Effect of computed tomography vs. computed tomography perfusion on mechanical thrombectomy outcomes within 6 hours.

OBJECTIVES: It is unclear which selection strategy, plain CT vs. CT perfusion (CTP), is more powerful in predicting outcome after mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aimed to compare the effect of plain CT and CTP in predicting outcome after MT within 6 h. METHODS: We conducted a prospective analysis of a retrospective cohort from our single-center study, which had occlusion of the internal carotid artery and middle cerebral artery up to the proximal M2 segment and received MT within 6 h. According to the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS), patients were divided into a high-ASPECTS group (≥ 6) and a low ASPECTS group (< 6). Similarly, patients were divided into mismatch and no-mismatch groups according to the DEFUSE3 criteria for CTP. A good outcome was defined as a 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of ≤ 3. Univariate and binary logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between different imaging modality and 90-day mRS score, and mortalities, respectively. RESULTS: The high ASPECTS group included 307 patients (89.2%). The mismatch group included 189 (54.9%) patients meeting the DEFUSE3 criterion. Compared to the low ASPECTS group, the high ASPECTS group had a good outcome (odds ratio (OR), 2.285; [95% confidence interval (CI) (1.106, 4.723)], p = 0.026) and lower mortality (OR, 0.350; [95% CI (0.163, 0.752)], p = 0.007). However, there were no significant differences in good outcomes and mortality between the mismatch and no-mismatch groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with plain CT, CTP does not provide additional benefits in the selection of patients suitable for MT within 6 h. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: CT perfusion is not superior to plain CT for the prediction of clinical outcomes when selecting patients for mechanical thrombectomy in the first 6 h. In that clinical setting, plain CT may be safe in the absence of perfusion data. KEY POINTS: • The advantage of CT perfusion (CTP) over CT in pre-mechanical thrombectomy (MT) screening has not been proven for patients with a large infarct core. • CTP is not better than plain CT in predicting good outcome following MT within 6 h. • Plain CT is sufficient for selecting patients suitable for MT within 6 h of large artery occlusion.

Association of Atrial Fibrillation with Remote Intracerebral Hemorrhage After Intravenous Thrombolysis: Results from a Multicenter Study in China.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to investigate the association between atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly newly diagnosed AF, and remote intracerebral hemorrhage (rICH) in patients with ischemic stroke who were treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). METHODS: This observational study was conducted on patients with ischemic stroke who received IVT with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator. The data were taken from a multicenter prospective registry of a Chinese population. rICH was defined as any extraischemic hemorrhage detected on computerized tomography (CT) 24 h after intravenous thrombolysis. We collected and compared the demographic data and clinical characteristics of all the patients with rICH to those of patients without any type of hemorrhagic transformation. The association between AF and rICH was analyzed using univariate analysis and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 20,697 patients were included in the study, with 1566 (7.6%) experiencing intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), 586 (2.8%) experiencing rICH, and 19,131 (92.4%) not experiencing any form of hemorrhagic transformation. Univariate analysis revealed significant differences in age, pre-thrombolysis systolic blood pressure, baseline National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, previously known AF, newly diagnosed AF, coronary heart disease, congestive heart failure, hyperhomocysteinemia, and history of thrombolysis between the rICH and control groups (P < 0.05). Further multivariate logistic regression analysis indicated that total AF (OR 1.821, 95% CI 1.082-3.065, P < 0.05), previously known AF (OR 1.470, 95% CI 1.170-1.847), and newly diagnosed AF (OR 1.920, 95% CI 1.304-2.825) were independently associated with rICH. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that AF, regardless of whether it is newly diagnosed or previously known, may be associated with the occurrence of rICH following intravenous thrombolysis. Interestingly, our findings suggest that newly diagnosed AF may have a stronger impact on rICH than previously known AF, although confirmation from more studies is needed.