The impact of allogeneic stem cell transplantation on the natural course of poor-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia as defined by the EBMT consensus criteria: a retrospective donor versus no donor comparison.

BACKGROUND: In a single-center retrospective donor versus no-donor comparison, we investigated if allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can improve the dismal course of poor-risk chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with CLL who were referred for evaluation of alloSCT within a 7-year time frame and had a donor search indication according to the EBMT criteria or because of Richter's transformation were included. Patients for whom a matched donor could be found within 3 months (matches) were compared with patients without such a donor (controls). Primary end point was overall survival measured from the 3-month landmark after search initiation. RESULTS: Of 105 patients with donor search, 97 (matches 83; controls 14) were assessable at the 3-month landmark. Matches and controls were comparable for age, gender, time from diagnosis, number of previous regimens, and remission status. Disregarding if alloSCT was actually carried out or not, survival from the 3-month landmark was significantly better in matches versus controls [hazard ratio 0.38, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-0.85; P = 0.014]. The survival benefit of matches remained significant on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides first comparative evidence that alloSCT may have the potential to improve the natural course of poor-risk CLL as defined by the EBMT criteria.

Hepatotoxicity in patients prescribed efavirenz or nevirapine.

AIM: For several years Nonnucleoside reverse transciptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) in antiretroviral therapy have been associated with hepatic side effects. Particularly the hepatotoxic potential of Nevirapine is well analysed today. We performed a prospective, multicenter study to compare the hepatotoxicity of Efavirenz (EFV) with that of Nevirapine (NVP) and to investigate further risk factors. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included HIV-1-infected patients from five clinics and private medical practices in southwestern Germany who initiated an antiretroviral therapy with NVP or EFV between July 1998 and December 2001. Among 296 patients in total, 151 received EFV and 145 received NVP. Laboratory tests during the course of treatment included liver enzymes, HIV-RNA and CD4 cell-count. Additionally, signs of clinical hepatitis were recorded. Hepatotoxicity was graded in the manner of Sulkowsky et al. (2000), who used a scale modified from that of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group. RESULTS: Hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus were detected in 10.1% and 4.1% of patients, respectively. The overall rate of severe hepatotoxicity (grade 3 to 4 elevations in aspartate aminotransferase and/or alanine aminotransferase) was 2 of 151 (1.3%) in patients prescribed EFV and 3 of 145 (2.1%) in patients prescribed NVP. Mild-to-moderate hepatotoxicity (grade 2 elevation) was observed in 6.0% (EFV) and 3.4% (NVP) of patients. Incidence of mild-to-moderate and severe hepatotoxicity did not differ significantly between the study groups. 3 of 14 patients (2.1%) with grade 2 elevation of liver enzymes (LEE) and 4 of 5 patients (80%) with grade 3 to 4 LEE were symptomatic. Only risk factor for the development of mild-to-moderate hepatotoxicity was hepatitis C coinfection. CONCLUSION: Increases of liver enzymes during therapy with NVP or EFV are not unusual, but are mostly mild-to-moderate and asymptomatic. LEE occurs just as frequent in patients prescribed EFV as in patients prescribed NVP.

Long-term consequences of treatment interruptions in chronically HIV-1-infected patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of antiretroviral treatment (ART) interruptions on metabolic, immunological, virological and clinical outcomes in chronically HIV-1 infected patients. METHODS: Multi-centric, prospective, controlled 24-month cohort study in HIV-1 infected patients interrupting ART once or several times and for at least two weeks. Patients were compared to a frequency-matched control group continuing on ART. RESULTS: A total of 399 HIV-1 infected patients were included, among them 133 patients with treatment interruption (TI) and 266 control patients. Baseline characteristics were well matched. Median baseline CD4 cell count was 379/microl in TI-patients and 410/microl in control patients (p = ns). Median duration of the first TI was 1.1 months, and 37 % of patients had two or further TI's. Whereas CD4 cell count in control patients had increased significantly by a median of 67/microl at month 24 (p<0.0001), median CD4 cell count at month 24 in the TI-patients did not differ significantly from baseline. However, two-year AIDS-free survival was not significantly different between TI- and control patients. Liver enzymes and blood lipids improved significantly during TI. CONCLUSION: TI was associated with a significant immunological disadvantage at 24-month follow-up compared to continued ART. In this relatively immunocompetent cohort, however, TI's did not lead to an increased risk of disease progression within two years of follow-up.

Evaluation of an efavirenz-containing regimen: an open-label, multicenter study.

PURPOSE: Efavirenz (EFV) has been shown to be a highly effective HIV therapy in antiretroviral-naïve patients when used with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. METHOD: The study participants were 314 patients, 45 of whom had not been previously treated with any antiretroviral medication. The other patients were heavily pretreated for about 3 years (1,047 days); 34 with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, 147 with triple therapy, and 88 with a quadruple regimen. RESULTS: Suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA to <50 copies/mL and <500 copies/mL was achieved in 56% and 72% of the pretreated patients and in 82% and 91% of the naïve patients, respectively, at week 80 (intention-to-treat analysis: noncompleters = failure: 10% and 15% and 20% and 22%, respectively). The viral load reduction at week 80 was 0.7 log(10) for the pretreated patients and 2.6 log(10) for the naïve patients. CD4 cell counts increased from 386 to 474 cells/microL at week 80 in the pretreated group and from 264 to 431 in the naïve patients. 118 patients discontinued the treatment due to adverse events (37 patients due to nervous system symptoms and 15 patients because of exanthema). There were no AIDS-defining events in the group of antiretroviral-treated patients. CONCLUSION: EFV in combination with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors as antiretroviral therapy was potent and effective in reducing viral load, mainly in treating therapy-naïve patients and in preventing AIDS-defining events.

Evaluation of a didanosin-containing regimen including genotypic resistance testing: an open-label, multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To show Didanosin in a new formulation as a once-a-day capsula as a well-tolerated and effective HIV-therapy when used in a protease sparing regimen including genotypic resistance pattern in blood, semen and cerebrospinal fluid before and during treatment. METHOD: Two groups of 58 patients, each containing 9 patients who had not been previously treated with any antiretroviral medication, and 49 patients heavily pretreated for 3,7 (DDI group) and 2,8 (non-DDI group) years, have been followed up for at least half a year. A group of 24 patients taking a special combination of Didanosin plus Efavirenz and Stavudine have been analysed with genotypic resistance testing concerning viral load response and resistance pattern under therapy. RESULTS: Suppression of plasma HIV-1 RNA to <50 copies/mL and <500 copies/mL in the DDI group was achieved in 74% and 84% of the pretreated patients, respectively, and in 100% of the naive patients after 24 weeks. In the non-DDI group suppression was achieved in 59% and 69% of the pretreated patients, respectively, and in also 100% of the naive patients. The viral load reduction in the DDI containing regimen at week 24 was 1.7 log subset 10 for the pretreated and 3,4 log subset 10 for the naive patients. In the non-DDI group, the reduction was 1.5 for the pretreated and 4,0 for the naive patients. CD4 cell counts increased from 440 to 517 cells/microL at week 24 for the pretreated, and from 171 to 289 for the naive patients in the DDI containing regimen. In the other group, cells increased from 396 to 406 for the pretreated and from 155 to 321 for the naive patients. In each group, 12 patients discontinued treatment; 4 patients in the DDI group and 7 patients in the non-DDI group because of adverse events. There were no AIDS-defining events in the antiretroviral-treated patients in both groups. 16 patients of the special combination group (DDI, D4T and EFV) were evaluated for more than 24 weeks. Suppression of HIV-1 RNA to <50 copies /mL were found in 75% of the naive and 43% of the pretreated patients. No relevant mutations were found during treatment. CONCLUSION: The new formulation of Didanosin as a once-a-day capsula in a protease sparing regimen was well-tolerated, effective in reducing viral load and in preventing AIDS-defining events. The combination of DDI, D4T and EFV proved to be a potent therapy without developing relevant mutations.

[Rashes in HIV-infected patients undergoing therapy with nevirapine or efavirenz]. / Arzneimittelexantheme bei Therapie der HIV-Infektion mit Efavirenz und Nevirapin.

Efavirenz and nevirapine are frequently used drugs in antiretroviral therapy. Rashes are common side effects of these drugs. In this study, we examined the characteristics of efavirenz- and nevirapine-associated rashes. This prospective nonrandomized multicenter study included 662 HIV-infected patients (efavirenz: 325, nevirapine: 337) to determine incidence, duration, cross-reactivity, and outcome upon reexposure. Of the treated patients, 4.5% (n=30) developed rashes (nevirapine: 2.4% and efavirenz: 6.4%). In four patients treatment was not interrupted. Three patients were re-exposed to the initial drug without any side effects. Therapy with nevirapine or efavirenz does not have to be interrupted if rashes exhibit no blistering, mucosal manifestations, or systemic signs.