Does Medialization Improve Swallowing Function in Patients with Unilateral Vocal Fold Paralysis? A Systematic Review.

Glottal incompetence caused by unilateral vocal fold paralysis (UVFP) is a common cause of dysphagia and aspiration. Treatments targeted at reducing glottal incompetence by injection augmentation or medialization thyroplasty are well established at improving voice outcomes, but improvements in swallowing function are less clear. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the impact of vocal fold medialization on dysphagia outcomes. Six electronic bibliographic databases and one clinical trial registry were searched on 3/13/2020. Our patient population were adult patients with verified UVFP that underwent vocal fold medialization. We limited review to prospective studies that had formal dysphagia assessment both before and after medialization. Nine studies met selection criteria (7 prospective case series and 2 prospective cohort studies) totaling 157 patients. The most common etiology of UVFP was iatrogenic (74/157; 47%). The majority of patients underwent injection augmentation (92/157; 59%), and the remaining underwent medialization thyroplasty. A variety of methods were used to assess changes in dysphagia including patient-reported outcome measures, flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing, videofluoroscopic swallow study, and high-resolution manometry. 7/9 studies demonstrated clinically significant improvement in swallowing function following medialization; 4/9 studies demonstrated statistically significant improvement, and three studies did not show statistically significant improvement after intervention. Study participants and outcome measures evaluating swallowing function in this review were heterogeneous. Moreover, the reviewed studies are concerning for multiple risks of bias impacting their conclusions. Taken together, this systematic review demonstrates limited evidence that injection augmentation and medialization thyroplasty improve swallowing function and/or safety.

Demographic Differences in Clinical Presentation of Pediatric Paradoxical Vocal Fold Motion (PVFM).

OBJECTIVES: Paradoxical vocal fold motion (PVFM) is involuntary closure of the vocal folds during inspiration, often presenting in children and young adults. Although common symptoms and triggers are known, differences in clinical presentation based on patient demographics are unknown. This study characterizes differences in clinical presentation of pediatric PVFM based on age, sex, and race/ethnicity. METHODS: We reviewed electronic medical records of patients 0-21 years old with PVFM based on ICD codes from 2009 to 2019 within a tertiary academic health system. Demographics, symptoms, triggers, concurrent diagnoses, and laryngoscopy findings were abstracted. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using logistic regression. RESULTS: Among 96 individuals the mean age was 10.6 years (standard deviation ±6.5) and 66 (69%) were female. In comparison to 13-21 year olds, those 0-2 years more often had PVFM observed on laryngoscopy (OR = 17.84, 95% CI: 3.14-101.51) and had less shortness of breath (OR = 0.01, 95% CI: 0.00-0.09). Those 3-12 years had more asthma (OR = 3.07, 95% CI: 1.07-8.81) and cough (OR = 6.12, 95% CI: 1.77-21.13). Both 0-2 (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.02-0.24) and 3-12 year olds (OR = 0.13, 95% CI: 0.04-0.40) presented less with activity as a trigger. Racial/ethnic minorities were more likely to present with pharyngeal findings (eg mucosal inflammation, adenotonsillar hypertrophy) on laryngoscopy (OR = 4.58, 95% CI: 1.45-15.37) compared to non-Hispanic Whites. Differences in clinical presentation by sex were not observed. CONCLUSION: We identified several differences in symptoms, triggers, and laryngoscopy findings in pediatric PVFM based on age and race/ethnicity. Associations between sex and clinical presentation were not observed.

Speech Language Pathology Rehabilitation.

The speech language pathologist has a vital management role in patients with voice and swallow concerns, as well as stroke patients and patients with fluency problems. This article summarizes the variety of speech and swallow rehabilitation that adult patients may require or seek. The case examples allow the reader to base the clinical decision-making process within the context of a patient presentation and elucidate the role of speech and language pathology services for the primary care provider in order to refer patients with symptoms and concerns to the right provider early in their medical care.

Speech-language pathology care and short- and long-term outcomes of oropharyngeal cancer treatment in the elderly.

OBJECTIVE: To examine associations between speech-language pathology (SLP) care and pretreatment variables, short-term and long-term swallowing and airway impairment, and survival in elderly patients treated for oropharyngeal squamous cell cancer (SCCA). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare data. METHODS: We evaluated longitudinal data from 666 patients diagnosed with oropharyngeal SCCA from 2004 to 2007 using cross-tabulations, multivariate logistic regression, and survival analysis. RESULTS: SLP care was documented in 25% of patients. High-volume hospital care (odds ratio (OR) = 3.2 [1.0-10.0]) and dysphagia during treatment (OR = 13.0 [3.6-47.1]) were the only significant predictors of SLP care during the initial treatment period. SLP care was significantly more likely during the first year (OR = 5.3 [3.1-9.1]) and second year (OR = 4.5 [2.4-8.2]) following initial treatment. Subsequent dysphagia (OR = 32.5 [16.9-62.4]), stricture (OR = 2.2 [1.2-4.0]), gastrostomy (OR = 1.7 [1.1-2.7]), and tracheostomy tube use (OR = 2.4 [1.2-4.8]) were significantly associated with long-term SLP care. After controlling for patient, tumor, and treatment-related variables, SLP care was associated with significant relative attenuation of the OR for dysphagia (93%), stricture (35%), weight loss (8%), and airway obstruction (34%). Survival analysis, controlling for all other variables, demonstrated improved survival for patients under SLP care (hazard ratio = 0.73 [0.57-0.95]). CONCLUSION: SLP care is underutilized in elderly oropharyngeal SCCA patients and largely utilized after the onset of impaired airway and swallowing function, but is associated with improved outcomes. These data suggest a need for treatment guidelines that incorporate the routine use of SLP care in this population during the initial treatment period and beyond. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2c. Laryngoscope, 128:1403-1411, 2018.