Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Revista
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lupus ; 28(11): 1344-1349, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31551028

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether remission and low disease activity state protect systemic lupus erythematosus patients from being hospitalized. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients from the Almenara Lupus Cohort were included. Visits were performed every 6 months. Variables were measured at each visit. Hospitalizations were evaluated in the interval between two visits. Remission was defined as: a SLEDAI-2 K of 0, prednisone ≤5 mg/day and immunosuppressants on maintenance dose; low disease activity state as: a SLEDAI-2 K of ≤4, prednisone ≤7.5 mg/day and immunosuppressants on maintenance dose. Univariable and multivariable interval-censored survival regression models were used. In multivariable analysis, possible confounders were gender, age at diagnosis, socioeconomic status, educational level, disease duration, antimalarial use, the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology damage index (SDI) and Charlson comorbidity index. Confounders were determined in the same visit as disease activity state. RESULTS: Of the 308 patients, 92.5% of them (n = 285) were women, had a mean age at diagnosis of 34.8 (13.4) years and a disease duration of 7.7 (6.5) years. At baseline the mean SDI was 1.13 (1.34). A total of 163 of the patients were hospitalized. In the multivariable analysis remission (hazard ratio 0.445 (0.274-0.725), P = 0.001) and low disease activity state (relative risk 0.504 (0.336-0.757), P = 0.001) at baseline were found to decrease the risk of hospitalization in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. A total of 158 hospitalizations presented a discernible cause. Disease activity was the most common cause of hospitalization, with 84 admissions (53.16%), the majority, 38, was due to active kidney disease (45.23%). CONCLUSION: Remission and low disease activity state decreased the risk of hospitalizations in these systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Disease activity, particularly renal, was the most frequent cause of hospitalization.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Nefropatias/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Indução de Remissão , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Adulto Jovem
2.
Lupus ; 28(9): 1101-1110, 2019 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31291843

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of this study was to identify factors predictive of serious infections over time in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). METHODS: A multi-ethnic, multi-national Latin American SLE cohort was studied. Serious infection was defined as one that required hospitalization, occurred during a hospitalization or led to death. Potential predictors included were sociodemographic factors, clinical manifestations (per organ involved, lymphopenia and leukopenia, independently) and previous infections at baseline. Disease activity (SLEDAI), damage (SLICC/ACR Damage Index), non-serious infections, glucocorticoids, antimalarials (users and non-users), and immunosuppressive drugs use; the last six variables were examined as time-dependent covariates. Cox regression models were used to evaluate the predictors of serious infections using a backward elimination procedure. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of the 1243 patients included, 1116 (89.8%) were female. The median (interquartile range) age at diagnosis and follow-up time were 27 (20-37) years and 47.8 (17.9-68.6) months, respectively. The incidence rate of serious infections was 3.8 cases per 100 person-years. Antimalarial use (hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.48-0.99; p = 0.0440) was protective, while doses of prednisone >15 and ≤60 mg/day (hazard ratio: 4.18; 95 %CI: 1.69-10.31; p = 0.0019) and >60 mg/day (hazard ratio: 4.71; 95% CI: 1.35-16.49; p = 0.0153), use of methylprednisolone pulses (hazard ratio: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.10-2.13; p = 0.0124), increase in disease activity (hazard ratio: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.01-1.04; p = 0.0016) and damage accrual (hazard ratio: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.11-1.34; p < 0.0001) were predictive factors of serious infections. CONCLUSIONS: Over time, prednisone doses higher than 15 mg/day, use of methylprednisolone pulses, increase in disease activity and damage accrual were predictive of infections, whereas antimalarial use was protective against them in SLE patients.


Assuntos
Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Antimaláricos/administração & dosagem , Estudos de Coortes , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Feminino , Seguimentos , Glucocorticoides/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Imunossupressores/administração & dosagem , Infecções/etiologia , América Latina , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Prednisona/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Proteção , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Adulto Jovem
3.
Lupus ; 26(6): 650-655, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27558795

RESUMO

Objective The objective of this study was to determine the association of disease expression patterns with demographic and clinical characteristics in SLE. Methods Patients from a multi-ethnic SLE cohort were included. Disease expression patterns were defined as acute SLE and insidious SLE; this group was divided into those who accrued three ACR criteria and then accrued the fourth (insidious pattern A) and those who have one or two and then accrued four criteria (insidious pattern B). Disease activity was ascertained with the SLAM-R and disease damage with SLICC/ACR damage index. Variables were compared using analysis of variance for numeric variables and χ2 for categorical variables. Multivariable analyses adjusting for possible confounders were performed. Results Six hundred and forty patients were included; the most frequent pattern was the insidious pattern B, with 415 (64.8%) patients, followed by the acute SLE group with 115 (18.0%) and the insidious pattern A with 110 (17.2%) patients. Patients from the insidious pattern A were older at diagnosis (pattern A: 39.8 vs pattern B: 36.7 vs acute: 32.4 years; p < 0.0001), more educated (13.6 vs 13.1 vs 12.1; p = 0.0008) and with a less active disease at baseline (8.8 vs 9.2 vs 10.7; p = 0.0227). Caucasian and Hispanic (Puerto Rico) ethnicities were overrepresented in this group (40.0% vs 27.7% vs 19.1% and 18.2% vs 17.1% vs 9.6%; p = 0.0003). Conclusions More insidious onset is associated with older age, Caucasian ethnicity, higher level of education, and lower disease activity than those with acute onset. However, after multivariable analyses, disease activity was not associated with any disease expression pattern.


Assuntos
Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/classificação , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Feminino , Humanos , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/etnologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Estados Unidos/etnologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA