Cytopathologists can reliably perform ultrasound-guided thyroid fine needle aspiration: a 1-year audit on 3715 consecutive cases.

OBJECTIVE: In our Pathology Department, fine needle aspiration (FNA) of palpable thyroid nodules is performed by cytopathologists who ensure correct sample management and rapid on-site evaluation (ROSE). Conversely, ultrasound (US)-guided FNAs have traditionally been carried out by endocrinologists and radiologists in outside clinics, where the presence of a cytopathologist is not always feasible. To overcome this limitation, cytopathologists have started to perform US-guided FNAs themselves. This study retrospectively evaluates 1 year of this novel practice. METHODS: A total of 2225 US-guided FNAs were performed in our clinic by cytopathologists, whereas 1490 aspirates were taken by a group of non-cytopathologists. Among these, 756 FNAs were taken by a single experienced endocrinologist. The distribution of the Bethesda classification categories was evaluated in each of these groups. RESULTS: FNAs performed by cytopathologists were more often diagnostic and better prepared than those taken by non-cytopathologists, including those taken by the experienced endocrinologist (P < 0.01). The latter operator yielded a higher rate of suspicious and malignant FNAs, reflecting a more appropriate clinical triage of worrisome nodules. CONCLUSION: Although the endocrinologist's evaluation is crucial to select clinically relevant thyroid nodules, cytopathologists can reliably perform US guidance in addition to their traditional expertise in sampling, specimen preparation and ROSE.

The prognostic impact of tumor mutational burden (TMB) in the first-line management of advanced non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The role of tumor mutational burden (TMB) is still debated for selecting advanced non-oncogene addicted non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who might benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Of note, TMB failed to predict a benefit in overall survival (OS) among such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to compare efficacy outcomes among first-line immune-oncology (IO) agents versus standard platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) within two subgroups (TMB-low and TMB-high on either tissue or blood). We collected hazard ratios (HRs) to evaluate the association for progression-free survival (PFS) and OS, with the relative 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Risk ratios (RRs) were used as an association measure for objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: Eight different cohorts of five randomized controlled phase III studies (3848 patients) were analyzed. In TMB-high patients, IO agents were associated with improved ORR (RRs 1.37, 95% CI 1.13-1.66), PFS (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.79) and OS (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.59-0.77) when compared with CT, thus suggesting a possible predictive role of high TMB for IO regimens. In TMB-low patients, the IO strategy did not lead to any significant benefit in survival and activity, whereas the pooled results of both ORR and PFS were intriguingly associated with a statistical significance in favor of CT. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis resulted in a proven benefit in OS in favor of IO agents in the TMB-high population. Although more prospective data are warranted, we postulated the hypothesis that monitoring TMB, in addition to the existing programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level, could represent the preferable option for future clinical research in the first-line management of advanced non-oncogene addicted NSCLC patients.