Increased arterial stiffness in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: the Cardio-GOOSE study.

OBJECTIVE: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a very frequent disease in Western countries. NAFLD shares with metabolic syndrome the same etiologic factors, such as obesity, diabetes, and dyslipidemia, which are also major cardiovascular risk factors. Cardio-GOOSE (Cardio-Gambettola ObservatOry liver Steatosis Estimation) is a population-based cohort study finalized to evaluate the relationship between NAFLD, subclinical vascular damage, and arterial stiffness. METHODS: The study population consisted of 220 participants (123 women), aged between 30 and 70 years, who participated in the GOOSE study. Arterial stiffness was determined by measuring the carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) by means of the PulsePen device. Preclinical atherosclerosis was detected by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement. RESULTS: NAFLD was associated with metabolic syndrome in 48% of cases. IMT values were strongly related to metabolic syndrome factors. No significant differences in IMT were found between controls and patients with isolated NAFLD (0.77 +/- 0.15 mm versus 0.76 +/- 0.14 mm). Conversely, in patients with NAFLD associated with metabolic syndrome, IMT values were significantly higher than in patients with NAFLD alone (0.85 +/- 0.16 mm, P < 0.005). PWV values were significantly lower in controls compared to patients with isolated NAFLD (7.40 +/- 1.47 versus 7.98 +/- 1.51 m/s, P < 0.05) as well as patients with both NAFLD and metabolic syndrome (8.29 +/- 2.2 m/s, P < 0.001). The prevalence in NAFLD was increased in patients with the highest PWV values, and persisted after adjustment for factors determining metabolic syndrome (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown a possible independent role of NAFLD in determining arterial stiffness.

Inadequate use of acid-suppressive therapy in hospitalized patients and its implications for general practice.

Acid-suppressive therapy (AST) is largely prescribed in both hospital and general practice setting but few data are available on appropriateness of AST use in hospitalized patients and its fallout on prescribing in general practice. We assessed AST in patients consecutively admitted to an internal medicine department to determine the type and timing of prescription and indication for use according to widely accepted guidelines. Prescriptions were rated as indicated, acceptable, or not indicated. Overall, 58.7% of 834 admitted patients received AST, mainly proton pump inhibitors. The prescriptions were indicated in 50.1% of patients, not indicated in 41.5%, and acceptable in 6.5%. The main reason for inappropriate use was prophylaxis in low-risk patients (64.8%). On admission, 35.7% of 112 patients already on AST were judged to receive inappropriate prescription; of 348 patients discharged on AST, overuse was identified in 38.5%. No significant difference was observed for inappropriate use at admission, during hospitalization, and at discharge. In 64 inpatients (7.7%) AST, although indicated, mainly for ulcer prophylaxis in high-risk patients, was not prescribed. In conclusion, AST is substantially over-used in both hospital and general practice settings, mainly for ulcer prophylaxis in low-risk patients. On the other hand, AST is underused in a small, but not negligible proportion of high-risk patients.