Complications and imaging artifacts related to MRI in patients with intramedullary osteosynthesis after proximal femur fracture.

BACKGROUND: Fractures of the proximal femur is one of the most frequent human injuries, and most of the patients are treated with osteosynthesis, such as intramedullary nails. These patients often require magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in their further lives due to various reasons. This raises the question of whether complications with implanted osteosynthesis material such as implant loosening, burning, dislocation, or other complications are to be expected or whether an MRI examination is even suitable with regard to imaging artifacts. METHODS: The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate the rate and type of complications after MRI examinations in patients with inserted intramedullary osteosynthesis device. Furthermore, artifacts in MRI caused by this device were assessed. RESULTS: MRI scans of the head (20 of 62), spine (20 of 62), pelvis (10 of 62), and lower extremity (6/62) were performed. Three of the 62 patients received an MRI of the abdomen, and 2 of the 62 patients received an MRI of the thorax and the upper extremity. Of the 62 patients, noneexperienced complications during the immediate examination. Similarly, none of the patients showed early complications within the first 2 weeks after MRI. In our long-term follow-up examination, no long-term complication after MRI was observed in the recorded 15 patients. Artifacts were found in 14 patients: in MRI scans of the pelvis (10/10), of the abdomen (2/3), and of the lower extremity (2/6). CONCLUSION: There were no complications during the MRI scan, in the first 2 weeks after MRI, or in the recorded long-term results. MRI with an enclosed intramedullary nail provided good image quality unless the immediate implant site was imaged. MRI diagnosis is thus possible in patients with an inserted intramedullary nail. The inserted intramedullary nail should therefore not be an exclusion criterion when sectional imaging with MRI is required.

Atorvastatin donor pre-treatment in a model of brain death and allogeneic kidney transplantation in rat.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of donor pre-treatment with atorvastatin in a model of brain death followed by prolonged cold preservation and allogeneic kidney transplantation in rats. MATERIAL/METHODS: Donor rats were pre-treated with atorvastatin or vehicle 2 days prior to induction of brain death. After a brain death period of 6h kidneys were explanted and stored for 24 h at 4°C in UW solution and transplanted into allogeneic recipients. Non brain dead rats treated with vehicle were ventilated for 6h prior to explantation and served as controls. Grafts were harvested after 10 days. RESULTS: Donor treatment of brain dead organ donors with atorvastatin had no influence on renal histology (Banff score) or renal inflammation compared to vehicle treated brain dead rats 10 days after cold preservation and allogeneic transplantation. Grafts from brain dead organ donors showed severe signs of vasculopathy compared to grafts from non brain dead organ donors 10 days after prolonged cold preservation and allogeneic kidney transplantation. Kidneys harvested after brain death before cold preservation and allogeneic transplantation showed an increased infiltration of ED1 and MHCII positive cells compared to kidneys of non-brain dead animals (NBD). CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin donor pre-treatment of brain dead organ donors combined with 24h of cold preservation has no influence on graft rejection and infiltration with ED1 or MHCII positive cells in an allogeneic rat renal transplantation model. The detrimental combination of brain death and cold preservation might have overcome the possible protective effect of atorvastatin donor pre-treatment.

The additional detrimental effects of cold preservation on transplantation-associated injury in kidneys from living and brain-dead donor rats.

BACKGROUND: Brain death and cold preservation are major alloantigen-independent risk factors for transplantation outcome. The present study was conducted to assess the influence of these factors on transplantation-associated injury independently or in combination. METHODS: Brain death was induced in F344 rats. Renal grafts were harvested after 6 hr and either directly transplanted in unilateral nephrectomized Lewis recipient or subjected to 24 hr of cold preservation in University of Wisconsin solution before implantation. Allografts obtained from living donor rats were also subjected to cold preservation or not. DNA damage was assessed before implantation by terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling staining. Ten days after transplantation, renal histology was performed according to Banff '97 classification. The expressions of cytokines and adhesion molecules were analyzed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Cold preservation significantly increased the number of terminal deoxynucleotide transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling positive cells in renal allografts. Ten days after transplantation, histology revealed a higher degree of tubulitis and vasculitis scores when the grafts were subjected to cold storage. Vasculitis was aggravated when the graft was obtained from brain death (BD) donors. BD, but not cold preservation alone, was associated with papillary necrosis. This was more frequently observed after cold preservation. Immunohistology showed an increase in MHC class II+ cells after cold preservation. The combination of BD and cold preservation revealed a higher degree of VEGF and IL-10 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Our Study emphasizes that cold ischemia time should be limited when renal allografts from brain-dead donors are transplanted.