Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Arch Dermatol ; 139(2): 143-52, 2003 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12588220

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because outpatient surgery is being increasingly scrutinized in the lay press, it is important that dermatologists and dermatologic surgeons accurately characterize the safety of office-based surgery. Although there is abundant anecdotal evidence to support the inherent safety of dermatologic surgery, there are few data that support the safety of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) as performed by appropriately trained dermatologic surgeons in outpatient settings. DESIGN: All patients presenting for MMS micrographic surgery during the calendar year 2000 were prospectively enrolled in this study designed to evaluate the incidence of multiple complications associated with scalpel-based cutaneous surgery (postoperative hemorrhage, hematoma formation, wound infection, wound dehiscence, and flap/graft necrosis). SETTING: An academic MMS practice. PATIENTS: A total of ,1052 patients (1,358 MMS cases) were prospectively enrolled. Complete follow-up information was available for 1,343 cases (98.9%). RESULTS: Complications associated with MMS were very infrequent, with an overall complication incidence of 1.64% (22/1,343). Most surgical complications involved difficulties with hemostasis. No complications were significant enough to involve the assistance of another specialist or to require the hospitalization of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Mohs micrographic surgery is a very safe outpatient procedure when performed by appropriately trained physicians. The types of complications seen in our patients were identical to those seen in hospitalized patients described in previous studies. Our complication rates were equal to or lower than the published complication rates from specialists in other surgical disciplines.


Assuntos
Cirurgia de Mohs/efeitos adversos , Cirurgia de Mohs/métodos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Ambulatórios/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Distribuição por Sexo , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Semin Plast Surg ; 22(4): 247-56, 2008 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20567701

RESUMO

Since the inception of Mohs micrographic surgery in the 1930s, this technique has proved its utility in the treatment of cutaneous tumors. This review describes the technique of Mohs micrographic surgery and the various indications for which it is used. We discuss the use of Mohs micrographic surgery for the following cutaneous tumors: basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, melanoma in situ, dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans, Merkel cell carcinoma, microcystic adnexal carcinoma, atypical fibroxanthoma, and sebaceous carcinoma. Mohs micrographic surgery is cost effective in the U.S. health care system because billing for the surgeon-pathologist and laboratory processing is bundled together. However, Mohs micrographic surgery may be more expensive in European systems because the Mohs technique surgeon, pathologist, and laboratory fees may be billed separately.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA