Surgical aortic valve replacement in elderly patients: effects on physical performance, cognitive function and health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is still the gold standard for treating aortic valve stenosis (AVS). Its effectiveness has been extensively examined in terms of perioperative mortality, but its impact on overall health has received much less attention. AIMS: To assess the physical performance, cognitive status, and health-related quality of life of elderly patients undergoing SAVR, in the short, medium and long term. METHODS: This single-center prospective study enrolled patients aged > 70 years who underwent isolated SAVR for severe AVS. Data were collected on each participant's clinical status, physical performance, cognitive status, mood, and health-related quality of life. This multidimensional geriatric assessment was performed before surgery (T0), and again at 45 days (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) post-surgery. Baseline (T0) and follow-up (T2-T4) data were compared separately for patients grouped by gender using paired t-tests. RESULTS: Data from a total of 35 patients were analyzed. Compared with the baseline (T0), nutritional status worsened at T1, then gradually improved through to T4. Physical performance, mood, and health-related quality of life improved significantly after surgery. Cognitive function showed no change through to T3, but then deteriorated at T4. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that SAVR in patients over 70 years of age has a positive impact on nutrition, mood, and health-related quality of life. Cognitive function was not negatively affected in the short and medium term, although it deteriorated in the long term. SAVR also had a positive impact on the physical performance of our sample.

Low fetal age is not a contraindication for extracorporeal membranous oxygenation in COVID-19-related ARDS.

INTRODUCTION: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) causes a small proportion of patients to be admitted to intensive care units, where they sometimes require extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The literature on pregnant women with COVID-19 who require ECMO is sparse. CASE REPORT: We describe here the earliest-fetal-age pregnant patient with COVID-19 who underwent ECMO yet reported, who kept her child while under close follow-up with magnetic resonance imagery and ultrasound. CONCLUSION: The management of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in pregnant women, including ARDS secondary to COVID-19 and those cases which are not eligible for fetal delivery, may benefit from the assistance of ECMO even in the early pregnancy.

Evaluation of the "release and perfuse technique" for aortic arch surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The hypothermic circulatory arrest is a major limitation of the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique, associated with a high incidence of postoperative mobility and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes of patients suffering from different aortic arch diseases treated with the release and perfuse technique (RPT). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who had undergone aortic arch repair with the RPT at our Institution between October 2019 and September 2021. Preoperative, intra-operative, and postoperative data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients undergoing aortic arch surgery with the use of RPT were analyzed. Twelve of them (67%) were males, and the median age of the entire cohort was 67 (56-73) years. The primary indications for surgery included acute type A aortic dissection (50%), chronic type B aortic dissection (33%), and chronic aneurysms (17%). The median cardiopulmonary bypass-, aortic cross-clamp- and circulatory arrest times were 163 (147-213) min, 69 (51-120) min, and 10 (8-13) min, respectively. The median intensive care unit and hospital stay were 4 (2-7) and 12 (11-16) days, respectively. One patient (6%) died during the first 30 days after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Considering the anatomical limitations related to the use of this technique, the RPT can be safely performed and could represent a promising strategy to reduce the circulatory arrest time during aortic arch surgery. Nevertheless, further studies are required to demonstrate its efficacy.

Preliminary results of a simplified aortic valve-sparing technique: A feasibility study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: To evaluate whether the simplified valve-sparing technique (SVST) implies clinical outcomes comparable or not with those of established David technique in the surgery of aortic root. METHODS: We collected the records of patients who had undergone aortic root surgery with the SVST or standard David technique (SDT) at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. The primary endpoints were the incidence of all-cause death, reoperation for any reason, and postoperative complications. The secondary endpoint was the midterm incidence of reoperation for aortic valve regurgitation. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients who underwent aortic root surgery were analyzed. SDT and SVST were performed in 48 (28.4%) and in 121 (71.6%) patients, respectively. Thirty-day mortality occurred in 0% and 0.8% of patients in the SDT and SVST groups, respectively. The rate of postoperative new permanent pacemaker implantation was 6.3% (three patients) and 0.8% (one patient) in SDT and SVST cohort, respectively (p = .07). The incidence of postoperative thromboembolic stroke was 6.3% and 2.5% in SDT and SVST groups, respectively (p = .23). The median follow-up time was 29 (23-47) months. During the FU period, no differences were found between two cohorts in terms of all-cause mortality (p = .99), the incidence of reoperation (p = .19), and incidence of aortic valve regurgitation requiring reoperation (p = .58). CONCLUSIONS: The SVST appears to be safe and feasible showing early clinical results comparable to the SDT. Nevertheless, further studies with larger series and long-term follow-ups are required to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

Biventricular assistance with 2 hm3 in a small chest patient: extra-pericardial implant.

We describe the clinical course and treatment of a 53-year-old female, with small chest dimensions, referred to our institution for a primary cardiogenic shock. The patient underwent an on-pump left ventricular assist-device (VAD) implantation with the aid of immediate post-operative paracorporeal right-VAD assistance for an acute right ventricular failure. After two unsuccessful weaning attempts, she underwent extrapericardial HM 3 RVAD implantation.

COVID-19 infection in left ventricular assist device patients.

We describe two cases of favorable and unexpected recovery in positive patients with coronavirus disease 2019, suffering from multiorgan comorbidity and already assisted with the left ventricular assist device. We have observed that, although in the presence of more comorbidities, when the maintenance of a valid support of the cardiovascular function is guaranteed, the possibility of successfully overcoming the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection is still alive.

Use of rapid-deployment aortic valve prosthesis and patch reconstruction in complex endocarditis.

We describe the case of a 59-year-old female affected by aortic extensive endocarditis with communication between aortic annulus and right cavities, treated with double pericardial patch reconstruction and rapid-deployment aortic valve prosthesis implantation.

Left ventricle reconstruction and heartmate3 implantation. The "double patch technique".

BACKGROUND: HeartMate 3 is a left ventricular assist device, composed of a centrifugal pump. It can be applied as a myocardial recovery, a bridge to transplant, or a destination therapy, in the treatment of patients with left ventricular heart failure. METHODS: Herein we describe a technique applied against a giant aneurysmal dilatation, which combines a surgical device implantation and a left ventricular reconstruction using a double patch. RESULTS: The patch minimizes thrombotic risk thanks to its internal bovine pericardium layer, which is in contact with blood. CONCLUSIONS: The outlined technique is relatively reproducible and safe in a selected group of patients, as it employs a high-quality device and enables the restoration of an appropriate ventricular geometry.

Surgical repair of aortic coarctation in pediatric age: A single center two decades experience.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate early and long-term results of surgical treatment of aortic coarctation (CoAo) in infants and children. METHODS: A retrospective clinical review of patients less than 18 years with CoAo, undergoing surgery between 1995 and 2015. Data were retrieved from our institutional database, to identify preoperative and postoperative characteristics. Statistical analysis was performed by bivariate, Cox's, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Three hundred forty-one consecutive patients (male/female: 192/149; the median age at surgery of 25 days; interquartile range [IQR], 10-143 days) were included; 187 patients were less than 1 month (54.9%); 276 underwent extended end-to-end anastomosis (EEEA) (80.9%). Hypoplastic aortic arch (HAA) occurred in 34.6% and bicuspid aortic valve in 21.1%. The isolated type was present in 249 (73.0%). Significant postoperative complications occurred in 5.6%. Thirty-day mortality was 1.4%. At a median follow-up of 10.2 years (IQR, 6-15 years; FU completeness, 91.2%), there were eight late deaths (2.6%), most in the complex type. Among 298 survivors, 284 (95.3%) were in NYHA class I; 10 (3.0%) were on antihypertensive treatment. Reinterventions on aortic arch occurred only in 4.5%, being HAA a significant risk factor for reoperation ( P = 0.00173). Freedom from mortality and reintervention on aorta at 21 years were 93.5% and 93.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical repair of CoAo by EEEA without CPBP is a safe and low-risk procedure, concerning either early or late outcomes, despite the presence of HAA and neonatal age can influence recoarctation. Most patients are clinically well in the long-term, and only a few require antihypertensive therapy.

Comparison of Transcarotid vs. Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the carotid artery has been used as an alternative approach for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The aim of this study was to prove the safety and feasibility of transcarotid (TC) vs. transfemoral (TF) TAVI. Methods and Results: This retrospective study enrolled 726 consecutive patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis. All patients underwent TC-TAVI or TF-TAVI at Hôpital Haut-Lévèque, Bordeaux Heart University Hospital between September 2012 and October 2017. The TC-TAVI (n=83) and TF-TAVI (n=643) groups were compared statistically. The EuroSCORE II was significantly higher (8.2±6.7 vs. 6.4±5.5; P=0.007) and rates of current smoking, dyslipidemia and peripheral arterial disease were higher in the TC-TAVI than TF-TAVI group. All TC-TAVIs and 9.3% of TF-TAVIs were performed under general anesthesia. Radiation time was significantly shorter in the TC-TAVI than TF-TAVI group (14.5±6.0 vs. 23.0±10.8 min; P<0.001). Postimplant balloon valvuloplasty was performed more frequently in the TF-TAVI than TC-TAVI group (7.2% vs. 19.4%; P=0.006). Postoperative echocardiographic data were similar between the 2 groups, and there were no significant differences in 30-day mortality (8.4% vs. 5.0%; P=0.189) or stroke rate (1.2% vs. 2.6%; P=0.428) between the TF-TAVI and TC-TAVI groups. CONCLUSIONS: The feasibility and 30-day safety of TC-TAVI and TF-TAVI are similar. When TF-TAVI is not suitable anatomically for a particular patient, TC-TAVI is a preferable alternative.

Aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprosthesis in case of infective endocarditis: a literature review.

Purpose: Recently, the use of rapid deployment (RD) aortic valve prostheses has been introduced for the treatment of aortic valve replacement (AVR), showing excellent hemodynamic performances.According to these data, some groups have proposed new RD valves as an alternative solution in the case of infective aortic endocarditis (IAE) to reduce the use of foreign materials, and the manipulation of the annulus.The aim of this review is to report the results of early clinical experiences with the use of RD bioprostheses in the case of IAE, in order to discuss technical and clinical aspects of this emerging strategy to better elucidate its advantages and limitations as a potential therapeutic solution. Methods: An in-depth search of PubMed from January to March 2023 was performed. English-language articles were selected independently by authors following the criteria in order to consider all available experiences (full papers, case reports, and case series) that have investigated the use of RD in case of IAE. Results: The use of rapid deployment bioprosthesis represents a bailout strategy in case of severe aortic valve endocarditis and should be evaluated with caution in selected cases. This review collects the first, initial, and pioneering experiences of the use of the RD prosthesis in case of infective endocarditis, particularly when the fragility of the annular tissues precludes a secure anchoring of sutured prostheses.The reduced use of foreign materials by minimizing the number of stitches, the reduced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times, and the excellent hemodynamic performances associated with the use of RD bioprosthesis represent the most important advantages that could justify their use in the setting of aortic valve endocarditis. Conclusion: Although there are few anecdotal experiences, surgical aortic valve replacement with the use of RD represents an emerging strategy in case of aortic valve endocarditis. Its advantages, pros, and cons are under debate, and robust clinical trials are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

ECMO Alone Versus ECPELLA in Patients Affected by Cardiogenic Shock: The Multicenter EVACS Study.

The objective was to investigate the outcomes of concomitant venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and left ventricular unloading with Impella (ECPELLA) compared with ECMO alone to treat patients affected by cardiogenic shock. Data from patients needing mechanical circulatory support from 4 international centers were analyzed. Of 438 patients included, ECMO alone and ECPELLA were adopted in 319 (72.8%) and 119 (27.2%) patients, respectively. Propensity score matching analysis identified 95 pairs. In the matched cohort, 30-day mortality rates in the ECMO and ECPELLA were 49.5% and 43.2% ( P = 0.467). The incidences of complications did not differ significantly between groups ( P = 0.877, P = 0.629, P = 1.000, respectively). After a median follow-up of 0.18 years (interquartile range 0.02-2.55), the use of ECPELLA was associated with similar mortality compared with ECMO alone (hazard ratio 0.81, 95% confidence interval 0.54-1.20, P = 0.285), with 1-year overall survival rates of 51.3% and 46.6%, for ECPELLA and ECMO alone, respectively. ECMO alone and ECPELLA are both effective strategies in patients needing mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock, showing similar rates of early and mid-term survival.

Endoventricular circular patch repair: the "Dor procedure".

Although during recent decades the prompt clinical management of myocardial infarction has significantly reduced the incidence of mechanical complications, post-infarction heart failure is still an open issue. The surgical ventricular reconstruction technique, also called the "Dor procedure", was introduced as a surgical strategy to reduce left ventricular volume and restore its shape and function by performing an endoventricular circular patch plasty. Although its use was not clearly beneficial, there is growing evidence from specialized centres suggesting its safety and efficacy, thus bringing this technique back to a leading role in the surgical armamentarium to treat patients with heart failure. The objective of this work was to present a step-by-step explanation of the Dor procedure as a landmark for all surgeons who want to perform it.

Impact of Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) minor access site vascular complications in patients undergoing percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 minor access site vascular complications (VCs) in patients who underwent percutaneous transfemoral (TF) transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: This single-centre retrospective study included consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous TF-TAVI from 2009 to 2021. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to compare early and long-term clinical results between patients with VC and without VC (nVC). RESULTS: A total of 2161 patients were included, of whom 284 (13.1%) experienced access site VC. Propensity score analysis allowed to match 270 patients from the VC group with 727 patients from the nVC group. In the matched cohorts, the VC group showed longer operative times (63.5 vs 50.0 min, P < 0.001), higher operative and in-hospital mortality (2.6% vs 0.7%, P = 0.022; and 6.3% vs 3.2%, P = 0.040, respectively), longer hospital length of stay (8 vs 7 days, P = 0.001) and higher rates of blood transfusion (20.4% vs 4.3%, P < 0.001) and infectious complications (8.9% vs 3.8%, P = 0.003). Overall survival during follow-up was significantly lower in the VC group (hazard ratio 1.37, 95% CI 1.03-1.82, P = 0.031) with 5-year survival rates being 58.0% (95% CI 49.5-68.0%) and 70.7% (95% CI 66.2-75.5%) for the VC and nVC groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study observed that minor access site VCs during percutaneous TF-TAVI can be serious events affecting early and long-term outcomes.

Long-term outcomes of concomitant suture bicuspidization technique to treat mild or moderate tricuspid regurgitation in patients undergoing mitral valve surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term outcomes of concomitant suture bicuspidization to treat mild or moderate tricuspid regurgitation at the time of mitral valve (MV) surgery. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent MV surgery for degenerative MV regurgitation with mild or moderate tricuspid regurgitation and annular dilatation between January 2009 and December 2017 were analysed. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: mitral valve surgery alone (MVA) and MV surgery with concomitant tricuspid valve (TV) repair. RESULTS: A total of 196 patients were included in the study. MVA and MV surgery with concomitant TV repair were performed in 91 (46.4%) and 105 (53.6%) patients, respectively. Propensity score matching analysis identified 54 pairs. In the matched cohort, 30-day mortality (0.0% vs 1.9%, P = 1.0) and new permanent pacemaker implantation (11.1% vs 7.4%, P = 0.740) did not differ significantly between groups. After a mean follow-up of 6.0 (2.8) years, MV surgery with concomitant TV repair was not associated with increased mortality risk compared to MVA (hazard ratio 1.04, 95% confidence interval 0.47-2.28, P = 0.927) with 10-year overall survival rates of 69.9% and 77.2%, respectively. Furthermore, MV surgery with concomitant TV repair was associated with a significantly reduced progression of TV regurgitation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing MV surgery with concomitant TV repair had similar 30-day and long-term survival, similar permanent pacemaker implantation rate and reduced progression of TV regurgitation compared to those undergoing MVA.