Latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA) is associated with small fibre neuropathy.

AIM: To assess if latent autoimmune diabetes of adulthood (LADA) is associated with small fibre neuropathy. METHODS: Participants with LADA (n=31), Type 2 diabetes (n=31) and healthy control participants without diabetes (n=31) underwent a detailed assessment of neurologic deficits, quantitative sensory testing, electrophysiology, skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy. RESULTS: The groups were matched for age (healthy control without diabetes: 53.5±9.1 vs. Type 2 diabetes: 58.0±6.5 vs. LADA: 53.2±11.6 years), duration of diabetes (Type 2 diabetes: 10.0±8.3 vs. LADA: 11.0±9.1 years) and blood pressure. However, BMI (P=0.01) and triglycerides (P=0.0008) were lower and HbA1c (P=0.0005), total cholesterol (P=0.01) and HDL (P=0.002) were higher in participants with LADA compared with Type 2 diabetes. Peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (P=0.04) and sural sensory nerve conduction velocity (P=0.008) were lower in participants with latent autoimmune diabetes in adults compared with Type 2 diabetes. Intra-epidermal nerve fibre density (P=0.008), corneal nerve fibre density (P=0.003) and corneal nerve branch density (P=0.006) were significantly lower in participants with LADA compared with Type 2 diabetes. There were no significant differences in the other neuropathy parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Despite comparable age and duration of diabetes, participants with LADA demonstrate more severe neuropathy and particularly small fibre neuropathy, compared with participants with Type 2 diabetes.

Visual complications in diabetes mellitus: beyond retinopathy.

Diabetic retinopathy is the most common cause of vision loss in people with diabetes mellitus; however, other causes of visual impairment/loss include other retinal and non-retinal visual problems, including glaucoma, age-related macular degeneration, non-arteritic anterior ischaemic optic neuropathy and cataracts. Additionally, when a person with diabetes complains of visual disturbance despite a visual acuity of 6/6, abnormalities in refraction, contrast sensitivity, straylight and amplitude of accommodation should be considered. We review and highlight these visual problems for physicians who manage people with diabetes to ensure timely referral and treatment to limit visual disability, which can have a significant impact on daily living, especially for those participating in sports and driving.

The diagnostic accuracy of Neuropad for assessing large and small fibre diabetic neuropathy.

AIMS: Neuropad is a simple visual indicator test, with moderate diagnostic performance for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. As it assesses sweating, which is a measure of cholinergic small nerve fibre function, we compared its diagnostic performance against established measures of both large and, more specifically, small fibre damage in patients with diabetes. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven participants (89 without diabetic peripheral neuropathy and 38 with) aged 57 ± 9.7 years underwent assessment with Neuropad, large nerve fibre assessments: Neuropathy Disability Score, vibration perception threshold, peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity; small nerve fibre assessments: neuropathy symptoms (Diabetic Neuropathy Symptoms score) corneal nerve fibre length and warm perception threshold. RESULTS: Neuropad has a high sensitivity but moderate specificity against large fibre neuropathy assessments: Neuropathy Disability Score (> 2) 70% and 50%, vibration perception threshold (> 14 V) 83% and 53%, and peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (< 42 m/s) 81% and 54%, respectively. However, the diagnostic accuracy of Neuropad was significantly improved against corneal nerve fibre length (< 14 mm/mm2) with a sensitivity and specificity of 83% and 80%, respectively. Furthermore, the area under the curve for corneal nerve fibre length (85%) was significantly greater than with the Neuropathy Disability Score (66%, P = 0.01) and peroneal motor nerve conduction velocity (70%, P = 0.03). For neuropathic symptoms, sensitivity was 78% and specificity was 60%. CONCLUSIONS: The data show the improved diagnostic performance of Neuropad against corneal nerve fibre length. This study underlines the importance of Neuropad as a practical diagnostic test for small fibre neuropathy in patients with diabetes.

The Peripheral Neuropathy Prevalence and Characteristics Are Comparable in People with Obesity and Long-Duration Type 1 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Peripheral neuropathy is reported in obesity even in the absence of hyperglycaemia. OBJECTIVE: To compare the prevalence and characterise the phenotype of peripheral neuropathy in people living with obesity (OB) and long-duration type 1 diabetes (T1D). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a prospective cross-sectional study of 130 participants including healthy volunteers (HV) (n = 28), people with T1D (n = 51), and OB (BMI 30-50 kg/m2) (n = 51). Participants underwent assessment of neuropathic symptoms (Neuropathy Symptom Profile, NSP), neurological deficits (Neuropathy Disability Score, NDS), vibration perception threshold (VPT) and evaluation of sural nerve conduction velocity and amplitude. RESULTS: Peripheral neuropathy was present in 43.1% of people with T1D (age 49.9 ± 12.9 years; duration of diabetes 23.4 ± 13.5 years) and 33.3% of OB (age 48.2 ± 10.8 years). VPT for high risk of neuropathic foot ulceration (VPT ≥ 25 V) was present in 31.4% of T1D and 19.6% of OB. Participants living with OB were heavier (BMI 42.9 ± 3.5 kg/m2) and had greater centripetal adiposity with an increased body fat percentage (FM%) (P < 0.001) and waist circumference (WC) (P < 0.001) compared to T1D. The OB group had a higher NDS (P < 0.001), VAS for pain (P < 0.001), NSP (P < 0.001), VPT (P < 0.001) and reduced sural nerve conduction velocity (P < 0.001) and amplitude (P < 0.001) compared to HV, but these parameters were comparable in T1D. VPT was positively associated with increased WC (P = 0.011), FM% (P = 0.001) and HbA1c (P < 0.001) after adjusting for age (R2 = 0.547). Subgroup analysis of respiratory quotient (RQ) measured in the OB group did not correlate with VPT (P = 0.788), nerve conduction velocity (P = 0.743) or amplitude (P = 0.677). CONCLUSION: The characteristics of peripheral neuropathy were comparable between normoglycaemic people living with obesity and people with long-duration T1D, suggesting that metabolic factors linked to obesity play a pivotal role in the development of peripheral neuropathy. Further studies are needed to investigate the mechanistic link between visceral adiposity and neuropathy.

NerveCheck: An inexpensive quantitative sensory testing device for patients with diabetic neuropathy.

AIMS: Sensory neuropathy is central to the development of painful neuropathy, and foot ulceration in patients with diabetes. Currently, available QST devices take considerable time to perform and are expensive. NerveCheck is the first inexpensive ($500), portable QST device to perform both vibration and thermal testing and hence evaluate diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study was undertaken to establish the reproducibility and diagnostic validity of NerveCheck for detecting neuropathy. METHODS: 130 subjects (28 with DPN, 46 without DPN and 56 control subjects) underwent QST assessment with NerveCheck; vibration perception and thermal testing. DPN was defined according to the Toronto criteria. RESULTS: NerveCheck's intra correlation coefficient for vibration, cold and warm sensation testing was 0.79 (95% LOA: -4.20 to 6.60), 0.86 (95% LOA: -1.38 to 2.72) and 0.71 (95% LOA: -2.36 to 3.83), respectively. The diagnostic accuracy (AUC) for vibration, cold and warm sensation testing was 86% (SE: 0.038, 95% CI 0.79-0.94), 79% (SE: 0.058, 95% CI 0.68-0.91) and 72% (SE: 0.058, 95% CI 0.60-0.83), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that NerveCheck has good reproducibility and comparable diagnostic accuracy to established QST equipment for the diagnosis of DPN.