Reliability of different body temperature measurement sites during aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: We retrospectively performed a comparative analysis of temperature measurement sites during surgical repair of the thoracic aorta. METHODS: Between January 2004 and May 2006, 22 patients (mean age: 63 ± 12 years) underwent operations on the thoracic aorta with arterial cannulation of the aortic arch concavity and selective antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP) during deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA). Indications for surgical intervention were acute type A dissection in 14 (64%) patients, degenerative aneurysm in 6 (27%), aortic infiltration of thymic carcinoma in 1 (4.5%) and intra-aortic stent refixation in 1 (4.5%). Rectal, tympanic and bladder temperatures were evaluated to identify the best reference to arterial blood temperature during HCA and ACP. RESULTS: There were no operative deaths and the 30-day mortality rate was 13% (three patients). Permanent neurological deficits were not observed and transient changes occurred in two patients (9%). During re-warming, there was strong correlation between tympanic and arterial blood temperatures (r = 0.9541, p<0.001), in contrast to the rectal and bladder temperature (r = 0.7654, p = n.s; r = 0.7939, p = n.s., respectively). CONCLUSION: We conclude that tympanic temperature measurements correlate with arterial blood temperature monitoring during aortic surgery with HCA and ACP and, therefore, should replace bladder and rectal measurements.

Management options for aorto-oesophageal fistula: case histories and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: An aorto-oesophageal fistula is a rare clinical entity, leading to life-threatening gastrointestinal bleeding. Thoracic aortic aneurysms are the most common cause of aorto-oesophageal fistulae; further causes involve foreign body ingestion, trauma (in most cases iatrogenic), carcinoma or, very rarely, aortitis tuberculotica. METHODS: Due to its rarity, there are no large multicentre studies present to evaluate the efficacy of different therapeutic management options. Since it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, we give a short summary of various treatment approaches performed in our clinical practice in the past three years. The most straightforward therapeutic option may be an endovascular aortic repair and subtotal oesophageal resection followed by gastro-oesophageal reconstruction, but other alternative treatment possibilities are also present, although with probable higher morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Eliminating the source of bleeding as an emergency, resecting the oesophagus urgently to prevent sepsis and reconstructing the gastrointestinal continuity as an elective case after having the inflammatory processes settled seems to justify the endovascular aortic repair and subtotal oesophageal resection, followed by a gastro-oesophageal reconstruction, as an effective surgical approach.

Use of an automated knot fastener shortens operative times in minimally invasive mitral valve repair.

INTRODUCTION: Longer durations of cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Little is known about the effect of automated knot fasteners (Cor-Knot®) in minimally invasive mitral valve repair on operative times and outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether these devices shortened cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times and whether this impacted on postoperative outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing isolated minimally invasive mitral valve repair by a single surgeon between March 2011 and March 2016 were included (n = 108). Two cohorts were created based on the use (n = 52) or non-use (n = 56) of an automated knot fastener. Data concerning intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were collected and compared. RESULTS: Preoperative demographics were well matched between groups with no significant difference in logistic Euroscore (manual vs automated: median 3.1, interquartile range, IQR, 2.1-5.5, vs 5.4, IQR 2.2-8.3; P = 0.07, respectively). Comparing manually tied knots to an automated fastener, cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times were significantly shorter in the automated group (cardiopulmonary bypass: median 200 minutes, IQR 180-227, vs 165 minutes (IQR 145-189 minutes), P < 0.001; aortic cross clamp 134 minutes (IQR 121-150 minutes) vs 111 minutes (IQR 91-137 minutes), P < 0.001, respectively). There was no mortality and no strokes, nor were there any differences in postoperative outcomes including reoperation for bleeding, renal failure, intensive care or hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an automated knot fastener significantly reduces cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp times in minimally invasive mitral valve repair but this does not translate into an improved clinical outcome.