Dynamics of F-actin prefigure the structure of butterfly wing scales.

The wings of butterflies and moths consist of dorsal and ventral epidermal surfaces that give rise to overlapping layers of scales and hairs (Lepidoptera, "scale wing"). Wing scales (average length ~200 µm) are homologous to insect bristles (macrochaetes), and their colors create the patterns that characterize lepidopteran wings. The topology and surface sculpture of wing scales vary widely, and this architectural complexity arises from variations in the developmental program of the individual scale cells of the wing epithelium. One of the more striking features of lepidopteran wing scales are the longitudinal ridges that run the length of the mature (dead) cell, gathering the cuticularized scale cell surface into pleats on the sides of each scale. While also present around the periphery of other insect bristles and hairs, longitudinal ridges in lepidopteran wing scales gain new significance for their creation of iridescent color through microribs and lamellae. Here we show the dynamics of the highly organized F-actin filaments during scale cell development, and present experimental manipulations of actin polymerization that reveal the essential role of this cytoskeletal component in wing scale elongation and the positioning of longitudinal ribs.

Profiles of minimally verbal autistic children: Illuminating the neglected end of the spectrum.

Heterogeneity among individuals on the autism spectrum is widely acknowledged as a barrier to develop effective interventions. Overcoming this challenge requires characterization of individual differences, especially for children that are minimally verbal and often excluded from research studies. Most studies that describe autistic subgroups identify a single minimally verbal verbal group based on a single identifying measure (e.g., ADOS module one or single item indicating absence of phrase speech). Determining personalized courses of intervention requires a more detailed understanding since a single intervention will not be effective for all who are minimally verbal. The present study identified comprehensive profiles of cognitive, language, and social communication skills within a large, diverse, group of minimally verbal children with autism. The analysis combined baseline data from two studies to yield a sample of 344 participants, who were 3 to 8 years old at the time of study onset, with 60% who identified as having a race/ethnicity other than White. Via latent profile analysis (LPA), a three-group model was identified as best fit to the data. Profile identification was dependent on a participant's combination of cognitive, expressive, and social communication characteristics, rather than a single domain. One group (n = 206) had global delays, while the other two groups (n = 95 and n = 43) had variable strengths in cognition and communication. Findings suggest that low-frequency/minimally verbal communicators with autism have heterogeneous characteristics that can be systematically organized.

Discrimination and Harassment Experiences of Autistic College Students and Their Neurotypical Peers: Risk and Protective Factors.

This study examines autistic and non-autistic college students' experiences of discrimination and harassment and identifies protective and risk factors. A nationwide survey was used to match autistic students (N = 290) and non-autistic students (N = 290) on co-occurring diagnoses and demographic characteristics. Multiple regression and interaction analysis revealed that faculty support was protective against discrimination and harassment regardless of autism status. Habits of mind was particularly protective for autistic students against harassment. Any student who engaged in school-facilitated events was more likely to experience discrimination and harassment, but the risk was heightened for autistic students. Findings highlight the importance of faculty support in fostering positive interpersonal experiences on campus, and demonstrate the need to address deeper college campus issues with respect to neurodiversity.

Adjustment Across the First College Year: A Matched Comparison of Autistic, Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, and Neurotypical Students.

Background: Although the number of autistic students attending higher education has grown substantially in recent decades, little is known about factors that support their retention and persistence in college. First-year experiences and adaptability to the college environment greatly impact students' decisions to remain enrolled. Despite the importance of first-year adjustment to persistence and retention, few studies have examined the adjustment experiences of first-year autistic students compared to those of matched nonautistic students. Methods: This study used national survey data to compare the first-year college adjustment experiences of 222 freshmen, including 74 self-identified autistic students, 74 students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and 74 students without diagnoses (referred to as neurotypical; NT), matched on mental health and demographic characteristics. Students were compared on measures of academic, social, emotional, and institutional adjustment at the end of freshman year. Separate general linear models were used to investigate predictors of positive self-reported first-year adjustment. Results: Autistic students reported significantly lower levels of social self-confidence than their NT and ADHD peers at the end of freshman year. On all other adjustment domains, students in the autism, ADHD, and NT groups did not significantly differ. Autistic students were not significantly different from their ADHD and NT peers in terms of satisfaction with their college experience or sense of belonging to their institution. Social factors, including social self-confidence and ease of making friends, emerged as important contributors to positive first-year adjustment outcomes across all groups. Conclusions: When controlling for demographic factors and mental health characteristics entering college, autistic students do not significantly differ from their NT and ADHD peers on several domains of college adjustment. Future studies should further investigate the impact of mental health and student characteristics on college trajectories and outcomes for autistic students.

Why is this an important issue?: Although more autistic young people are enrolling in college, many do not finish their degrees. Adjusting more easily to college life in the first year can encourage students to stay enrolled. Not much is known about adjustment for autistic college students, in particular compared with their nonautistic peers. What was the purpose of this study?: Our goal was to understand whether there were differences in how the three groups of first-year students adjust to college. Those three groups included the following: (1) autistic students, (2) students with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder ("ADHD"), and (3) neurotypical ("NT") students (those who do not identify as having a disability). We wanted to see if the groups were similar or different in their first-year experiences. We also wanted to know what factors help autistic students adjust and feel comfortable during their first year. What did the researchers do?: We compared survey responses about first-year adjustment across three groups of students. We know that students' background can affect their experience in college, so we matched each autistic student to one student with ADHD and one NT student so that they had similar background characteristics (e.g., gender and high school test scores). We compared the groups on campus, academic, emotional, and social experiences during the first year of college. Lastly, we determined which factors were most important for the successful first-year adjustment of autistic college students. What were the results of the study?: Autistic students were less confident socially than their ADHD and NT peers but were not significantly different from their peers on many other domains, including satisfaction with their college experience. Having more social self-confidence and making friends more easily were important to the first-year adjustment of all students. What do these findings add to what was already known?: While previous studies looked at academic adjustment, this study adds information about the social, emotional, and institutional adjustment of autistic college students. What are the potential weaknesses of the study?: We used surveys that were not specifically designed for autistic and other neurodivergent people. Students who dropped out during their first year were not included in this study, and so, our findings only apply to students who completed their first year. There were a relatively small number of students in each group, which may have made it harder for us to see the differences in how these groups adjust to college. Lastly, our sample does not include students enrolled in 2-year colleges and is not representative of the racial/ethnic and gender diversity of the autistic community across the United States. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: These findings can guide colleges in choosing which resources to focus on for first-year students. Our results show that autistic students may benefit from more supports around social self-confidence during their first year of college. Mental health is another area that is important for autistic students and their success in college, and future studies should explore this topic more.

Parenting stress in caregiver-mediated interventions for toddlers with autism: An application of quantile regression mixed models.

Traditional longitudinal modeling approaches require normally distributed data and do not account for sample heterogeneity. Parenting stress, in particular, can be difficult to model across time without transforming the data as it is usually high for caregivers of children with ASD. This study used novel linear quantile mixed models (LQMMs) to model non-normal parent stress scores across two caregiver-mediated interventions involving toddlers with ASD. The sample included 86 caregiver-child dyads who were randomized to either a parent-only psychoeducational intervention or hands-on parent training in a naturalistic developmental intervention. Child and parent-related domains of the Parenting Stress Index (PSI) were the primary outcomes in this study. The PSI was collected at entry, 10-week exit, 3-month follow-up, and 6-month follow-up periods. Separate LQMMs were used to model five specific quantiles ( τ=0.1,0.25,0.5,0.75,and0.9) of the two PSI domains across the complete intervention timeline. These five quantiles effectively modeled the entire conditional distribution of parenting stress scores. The LQMMs indicated that child-related parenting stress decreased across all quantiles within both interventions, with no difference in the rate of parenting stress change between the intervention groups. For parent-related parenting stress, the effect of intervention depended on the group's stress level; some parents increased their perceived stress within the hands-on intervention at the 3-month follow-up. Overall, this study demonstrated that the use of LQMMs yielded additional information, beyond traditional longitudinal models, regarding the relationship between parenting stress within two caregiver-mediated intervention protocols. This study also discussed the methodological contributions and potential future applications of LQMMs. LAY SUMMARY: This study used a newer longitudinal modeling technique to examine how parenting stress changed across two caregiver-mediated interventions for toddlers with ASD. Results showed that certain parents in the JASPER condition might require additional support as they exit the study and enter into their first follow-up period. It was also determined that this new modeling technique could be a valuable tool to analyze highly variable data often present in ASD intervention studies.

A telehealth approach to improving clinical trial access for infants with tuberous sclerosis complex.

BACKGROUND: Research in rare genetic syndromes associated with ASD is often hampered by the wide geographic distribution of families and the presence of medical comorbidities, such as epilepsy, that may preclude travel to clinical sites. These challenges can limit the sample size and generalizability of the cohorts included in both natural history studies and clinical trials. Tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) is a rare genetic syndrome that confers an elevated risk for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), with social communication delays identified in this population as early as 12 months of age. Early identification of risk necessitates parallel testing of early intervention, prompting the first randomized controlled clinical trial of behavioral intervention for infants with TSC (NCT03422367). However, considerable early recruitment challenges have mandated the systematic identification of enrollment barriers followed by modification of the study design to address these barriers. METHODS: Caregivers were interviewed regarding barriers to enrollment (phase 1). Adaptations to the intervention were made to address these barriers (phase 2). Outcomes based on this modification to the study design were defined by enrollment rate and participant demographics. RESULTS: Qualitative reports from caregivers indicated that distance and time were the primary barriers to clinical trial enrollment. The intervention was then modified to a remote model, with at-home, parent-delivered intervention, and weekly video conferencing with interventionists at the study sites. Enrollment increased 10-fold (from 3 to 30 participants) within 1 year and included a more diverse and clinically representative cohort of infants. CONCLUSION: The design and implementation of more scalable methods to disseminate research remotely can substantially improve access to clinical trials in rare neurodevelopmental disorders. The lessons learned from this trial can serve as a model for future studies not only in rare conditions, but in other populations that lack adequate access, such as families with limited financial or clinical resources. Continued efforts will further refine delivery methods to enhance efficiency and ease of these delivery systems for families.