Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur Heart J ; 42(33): 3190-3199, 2021 08 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34179965

RESUMO

AIMS: Patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) at low risk for short-term death are candidates for home treatment or short-hospital stay. We aimed at determining whether the assessment of right ventricle dysfunction (RVD) or elevated troponin improves identification of low-risk patients over clinical models alone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individual patient data meta-analysis of studies assessing the relationship between RVD or elevated troponin and short-term mortality in patients with acute PE at low risk for death based on clinical models (Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index, simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index or Hestia). The primary study outcome was short-term death defined as death occurring in hospital or within 30 days. Individual data of 5010 low-risk patients from 18 studies were pooled. Short-term mortality was 0.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.4-1.3]. RVD at echocardiography, computed tomography or B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP)/N-terminal pro BNP (NT-proBNP) was associated with increased risk for short-term death (1.5 vs. 0.3%; OR 4.81, 95% CI 1.98-11.68), death within 3 months (1.6 vs. 0.4%; OR 4.03, 95% CI 2.01-8.08), and PE-related death (1.1 vs. 0.04%; OR 22.9, 95% CI 2.89-181). Elevated troponin was associated with short-term death (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.06-7.26) and death within 3 months (OR 3.68, 95% CI 1.75-7.74). CONCLUSION: RVD assessed by echocardiography, computed tomography, or elevated BNP/NT-proBNP levels and increased troponin are associated with short-term death in patients with acute PE at low risk based on clinical models. RVD assessment, mainly by BNP/NT-proBNP or echocardiography, should be considered to improve identification of low-risk patients that may be candidates for outpatient management or short hospital stay.


Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Disfunção Ventricular Direita , Doença Aguda , Biomarcadores , Ventrículos do Coração , Humanos , Peptídeo Natriurético Encefálico , Fragmentos de Peptídeos , Prognóstico , Medição de Risco , Troponina
2.
Intern Med J ; 51(8): 1236-1242, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33834578

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests an association between COVID-19 and acute pulmonary embolism (APE). AIMS: To assess the prevalence of APE in patients hospitalised for non-critical COVID-19 who presented clinical deterioration, and to investigate the association of clinical and biochemical variables with a confirmed diagnosis of APE in these subjects. METHODS: All consecutive patients admitted to the internal medicine department of a general hospital with a diagnosis of non-critical COVID-19, who performed a computer tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) for respiratory deterioration in April 2020, were included in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Study populations: 41 subjects, median (interquartile range) age: 71.7 (63-76) years, CPTA confirmed APE = 8 (19.51%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.82-34.87%). Among patients with and without APE, no significant differences were found with regards symptoms, comorbidities, treatment, Wells score and outcomes. The optimal cut-off value of d-dimer for predicting APE was 2454 ng/mL, sensitivity (95% CI): 63 (24-91), specificity: 73 (54-87), positive predictive value: 36 (13-65), negative predictive value: 89 (71-98) and AUC: 0.62 (0.38-0.85). The standard and age-adjusted d-dimer cut-offs, and the Wells score ≥2 did not associate with confirmed APE, albeit a cut-off value of d-dimer = 2454 ng/mL showed an relative risk: 3.21; 95% CI: 0.92-13.97; P = 0.073. Heparin at anticoagulant doses was used in 70.73% of patients before performing CTPA. CONCLUSION: Among patients presenting pulmonary deterioration after hospitalisation for non-critical COVID-19, the prevalence of APE is high. Traditional diagnostic tools to identify high APE pre-test probability patients do not seem to be clinically useful. These results support the use of a high index of suspicion for performing CTPA to exclude or confirm APE as the most appropriate diagnostic approach in this clinical setting.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Embolia Pulmonar , Idoso , Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio , Hospitalização , Humanos , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 37(5): 799-804, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30037561

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The prognostic accuracy of D-dimer for risk assessment in acute Pulmonary Embolism (APE) patients may be hampered by comorbidities. We investigated the impact of comorbidity burden (CB) by using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), on the prognostic ability of D-dimer to predict 30 and 90-day mortality in hemodynamically stable elderly patients with APE. METHODS: All patients aged >65 years with normotensive APE, consecutively evaluated in the Emergency Department since 2010 through 2014 were included in this retrospective cohort study. Area under the curve (AUC) and ½ Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) were calculated. RESULTS: Study population: 162 patients, median age: 79.2 years. The optimal cut-off value of CCI score for predicting mortality was ≤1 (Low CB) and >1 (High CB), AUC = 0.786. Higher levels of D-dimer were associated with an increased risk death at 30 (HR = 1.039, 95%CI:1.000-1.080, p = 0.049) and 90 days (HR = 1.039, 95%CI:1.009-1.070, p = 0.012). When added to simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) score, D-dimer increased significantly the AUC for predicting 30-day mortality in Low CB (AUC = 0.778, 95%CI:0.620-0.937, ½NRI = 0.535, p = 0.015), but not in High CB patients (AUC = 0.634, 95%CI:0.460-0.807, ½ NRI = 0.248, p = 0.294). Similarly, for 90-day mortality D-dimer increased significantly the AUC in Low CB (AUC = 0.786, 95%CI:0.643-0.929, ½NRI = 0.424, p-value = 0.025), but not in High CB patients (AUC = 0.659, 95%CI:0.541-0.778, ½NRI = 0.354, p-value = 0.165). CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with normotensive APE, comorbidities condition the prognostic performance of D-dimer, which was found to be a better predictor of death in subjects with low CB. These results support multimarker strategies for risk assessment in this population.


Assuntos
Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/metabolismo , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
4.
Thromb J ; 15: 13, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28490974

RESUMO

Recently, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) authorized the introduction and marketing of Thorinane® and Inhixa®, biosimilars of the Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin. The authorization path is considerably different from the guidelines published by the EMA in 2009, as well as from the recommendations from the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis published in 2013. Indeed, both of them recommended that LMWHs biosimilars therapeutic equivalence should be demonstrated in at least one adequately designed clinical trial. Shortly after enoxaparin biosimilars approval, EMA published a revised version of its guideline, no longer requiring the execution of a clinical study in patients at risk of venous thromboembolism. Also the assessment of safety shows some relevant flaws, as it relies only on a 20 healthy volunteers study, clearly underpowered to draw any conclusions about the safety profile of the drug. In our opinion, the approach taken by EMA for approval of enoxaparin biosimilars raises serious concerns about their actual, clinical "similarity". On these grounds, with the endorsement of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET) and the Italian Society for Angiology and Vascular Medicine (SIAPAV), we elaborated the present document aimed at reviewing and reappraising some critical points regarding the introduction of biosimilars of LMWH in Europe. Moreover, we would strongly advise the Italian National Health Authorities not to entrust safety assessment to the post-marketing surveillance only, but to promote well designed and powered studies aimed at establish the actual efficacy and safety of LMWH biosimilars.

5.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 44(3): 316-323, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28852931

RESUMO

Elderly patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism (PE) frequently have significant underlying comorbidities which may condition the prognosis. The current study aimed to determine the ability of Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) score to predict short and long-term mortality in elderly patients with hemodynamically stable acute PE. All hemodynamically stable patients aged >65 years with acute PE, evaluated in the Emergency Department since 2010 through 2014, were included in this retrospective cohort study. CCI, simplified pulmonary embolism severity index (sPESI) scores and vital status were recorded. Were included 162 patients with confirmed PE, out of 657 suspected cases (24.7%). Median age: 79.2 years, 74.1% presented an sPESI > 1 and 61.1% a CCI > 1. The overall 30, 90-day and 2-year mortality was 11.7% (95%CI 6.6-16.6), 19.8% (95%CI 13.4-25.7) and 31.8% (95%CI 24.1-38.8). For 30-day mortality sPESI showed an AUC 0.642 (95%CI 0.511-0.772) and adding CCI as covariate did not increase its prognostic performance. For 90-day mortality, in an adjusted model including sPESI and CCI, CCI showed a HR 1.282 (95%CI 1.151-1.429, p-value < 0.001), and sPESI a HR = NS(p-value = 0.267). For 2-year mortality, in an adjusted model including sPESI and CCI, CCI showed a HR 1.295 (95%CI 1.180-1.421, p-value < 0.001) and sPESI a HR = NS(p-value = 0.353). In elderly patients with hemodynamically stable PE, the CCI score was found to be an independent predictor of mortality. CCI shows a significantly better ability to predict 90-day and 2-year mortality than sPESI. The assessment of comorbidity burden by using the CCI score may be proposed as an useful tool to predict mortality in these patients.


Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Humanos , Mortalidade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco
6.
J Thromb Thrombolysis ; 42(3): 386-92, 2016 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27357135

RESUMO

In a general population with acute Pulmonary Embolism (PE) elevated D-dimer concentrations associate with increased mortality. The aim of the study was to assess the ability of D-dimer to predict 30 and 90-days mortality in elderly patients with acute PE. Hemodynamically stable patients aged ≥65 years old with confirmed PE were included in this retrospective cohort study. A pulmonary computerized tomography angiography scan, D-dimer concentrations, simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (sPESI) variables and vital status were available for all patients. The study included 154 confirmed cases of PE (23.5 % of suspected), median age 79.1 years. D-dimer was higher in patients dead than in those alive at 30 (median 14,547 vs. 8340 ng/mL, p = 0.05) and 90 days (13,604 vs. 7973 ng/mL, p = 0.013). When adding D-dimer to sPESI, the discriminant capacity to predict mortality within 30 and 90 days was increased by 0.080 and 0.089, respectively. The contribution of D-dimer to the discriminating ability was NRI = 0.286 (95 % CI -0.198 to 0.770, p value: 0.247) at 30 days and NRI = 0.605 (95 % CI 0.223-0.988, p-value: 0.002) at 90 days.D-dimer concentration was associated with 30 and 90-days mortality and showed a higher discriminant capacity than sPESI alone to predict 90-days mortality. Adding D-dimer concentrations to sPESI score seems to improve its prognostic ability, supporting multivariable risk models as the best approach to estimate prognosis in elderly patients with PE.


Assuntos
Produtos de Degradação da Fibrina e do Fibrinogênio/análise , Embolia Pulmonar/mortalidade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Análise Multivariada , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prognóstico , Embolia Pulmonar/sangue , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
7.
Semin Thromb Hemost ; 41(2): 113-32, 2015 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25703242

RESUMO

Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) represents the standard of care for prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We conducted a review of the evidence supporting the use of the different LMWHs employed in VTE prophylaxis, in different clinical settings, and analyzed its progression over time. To evaluate the standards of methodological quality of studies, we elaborated a quality assessment tool. By electronic databases, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases, 249 articles deemed eligible for the analysis were selected. Several LMWHs did not have publications in all clinical settings. Extended duration of prophylaxis was documented only for a few LMWH. The quality score yielded statistically significant differences between the medians of the four settings (p = 0.0021) with a higher score in major orthopedic surgery (median, 16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15-16) when compared with general surgery (median, 14; 95% CI, 13-14; p < 0.001). Median score for studies published after the year 1990 was higher than for those published earlier (p < 0.001). We conclude that the quality of the studies supporting LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in the different clinical settings is not homogeneous and inferior for studies performed before the year 1990. Clinical interchangeability of LMWHs in clinical practice remains a critical issue, and the selection of a product should be based on evidence available for each agent, and for each clinical indication derived from clinical trials.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle , Humanos , MEDLINE , Procedimentos Ortopédicos , PubMed , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiologia
8.
Thromb J ; 13: 28, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26347594

RESUMO

Dual antiplatelet therapy based on the combination of an adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-receptor antagonist plus aspirin has demonstrated to be more effective in reducing the rate of major ischemic vascular events compared to aspirin monotherapy in some clinical settings. The current controversy on the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy should not conceal another major issue: the choice of the more appropriate antiplatelet monotherapy after the dual treatment phase. The aim of this article is to critically analyze the available evidence in this topic. Data from studies like CAPRIE, MATCH, PROFESS, CHANCE, DAPT and others, raise questions as why antiplatelet monotherapy after the dual phase should only be based on aspirin, in spite of a lack of evidence surprisingly not highlighted by key opinion leaders and experts. We conclude that, whether ADP-receptor antagonist rather than aspirin may be proposed as monotherapy seems not only have no answer but also not place in the current specialists' analysis, as if a dogmatic approach were prevalent. Perhaps the time for an open debate on these topics is ripe.

9.
Vasa ; 44(5): 371-9, 2015 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26317257

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of this prospective multicenter cohort study was to characterise the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors and intermittent claudication (IC) symptoms in clinical practice patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), and to determine the care gap with international guidelines and evidence-based therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 2011 through 2013, participating centres enrolled consecutive patients with PAD of atherosclerotic, origin demonstrated by ultrasound, ankle brachial index (ABI) < 0.9 and symptoms of IC. A seven item grid was built for the assessment of care gap (percentage of patients eligible for a treatment who did not receive it). cerebrovascular disease or at least two CVD risk factors. Care gap was lower than 25 % for any method to stop smoking, lipid lowering agents, antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation therapy and any kind of exercise program; between 25% and 50% for ACE inhibitors/ angiotensin II antagonist therapy; between 50% and 75% for beta-blocker therapy; and higher than 75% for supervised exercise program and use of cilostazol. Patients with and without CADI cerebrovascular disease were differently treated with clopidogrel (27.3% and 4.8 %, p < 0.001), any antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy (98.7% and 83.3 %, p <0.001) and beta-blockers (46.8% and 16.0%, p<0.001). RESULTS: All patients (232) presented at least one CVC risk factor, 90.2% at least two, and 91.5% had either established CAD or CONCLUSIONS: Many gaps with evidence-based recommendations are still present in the pattern of the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment for CVD risk factors and IC symptoms in clinical practice PAD patients.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/uso terapêutico , Índice Tornozelo-Braço/métodos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Claudicação Intermitente/terapia , Doença Arterial Periférica/terapia , Idoso , Angiografia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/epidemiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Claudicação Intermitente/diagnóstico , Claudicação Intermitente/etiologia , Itália , Masculino , Cooperação do Paciente , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Doença Arterial Periférica/diagnóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
10.
Recenti Prog Med ; 106(4): 180-91, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Italiano | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25959891

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Computerized Decision Support Systems (CDSSs) connect health care professionals with high-quality, evidence-based information at the point-of-care to guide clinical decision-making. Current research shows the potential of CDSSs to improve the efficiency and quality of patient care. The mere provision of the technology, however, does not guarantee its uptake. This qualitative study aims to explore the barriers and facilitators to the use of CDSSs as identified by health providers. METHODS: The study was performed in three Italian hospitals, each characterized by a different level of familiarity with the CDSS technology. We interviewed frontline physicians, nurses, information technology staff, and members of the hospital board of directors (n=24). A grounded theory approach informed our sampling criteria as well as the data collection and analysis. RESULTS: The adoption of CDSSs by health care professionals can be represented as a process that consists of six "positionings," each corresponding to an individual's use and perceived mastery of the technology. In conditions of low mastery, the CDSS is perceived as an object of threat, an unfamiliar tool that is difficult to control. On the other hand, individuals in conditions of high mastery view the CDSS as a helpful tool that can be locally adapted and integrated with clinicians' competences to fulfil their needs. In the first positionings, the uptake of CDSSs is hindered by representational obstacles. The last positionings, alternatively, featured technical obstacles to CDSS uptake. DISCUSSION: Our model of CDSS adoption can guide hospital administrators interested in the future integration of CDSSs to evaluate their organizational contexts, identify potential challenges to the implementation of the technology, and develop an effective strategy to address them. Our findings also allow reflections concerning the misalignment between most Italian hospitals and the current innovation trends toward the uptake of computerized decision support technologies.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente aos Computadores , Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar/estatística & dados numéricos , Coleta de Dados , Difusão de Inovações , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Teoria Fundamentada , Humanos , Itália , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde
11.
Europace ; 16(12): 1720-5, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25087153

RESUMO

AIMS: To assess different aspects of the definition of valvular/non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) used in clinical practice by physicians who usually treat this condition. METHODS AND RESULTS: We prospectively conducted a web-based survey including cardiologists and internists who attended continuing medical education courses on cardiovascular medicine. A questionnaire was drawn up, containing 17 questions clustered into five main topics: (A) known rheumatic aetiology; (B) site/type of valve involvement; (C) prosthetic heart valve; (D) haemodynamic relevance; (E) miscellaneous. The overall response rate was 22.4% (21.1% for cardiologists and 24% for internists). Coexistence of both medical history of rheumatic disease and clinical signs of valvular involvement were considered as essential prerequisites for the diagnosis of rheumatic AF by half of the respondents, and one-third assumed that lone aortic valve disease was sufficient for AF to be defined as valvular. A similar proportion of respondents considered that in the presence of mitral regurgitation, AF had to be defined as valvular. The majority of responding physicians considered the degree of valvular defect of lesser importance for the definition of valvular or non-valvular origin of AF. CONCLUSION: We found important heterogeneity and uncertainties in the answers given by physicians who usually treat patients with AF, as evidence of the lack of precise and unique definitions of the origin of AF (valvular/non-valvular). It is urgent to issue clear widely accepted definitions of the origin of AF, which should improve clinical practice and research.


Assuntos
Fibrilação Atrial/classificação , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/classificação , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/diagnóstico , Médicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Terminologia como Assunto , Fibrilação Atrial/etiologia , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/complicações , Humanos , Internacionalidade , Vocabulário Controlado
12.
Intern Emerg Med ; 17(6): 1727-1737, 2022 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35661313

RESUMO

Machine learning (ML) techniques may improve readmission prediction performance in heart failure (HF) patients. This study aimed to assess the ability of ML algorithms to predict unplanned all-cause 30-day readmissions in HF elderly patients, and to compare them with conventional LACE (Length of hospitalization, Acuity, Comorbidities, Emergency department visits) index. All patients aged ≥ 65 years discharged alive between 2010 and 2019 after a hospitalization for acute HF were included in this retrospective cohort study. We applied MICE (Multivariate Imputation via Chained Equations) method to obtain a balanced, fully valued dataset and LASSO (Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator) algorithm to get the most significant features. Training (80% of records) and test (20%) cohorts were randomly selected. Study population: 3079 patients, 394 (12.8%) presented at least one readmission within 30 days, and 2685 (87.2%) did not. In the test cohort AUCs (IC95%) of XGBoost, Ada Boost Classifier, Random forest, and Gradient Boosting, and LACE Index were: 0.803 (0.734-0.872), 0.782 (0.711-0.854), 0.776 (0.703-0.848), 0.786 (0.715-0.857), and 0.504 (0.414-0.594), respectively, for predicting readmissions. A SHAP analysis was performed to offer a breakdown of the ML variables associated with readmission. Positive and negative predicting values estimates of the different ML models and LACE index were also provided, for several values of readmission rate prevalence. Among elderly patients, the rate of all-cause unplanned 30-day readmissions after hospitalization due to an acute HF was high. ML models performed better than the conventional LACE index for predicting readmissions. ML models can be proposed as promising tools for the identification of subjects at high risk of hospitalization in this clinical setting, enabling care teams to target interventions for improving overall clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Insuficiência Cardíaca , Readmissão do Paciente , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Hospitalização , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Modelos Logísticos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
13.
Eur J Intern Med ; 73: 36-42, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708362

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Most patients evaluated for suspected pulmonary embolism(PE) conclude the Emergency Department(ED) work-up with a diagnosis of PE not confirmed(PE excluded;PE-E). We aimed to investigate the clinical features, short and long-term mortality, and prognostic factors for death in elderly with PE-E, and to compare these figures with those of patients with PE confirmed(PE-C). METHODS: Consecutive patients ≥65 years old evaluated in the ED for clinically suspected hemodynamically stable acute PE were included in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Study population: 657 patients with suspected PE, PE-C:162(24.65%). When compared with PE-C, patients with PE-E presented a higher prevalence of chronic cardiopulmonary disease (17.37% vs 8.02%, p = 0.003), a lower prevalence of pulse rate >110 (13.13% vs 25.93%; p<0.001), of arterial oxygen saturation <90% (16.16% vs. 25.93%; p = 0.007) and of hospitalized patients (52.93% vs 98.15%; p < 0.001). Thirty-day, 90-day, 1-year, 2-year and 5-year overall mortality was 8.83%, 15.98%, 23.59%, 29.68%, and 51.09%, respectively, differences between PE-E and PE-C non statistically significant. Among patients with PE-E, multivariate analysis showed that simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score>0 was associated with higher short and long-term mortality (30-day:HR:5.31,p = 0.029; 5 year:HR:2.18, p < 0.001), meanwhile comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index>0) only with higher long-term mortality (30-day: HR:1.60, p = 0.342; 5 year: HR:1.41, p = 0.038). CONCLUSION: In real world haemodinamically stable elderly patients evaluated in the ED for suspected PE, short and long-term mortality was markedly high regardless whether PE was confirmed or excluded. At the time to set management and follow up strategies, elderly patients with PE excluded should not be considered a low-risk population.


Assuntos
Embolia Pulmonar , Idoso , Humanos , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
14.
Heliyon ; 6(9): e04857, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32984589

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Data on medium- and long-term prognostic factors for death in elderly patients with acute Pulmonary Embolism (APE) are lacking. The present study aimed to assess sPESI score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) as medium- and long-term predictors of mortality in elderly patients with haemodinamically stable APE. METHODS: All consecutive patients aged≥65 years old, evaluated at the emergency department (ED) of our hospital from 2010 through 2014, with a final diagnosis of APE, were included in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Study population:162 patients, female:36.5%, median age:79 years old, 74% presented a sPESI score>0, and 61% a CCI≥ 1. All causes mortality: 19.8%, 23.5%, 26.5%, 32.1% and 48.2% at 3, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years after APE. Univariate regression analysis: CCI≥1 was associated with a higher mortality at 3, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years. Multivariate Cox analysis: CCI≥1 associated with increased mortality at 3 months (HR:4.29; IC95%:1.46-12.59), 6 months (HR:5.33; IC95%:1.84-15.44), 1 year (HR:4.87; IC95%:1.87-12.70), 2 years (HR:3.78; IC95%:1.74-8.25), and 5 years (HR:2.30; IC95%:1.33-3.99). sPESI score≥1 was not found to be related to an increased medium-or long-term mortality. Negative predictive values (IC95%) of CCI≥1 were 93.65% (87.61-99.69), 93.65% (87.61-99.69), 92.06% (85.37-98.76), 87.3% (79.05-95.55) and 71.61% (60.13-83.1) for mortality at 3, 6 months, 1, 2 and 5 years. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with a confirmed normotensive APE, unlike sPESI score, CCI showed to be an independent prognostic factor for medium- and long-term mortality. In these patients, after the acute phase following a PE event, the assessment of the comorbidities burden represents the most appropriate approach for predicting medium- and long-term mortality.

15.
Drug Saf ; 32(2): 159-67, 2009.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19236122

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibacterials on the onset of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest using three different observational designs. METHODS: A population-based case-control study was performed by linking automated databases from the Varese Province of Italy. Cases were all subjects who experienced ventricular arrhythmia or cardiac arrest from July 1998 to December 2003. For each case, up to ten controls were randomly selected after matching for sex, age, practitioner and date of arrhythmia onset. The use of macrolides and fluoroquinolones during two time windows denoted as recent and referent intervals was ascertained. Odds ratios were estimated using case-control, case-crossover and case-time-control approaches. RESULTS: 1275 cases and 9189 controls met the inclusion criteria. Adjusted odds ratios (and corresponding 95% CIs) associated with recent exposure to macrolides were 2.13 (1.34, 3.39), 1.70 (0.88, 3.26) and 1.62 (0.78, 3.34) by using case-control, case-crossover and case-time-control designs, respectively. The corresponding estimates for fluoroquinolones were 3.58 (2.51, 5.12), 1.98 (1.19, 3.29) and 1.59 (0.88, 2.87), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Three observational study designs each using entirely different sets of controls consistently showed that recent use of macrolide and fluoroquinolone antibacterials may be associated with increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac arrest.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Arritmias Cardíacas/induzido quimicamente , Arritmias Cardíacas/epidemiologia , Fluoroquinolonas/efeitos adversos , Parada Cardíaca/induzido quimicamente , Parada Cardíaca/epidemiologia , Macrolídeos/efeitos adversos , Disfunção Ventricular/induzido quimicamente , Disfunção Ventricular/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Cross-Over , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Fluoroquinolonas/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Macrolídeos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Razão de Chances , População , Projetos de Pesquisa , Risco , Adulto Jovem
16.
Eur J Prev Cardiol ; 26(8): 836-846, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30477319

RESUMO

AIMS: Current guidelines strongly recommend antiplatelet therapy with aspirin plus a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor (dual therapy) for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). To better understand how antiplatelet treatment is prescribed in clinical practice, the aim of this study was to provide a more detailed description of real-world patients with and without antiplatelet treatment after an ACS, their outcomes at one-year follow-up and the related integrated cost. METHODS: The ReS database, including more than 12 million inhabitants, was evaluated. During the accrual period ACS patients discharged alive were identified on the basis of ICD-IX-CM code. Antiplatelet drug prescriptions and healthcare costs were analysed over one-year follow-up. RESULTS: In 2014, of the 25,129 patients discharged alive after an ACS, 5796 (23%) did not receive any antiplatelet therapy during the first month after hospital discharge. Among them, 3846 (66%) subjects were prescribed an antiplatelet drug subsequently, while 7.7% did not receive any antiplatelet treatment during the whole following year. Dual therapy in the subgroup of patients undergoing a revascularization procedure ( n = 8436) was prescribed to 79.2% of cases and to 46.1% ( n = 4009) of medically managed patients. The patients not treated with an antiplatelet treatment in the first month showed the highest one-year healthcare costs, mostly due to hospital re-admissions. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a large patient community shows that a considerable proportion of patients remained untreated with antiplatelet treatment after an ACS event. A clearer characterization of these subjects can help to improve the adherence to the current guidelines and recommendations.


Assuntos
Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/tratamento farmacológico , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/tendências , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/tendências , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/uso terapêutico , Padrões de Prática Médica/tendências , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/diagnóstico , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/economia , Síndrome Coronariana Aguda/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/tendências , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/economia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Custos de Medicamentos/tendências , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/efeitos adversos , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/economia , Terapia Antiplaquetária Dupla/mortalidade , Feminino , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/tendências , Custos Hospitalares/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/economia , Readmissão do Paciente/tendências , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Agregação Plaquetária/economia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Padrões de Prática Médica/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Clin Drug Investig ; 39(4): 355-362, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30697670

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Warfarin-related nephropathy is an unexplained acute kidney injury, and may occur in patients with supratherapeutic INR, in the absence of overt bleeding. Similar findings have been observed in rats treated with dabigatran etexilate. We conducted a prospective study in dabigatran etexilate-treated patients to assess the incidence of dabigatran-related nephropathy and to investigate the possible correlation between dabigatran plasma concentration (DPC) and worsening renal function. METHOD: One hundred and seven patients treated long term with dabigatran etexilate for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were followed up for 90 days. DPC, serum creatinine (SCr) and serum cystatin C were prospectively measured. Ninety five patients had complete follow-up data and were evaluable for primary endpoint. RESULTS: Eleven patients had supratherapeutic DPC, defined as DPC higher than 200 ng/ml at study enrolment, but at the end of follow-up no patient showed a persistent increase in SCr. No patients experienced acute kidney injury. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that no persistent renal detrimental effect is associated with dabigatran treatment. An increase in SCr during dabigatran treatment is reversible and it seems to be unrelated to dabigatran itself.


Assuntos
Antitrombinas/uso terapêutico , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Dabigatrana/uso terapêutico , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Rim/fisiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antitrombinas/farmacologia , Fibrilação Atrial/diagnóstico , Fibrilação Atrial/fisiopatologia , Dabigatrana/farmacologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Testes de Função Renal/tendências , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos
18.
JAMA Netw Open ; 2(12): e1917094, 2019 12 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31825499

RESUMO

Importance: Sophisticated evidence-based information resources can filter medical evidence from the literature, integrate it into electronic health records, and generate recommendations tailored to individual patients. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of a computerized clinical decision support system (CDSS) that preappraises evidence and provides health professionals with actionable, patient-specific recommendations at the point of care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial among internal medicine wards of a large Italian general hospital. All analyses in this randomized clinical trial followed the intent-to-treat principle. Between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, patients were randomly assigned to the intervention group, in which CDSS-generated reminders were displayed to physicians, or to the control group, in which reminders were generated but not shown. Data were analyzed between February 1 and July 31, 2018. Interventions: Evidence-Based Medicine Electronic Decision Support (EBMEDS), a commercial CDSS covering a wide array of health conditions across specialties, was integrated into the hospital electronic health records to generate patient-specific recommendations. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the resolution rate, the rate at which medical problems identified and alerted by the CDSS were addressed by a change in practice. Secondary outcomes included the length of hospital stay and in-hospital all-cause mortality. Results: In this randomized clinical trial, 20 563 patients were admitted to the hospital. Of these, 6480 (31.5%) were admitted to the internal medicine wards (study population) and randomized (3242 to CDSS and 3238 to control). The mean (SD) age of patients was 70.5 (17.3) years, and 54.5% were men. In total, 28 394 reminders were generated throughout the course of the trial (median, 3 reminders per patient per hospital stay; interquartile range [IQR], 1-6). These messages led to a change in practice in approximately 4 of 100 patients. The resolution rate was 38.0% (95% CI, 37.2%-38.8%) in the intervention group and 33.7% (95% CI, 32.9%-34.4%) in the control group, corresponding to an odds ratio of 1.21 (95% CI, 1.11-1.32; P < .001). The length of hospital stay did not differ between the groups, with a median time of 8 days (IQR, 5-13 days) for the intervention group and a median time of 8 days (IQR, 5-14 days) for the control group (P = .36). In-hospital all-cause mortality also did not differ between groups (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.17; P = .59). Alert fatigue did not differ between early and late study periods. Conclusions and Relevance: An international commercial CDSS intervention marginally influenced routine practice in a general hospital, although the change did not statistically significantly affect patient outcomes. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02577198.


Assuntos
Sistemas de Apoio a Decisões Clínicas , Medicina Baseada em Evidências/métodos , Sistemas de Informação Hospitalar , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Precisão/métodos , Idoso , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais Gerais , Humanos , Itália , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde
19.
Blood Press Monit ; 13(2): 107-10, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18347445

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Blood pressure (BP) 'Cardiette BP one' system (BP one) is an oscillometric ambulatory BP monitor manufactured in Italy in conformity to current regulations for medical devices. We decided to determine the accuracy of measures made with BP one, using the protocol of the British Hypertension Society published in 1990, and revised in 1993, for evaluating the accuracy of BP measurement devices. METHODS: The evaluation included before-use calibration, in-use assessment, after-use calibration, and static device validation that involved 85 participants. RESULTS: The mean difference between manual readings with sphygmomanometer and automatic ones with the device were -0.36+/-5.74 (mean+/-SD) for systolic values and 2.52+/-4.87 for diastolic values. On the basis of the percentages of measurements differing from the mercury sphygmomanometer standard by

Assuntos
Monitorização Ambulatorial da Pressão Arterial/instrumentação , Oscilometria/instrumentação , Autocuidado/instrumentação , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Hipertensão/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
20.
BJGP Open ; 2(3): bjgpopen18X101602, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30564735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Familiarity and competency in the options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) and the role of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) may vary among primary care physicians (PCPs) from different European countries. AIMS: To investigate PCP views on prescribing and managing NOACs across Europe and identify perceived unmet needs. DESIGN & SETTING: Web-based survey including PCPs with particular interest in cardiovascular medicine. METHOD: A questionnaire was drawn up, containing 10 questions on initiation and ongoing management of NOACs; use of AF stroke guidelines on NOACs and anticoagulant switching; and perceived information needs. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 42%. The majority of PCPs declared they are responsible for and confident in both initiating and managing NOAC therapy. In some countries, PCPs are not able to initiate NOAC therapy due to administrative barriers (namely, Italy and Slovakia). No single set of guidelines is referred to across all countries and over a fifth of responders indicate they do not follow specific guidelines. The main learning needs reported were more related to initiation than to ongoing management of anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSION: According to this self-assessment survey, the experience of most PCPs in management of different aspects of AF appears good and only some felt the need for further training. However, in the light of the importance of this topic as public health issue, intensified efforts aiming at better equipping PCPs to meet their key roles in an integrated service across Europe are overdue.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA