Mechanistic differences between HIV-1 and SIV nucleocapsid proteins and cross-species HIV-1 genomic RNA recognition.

BACKGROUND: The nucleocapsid (NC) domain of HIV-1 Gag is responsible for specific recognition and packaging of genomic RNA (gRNA) into new viral particles. This occurs through specific interactions between the Gag NC domain and the Psi packaging signal in gRNA. In addition to this critical function, NC proteins are also nucleic acid (NA) chaperone proteins that facilitate NA rearrangements during reverse transcription. Although the interaction with Psi and chaperone activity of HIV-1 NC have been well characterized in vitro, little is known about simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) NC. Non-human primates are frequently used as a platform to study retroviral infection in vivo; thus, it is important to understand underlying mechanistic differences between HIV-1 and SIV NC. RESULTS: Here, we characterize SIV NC chaperone activity for the first time. Only modest differences are observed in the ability of SIV NC to facilitate reactions that mimic the minus-strand annealing and transfer steps of reverse transcription relative to HIV-1 NC, with the latter displaying slightly higher strand transfer and annealing rates. Quantitative single molecule DNA stretching studies and dynamic light scattering experiments reveal that these differences are due to significantly increased DNA compaction energy and higher aggregation capability of HIV-1 NC relative to the SIV protein. Using salt-titration binding assays, we find that both proteins are strikingly similar in their ability to specifically interact with HIV-1 Psi RNA. In contrast, they do not demonstrate specific binding to an RNA derived from the putative SIV packaging signal. CONCLUSIONS: Based on these studies, we conclude that (1) HIV-1 NC is a slightly more efficient NA chaperone protein than SIV NC, (2) mechanistic differences between the NA interactions of highly similar retroviral NC proteins are revealed by quantitative single molecule DNA stretching, and (3) SIV NC demonstrates cross-species recognition of the HIV-1 Psi RNA packaging signal.

Fidelity of plus-strand priming requires the nucleic acid chaperone activity of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein.

During minus-strand DNA synthesis, RNase H degrades viral RNA sequences, generating potential plus-strand DNA primers. However, selection of the 3' polypurine tract (PPT) as the exclusive primer is required for formation of viral DNA with the correct 5'-end and for subsequent integration. Here we show a new function for the nucleic acid chaperone activity of HIV-1 nucleocapsid protein (NC) in reverse transcription: blocking mispriming by non-PPT RNAs. Three representative 20-nt RNAs from the PPT region were tested for primer extension. Each primer had activity in the absence of NC, but less than the PPT. NC reduced priming by these RNAs to essentially base-line level, whereas PPT priming was unaffected. RNase H cleavage and zinc coordination by NC were required for maximal inhibition of mispriming. Biophysical properties, including thermal stability, helical structure and reverse transcriptase (RT) binding affinity, showed significant differences between PPT and non-PPT duplexes and the trends were generally correlated with the biochemical data. Binding studies in reactions with both NC and RT ruled out a competition binding model to explain NC's observed effects on mispriming efficiency. Taken together, these results demonstrate that NC chaperone activity has a major role in ensuring the fidelity of plus-strand priming.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 reverse transcriptase activity in model systems that mimic steps in reverse transcription.

Human immunodeficiency virus type 2 (HIV-2) infection is a serious problem in West Africa and Asia. However, there have been relatively few studies of HIV-2 reverse transcriptase (RT), a potential target for antiviral therapy. Detailed knowledge of HIV-2 RT activities is critical for development of specific high-throughput screening assays of potential inhibitors. Here, we have conducted a systematic evaluation of HIV-2 RT function, using assays that model specific steps in reverse transcription. Parallel studies were performed with HIV-1 RT. In general, under standard assay conditions, the polymerase and RNase H activities of the two enzymes were comparable. However, when the RT concentration was significantly reduced, HIV-2 RT was less active than the HIV-1 enzyme. HIV-2 RT was also impaired in its ability to catalyze secondary RNase H cleavage in assays that mimic tRNA primer removal during plus-strand transfer and degradation of genomic RNA fragments during minus-strand DNA synthesis. In addition, initiation of plus-strand DNA synthesis was much less efficient with HIV-2 RT than with HIV-1 RT. This may reflect architectural differences in the primer grip regions in the p66 (HIV-1) and p68 (HIV-2) palm subdomains of the two enzymes. The implications of our findings for antiviral therapy are discussed.