The Anatomical Course of the Superior Gluteal Vessel Bundle with Regard to Different Approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Iatrogenic vascular injury during total hip arthroplasty (THA) is rare, reported at rates of 0.05 to 0.3%, but a potentially limb-threatening and life-threatening complication. We aimed to describe safe and danger zones for the superior gluteal vessel bundle (SGV bundle) with reference to different THA approaches. METHODS: There were 27 formalin-fixed cadavers with 49 hemipelves dissected. The course and distribution of the SGV bundle were investigated with the help of anatomical landmarks like the greater trochanter, the iliac tubercle (IT), and the ischial tuberosity. RESULTS: We found and exposed the SGV bundle in all 49 specimens with no sex-specific differences. No SGV bundle was encountered up to 28 mm from the greater trochanter and up to 16 mm below the IT. The zone with the highest probability of finding the vessels was 25 to 65 mm below the IT in 39 (80%) cases - defining a danger zone (in relation to the skin incision) in the proximal fourth for the direct anterior approach, in the proximal half for the antero-lateral approach, in the proximal fifth for the direct lateral approach, and almost no danger zone for the posterior approach. CONCLUSIONS: Special care in proximal instrument placement should be taken during THA. When extending one of the surgical approaches, manipulations in the proximal, cranial surgical window should be performed with the utmost care to avoid SGV bundle injury.

The Anatomical Course of the Femoral Nerve with Regard to the Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Femoral nerve (FN) injury is noted as a serious neurological complication following total hip arthroplasty performed via a direct anterior approach (DAA). Therefore, we aimed to clarify the anatomical course of the FN around the acetabular rim and in relation to retractor placement during DAA. METHODS: According to standard protocol, a DAA for total hip arthroplasty was performed on 69 hemipelves from formalin-preserved full-body donors. The surgery was halted after retractor placement at the anterior part of the acetabulum. Then dissection was performed to expose the FN and the iliopsoas muscle. Various measurements were taken using a reference line from the anterior superior iliac spine to the acetabulum's center. A total of 6 measurement points, one every 30° from 0° to 150° along the reference line were used to determine the association between the FN and the retractor tip (RT) and the anterior acetabular rim. RESULTS: The mean distance from the RT to the FN was 22.5 millimeters (mm). The distance from the FN to the anterior acetabular rim decreased from 0 to 90°, where it was 18.8 mm, before increasing again to 27.3 mm at 150°. CONCLUSIONS: In our cadaveric study, the FN was within 11 to 36 mm of the RT. Second, we found the FN to be closest to the anterior acetabular rim at 90° and 120°. Accordingly, special care should be taken during retractor placement, and if possible, placement at 90° and 120° avoided.

The anatomical course of the sciatic nerve in relation to different approaches in total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Although sciatic nerve (SN) injury is relatively rare, it is a devastating complication after primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, precise localization of the SN is essential for arthroplasty surgeons. METHODS: We dissected 50 hemipelves from formalin-fixed cadavers. The course and location of the sciatic nerve were investigated in relation to different approaches for THA with the help of anatomical landmarks like the greater trochanter (GT), the iliac tubercle, the ischial tuberosity (IschT), the infrapiriform foramen, and the suprapiriform foramen. RESULTS: We found and exposed the sciatic nerve in all 50 specimens with no sex-specific differences. No SN was encountered up to 22 mm posterior from the GT. The zone affording the highest probability of finding the nerve was posterior to the GT between 32 and 55 mm in 39 (78%) cases, thus defining a danger zone for different approaches for the THA. CONCLUSION: Special care should be taken with posterior and deep instrument placement between the GT and IschT during THA. Moreover, manipulations in the proximal third of the posterior approach reaching deep and posteriorly should be performed with the utmost care.