RESUMO
BACKGROUND: FICare model has been evaluated mostly on the stable preterm infant.We have scaled the model to two implementation levels(basic/advanced),making it suitable for all high-risk neonates.We report on the short- and mid-term outcomes of infants enrolled in a pilot on FICare implementation at our NICU. METHODS: During 52 months study period,families were invited to join the program if their newborns' admission required neonatal specialized care for at least 3 weeks,and trained according to the program's curricula.Following a rigorous sequential admission order,each case(FICare group:134 < 34 weeks;52 term newborns)was matched by a contemporary control(CC:134 < 34 weeks;52 term newborns)and 2 historical controls born within the 3 years prior to FICare site implementation(HC:268 < 34 weeks;104 term newborns),cared as usual RESULTS: FICare intervention started by the end of first week of postnatal life.Rates of breastfeeding during admission and at discharge,and direct breastfeeding upon discharge were higher in FICare compared to CC and HC.Duration of intermediate care hospitalization(preterm and term cohorts)and total hospital length of stay (term cohorts)were shorter in FICare group.Use of Emergency Services after discharge was also lower in the FICare group CONCLUSIONS: Short and mid-term efficacy of FICare on health outcomes and family empowerment in a broader and highly-vulnerable neonatal population supports its generalization in complex healthcare neonatal services. IMPACT STATEMENT: Scaling the FICare model to the critically ill, unstable premature and term infant is feasible and safe. The early intervention shows similar benefits in the short- and mid-term infants' outcomes in the whole spectrum of neonatal specialized care.
RESUMO
This study highlights the importance of human milk in providing anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 immunity to newborns. The highest protective activity of human milk against COVID-19 was found in colostrum from infected mothers. Neutralizing activity was associated with high levels of specific IgA. Depletion of IgA, but not IgG, from milk samples completely abolished the ability of human milk to neutralize severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Neutralizantes , Anticorpos Antivirais , COVID-19 , Colostro , Imunoglobulina A , Imunoglobulina G , Leite Humano , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Leite Humano/imunologia , Leite Humano/virologia , COVID-19/imunologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , SARS-CoV-2/imunologia , Imunoglobulina A/análise , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Anticorpos Neutralizantes/imunologia , Colostro/imunologia , Recém-Nascido , Adulto , Gravidez , MãesRESUMO
While cesarean deliveries performed for health indications can save lives, unnecessary cesareans cause unjustifiable health risks for the mother, newborn, and for future pregnancies. Previous recommendations for cesarean delivery rates at a country level in the 10-15% range are currently unrealistic, and the proposed concept that striving to achieve specific rates is not important has resulted in a confusing message reaching healthcare professionals and the public. It is important to have a clear understanding of when cesarean delivery rates are deviating from internationally acceptable ranges, to trigger the implementation of healthcare policies needed to correct this problem. Based on currently existing scientific evidence, we recommend that cesarean delivery rates at a country level should be in the 15-20% range. This advice is based on the demonstration of decreased maternal and neonatal mortalities when national cesarean delivery rates rise to circa 15%, but values exceeding 20% are not associated with further benefits. It is also based on real-world experiences from northern European countries, where cesarean delivery rates in the 15-20% range are associated with some of the best maternal and perinatal quality indicators in the world. With the increase in cesarean delivery rates projected for the coming years, experience in provision of intrapartum care may come under threat in many hospitals, and recovering from this situation is likely to be a major challenge. Professional and scientific societies, together with healthcare authorities and governments need to prioritize actions to reverse the upward trend in cesarean delivery rates observed in many countries, and to strive to achieve values as close as possible to the recommended range.
Assuntos
Tocologia , Gravidez , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Humanos , Cesárea , Mães , Mortalidade Infantil , HospitaisRESUMO
Este trabajo informa acerca del proceso y los resultados del Segundo Consenso Clínico de la SIBEN (Sociedad Iberoamericana de Neonatología), en el cual 80 neonatólogos de 23 países fueron invitados a participar y colaborar. Se desarrollaron varias preguntas de importancia clínico-fisiológica sobre el manejo hemodinámico del recién nacido. Los participantes fueron distribuidos en grupos, facilitando así la interacción y el trabajo conjunto, con la consigna de responder de tres a cinco preguntas mediante el análisis de bibliografía y factores locales. El Grupo de Consenso se reunió en Mar del Plata, Argentina, donde se llevaron a cabo diversas ponencias, debates y presentaciones. En total participaron 54 neonatólogos de 21 países, con el objetivo de desarrollar un consenso sobre aspectos que incluyeron conceptos y definiciones de inestabilidad hemodinámica, la fisiopatología del cuadro de compromiso hemodinámico, las estrategias terapéuticas recomendadas y el monitoreo hemodinámico. Se espera que esta experiencia internacional sirva como una iniciativa útil tanto para la búsqueda de futuros consensos como para reducir las disparidades existentes entre los tratamientos y resultados de los diferentes países de la Región.
This study reports on the process and results of the Second Clinical Consensus of the Ibero-American Society of Neonatology. Eighty neonatologists from 23 countries were invited to collaborate and participate in the event. Several questions of clinical-physiological importance in the hemodynamic management of newborns were addressed. Participants were divided into groups to facilitate interaction and teamwork, with instructions to respond to three to five questions by analyzing the literature and local factors. Meeting in Mar del Plata, Argentina, the Consensus Group served as a form for various presentations and discussions. In all, 54 neonatologists from 21 countries attended, with the objective of reaching a consensus on such matters as concepts and definitions of hemodynamic instability, the physiopathology of hemodynamic compromise, recommended therapy strategies, and hemodynamic monitoring. It is hoped that this international experience will serve as a useful initiative for future consensus building and reduction of the existing disparities among the countries of the Region in terms of treatment and outcomes.