Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Indóis/administração & dosagem , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/tratamento farmacológico , Pirróis/administração & dosagem , Sarcoma/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Amputação Cirúrgica , Cotos de Amputação , Axila , Esquema de Medicação , Antebraço , Mãos , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Musculares/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Musculares/secundário , Sarcoma/secundário , Sarcoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/secundário , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Sunitinibe , Resultado do Tratamento , UmbigoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The favorable season for Aedes albopictus circulation has started in Europe and may lead to autochthonous transmission of Zika virus. Health care providers should be familiar with evocative clinical presentations and able to give updated information to women of reproductive age infected by Zika virus. OBSERVATIONS: We report five laboratory-confirmed Zika virus infections imported to metropolitan France from Central and South America between January and April, 2016. The five young women were not connected and not pregnant; common presentation combined a rash with persistent arthralgia. Zika virus was identified by RT-PCR from serum or urines, between two and eight days after the onset of the symptoms. CONCLUSION: As the duration of potential materno-foetal infectivity is still unknown, we were unable to answer with certitude to the patients' questions about the time interval to respect before attempting a pregnancy: one of them became pregnant one month after the diagnosis.
Assuntos
Exantema/diagnóstico , Viagem , Infecção por Zika virus/diagnóstico , Doença Aguda , Adulto , América Central , Exantema/virologia , Feminino , França , Humanos , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase , Saúde Reprodutiva , América do Sul , Zika virus/genética , Zika virus/isolamento & purificação , Infecção por Zika virus/transmissão , Infecção por Zika virus/virologiaRESUMO
After showing, as many others did, in an article published in 1987, that indomethacin administered immediately after surgery and for about 3 weeks at a dose of 75 mg/day effectively protected THA against heterotopic ossification, the authors have searched whether treatment duration could be reduced, and to investigate the existence of risk factors other than those classically known. They studied the prevalence of heterotopic ossification in two groups of THA with known risks of ossification, one with one-week prophylaxis, the other with two-week prophylaxis using Indomethacin. The results obtained were compared with a third group of THA performed during the same period, which presented no known risk of ossification and were not treated with indomethacin, and with the THAs of the initial study, where indomethacin had been administered for 3 weeks. Occurrence of heterotopic ossification was equally prevented by an 8-day course and by a longer one. No etiological, radiological or pathological risk factor other than those described in 1987 were fund (with all due caution given to hips re-operated on that had not ossified the first time): in contrast, the type or acetabular cup appears to have some influence on the occurrence of HO: uncemented prosthesis clearly favours ossification.
Assuntos
Prótese de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Indometacina/uso terapêutico , Osseointegração , Osteoartrite do Quadril/cirurgia , Acetábulo/cirurgia , Parafusos Ósseos , Feminino , Prótese de Quadril/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Osteoartrite do Quadril/tratamento farmacológico , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The authors had for aim to assess the prevalence of hepatitis B co-infection in a cohort of HIV-infected patients, routinely followed-up at the Day Care Unit of the Bobo Dioulasso Sanou Souro University Hospital, Burkina Faso. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Elisa technique was used to dose HBs antigen (AgHBs), antibodies anti-HBs and anti-HBc in all the patients followed by the biological laboratory, from October to December 2008. RESULTS: The AgHBs prevalence was 12.7% [CI at 95%: 10.7-15.0%] and men were slightly more likely to be positive for AgHBs than women (16.5% [12.0-21.9%] versus 11.6% [9.4-14.1%]; P=0.047); 83.3% of the patients [80.8-85.6%] were positive for hepatitis B core antibody, and 32.6% [29.7-35.6%] for hepatitis B surface antibody; 29.9% of the patients [27.1-32.8%] had a complete profile of former hepatitis B infection, 41.3% [38.2-44.4%] expressed core antibodies only; 13.8% [11.7-16.0%] had a negative serological test, and 2.3% [1.5-3.4%] presented a vaccinal immunity. CONCLUSION: These results stress the usefulness of screening for hepatitis B in all HIV-infected patients, along with the initial biological tests. This would help adapt HIV treatment to co-infected patients and to build an expanded program of vaccination for non-immune patients.