The application of immunocytochemistry to cytologic direct smears of metastatic merkel cell carcinoma.

Merkel cell carcinoma represents a highly aggressive cutaneous malignancy characterized by regional recurrences, lymph node metastases, distant metastases, and high mortality. As the cytomorphology of Merkel cell carcinoma can be mimicked by other malignancies, especially lymphoma and pulmonary small cell carcinoma, immunocytochemistry is often useful in confirming the diagnosis. Cell blocks, which are traditionally utilized for immunocytochemistry, occasionally exhibit insufficient cellularity. Hence, we prospectively investigated the application of CK20 immunocytochemistry to air-dried, unstained direct smears in the diagnosis of Merkel cell carcinoma fine needle aspirates (FNAs). Eight consecutive FNAs of Merkel cell carcinoma were prospectively examined in this series; seven (88%) cases exhibited immunoreactivity for CK20 in the tumor cells. The one CK20-negative Merkel cell carcinoma was immunoreactive for synaptophysin and CD56. This immunophenotype was identical to that of the original primary tumor. For comparison, air-dried direct smears prepared from three pulmonary small cell carcinoma FNAs were examined by CK20 immunocytochemistry. In all cases, no CK20 immunoreactivity was seen in any of the tumor cells. In conclusion, direct smears represent a feasible and robust source of cellular material for immunocytochemical studies to diagnose Merkel cell carcinoma. This methodology allows the cytologist to confirm on site that material for diagnostic immunocytochemistry is present thereby serving as a safeguard in instances where insufficient cell block cellularity is anticipated or encountered.

The application of immunocytochemistry to direct smears in the diagnosis of effusions.

Metastatic malignancy represents a common cause of effusions. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is useful in confirming malignancy and gaining insight into the site of origin. Cell blocks are commonly utilized for this purpose; nonetheless, when the malignant cells are sparse, they may not be represented in cell blocks thereby precluding immunophenotypic characterization. Thus, we sought to investigate the utility of direct smear preparations as a platform for ICC in the diagnosis of effusions. Air-dried, unstained direct smears were prepared from 49 malignant effusions and 17 reactive effusions for comparison. ICC for EMA and MOC-31 highlighted the tumor cells in 91 and 98% of the malignant effusions tested, respectively. EMA immunoreactivity was focally observed within the calretinin-positive mesothelial cell population in 1 (6%) of the 17 reactive effusions. ICC for MOC-31 was negative in all reactive effusions. Site-specific immunomarkers were also evaluated. Immunoreactivity for Napsin-A and TTF-1 were observed in 78 and 67% of metastatic lung adenocarcinomas, respectively. ICC for PAX8 highlighted metastatic Müllerian and thyroid carcinomas in 100% of cases tested. CDX-2 immunoreactivity was observed in 25, 60, and 100% of metastatic gastric, pancreatic, and colorectal adenocarcinomas, respectively. Positivity for p63 was observed in 75% of metastatic urothelial cell carcinomas and the one case of pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma examined. Calretinin ICC highlighted the tumor cells in both malignant mesothelioma cases tested as well as the benign mesothelial cells in the reactive effusions. In conclusion, direct smears represent an effective platform for the performance of ICC in the diagnosis of malignant effusions.

The application and diagnostic utility of immunocytochemistry on direct smears in the diagnosis of pulmonary adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma.

The importance of subclassifying pulmonary nonsmall cell carcinoma (NSCLC) in cytologic material is becoming increasingly paramount. Occasionally, cell blocks traditionally used for ancillary studies are sparsely cellular or acellular. Hence, we investigated the diagnostic utility of immunocytochemistry for Napsin-A, TTF-1, and p63 on direct smears of NSCLC. Immunohistochemistry for Napsin-A was initially tested on a tissue microarray (TMA) composed of pulmonary adenocarcinoma. Subsequently, in 25 cases, immunocytochemistry for Napsin-A, TTF-1, and p63 was performed on cytologic direct smears. Smears were prepared from tumor cells scraped from lung resection specimens (n = 10), endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial fine-needle aspirates (n = 13), and pelleted cell material from pleural effusions (n = 2). Immunohistochemistry utilizing the TMA revealed Napsin-A positivity in 73% of pulmonary ADCs. Next, immunocytochemistry on direct cytologic smears demonstrated a Napsin-A(+)/TTF-1(+) immunophenotype in 15 of 18 adenocarcinomas; p63 was completely negative (n = 12) or only focally positive (n = 3) in these 15 adenocarcinomas. The remaining three adenocarcinomas were negative for all three markers. All six squamous cell carcinomas were Napsin-A(-)/TTF-1(-) and diffusely p63(+). In conclusion, direct smears represent a feasible and robust source of cellular material for immunocytochemical studies to diagnose pulmonary ADC and SQC. Our method allows the cytologist to confirm on site that material for diagnostic immunocytochemistry is present thereby serving as a safeguard in instances where the cell block is of insufficient cellularity.

Group consensus review minimizes the diagnosis of "follicular lesion of undetermined significance" and improves cytohistologic concordance.

We conducted a group consensus review of thyroid aspirates that were previously interpreted as "atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance" (AUS/FLUS) and followed by surgical interventions. The study aimed to investigate if consensus review would minimize the diagnosis of AUS/FLUS with an optimal interobserver agreement and also promote a better cytohistologic concordance. A group of reviewers who were blinded to the corresponding histologic findings simultaneously evaluated a total of 50 aspirates at a multiheaded light microscope. Using the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology as a guideline, a consensus interpretation was reached upon review of each aspirate. Interobserver agreement was calculated and recorded. The cytohistologic correlation was then performed between the consensus interpretation and the corresponding histologic diagnosis. The consensus review reclassified 26 (52%) aspirates as non-neoplasia/benign, 10 (20%) as follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm, 1 (2%) as papillary thyroid carcinoma, and 2 (4%) as nondiagnostic. Eleven (22%) aspirates remained AUS/FLUS. The interobserver agreement across the five diagnostic categories ranged from 71.6% to 100% with an average level of 88.8%. Cytohistologic concordance was achieved in 24 of 26 (92.3%) and 9 of 11 (81.8%) aspirates that were reclassified as non-neoplasia/benign and neoplasia/malignancy, respectively. A diagnostic accuracy of 89.2% (33/37) was obtained in reclassified cases. In conclusion, the group consensus review minimized AUS/FLUS, offered an optimal level of interobserver agreement, and most importantly, promoted excellent cytohistologic concordance in reclassified cases and, therefore, could play a substantial role in the future in reducing reaspiration and/or unnecessary surgeries.

Application of immunocytochemistry and BRAF mutational analysis to direct smears of metastatic melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The cytodiagnosis of melanoma in fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens can be challenging, often requiring the use of immunocytochemistry. As constitutively activating mutations in the BRAF oncogene are present in at least 40% of melanomas, the use of FNA material to interrogate the BRAF mutational status is likely to increase. Because cell blocks, traditionally used for these studies, can occasionally exhibit insufficient tumor cellularity, the authors investigated the utility of direct smears for immunocytochemistry and BRAF mutational analysis. METHODS: Immunocytochemistry for S-100, HMB-45, and Mart-1 was prospectively performed on direct smears in 17 FNAs of metastatic melanoma. Next, BRAF sequencing was performed using DNA isolated from archived Diff-Quik-stained direct smears for 15 cases. In parallel, sequencing was performed using DNA obtained from corresponding cell blocks. RESULTS: S-100 positivity in the tumor cells was observed in all 17 cases. HMB-45 and Mart-1 positivity was noted in 81% and 88% of cases, respectively. All 3 markers were positive in 76% of cases. Next, of the 15 archived melanoma FNAs tested, BRAF mutations were observed in 8 (53%); 5 and 3 melanomas harbored the V600E and V600K mutation, respectively. Corresponding cell blocks were also tested for all 15 cases, yielding concordant BRAF results in 14 (93%); 1 cell block yielded a false-negative result. CONCLUSIONS: Cytologic direct smears represent a robust and valuable source of cellular material for immunocytochemistry and molecular studies, especially in instances in which inadequate cell block cellularity is anticipated or encountered.

The application of molecular diagnostic studies interrogating EGFR and KRAS mutations to stained cytologic smears of lung carcinoma.

EGFR and KRAS mutation analyses are of increasing importance for guiding the treatment of non-small cell lung carcinomas. Insufficient cellularity of cell blocks can represent an impediment to the performance of these tests. We investigated the usefulness of cytologic direct smears as an alternative specimen source for mutation testing. Tumor cell-enriched areas from freshly prepared and archived rapid Romanowsky-stained direct smears in 33 cases of lung carcinoma were microdissected for DNA isolation and evaluated for EGFR and KRAS mutations. EGFR mutations were detected in 3 adenocarcinomas; 2 tumors had the L858R substitution and 1 an exon 19 deletion. KRAS mutations affecting codon 12, 13, or 61 were detected in 11 cases (8 adenocarcinomas and 3 non-small cell carcinomas). EGFR and KRAS mutations were mutually exclusive. Hence, archived and freshly prepared direct smears represent a robust and valuable specimen source for molecular studies, especially when cell blocks exhibit insufficient cellularity.