Evaluation of an Opt-Out Protocol for Antibiotic De-Escalation in Patients With Suspected Sepsis: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Sepsis guidelines recommend daily review to de-escalate or stop antibiotics in appropriate patients. This randomized, controlled trial evaluated an opt-out protocol to decrease unnecessary antibiotics in patients with suspected sepsis. METHODS: We evaluated non-intensive care adults on broad-spectrum antibiotics despite negative blood cultures at 10 US hospitals from September 2018 through May 2020. A 23-item safety check excluded patients with ongoing signs of systemic infection, concerning or inadequate microbiologic data, or high-risk conditions. Eligible patients were randomized to the opt-out protocol vs usual care. Primary outcome was post-enrollment antibacterial days of therapy (DOT). Clinicians caring for intervention patients were contacted to encourage antibiotic discontinuation using opt-out language. If continued, clinicians discussed the rationale for continuing antibiotics and de-escalation plans. To evaluate those with zero post-enrollment DOT, hurdle models provided 2 measures: odds ratio of antibiotic continuation and ratio of mean DOT among those who continued antibiotics. RESULTS: Among 9606 patients screened, 767 (8%) were enrolled. Intervention patients had 32% lower odds of antibiotic continuation (79% vs 84%; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], .47-.98). DOT among those who continued antibiotics were similar (ratio of means, 1.06; 95% CI, .88-1.26). Fewer intervention patients were exposed to extended-spectrum antibiotics (36% vs 44%). Common reasons for continuing antibiotics were treatment of localized infection (76%) and belief that stopping antibiotics was unsafe (31%). Thirty-day safety events were similar. CONCLUSIONS: An antibiotic opt-out protocol that targeted patients with suspected sepsis resulted in more antibiotic discontinuations, similar DOT when antibiotics were continued, and no evidence of harm. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT03517007.

Evaluating the incidence of acute kidney injury and gentamicin synergy dosing for endocarditis.

Objectives: Current infective endocarditis guidelines recommend two different gentamicin synergy dosing strategies for selected Gram-positive organisms. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) with gentamicin synergy dosing, comparing divided-daily and once-daily dosing strategies for infective endocarditis (IE). Methods: Groups were split into patients who received gentamicin divided-daily dosing and once-daily (3 mg/kg) dosing for Gram-positive IE. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI defined by RIFLE (risk, injury, failure, loss, end-stage renal disease) criteria after starting gentamicin. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify possible independent predictors of developing AKI. Notable secondary outcomes included hospital length of stay, need for gentamicin dose adjustments based on therapeutic drug monitoring, and assessment of each case of AKI using the Naranjo algorithm. Results: The incidence of AKI was significantly higher in the divided-daily group compared with the once-daily group (52.5% versus 13%, P < 0.01). The divided-dosing group had significantly longer median [IQR] hospital length of stay (19 days [12:29] versus 13.5 days [9:22], P < 0.01) and a greater number of patients who required dose adjustments (76.2% versus 21.7%, P < 0.01). The multivariable regression analysis showed that the divided-dosing strategy, duration and institution were independently associated with incidence of AKI. Conclusions: This analysis suggests a lower incidence of AKI in the treatment of endocarditis with gentamicin synergy dosed once-daily compared with a divided-daily dosing. Further studies are warranted to assess if there is a difference in efficacy between gentamicin synergy dosing strategies and in gentamicin compared with no gentamicin regimens for IE.

Evaluating Clinical Sequelae of the Carbapenem-Valproate Interaction: A Retrospective Analysis.

Background: Previous studies identified a rapid decrease in valproate serum concentrations when coadministered with a carbapenem; however, the specific consequences and subsequent therapy adjustments are not well described. We aimed to investigate the clinical and therapeutic implications of the carbapenem-valproate drug-drug interaction. Methods: This retrospective analysis included data from 2 large academic medical centers during January 2017 to June 2022. The primary outcome was incidence of seizures or behavioral events stratified by valproate indication. All adult patient encounters with concomitant administration of any carbapenem antimicrobial and valproate were included. Patients without prolonged exposure to valproate prior to hospitalization, without valproate levels pre- and post-carbapenem administration, with an admitting diagnosis of seizure, with exposure to other agents that decrease valproate concentrations, or who had a seizure during the hospitalization prior to carbapenem exposure were excluded. Results: Two hundred fifty-eight episodes of concomitant use among 78 unique adult patients were included. Valproate was used for seizure control in 41 patients (52.6%) and for mood-related disorders in 37 (47.4%). In those prescribed valproate for its antiepileptic properties, seizures occurred following carbapenem administration in 46.3% of encounters. In those taking valproate for mood-related disorders, 50.8% met the primary endpoint of behavioral disturbance. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates significant clinical implications of the carbapenem-valproate interaction. Clinicians should be aware of this interaction and consider alternative antimicrobial and/or antiepileptic agents whenever possible. Adding or increasing doses of antiepileptic agents and/or consultation with a neurologist prior to concomitant use should be considered when this combination cannot be avoided.

Pharmacotherapeutic Considerations in the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Infections: A Primer for Clinicians.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) can cause a variety of infections, including serious pulmonary disease. Treatment encompasses polypharmacy, with a targeted regimen of 2-5 active medications, depending on site of infection, species, and clinical characteristics. Medications may include oral, intravenous, and inhalational routes. Medication acquisition can be challenging for numerous reasons, including investigational status, limited distribution models, and insurance prior authorization. Additionally, monitoring and managing adverse reactions and drug interactions is a unique skill set. While NTM is primarily medically managed, clinicians may not be familiar with the intricacies of medication selection, procurement, and monitoring. This review offers insights into the pharmacotherapeutic considerations of this highly complex disease state, including regimen design, medication acquisition, safety monitoring, relevant drug-drug interactions, and adverse drug reactions.

Real-World Dalbavancin Use for Serious Gram-Positive Infections: Comparing Outcomes Between People Who Use and Do Not Use Drugs.

Background: Dalbavancin has been used off-label to treat invasive bacterial infections in vulnerable populations like people who use drugs (PWUD) because of its broad gram-positive coverage and unique pharmacological properties. This retrospective, multisite study examined clinical outcomes at 90 days in PWUD versus non-PWUD after secondary treatment with dalbavancin for bacteremia, endocarditis, osteomyelitis, septic arthritis, and epidural abscesses. Methods: Patients at 3 teaching hospitals who received dalbavancin for an invasive infection between March 2016 and May 2022 were included. Characteristics of PWUD and non-PWUD, infection highlights, hospital stay and treatment, and outcomes were compared using χ2 for categorical variables, t test for continuous variables, and nonparametric tests where appropriate. Results: There were a total of 176 patients; 78 were PWUD and 98 were non-PWUD. PWUD were more likely to have a patient-directed discharge (26.9% vs 3.1%; P < .001) and be lost to follow-up (20.5% vs 7.14%; P < .01). Assuming loss to follow-up did not achieve clinical cure, 73.1% of PWUD and 74.5% of non-PWUD achieved clinical cure at 90 days (P = .08). Conclusions: Dalbavancin was an effective treatment option for invasive gram-positive infections in our patient population. Despite higher rates of patient-directed discharge and loss to follow-up, PWUD had similar rates of clinical cure at 90 days compared to non-PWUD.

Dalbavancin Sequential Therapy for Gram-Positive Bloodstream Infection: A Multicenter Observational Study.

INTRODUCTION: Long-acting lipoglycopeptides such as dalbavancin may have utility in patients with Gram-positive bloodstream infections (BSI), particularly in those with barriers to discharge or who require prolonged parenteral antibiotic courses. A retrospective cohort study was performed to provide further multicenter real-world evidence on dalbavancin use as a sequential therapy for Gram-positive BSI. METHODS: One hundred fifteen patients received dalbavancin with Gram-positive BSI, defined as any positive blood culture or diagnosed with infective endocarditis, from 13 centers geographically spread across the United States between July 2015 and July 2021. RESULTS: Patients had a mean (SD) age of 48.5 (17.5) years, the majority were male (54%), with many who injected drugs (40%). The most common infection sources (non-exclusive) were primary BSI (89%), skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) (25%), infective endocarditis (19%), and bone and joint infection (17%). Staphylococcus aureus accounted for 72% of index cultures, coagulase-negative Staphylococcus accounted for 18%, and Streptococcus species in 16%. Dalbavancin started a median (Q1-Q3) of 10 (6-19) days after index culture collection. The most common regimen administered was dalbavancin 1500 mg as one dose for 50% of cases. The primary outcome of composite clinical failure occurred at 12.2%, with 90-day mortality at 7.0% and 90-day BSI recurrence at 3.5%. CONCLUSIONS: Dalbavancin may serve as a useful tool in facilitating hospital discharge in patients with Gram-positive BSI. Randomized controlled trials are anticipated to validate dalbavancin as a surrogate to current treatment standards.

Neuroinvasive Bacillus cereus Infection in Immunocompromised Hosts: Epidemiologic Investigation of 5 Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Background: Bacillus cereus is a ubiquitous gram-positive rod-shaped bacterium that can cause sepsis and neuroinvasive disease in patients with acute leukemia or neutropenia. Methods: A single-center retrospective review was conducted to evaluate patients with acute leukemia, positive blood or cerebrospinal fluid test results for B cereus, and abnormal neuroradiographic findings between January 2018 and October 2022. Infection control practices were observed, environmental samples obtained, a dietary case-control study completed, and whole genome sequencing performed on environmental and clinical Bacillus isolates. Results: Five patients with B cereus neuroinvasive disease were identified. All patients had acute myeloid leukemia (AML), were receiving induction chemotherapy, and were neutropenic. Neurologic involvement included subarachnoid or intraparenchymal hemorrhage or brain abscess. All patients were treated with ciprofloxacin and survived with limited or no neurologic sequelae. B cereus was identified in 7 of 61 environmental samples and 1 of 19 dietary protein samples-these were unrelated to clinical isolates via sequencing. No point source was identified. Ciprofloxacin was added to the empiric antimicrobial regimen for patients with AML and prolonged or recurrent neutropenic fevers; no new cases were identified in the ensuing year. Conclusions: B cereus is ubiquitous in the hospital environment, at times leading to clusters with unrelated isolates. Fastidious infection control practices addressing a range of possible exposures are warranted, but their efficacy is unknown and they may not be sufficient to prevent all infections. Thus, including B cereus coverage in empiric regimens for patients with AML and persistent neutropenic fever may limit the morbidity of this pathogen.

Impact of a pharmacy resident on a transitions of care rotation for inpatients enrolled in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program.

A novel pharmacy residency rotation was created to meet the needs of patients enrolled in an outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) program but not yet discharged from the inpatient setting. This service resulted in a high number of antimicrobial stewardship interventions identified and accepted by the primary team(s).

Contemporary Pharmacotherapies for Nontuberculosis Mycobacterial Infections: A Narrative Review.

Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are a group of atypical bacteria that may cause a spectrum of clinical manifestations, including pulmonary, musculoskeletal, skin and soft tissue, and cardiac infections. Antimycobacterial medication regimens for NTM infections require multiple agents with prolonged treatment courses and are often associated with poor tolerance in patients and suboptimal clinical outcomes. This review summarizes NTM pharmacotherapy, including treatment concepts, preferred medication regimens according to NTM species and site of infection, and emerging treatment methods for difficult-to-treat species.

Evaluation of Vancomycin Accumulation in Patients With Obesity.

Background: Current vancomycin guidelines recommend early and frequent area-under-the-curve monitoring in patients with obesity. Vancomycin's volume of distribution is likely altered in patients with obesity, which may result in lower serum concentrations initially but lead to accumulation with continued use. The objective of this study was to evaluate the incidence of vancomycin accumulation in patients with obesity and identify potential factors associated with accumulation. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective, observational study at a tertiary academic medical center. Adult patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2 and ≥ 2 vancomycin serum trough concentrations drawn in 2019 were screened for inclusion. The major endpoint was the incidence of vancomycin accumulation defined as ≥ 20% increase in trough concentration within the first 10 days of therapy. Key minor endpoints included incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and factors associated with accumulation. Results: Of the 443 patients screened, 162 were included. The median age was 56.5 years (interquartile range [IQR], 43-65.3), and 62.3% were male. The median weight was 112.7 kg (IQR, 99.8-122.6) and the median BMI was 36.8 kg/m2 (IQR, 33.1-41). The total daily dose median at initiation was 28.7 mg/kg per day (IQR, 25.4-31.2). Accumulation occurred in 99 of 162 patients (61.1%) and AKI occurred in 20 of 140 patients (14.3%). No specific factors were found to be associated with accumulation. Conclusions: Patients with obesity are likely to experience vancomycin accumulation within the first 10 days of therapy. Clinicians should use frequent monitoring of vancomycin and use caution when interpreting early concentrations in patients with obesity.

Vancomycin Area under the Concentration-Time Curve Estimation Using Bayesian Modeling versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

AIM: To evaluate the efficiency of Bayesian modeling software and first-order pharmacokinetic (PK) equations to calculate vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) estimations. METHODS: Unblinded, crossover, quasi-experimental study at a tertiary care hospital for patients receiving intravenous vancomycin. Vancomycin AUC monitoring was compared using Bayesian modeling software or first-order PK equations. The primary endpoint was the time taken to estimate the AUC and determine regimen adjustments. Secondary endpoints included the percentage of vancomycin concentrations usable for AUC calculations and acute kidney injury (AKI). RESULTS: Of the 124 patients screened, 34 patients had usable vancomycin concentrations that led to 44 AUC estimations. Without electronic health record (EHR) integration, the time from assessment to intervention in the Bayesian modeling platform was a median of 9.3 min (quartiles Q1-Q3 7.8-12.4) compared to 6.8 min (Q1-Q3 4.8-8.0) in the PK equations group (p = 0.004). With simulated Bayesian software integration into the EHR, however, the median time was 3.8 min (Q1-Q3 2.3-6.9, p = 0.019). Vancomycin concentrations were usable in 88.2% in the Bayesian group compared to 48.3% in the PK equation group and there were no cases of AKI. CONCLUSION: Without EHR integration, Bayesian software was more time-consuming to assess vancomycin dosing than PK equations. With simulated integration, however, Bayesian software was more time efficient. In addition, vancomycin concentrations were more likely to be usable for calculations in the Bayesian group.

Treating COVID-19: Evolving approaches to evidence in a pandemic.

The rapid pace of the COVID-19 pandemic precluded traditional approaches to evaluating clinical research and guidelines. We highlight notable successes and pitfalls of clinicians' new approaches to managing evidence amidst an unprecedented crisis. In "Era 1" (early 2020), clinicians relied on anecdote and social media, which democratized conversations on guidelines, but also led clinicians astray. "Era 2" (approximately late 2020 to early 2021) saw preprints that accelerated new interventions but suffered from a surfeit of poor-quality data. In the current era, clinicians consolidate the evidentiary gains of Era 2 with living, online clinical guidelines, but the public suffers from misinformation. The COVID-19 pandemic is a laboratory on how clinicians adapt to an absence of clinical guidance amidst an informational and healthcare crisis. Challenges remain as we integrate new approaches to innovations made in the traditional guideline process to confront both the long tail of COVID-19 and future pandemics.

Omadacycline for the Treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Disease: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Omadacycline is an aminomethylcycline antimicrobial approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in 2018 for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections. It has in vitro activity against nontuberculous mycobacteria, including Mycobacterium abscessus complex, but clinical data for this indication are lacking. METHODS: Omadacycline use was reviewed at an 804-bed academic medical center. Patients were included if they received omadacycline for culture-proven M abscessus disease in 2019. RESULTS: Four patients received omadacycline for the treatment of culture-positive M abscessus disease in 2019. Two patients had cutaneous disease, 1 had pulmonary disease, and 1 had osteomyelitis and bacteremia. The patients received omadacycline for a median duration of 166 days (range, 104-227) along with a combination of other antimicrobial agents. Omadacycline-containing regimens were associated with a clinical cure in 3 of 4 patients, with 1 patient improving on ongoing treatment. Omadacycline's tolerability was acceptable for patients with M abscessus disease, with 1 patient discontinuing therapy in month 6 due to nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Omadacycline is a novel oral option for the treatment of M abscessus disease, for which safe and effective options are needed. Although this case series is promising, further data are required to determine omadacycline's definitive role in the treatment of M abscessus disease.