 1, 2020, to April 30, 2021. Outcomes were recorded until July 31, 2021. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: To show factors related to death during hospitalization, patients were grouped as survivors and nonsurvivors. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate 90-day in-hospital mortality. Overall, 37 patients from 12 centers comprised the study cohort. The median patient age was 44 years old (interquartile range [IQR], 35-52), and 12 (32%) were female patients. The duration of ECMO support ranged from 2-to-132 days. At the end of the follow-up period, 13 patients (35%) were discharged or transferred alive, and 24 patients (65%) died during the hospitalization. The cumulative in-hospital mortality at 90 days was 64% (95% confidence interval: 47-81). During the time from intubation to VA ECMO or VAV ECMO initiation (1 day [IQR 0-7.5] v 6 days [IQR 2.5-14], p = 0.0383), body mass index (32 [IQR 26-36] v 37 [IQR 33-40], p = 0.009), and baseline C-reactive protein (7.15 v 38.9 mg/dL, p = 0.009) were higher in those who expired. CONCLUSION: Only one-third of the patients with COVID-19 requiring VA ECMO or VAV ECMO survived to discharge. Close monitoring of at-risk patients with early initiation of ECMO with circulatory support may further improve outcomes.

Prospective Multicenter Study of Myocardial Recovery Using Left Ventricular Assist Devices (RESTAGE-HF [Remission from Stage D Heart Failure]): Medium-Term and Primary End Point Results.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) unloading and hemodynamic support in patients with advanced chronic heart failure can result in significant improvement in cardiac function allowing LVAD removal; however, the rate of this is generally considered to be low. This prospective multicenter nonrandomized study (RESTAGE-HF [Remission from Stage D Heart Failure]) investigated whether a protocol of optimized LVAD mechanical unloading, combined with standardized specific pharmacological therapy to induce reverse remodeling and regular testing of underlying myocardial function, could produce a higher incidence of LVAD explantation. METHODS: Forty patients with chronic advanced heart failure from nonischemic cardiomyopathy receiving the Heartmate II LVAD were enrolled from 6 centers. LVAD speed was optimized with an aggressive pharmacological regimen, and regular echocardiograms were performed at reduced LVAD speed (6000 rpm, no net flow) to test underlying myocardial function. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with sufficient improvement of myocardial function to reach criteria for explantation within 18 months with sustained remission from heart failure (freedom from transplant/ventricular assist device/death) at 12 months. RESULTS: Before LVAD, age was 35.1±10.8 years, 67.5% were men, heart failure mean duration was 20.8±20.6 months, 95% required inotropic and 20% temporary mechanical support, left ventricular ejection fraction was 14.5±5.3%, end-diastolic diameter was 7.33±0.89 cm, end-systolic diameter was 6.74±0.88 cm, pulmonary artery saturations were 46.7±9.2%, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was 26.2±7.6 mm Hg. Four enrolled patients did not undergo the protocol because of medical complications unrelated to the study procedures. Overall, 40% of all enrolled (16/40) patients achieved the primary end point, P<0.0001, with 50% (18/36) of patients receiving the protocol being explanted within 18 months (pre-explant left ventricular ejection fraction, 57±8%; end-diastolic diameter, 4.81±0.58 cm; end-systolic diameter, 3.53±0.51 cm; pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, 8.1±3.1 mm Hg; pulmonary artery saturations 63.6±6.8% at 6000 rpm). Overall, 19 patients were explanted (19/36, 52.3% of those receiving the protocol). The 15 ongoing explanted patients are now 2.26±0.97 years after explant. After explantation survival free from LVAD or transplantation was 90% at 1-year and 77% at 2 and 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter prospective study, this strategy of LVAD support combined with a standardized pharmacological and cardiac function monitoring protocol resulted in a high rate of LVAD explantation and was feasible and reproducible with explants occurring in all 6 participating sites. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01774656.

Protocol endomyocardial biopsy beyond 6 months-It is time to move on.

The optimal duration and frequency of routine surveillance endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) have been questioned in the current era of heart transplantation (HT), where the advances in immunosuppression and donor selection strategies have led to a decline in acute allograft rejection. We investigated the utility of routine EMB beyond 6 months post-HT. A single-center retrospective review was performed on 2963 EMBs from 220 HT recipients over 10 years. Each EMB was categorized into protocol or symptom-triggered biopsy and reviewed for rejection. Heart transplant recipients with ≥2 known risk factors for rejection were designated as an elevated risk group. The majority of rejections occurred within 3 months following HT. The yield of routine protocol EMBs was significantly lower than symptom-triggered EMBs, not only during the first 6 months post-HT (1.6% vs. 33.3%, P < .0001), but more so during the 6-12 months (0.1% vs 83.0%, P < .0001). A similar pattern was observed in heart transplant recipients at both elevated and standard risk for rejection. In conclusion, EMB was found to be a low-yield screening modality for rejection beyond 6 months post-HT.

Oral Anticoagulation and Adverse Outcomes after Ischemic Stroke in Heart Failure Patients without Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulation (OAC) after an ischemic stroke in older patients with heart failure (HF) without atrial fibrillation remains uncertain. METHODS: Utilizing Get With The Guidelines Stroke national clinical registry data linked to Medicare claims from 2009-2014, we assessed the outcomes of eligible patients with a history of HF who were initiated on OAC during a hospitalization for an acute ischemic stroke. The cumulative incidences of adverse events were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted Cox proportional hazard ratios were compared between patients discharged on or off OAC. RESULTS: A total of 8,261 patients from 1,370 sites were discharged alive after an acute ischemic stroke and met eligibility criteria. Of those, 747 (9.0%) were initiated on OAC.  Patients on OAC were younger (77.2±8.0 vs. 80.5±8.9 years, p<0.01). After adjustment for clinical covariates, the likelihood of 1 year mortality was higher in those on OAC (aHR: 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.41, p<0.01), while no significant differences were noted for ICH (aHR: 1.34, 95% CI 0.69-2.59, p=0.38) and recurrent ischemic stroke (aHR: 0.78, 95% CI 0.54-1.15, p = 0.21).  The likelihood of all-cause bleeding (aHR: 1.59, 95% CI 1.29-1.96, p<0.01) and all-cause re-hospitalization (aHR: 1.14, 95% CI 1.02-1.27, p = 0.02) was higher for those on OAC. CONCLUSION: Initiation of OAC after an ischemic stroke in older patients with HF in the absence of atrial fibrillation is associated with death, bleeding and re-hospitalization without an associated reduction in recurrent ischemic stroke. If validated, these findings raise caution for prescribing OAC to such patients.

Outflow graft obstruction in patients with the HM 3 LVAD: A percutaneous approach.

BACKGROUND: The use of the HeartMate 3 (HM3) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is expanding. Despite being associated with lower rates of adverse events and increased survival, outflow graft obstruction (OGO) has been reported in patients with HM3. The incidence and best management of this serious complication remain unclear. METHODS: We describe six cases of HM3 OGO occurring in five patients in our institutional HM3 cohort. Four cases underwent computed tomography angiography and in two percutaneous angiography was directly performed to confirm the diagnosis. In four cases, percutaneous repair of the OG was performed using common interventional cardiology (IC) techniques. RESULTS: Our institutional incidence of OGO was 7% (event rate of 0.05 per patient year); much higher than the previously reported incidence of 1.6%. All cases occurred in the bend relief covered segment. Only two patients had apparent OG twisting, and in two, OGO occurred despite placement of an anti-twist clip at the time of implant. External compression seems to play a role in most cases. Balloon "graftoplasty" and stent deployment via the femoral artery alleviated the obstruction and normalized LVAD flow in all patients who underwent percutaneous repair. The use of self-expanding stents allowed for downsizing of the procedural access site to 10 Fr. No serious procedure-related complications occurred. CONCLUSION: OGO is common in HM3 patients, external compression due to biomaterial accumulated surrounding the OG is a common etiology. Percutaneous repair using standard IC techniques is safe and feasible in cases of compression with or without partial twisting.

COVID-19 in heart transplant recipients-A seroprevalence survey.

The clinical spectrum of COVID-19 in heart transplant recipients has not been fully defined, because asymptomatic and sub-clinical cases are difficult to capture. Seroprevalence surveys are an important tool to identify not just cases that have come to clinical attention, but all previously infected recipients. We performed a seroprevalence survey of the adult heart transplant program at a large New York City Hospital System. A total of 232 (87% of recipients being followed) subjects were tested, of whom 37 (15.9%) were found to be previously infected. This is comparable to the overall rate of prior infection in the NYC metro area. Disease course tended to be more severe than in the general population; however, this was at least partially driven by traditional risk factors of age and comorbidities. Lastly, 9 of 10 recipients who were initially found to be PCR positive subsequently tested positive for antibodies, confirming the ability of this population to mount a humoral response. In conclusion, prevalence of COVID-19 in heart transplant recipients on immunosuppression was comparable to that in the general population of NYC, and 90% of those with an initially positive viral swab developed antibodies. In those who are infected, disease course tends to be more severe.

Effect of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir on weight-adjusted tacrolimus trough/dose ratios in heart and kidney transplant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: The pharmacokinetic implications of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) use on tacrolimus posttransplant are unknown. This study sought to investigate the effects of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P), a CYP3A4 substrate and inhibitor, on weight-adjusted tacrolimus (FK) trough/dose ratio (T/D) following heart or kidney transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) viremic donors to HCV negative heart or kidney transplant recipients who received 12 weeks of G/P therapy. Weight-adjusted T/D was assessed while patients were at steady-state before, during, and after G/P treatment. Forty-one HCV negative recipients (three heart, 38 kidney) were evaluated. RESULTS: The weight-adjusted T/D significantly increased during G/P treatment (119.31, IQR 88-173.8) compared to before G/P treatment (67.4, IQR 53.4-115.9) (p < 0.01), but decreased after completion of treatment (90.1, IQR 52.9-122.7) (p < 0.01). There was no difference in weight-adjusted T/D before and after G/P treatment (p = 0.42). Four patients experienced acute rejection. CONCLUSION: Initiation of G/P in heart or kidney transplant recipients induces a reversible change in tacrolimus metabolism. A 33%-50% tacrolimus dose reduction may be considered at the time of G/P initiation. Regardless of tacrolimus dose adjustment, tacrolimus trough levels should be monitored 3 days after initiation of G/P. No clear relationship between HCV viremic organ transplantation and rejection risk was found. Larger studies are warranted to validate these findings.

Outcomes of heart transplantation in patients with human immunodeficiency virus.

Human immunodeficiency virus-positive (HIV+) patients are not routinely offered heart transplantation (HT) due to lack of adequate outcomes data. Between January 2004 and March 2017, we identified 41 adult (≥18 years) HT recipients with known HIV+ serostatus at the time of transplant in UNOS and evaluated post-HT outcomes. Overall, Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates of survival at 1 and 5 years were 85.9% and 77.3%, respectively, with no significant difference in bridge-to-transplant ventricular-assist device (BTT-VAD, n = 22) and no-BTT-VAD (n = 19). KM estimates of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and malignancy at 5 years were 32% and 19%, respectively. Using propensity scores, 41 HIV+ HT recipients were matched to 41 HIV- HT recipients for idiopathic dilated-cardiomyopathy; and there was no significant difference in post-HT survival up to 5 years. Furthermore, only 24 centers in the United States had performed HIV+ HT during the study period, indicating that >80% of HT centers in the United States had not performed any HIV+ HT. In a cohort representative of the current status of HIV+ HTs in the United States, we found that the posttransplant survival was excellent and rates of CAV and malignancy were comparable to the overall HT population. These results should encourage greater number of centers to offer HT to suitable HIV+ candidates and help reduce unequal access to HT for HIV+ patients.

A bridge from HeartMate XVE to HeartMate 3.

Cardiac recovery after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is rare. Recurrent heart failure after device explantation is also rare. We describe a patient who is the recipient of a third-generation LVAD due to recurrent heart failure nearly one decade after successfully being bridged to recovery after implantation of a first-generation LVAD.

Outcomes of Restrictive and Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathies After LVAD: An INTERMACS Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with restrictive (RCM) and hypertrophic (HCM) cardiomyopathies are felt to be a difficult population to treat with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) therapy. Scarce data exist on outcomes of continuous-flow (CF) LVAD support in these challenging patient cohorts. METHODS: The Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support Registry was queried for all patients with RCM (n = 94) and HCM (n = 104) who underwent CF LVAD implantation between March 2008 and March 2014. Survival, adverse event rates, baseline demographics, echocardiography parameters, and competing outcomes were compared with patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) (n = 8749). RESULTS: Left ventricular size was smaller and baseline EF was higher in RCM and HCM compared with DCM patients. Nonetheless, these parameters were not completely normal in the RCM and HCM groups, suggesting that most of these patients exhibited features of a DCM and represented a mixed phenotype. In these specific patient populations, survival up to 4 years was not different among the 3 groups (log rank 0.25) and competing outcomes at 1 year were similar. In the subgroup of patients with very small ventricles (ie, < 5.0 cm), survival was far inferior. Finally, overall rates of right ventricular assist device requirement, hemolysis, pump dysfunction, and cardiac arrhythmias were similar among the 3 groups. CONCLUSION: Relatively few patients with HCM and RCM undergo CF LVAD implantation, and most that do display some features of a DCM. Overall survival and adverse event profiles of these patients were similar to traditional DCM patients; however, in those with very small ventricles, survival was inferior.

Association of centre volume and in-hospital mortality in heart failure hospitalisations.

BACKGROUND: Centre volume is an important determinant of outcomes in patients requiring complex medical treatments or surgical procedures. Heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) has become an increasingly complex and resource intensive clinical event. We evaluated the effect of centre volume on mortality and costs in patients with HFH. METHODS: This was a retrospective registry-based analysis of adult patients discharged with a primary diagnosis of HF from hospitals across New York (NY) State over a 5-year period, between January 2009 and December 2013, using the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System inpatient discharge files. The primary outcome of interest was in-hospital mortality. All patients were followed from the day of admission to either in-hospital death or discharge alive. RESULTS: 300 972 HFHs from 198 facilities across NY State were included. Five-year centre volume was associated with a decrease in in-hospital mortality in unadjusted (HR=0.872, 95% CI 0.863 to 0.881, p<0.001) and adjusted Cox models (HR=0.869, 95% CI 0.859 to 0.879, p<0.001). After dividing the overall cohort into three groups based on 5-year centre volume, groups with medium and high volume centres had lower in-hospital mortality when compared with the group with low volume centres. The results were consistent in various subgroup analyses. Furthermore, hospitals in the higher centre volume groups had increased HFH costs across different severity of illness categories and involved increased use of cardiac procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Higher centre volume was associated with lower HFH mortality but increased HFH costs and increased cardiac procedures in a cohort of Medicare and non-Medicare beneficiaries.

Frailty Assessment in Advanced Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have recently demonstrated the value of frailty assessment in a general heart failure (HF) population; however, it is unknown whether these findings are also applicable in advanced HF. We investigated the utility of frailty assessment and its prognostic value in elderly patients with advanced HF. METHODS: Forty consecutive elderly subjects aged ≥65 years, with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%, New York Heart Association class III or IV, and a 6-minute walk test <300 m were enrolled from the HF clinic at Montefiore Medical Center between October 2012 and July 2013. Subjects were assessed for frailty with the Fried Frailty Index, consisting of 5 components: hand grip strength, 15-foot walk time, weight loss, physical activity, and exhaustion. All subjects were prospectively followed for death or hospitalization. RESULTS: At baseline, the mean age of the cohort was 74.9 ± 6.5 years, 58% female, left ventricular ejection fraction 25.6 ± 6.4%, 6-minute walk test 195.8 ± 74.3 m and length of follow-up 454 ± 186 days. Thirty-five percent were prefrail and 65% were frail. Frailty status was associated with the combined primary endpoint of mortality and all-cause hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR] 1.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-3.25, P = .013). On individual analysis, frailty was associated with all-cause hospitalizations (HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.12-3.27, P = .017) and non-HF hospitalizations (HR 3.31, 95% CI 1.14- 9.6, P = .028), but was not associated with HF hospitalizations alone (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.68-2.49, P = .380). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty assessment in patients with advanced HF is feasible and provides prognostic value. These findings warrant validation in a larger cohort.

Creating adequate pulsatility with a continuous flow left ventricular assist device: just do it!

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Continuous flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced heart failure; however, as experience with these devices has grown, a number of unanticipated adverse events have emerged. In this study, we review the current literature associating a lack of pulsatility with these events. RECENT FINDINGS: It is now evident that continuous flow LVAD physiology reflects a spectrum of 'low pulsatile' rather than a truly 'nonpulsatile' state. Thus, the detrimental consequences of nonpulsatile flow noted in early experimental setups may or may not occur in humans supported with continuous flow LVADs. Such studies have demonstrated not only alterations in vascular function and structure during continuous flow LVAD support, but also a clear association of the degree of alterations in vascular, baroreceptor, and sympathetic nervous system function with the degree of actual pulsatility. In addition, a number of clinical events have been linked to continuous flow LVAD physiology, including a decreased extent of ventricular unloading possibly impairing myocardial recovery, hemolysis and device thrombosis, development of aortic insufficiency, and mucosal bleeding. SUMMARY: Many of the adverse effects of the current continuous flow LVADs are associated with low pulsatile flow. An evolved understanding of pulsatility as a continuous rather than a binary variable may allow us to incorporate appropriate degrees of pulsatility into the next generation pumps and mitigate these effects.

Heart transplantation versus continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: comprehensive cost at 1 year.

BACKGROUND: With health care reform firmly on the horizon, it is critical to understand the costs associated with new technologies such as continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) compared with well established treatments such as heart transplantation (HT). Scarce data exist describing the costs of these 2 therapies after 1 year of support. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 20 consecutive subjects who underwent implantation of a CF-LVAD and 20 consecutive subjects who underwent HT and survived ≥1 year. Comprehensive cost calculation included all direct and indirect costs from day of operation through 365 days and were inflation adjusted to 2010 US dollars. Hospital charges were converted to costs with the use of hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios and were analyzed by time segment as well as cost center. The total 1-year cost was higher in the CF-LVAD group, although this difference did not reach statistical significance ($369,519 [interquartile range [IQR] $321,020-$520,395] vs $329,648 [IQR $278,924-$395,456]; P = .242). In both groups, the index admission constituted >50% of the total 1-year cost and the major drivers of expense by cost center were organ/device acquisition, room and board, and professional fees. CONCLUSIONS: Patients surviving to 1 year on CF-LVAD support accrued costs similar to those of HT recipients; however, the total cost, at more than one-third of a million dollars, remains high. Reduction in the postoperative length of stay offers an avenue for significant cost savings.

Donation After Circulatory Death Heart Transplant: Current State and Future Directions.

Orthotopic heart transplant is the gold standard therapeutic intervention for patients with end-stage heart failure. Conventionally, heart transplant has relied on donation after brain death for organ recovery. Donation after circulatory death (DCD) is the donation of the heart after confirming that circulatory function has irreversibly ceased. DCD-orthotopic heart transplant differs from donation after brain death-orthotopic heart transplant in ways that carry implications for widespread adoption, including differences in organ recovery, storage and ethical considerations surrounding normothermic regional perfusion with DCD. Despite these differences, DCD has shown promising early outcomes, augmenting the donor pool and allowing more individuals to benefit from orthotopic heart transplant. This review aims to present the current state and future trajectory of DCD-heart transplant, examine key differences between DCD and donation after brain death, including clinical experiences and innovations in methodologies, and address the ongoing ethical challenges surrounding the new frontier in heart transplant with DCD donors.

Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for Primary Graft Dysfunction After Cardiac Transplantation: Results of an A Priori Ventless Approach.

Primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after cardiac transplantation is a devastating complication with increasing frequency lately in the setting of donation after circulatory death (DCD). Severe PGD is commonly treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) using central or peripheral cannulation. We retrospectively reviewed the outcomes of PGD after cardiac transplantation requiring ECMO support at our center from 2015 to 2020, focused on our now preferential approach using peripheral cannulation without a priori venting. During the study period, 255 patients underwent heart transplantation at our center and 26 (10.2%) of them required ECMO for PGD. Of 24 patients cannulated peripherally 19 (79%) were alive at 30 days and 17 (71%) 1 year after transplant; two additional patients underwent central ECMO cannulation due to unfavorable size of femoral vessels and concern for limb ischemia. Successful decannulation with full graft function recovery occurred in 22 of 24 (92%) patients cannulated peripherally. Six of them had an indwelling intra-aortic balloon pump placed before the transplantation. None of the other 18 patients received a ventricular vent. In conclusion, the use of an a priori peripheral and ventless ECMO approach in patients with PGD after heart transplant is an effective strategy associated with high rates of graft recovery and survival.

Impact of adverse events on ventricular assist device outcomes.

Left ventricular assist devices have been proven to be superior to medical therapy for advanced heart failure patients awaiting heart transplantation and viable alternatives to transplantation for destination therapy patients. Improvements in the design of ventricular assist devices have been rewarded by a decrease in adverse events and an increase in survival. Despite significant progress, even the latest generation left ventricular assist devices are burdened by a significant long-term adverse events profile that will increasingly challenge physicians as patients survive longer on implantable mechanical circulatory support. In this review, we analyze the impact of long-term adverse events on clinical outcomes in the major trials of continuous flow left ventricular assist devices. We discuss several of the more pertinent and interesting adverse events, examine their potential causes, and explore their future implications.

Early optical coherence tomography evaluation of donor-transmitted atherosclerosis and cardiac allograft vasculopathy: insights from a prospective, single-center study.

BACKGROUND: The impact of donor transmitted atherosclerosis as assessed by intravascular ultrasound on development and progression of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) after heart transplantation (HT) remains poorly defined in contemporary practice. In this exploratory analysis, we sought to assess the prognostic role of early qualitative assessment of donor artery morphology using optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a more sensitive imaging modality. METHODS: HT recipients were prospectively enrolled for baseline OCT imaging of the left anterior descending coronary artery. OCT findings were classified as normal, homogeneous intimal thickening, and advanced plaque characteristics. The endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or new angiographically detectable CAV stratified by the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria up to 4 years of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients underwent baseline OCT of whom 51.4% had normal OCT, 14.3% had homogenous plaque, and 34.3% had advanced characteristics. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics between patients with and without normal morphology. During a mean follow-up of 3.3 ± 0.4 years, the endpoint occurred in 11 patients including 1 death, 7 CAV1, 3 CAV2, and 1 CAV3. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a significantly higher event rate in patients with advanced characteristics (log-rank p = 0.010). In multivariate analysis, OCT-based plaque morphology was an independent predictor of clinical events (adjusted hazard ratio 4.57, 95% confidence interval 1.50-13.92, p = 0.008) while maximal intimal thickness ≥0.5 mm was not. CONCLUSIONS: Early qualitative OCT assessment of donor coronary artery morphology appears to be a reliable marker for predicting future cardiovascular events in HT recipients. Our findings warrant more careful study in a larger cohort.

Outcomes of Non-ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction During Chronic Heart Failure and End-Stage Renal Disease.

Non-ST-segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) occurs frequently in a growing population of patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) but outcomes with invasive management approaches are unknown. We sought to determine in-hospital outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in comparison with medical management only. The National Inpatient Sample was used to capture hospitalizations in the United States from 2006 to 2019. Admissions for NSTEMI in patients with chronic HF and ESRD were identified by International Classification of Diseases codes. The cohort was divided into those that received PCI or medical management only. In-hospital outcomes were compared by multivariable logistic regression and propensity matching. In 27,433 hospitalizations, 8,004 patients (29%) underwent PCI, and 19,429 (71%) were managed with medications only. PCI was associated with lower adjusted odds of death during hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.52 to 0.66, p <0.01). This association remained consistent after propensity matching (adjusted odds ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.64, p <0.01) and was apparent across all subtypes of HF. Patients with PCI had greater duration (5, 3, to 9 vs, 5, 3 to 8 days, p <0.01) and cost of hospitalization ($107,942, 70,230 to $173,182 vs, $44,156, 24,409 to $80,810, p <0.01). In conclusion, patients with HF and ESRD admitted for NSTEMI experienced lower in-hospital mortality with PCI in comparison with medical therapy only. Invasive percutaneous revascularization may be reasonable for appropriately selected patients with HF and ESRD but randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its safety and efficacy in this high-risk population.