Intrinsic Aqueous Solubility: Mechanistically Transparent Data-Driven Modeling of Drug Substances.

Intrinsic aqueous solubility is a foundational property for understanding the chemical, technological, pharmaceutical, and environmental behavior of drug substances. Despite years of solubility research, molecular structure-based prediction of the intrinsic aqueous solubility of drug substances is still under active investigation. This paper describes the authors' systematic data-driven modelling in which two fit-for-purpose training data sets for intrinsic aqueous solubility were collected and curated, and three quantitative structure-property relationships were derived to make predictions for the most recent solubility challenge. All three models perform well individually, while being mechanistically transparent and easy to understand. Molecular descriptors involved in the models are related to the following key steps in the solubility process: dissociation of the molecule from the crystal, formation of a cavity in the solvent, and insertion of the molecule into the solvent. A consensus modeling approach with these models remarkably improved prediction capability and reduced the number of strong outliers by more than two times. The performance and outliers of the second solubility challenge predictions were analyzed retrospectively. All developed models have been published in the QsarDB.org repository according to FAIR principles and can be used without restrictions for exploring, downloading, and making predictions.

Binary and multi-class classification for androgen receptor agonists, antagonists and binders.

Androgens and androgen receptor regulate a variety of biological effects in the human body. The impaired functioning of androgen receptor may have different adverse health effects from cancer to infertility. Therefore, it is important to determine whether new chemicals have any binding activity and act as androgen agonists or antagonists before commercial use. Due to the large number of chemicals that require experimental testing, the computational methods are a viable alternative. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to develop predictive QSAR models for classifying compounds according to their activity at the androgen receptor. A large data set of chemicals from the CoMPARA project was used for this purpose and random forest classification models have been developed for androgen binding, agonistic, and antagonistic activity. In addition, a unique effort has been made for multi-class approach that discriminates between inactive compounds, agonists and antagonists simultaneously. For the evaluation set, the classification models predicted agonists with 80% of accuracy and for the antagonists' and binders' the respective metrics were 72% and 78%. Combining agonists, antagonists and inactive compounds into a multi-class approach added complexity to the modelling task and resulted to 64% prediction accuracy for the evaluation set. Considering the size of the training data sets and their imbalance, the achieved evaluation accuracy is very good. The final classification models are available for exploring and predicting at QsarDB repository (https://doi.org/10.15152/QDB.236).

CoMPARA: Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity.

BACKGROUND: Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) are xenobiotics that mimic the interaction of natural hormones and alter synthesis, transport, or metabolic pathways. The prospect of EDCs causing adverse health effects in humans and wildlife has led to the development of scientific and regulatory approaches for evaluating bioactivity. This need is being addressed using high-throughput screening (HTS) in vitro approaches and computational modeling. OBJECTIVES: In support of the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) led two worldwide consortiums to virtually screen chemicals for their potential estrogenic and androgenic activities. Here, we describe the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA) efforts, which follows the steps of the Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project (CERAPP). METHODS: The CoMPARA list of screened chemicals built on CERAPP's list of 32,464 chemicals to include additional chemicals of interest, as well as simulated ToxCast™ metabolites, totaling 55,450 chemical structures. Computational toxicology scientists from 25 international groups contributed 91 predictive models for binding, agonist, and antagonist activity predictions. Models were underpinned by a common training set of 1,746 chemicals compiled from a combined data set of 11 ToxCast™/Tox21 HTS in vitro assays. RESULTS: The resulting models were evaluated using curated literature data extracted from different sources. To overcome the limitations of single-model approaches, CoMPARA predictions were combined into consensus models that provided averaged predictive accuracy of approximately 80% for the evaluation set. DISCUSSION: The strengths and limitations of the consensus predictions were discussed with example chemicals; then, the models were implemented into the free and open-source OPERA application to enable screening of new chemicals with a defined applicability domain and accuracy assessment. This implementation was used to screen the entire EPA DSSTox database of ∼875,000 chemicals, and their predicted AR activities have been made available on the EPA CompTox Chemicals dashboard and National Toxicology Program's Integrated Chemical Environment. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP5580.

Best Practices for QSAR Model Reporting: Physical and Chemical Properties, Ecotoxicity, Environmental Fate, Human Health, and Toxicokinetics Endpoints.

BACKGROUND: Quantitative and qualitative structure­activity relationships (QSARs) have been used to understand chemical behavior for almost a century. The main source of QSAR models is the scientific literature, but the open question is how well these models are documented. OBJECTIVES: The main aim of this study was to critically analyze the publication practices of QSARs with regard to transparency, potential reproducibility, and independent verification. The focus was on the level of technical completeness of the published QSARs. METHODS: A total of 1,533 QSAR articles reporting 79 individual endpoints, mostly in environmental and health science, were reviewed. The QSAR parameters required for technical completeness were grouped into five categories: chemical structures, experimental endpoint values, descriptor values, mathematical representation of the model, and predicted endpoint values. The data were summarized and discussed using Circos plots. RESULTS: Altogether, 42.5% of the reviewed articles were found to be potentially reproducible. The potential reproducibility for different endpoint groups varied; the respective rates were 39% for physical and chemical properties, 52% for ecotoxicity, 56% for environmental fate, 30% for human health, and 32% for toxicokinetics. The reproducibility of QSARs is discussed and placed in the context of the reproducibility of the experimental methods. Included are 65 references to open QSAR datasets as examples of models restored from scientific articles. DISCUSSION: Strikingly poor documentation of QSARs was observed, which reduces the transparency, availability, and consequently, the application of research results in scientific, industrial, and regulatory areas. A list of the components needed to ensure the best practices for QSAR reporting is provided, allowing long-term use and preservation of the models. This list also allows an assessment of the reproducibility of models by interested parties such as journal editors, reviewers, regulators, evaluators, and potential users. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP3264.