Utilising activity patterns of a complex biophysical network model to optimise intra-striatal deep brain stimulation.

A large-scale biophysical network model for the isolated striatal body is developed to optimise potential intrastriatal deep brain stimulation applied to, e.g. obsessive-compulsive disorder. The model is based on modified Hodgkin-Huxley equations with small-world connectivity, while the spatial information about the positions of the neurons is taken from a detailed human atlas. The model produces neuronal spatiotemporal activity patterns segregating healthy from pathological conditions. Three biomarkers were used for the optimisation of stimulation protocols regarding stimulation frequency, amplitude and localisation: the mean activity of the entire network, the frequency spectrum of the entire network (rhythmicity) and a combination of the above two. By minimising the deviation of the aforementioned biomarkers from the normal state, we compute the optimal deep brain stimulation parameters, regarding position, amplitude and frequency. Our results suggest that in the DBS optimisation process, there is a clear trade-off between frequency synchronisation and overall network activity, which has also been observed during in vivo studies.

Subthalamic nucleus but not entopeduncular nucleus deep brain stimulation enhances neurogenesis in the SVZ-olfactory bulb system of Parkinsonian rats.

Introduction: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a highly effective treatment option in Parkinson's disease. However, the underlying mechanisms of action, particularly effects on neuronal plasticity, remain enigmatic. Adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone-olfactory bulb (SVZ-OB) axis and in the dentate gyrus (DG) has been linked to various non-motor symptoms in PD, e.g., memory deficits and olfactory dysfunction. Since DBS affects several of these non-motor symptoms, we analyzed the effects of DBS in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and the entopeduncular nucleus (EPN) on neurogenesis in 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA)-lesioned hemiparkinsonian rats. Methods: In our study, we applied five weeks of continuous bilateral STN-DBS or EPN-DBS in 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with stable dopaminergic deficits compared to 6-OHDA-lesioned rats with corresponding sham stimulation. We injected two thymidine analogs to quantify newborn neurons early after DBS onset and three weeks later. Immunohistochemistry identified newborn cells co-labeled with NeuN, TH and GABA within the OB and DG. As a putative mechanism, we simulated the electric field distribution depending on the stimulation site to analyze direct electric effects on neural stem cell proliferation. Results: STN-DBS persistently increased the number of newborn dopaminergic and GABAergic neurons in the OB but not in the DG, while EPN-DBS does not impact neurogenesis. These effects do not seem to be mediated via direct electric stimulation of neural stem/progenitor cells within the neurogenic niches. Discussion: Our data support target-specific effects of STN-DBS on adult neurogenesis, a putative modulator of non-motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease.