Photoactivated rose bengal mitigates a fibrotic phenotype and improves cutaneous wound healing in full-thickness injuries.

Healing of deep cutaneous wounds often results in detrimental sequelae, including painful and debilitating scars. Current therapies for full-thickness injuries that target specific phases of wound healing have moderate success; however, full resolution remains incomplete and negative consequences persist if skin homeostasis is not achieved. Photoactivated molecules can modulate cellular responses by generating reactive oxygen species and may provide a novel therapeutic option to improve wound healing. In the current study, we investigated the effects of Rose bengal (RB) dye in a preclinical model of full-thickness cutaneous injury. Monochromatic green light activates RB to generate ROS in the presence of oxygen, subsequently crosslinking collagen fibrils. In in vitro studies, we show that photoactivated RB is well tolerated by epidermal keratinocytes and dermal fibroblasts and can mitigate fibrotic signalling by downregulating collagen production. In a murine model of full-thickness injury, topically-applied and photoactivated RB closed wounds faster than control and vehicle treatments and showed significantly improved wound healing outcomes, including enhanced early granulation, better collagen organisation and increased vascularity in the presence of protracted tissue ROS. These data support an overall improved cutaneous wound healing profile after RB phototherapy and warrant further investigations into this versatile molecule.

Association of a 40-Gene Expression Profile With Risk of Metastatic Disease Progression of Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Specification of Benefit of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy.

PURPOSE: Adjuvant radiation therapy (ART) for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is recommended based on a number of wide-ranging clinicopathologic features, which encompass a broad array of patients. The 40-gene expression profile (GEP) test classifies cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma tumors into low (class 1), higher (class 2A), or highest (class 2B) risk of nodal and/or distant metastasis. This study's hypotheses are as follows: (1) local recurrence is associated with metastatic disease progression and (2) 40-GEP, by identifying high risk for metastasis, could predict a metastasis-specific benefit from ART. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Samples were obtained from 920 patients (ART-untreated: 496 class 1, 335 class 2A, and 33 class 2B; ART-treated: 11 class 1, 35 class 2A, and 10 class 2B) who were matched on clinical risk factors and stratified by ART status to create 49 matched patient strata. To control for the variety of characteristics and treatment selection bias, randomly sampled pairs of matched ART and non-ART patients comprising 10,000 resampled cohorts were each analyzed for 5-year metastasis-free survival and predicted time to metastatic event. RESULTS: Of 96 patients experiencing local recurrence, 56.3% experienced metastasis; of those experiencing both, 88.9% experienced local recurrence before (75.9%) or concurrently (13.0%) with metastasis. After matching for clinicopathologic risk, median 5-year disease progression rates for resampled cohorts demonstrated approximately 50% improvement for class 2B ART-treated compared with ART-untreated cohorts. ART-treated class 2B cohorts had a 5-fold delay in predicted time to metastatic event and deceleration of disease progression compared with ART-untreated cohorts (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P < .01); this was not observed for patients with class 1 or 2A cSCC (P > .05 for each). No risk factor or staging system combined with ART status identified groups that would benefit from ART as well as 40-GEP. CONCLUSIONS: Forty-GEP identifies patients at the highest risk of nodal/distant metastasis who may derive the greatest benefit from ART, as well as patients who may have clinical indications for ART but are at low risk of metastasis. Compared with current guidelines, 40-GEP could provide greater specificity concerning the benefit of ART in individual patients.

Post-traumatic stress disorder in burn patients - A large database analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) afflicts a significant portion of burn patients. This study aims to analyze the morbidity, prevalence, and treatment of PTSD in the burn population. METHODS: Using the TriNetX database, we identified burned patients > 18 years of age without (A) or with (B) a PTSD diagnosis. Patients were then stratified by percent of total body surface area (TBSA) burned. Morbidity and mortality was analyzed in each cohort. Prevalence and pharmacologic treatments for PTSD were analyzed from 2002 to 2022. RESULTS: PTSD incidence increased from 2.4% (n = 2281) in patients with < 10% to 3.1% (n = 542) in 10-30%, 7.4% (n = 285) in 30-59%, and 5.3% (n = 90) in > 60% TBSA burned. In patients with < 60% TBSA burned, PTSD diagnosis increased the risk of depression (p = <0.0003) and anxiety (p = <0.0001). In those with < 30% TBSA burned, PTSD diagnosis also increased risk of insomnia (p = <0.0001) and pruritus (p = 0.0211 for TBSA <10% and 0.0059 for TBSA 10-29%). PTSD diagnosis was associated with a decreased risk of mortality in patients with > 30% TBSA burned (p = 0.0179 for TBSA 30-59% and p = 0.0089 for TBSA >60%). From 2002 to 2022, the prevalence of PTSD in all burn patients was relatively stable between 2.2% and 3.2%. We found an increase in the use of serotonergic agents and prazosin for the treatment of PTSD during this timeframe. CONCLUSION: PTSD is not uncommon in the burn population, and those with burns and concomitant PTSD have an increased risk of morbidity. Screening and preventative measures to reduce morbidity and early implementation of care in burned patients with PTSD are indicated.

Integrating the 40-Gene Expression Profile (40-GEP) Test Improves Metastatic Risk-Stratification Within Clinically Relevant Subgroups of High-Risk Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma (cSCC) Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The validated 40-gene expression profile (40-GEP) test independently stratifies risk of regional or distant metastasis for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) tumors with high-risk clinicopathologic features. This study evaluated the stratification of risk by the 40-GEP test in a large cohort of tumors with one or more high-risk factors and in clinically relevant subgroups, including tumors within National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high- and very-high-risk groups, lower-stage BWH T1 and T2a tumors, and patients > 65 years old. METHODS: This multicenter (n = 58) performance study of the 40-GEP included 897 patients. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to assess risk stratification profiles for 40-GEP Class 1 (low), Class 2A (higher) and Class 2B (highest) risk groups, while nested Cox regression models were used to compare risk prediction of clinicopathologic risk classification systems versus risk classification systems in combination with 40-GEP. RESULTS: Patients classified as 40-GEP Class 1, Class 2A, or Class 2B had significantly different metastatic risk profiles (p < 0.0001). Integrating 40-GEP results into models with individual clinicopathologic risk factors or risk classification systems (Brigham and Women's Hospital, American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, 8th Edition) and NCCN demonstrated significant improvement in accuracy for prediction of metastatic events (ANOVA for model deviance, p < 0.0001 for all models). CONCLUSION: The 40-GEP test demonstrates accurate, independent, clinically actionable stratification of metastatic risk and improves predictive accuracy when integrated into risk classification systems. The improved accuracy of risk assessment when including tumor biology via the 40-GEP test ensures more risk-aligned, personalized patient management decisions.