Hospital Variation and Resource Use for Infants with Craniosynostosis Undergoing Open, Endoscopic, and Distraction Osteogenesis Surgical Techniques.

BACKGROUND: Craniosynostosis is treated with endoscopic, open, and/or distraction surgical techniques. We assessed institutional variation in the use these techniques for craniosynostosis and compared hospital resource use. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 5249 infants age <18 months old undergoing surgical procedures for all types of craniosynostosis in 2016-2020 in 39 freestanding children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database. Endoscopic vs. open cranial vault surgery (with and without distraction osteogenesis) was identified using ICD-10-CM codes. Inpatient cost and length of stay (LOS) were compared by surgery type with Wilcoxon Rank Sum. RESULTS: There was significant (p < .001) variation in the percentage of infants who underwent endoscopic repair across hospitals [median 23.6% (interquartile range (IQR): 7.6%-37.5%), range: 0% to 80.4%] and across regions [range: 22.1% (southeast) to 42.5% (northeast)]. For endoscopic procedures, median LOS and inpatient cost were lower (p < .001) without vs. with distraction [1 day (IQR 1-1) vs. 2 days (IQR 2-2); $14,617 (IQR 11,823-22178) vs. $33,599 (IQR 22,800-38,619)]. For open interventions, median LOS and inpatient cost were also lower (p < .001) without vs. with distraction [3 days (IQR 2-4) vs. 5 days (IQR 4-6) and $37,251 (IQR 27,114-50.320) vs. $62,247 (IQR 42,124-91,620)]. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial variation in the surgical approach for craniosynostosis exists across hospitals and regions. Endoscopic repair without distraction had the lowest hospital resource use, while open repair with distraction had the highest hospital resource. Subsequent analysis of short- and long-term outcomes as well as patient-and-family costs is necessary to assess the true cost-effectiveness of each approach.

Technical evolution of pediatric neurosurgery: craniosynostosis from 1972 to 2023 and beyond.

Very few clinical entities have undergone so many different treatment approaches over such a short period of time as craniosynostosis. Surgical treatments for this condition have ranged from simple linear craniectomies, accounting for the specific role of cranial sutures in assuring the normal growth of the skull, to more complex cranial vault reconstructions, based on the perceived role of the skull base in affecting the growth of the skull. While a great deal of evolution has occurred, there remains controversy regarding the ideal treatment including the best surgical technique, the optimal age for surgery, and the long-term morphological and neurodevelopmental outcomes. The evolution of the surgical management of craniosynostosis in the last 50 years has been affected by several factors. This includes the awareness of needing to operate on affected children during infancy to achieve the best results, the use of multistage operations, the availability of more sophisticated surgical tools, and improved perioperative care. In some forms of craniosynostosis, the operations can be carried out at a very young age with low morbidity, and with the postoperative use of a molding helmet, springs, or distractors, these operations prove to be as effective as traditional larger cranial reconstructions performed in older children. As a consequence, complex surgical operations have become progressively less utilized. A second relevant advance was the more recent advent of a molecular diagnosis, which allowed us to understand the pathogenesis of some associated malformations and neurodevelopmental issues that were observed in some children despite appropriate surgical treatment. Future research should focus on improving the analysis of longer-term outcomes and understanding the natural history of craniofacial conditions, including what issues persist despite optimal surgical correction. Progress in molecular investigations concerning the normal and pathological development of cranial sutures could be a further significant step in the management of craniosynostosis, possibly favoring a "medical" treatment in the near future. Artificial intelligence will likely have a role in establishing the diagnosis with less reliance on radiographic studies and in assisting with surgical planning. Overall, much progress has been made, but there remains much to do.

Syndrome of anterior neural stalk, vertebral abnormality, enteric duplication cyst, and diaphragmatic hernia related to persistent ventral neurenteric canal: report of two cases.

PURPOSE: Abnormalities in notochordal development can cause a range of developmental malformations, including the split notochord syndrome and split cord malformations. We describe two cases that appear related to unusual notochordal malformations, in a female and a male infant diagnosed in the early postnatal and prenatal periods, which were treated at our institution. These cases were unusual from prior cases given a shared constellation of an anterior cervicothoracic meningocele with a prominent "neural stalk," which coursed ventrally from the spinal cord into the thorax in proximity to a foregut duplication cyst. METHODS: Two patients with this unusual spinal cord anomaly were assessed clinically, and with neuroimaging and genetics studies. RESULTS: We describe common anatomical features (anterior neural stalk arising from the spinal cord, vertebral abnormality, enteric duplication cyst, and diaphragmatic hernia) that support a common etiopathogenesis and distinguish these cases. In both cases, we opted for conservative neurosurgical management in regards to the spinal cord anomaly. We proposed a preliminary theory of the embryogenesis that explains these findings related to a persistence of the ventral portion of the neurenteric canal. CONCLUSION: These cases may represent a form of spinal cord malformation due to a persistent neurenteric canal and affecting notochord development that has rarely been described. Over more than 1 year of follow-up while managed conservatively, there was no evidence of neurologic dysfunction, so far supporting a treatment strategy of observation.

Use of intraoperative bone scintigraphy for resection of spinal osteoid osteoma.

BACKGROUND: The location and proximity to the spinal cord in spinal osteoid osteoma can increase the likelihood of an incomplete resection. Intraoperative bone scintigraphy (IOBS) can be used to verify location and complete surgical resection. OBJECTIVE: To review our experience using IOBS for resection of intraspinal osteoid osteoma. METHODS: IRB approved, retrospective review of IOBS-guided resection over 10 years. Patients underwent injection of 200 uCi/kg (1-20 mCi) 99mTc-MDP 3-4 h prior surgery. Portable single-headed gamma camera equipped with a pinhole collimator (3- or 4-mm aperture) was used. Images were obtained pre-operatively, at the start of the procedure, and intraoperatively. Operative notes were reviewed. Evaluation of recurrence and clinical follow-up was performed. RESULTS: Twenty IOBS-guided resections were performed in 18 patients (median age 13.5 years, 6-22 years, 12 males). Size ranged 5-16 mm, with 38.9% (7/18) cervical, 22.2% (4/18) thoracic, 22.2% (4/18) lumbar, and 16.7% (3/18) sacral. In all cases, IOBS was able to localize the lesion. After suspected total excision, IOBS altered the surgical plan in 75% of cases (15/20), showing residual activity prompting further resection. Median length of follow-up was 6 months (range 1-156 months) with 90% (18/20) showing complete resection without recurrence. Two patients had osteoid osteoma recurrence at 7 and 10 months following the original resection, requiring re-intervention. CONCLUSIONS: IOBS is a useful tool for real-time localization and assessment of spinal osteoid osteoma resection. In all cases, IOBS was able to localize the lesion and changed surgical planning in 75% of cases. Ninety percent of patients achieved complete resection and remain recurrence free.

Two-Surgeon Multidisciplinary Approach to Pediatric Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Single-Institution Series and Review of the Literature.

BACKGROUND: A collaborative 2-surgeon approach is becoming increasingly popular in surgery but is not widely used for pediatric cervical spine fusions. The goal of this study is to present a large single-institution experience with pediatric cervical spinal fusion using a multidisciplinary 2-surgeon team, including a neurosurgeon and an orthopedic surgeon. This team-based approach has not been previously reported in the pediatric cervical spine literature. METHODS: A single-institution review of pediatric cervical spine instrumentation and fusion performed by a surgical team composed of neurosurgery and orthopedics during 2002-2020 was performed. Demographics, presenting symptoms and indications, surgical characteristics, and outcomes were recorded. Particular focus was given to describe the primary surgical responsibility of the orthopedic surgeon and the neurosurgeon. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (54% male) with an average age of 12.1 (range 2-26) years met the inclusion criteria. The most common indications for surgery were os odontoideum with instability (n=21) and trauma (n=18). Syndromes were present in 44 (39%) cases. Fifty-five (49%) patients presented with preoperative neurological deficits (26 motor, 12 sensory, and 17 combined deficits). At the time of the last clinical follow-up, 44 (80%) of these patients had stabilization or resolution of their neurological deficit. There was 1 new postoperative neural deficit (1%). The average time between surgery and successful radiologic arthrodesis was 13.2±10.6 mo. A total of 15 (13%) patients experienced complications within 90 days of surgery (2 intraoperative, 6 during admission, and 7 after discharge). CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary 2-surgeon approach to pediatric cervical spine instrumentation and fusion provides a safe treatment option for complex pediatric cervical cases. It is hoped that this study could provide a model for other pediatric spine groups interested in implementing a multi-specialty 2-surgeon team to perform complex pediatric cervical spine fusions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

Large Vertex Encephaloceles: Management and Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Complex vertex and posterior encephaloceles containing brain tissue have uncertain prognosis and high operative risk. Patients may not be offered operative intervention depending on local and regional specialist expertise. The authors present their experience treating 5 such pediatric patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of the surgical assessment, planning, and technique of cranial repairs, as well as surgical outcomes and developmental follow-up regarding adaptive functioning for patients presenting for second opinion for encephalocele of the cranial vertex after having been deemed too high risk at another institution. RESULTS: Five consecutive patients presented between January 2014 and June 2016. One patient was not offered repair. Of 4 patients who underwent reconstruction, average age at time of repair was 2.7 months (range, 0.9-6.7). One presented with ruptured encephalocele, whereas the remaining 3 underwent drainage of the encephalocele (average volume of 1200 mL) at time of surgical resection. Operative time averaged 3.7 hours (range, 2.2-5.3). There were no deaths. One patient had a single seizure postoperatively. Two patients required placement of permanent shunt for hydrocephalus. Two patients completed developmental evaluations, both of whom exhibited delays in adaptive functioning relative to same-aged peers. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with large, complex encephalocele warrant evaluation by an experienced high-volume tertiary care pediatric craniofacial center. The decision to proceed with surgical management should include an interdisciplinary team of surgeons, anesthesiologists, neurologists, and social work. Further study of developmental outcomes in both operated and unoperated patients is necessary to better understand risks and benefits of reconstruction.

Conditional trust: Community perceptions of drone use in malaria control in Zanzibar.

Background: The potential of drones to support public health interventions, such as malaria vector control, is beginning to be realised. Although permissions from civil aviation authorities are often needed for drone operations, the communities over which they fly tend to be ignored: How do affected communities perceive drones? Is drone deployment accepted by communities? How should communities be engaged? Methods: An initiative in Zanzibar, United Republic of Tanzania is using drones to map malarial mosqutio breeding sites for targeting larval source management interventions. A community engagement framework was developed, based on participatory research, across three communities where drones will be deployed, to map local perceptions of drone use. Costs associated with this exercise were collated. Results: A total of 778 participants took part in the study spanning a range of community and stakeholder groups. Overall there was a high level of acceptance and trust in drone use for public health research purposes. Despite this level of trust for drone operations this support was conditional: There was a strong desire for pre-deployment information across all stakeholder groups and regular updates of this information to be given about drone activities, as well as consent from community level governance. The cost of the perception study and resulting engagement strategy was US$24,411. Conclusions: Mapping and responding to community perceptions should be a pre-requisite for drone activity in all public health applications and requires funding. The findings made in this study were used to design a community engagement plan providing a simple but effective means of building and maintaining trust and acceptability. We recommend this an essential investment.

Operative Treatment of Cervical Spine Injuries Sustained in Youth Sports.

BACKGROUND: Little data exists on surgical outcomes of sports-related cervical spine injuries (CSI) sustained in children and adolescent athletes. This study reviewed demographics, injury characteristics, management, and operative outcomes of severe CSI encountered in youth sports. METHODS: Children below 18 years with operative sports-related CSI at a Level 1 pediatric trauma center were reviewed (2004 to 2019). All patients underwent morden cervical spine instrumentation and fusion. Clinical, radiographic, and surgical characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 3231 patients (mean, 11.3±4.6 y) with neck pain were evaluated for CSI. Sports/recreational activities were the most common etiology in 1358 cases (42.0%). Twenty-nine patients (2.1%) with sports-related CSI (mean age, 14.5 y; range, 6.4 to 17.8 y) required surgical intervention. Twenty-five were males (86%). Operative CSI occurred in football (n=8), wrestling (n=7), gymnastics (n=5), diving (n=4), trampoline (n=2), hockey (n=1), snowboarding (n=1), and biking (n=1). Mechanisms were 27 hyperflexion/axial loading (93%) and 2 hyperextension injuries (7%). Most were cervical fractures (79%) and subaxial injuries (79%). Seven patients (24%) sustained spinal cord injury (SCI) and 3 patients (10%) cord contusion or myelomalacia without neurological deficits. The risk of SCI increased with age (P=0.03). Postoperatively, 2 SCI patients (29%) improved 1 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grade and 1 (14%) improved 2 American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades. Increased complications developed in SCI than non-SCI cases (mean, 2.0 vs. 0.1 complications; P=0.02). Bony fusion occurred in 26/28 patients (93%) after a median of 7.2 months (interquartile range, 6 to 15 mo). Ten patients (34%) returned to their baseline sport and 9 (31%) to lower-level activities. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of sports-related CSI requiring surgery is low with differences in age/sex, sport, and injury patterns. Older males with hyperflexion/axial loading injuries in contact sports were at greatest risk of SCI, complications, and permanent disability. Prevention campaigns, education on proper tackling techniques, and neck strength training are required in sports at high risk of hyperflexion/axial loading injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Surgery for Infantile Craniosynostosis: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate patient outcomes of minimally invasive endoscopic strip craniectomy (ESC) for craniosynostosis. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort analysis (2004-2018) of 500 consecutive infants with craniosynostosis treated by ESC with orthotic therapy at a single center. Operative outcomes included transfusions, complications, and reoperations as well as head circumference change based on World Health Organization percentiles. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with blood transfusion. Paired t tests were used for within-patient comparisons and Fisher exact test to compare syndromic and nonsyndromic subgroups. RESULTS: ESC was associated with low rates of blood transfusion (6.6%), complications (1.4%), and reoperations (3.0%). Risk factors for transfusion included syndromic craniosynostosis (P = .01) and multiple fused sutures (P = .02). Median surgical time was 47 minutes, and hospital length of stay 1 day. Transfusion and reoperation rates were higher among syndromic patients (both P < .001). Head circumference normalized by 12 months of age relative to World Health Organization criteria in infants with sagittal, coronal, and multisuture craniosynostosis (all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: ESC is a safe, effective, and durable correction of infantile craniosynostosis. ESC can achieve head growth normalization with low risks of blood transfusion, complications, or reoperation. Early identification of craniosynostosis in the newborn period and prompt referral by pediatricians allows families the option of ESC vs larger and riskier open reconstruction procedures.

High-dose versus low-dose tranexamic acid for paediatric craniosynostosis surgery: a double-blind randomised controlled non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND: Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces blood loss and transfusion in paediatric craniosynostosis surgery. The hypothesis is that low-dose TXA, determined by pharmacokinetic modelling, is non-inferior to high-dose TXA in decreasing blood loss and transfusion in children. METHODS: Children undergoing craniosynostosis surgery were enrolled in a two-centre, prospective, double-blind, randomised, non-inferiority controlled trial to receive high TXA (50 mg kg-1 followed by 5 mg kg-1 h-1) or low TXA (10 mg kg-1 followed by 5 mg kg-1 h-1). Primary outcome was blood loss. Low dose was determined to be non-inferior to high dose if the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the mean difference in blood loss was above the non-inferiority margin of -20 ml kg-1. Secondary outcomes were transfusion, TXA plasma concentrations, and biological markers of fibrinolysis and inflammation. RESULTS: Sixty-eight children were included. Values were non-inferior regarding blood loss (39.4 [4.4] vs 40.3 [6.2] ml kg-1 [difference=0.9; 95% CI: -14.2, 15.9]) and blood transfusion (21.3 [1.6] vs 23.6 [1.5] ml kg-1 [difference=2.3; 95% CI: -2.1, 6.7]) between high-dose (n=32) and low-dose (n=34) groups, respectively. The TXA plasma concentrations during surgery averaged 50.2 (8.0) and 29.6 (7.6) µg ml-1. There was no difference in fibrinolytic and inflammatory biological marker concentrations. No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tranexamic acid 10 mg kg-1 followed by 5 mg kg-1 h-1 is not less effective than a higher dose of 50 mg kg-1 and 5 mg kg-1 h-1 in reducing blood loss and transfusion in paediatric craniosynostosis surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02188576.

Intraoperative Use of O-arm in Pediatric Cervical Spine Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Traditionally, fluoroscopy and postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans are used to evaluate screw position after pediatric cervical spine fusion. However, noncontained screws detected postoperatively can require revision surgery. Intraoperative O-arm is a 3-dimensional CT imaging technique, which allows intraoperative evaluation of screw position and potentially avoids reoperations because of implant malposition. This study's objective was to evaluate the use of intraoperative O-arm in determining the accuracy of cervical implants placed by a free-hand technique using anatomic landmarks or fluoroscopic guidance in pediatric cervical spine instrumentation. METHODS: A single-center retrospective study of consecutive examinations of children treated with cervical spine instrumentation and intraoperative O-arm from 2014 to 2018 was performed. In total, 44 cases (41 children, 44% men) with a mean age of 11.9 years (range, 2.1 to 23.5 y) were identified. Instability (n=16, 36%) and deformity (n=10, 23%) were the most frequent indications. Primary outcomes were screw revision rate, neurovascular complications caused by noncontained screws, and radiation exposure. RESULTS: A total of 272 screws were inserted (60 occipital and 212 cervical screws). All screws were evaluated on fluoroscopy as appropriately placed. Four screws (1.5%) in 4 cases (9%) were noncontained on O-arm imaging and required intraoperative revision. A mean of 7.7 levels (range, 5 to 13) were scanned. The mean CT dose index and dose-length product were 15.2±6.87 mGy and 212.3±120.48 mGy×cm. Mean effective dose was 1.57±0.818 mSv. There was no association between screw location and noncontainment (P=0.129). No vertebral artery injuries, dural injuries, or neurologic deficits were related to the 4 revised screws. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative non-navigated O-arm is a safe and efficient method to evaluate screw position in pediatric patients undergoing cervical spine instrumentation. Noncontained screws were detected in 9% of cases (n=4). O-arm delivers low radiation doses, allows for intraoperative screw revision, and negates the need for postoperative CT scans after confirmation of optimal implant position. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Acute Implant-related Complications in Pediatric Cervical Spine Fusion.

BACKGROUND: The use of modern rigid instrumentation in pediatric cervical fusions decreases the risk of implant-related complications, both acute and long term. However, previous studies have indicated that acute implant-related issues still occur in the adult population. Reports of pediatric acute implant complications, occurring within 3 months of surgery, are under-represented in the literature. The purpose of this study is to document the prevalence of acute implant-related complications in a pediatric cervical fusion population. METHODS: A retrospective review of instrumented cervical fusions from August 2002 to December 2018 was conducted. Acute implant-related complications were defined as malposition, fracture, or disengagement of cervical instrumentation, including screws, rods, and plates, within 90 days of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 166 cases were included (55% male individuals) with an average age at surgery of 12.5 years (SD, ±5.28). Acute implant-related complications occurred in 5 patients (3%). All 5 patients had a syndromic diagnosis: Loeys-Dietz (n=1), osteopetrosis (n=1), neurofibromatosis (n=1), trisomy 20 (n=1), and achondroplasia (n=1). One case involved asymptomatic screw protrusion, 1 case lateral mass screw pull-out, 2 more had screw-rod disengagement, and the last experienced dislodgement of the anterior plate. The median time until the presentation was 25 days (range, 1 to 79 d). All patients (n=5) required surgical revision. CONCLUSIONS: This case series suggests that the overall incidence of acute cervical implant failure is low. However, failure is more likely to occur in patients with underlying syndromes compared with patients with different etiologies. Intraoperative use of 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging is recommended to evaluate the screw position and potentially avoid later surgery.

Postoperative Changes in Orbital Dysmorphology in Patients With Unicoronal Synostosis.

Orbital asymmetry in unicoronal synostosis impacts craniofacial appearance and can potentiate functional visual disturbances, such as strabismus. Surgical treatment aims to normalize overall cranial morphology, including that of the orbits. The purpose of this study was to compare postoperative changes in orbital asymmetry following 2 common procedures.Preoperative and 1-year postoperative computed tomography scans for patients with isolated, nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis treated from 2007 to 2012, at 2 academic institutions were analyzed. Only patients treated by endoscopic suturectomy and postoperative helmeting or bilateral fronto-orbital advancement were included. Orbital index, depth, and volume asymmetry were determined for each patient both pre- and 1-year postoperatively. Student's t-tests were used to compare pre- and postoperative asymmetries within each treatment group. Regression analyses were used to examine postoperative change in asymmetry between treatment groups.Scans from 12 patients treated by fronto-orbital advancement and 23 treated by endoscopic suturectomy were analyzed. Differences between synostotic and nonsynostotic orbital index, depth, and volume were statistically significant both pre- and postoperatively. Statistically significant postoperative improvements in asymmetry were observed for orbital index, depth, and volume following suturectomy. Regression analysis indicated that the amount of pre- to postoperative change in all measures of asymmetry did not depend on surgical technique. Residual asymmetry following both procedures was apparent at 1 year postoperatively.Orbital asymmetry is improved, but not resolved following both fronto-orbital advancement and endoscopic suturectomy. Degree of improvement in symmetry is independent of surgical technique used.

Evaluation of Endoscopic Strip Craniectomy and Orthotic Therapy for Bilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis.

BACKGROUND: Bilateral coronal craniosynostosis is the premature fusion of both coronal sutures. Traditionally, this condition is treated by frontal-orbital advancement (FOA). Endoscopic strip craniectomy with cranial orthotic therapy, which has gained popularity in treating single suture craniosynostosis, has recently been adapted for the treatment of bicoronal synostosis. There have been few studies documenting the outcomes of this treatment. The objective of this study is to compare the morphological outcomes of endoscopic strip craniectomy and FOA in patients with bicoronal synostosis. METHODS: A retrospective case series was done on 24 patients with bilateral coronal synostosis treated with endoscopic strip craniectomy or FOA at 2 institutions. Patients with preoperative and 1-year postoperative computed tomography scans were included. Multiple measures of cranial shape and size were assessed: cephalic index, turricephaly index, basofrontal angle, circumference Z-score, and cranial vault volume Z-score. RESULTS: The 2 groups were similar statistically in terms of morphology at preoperative scan. There were no statistical differences between the FOA group and endoscopic group at postoperative scan in any of the morphologic outcomes measured. Cranial vault volume Z-scores increased postoperatively in both the endoscopic (P < 0.001) and FOA (P = 0.034) groups. CONCLUSIONS: One year after repair there were no significant morphological difference between patients with bicoronal synostosis treated with the endoscopic approach and those treated by FOA.

Headache, Chiari I malformation and foramen magnum decompression.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: With increasing use of MRI, more patients are being diagnosed with Chiari I malformation (CM1), many of whom are asymptomatic. When symptoms are present, headache is the most frequent presenting feature, although symptoms can be variable. The purpose of this review is to help primary care clinicians better understand the relationship between an individual's presenting symptoms and the presence of radiographic CM1, and to describe the expected outcomes for patients who undergo decompression surgery. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent literature has shown that asymptomatic patients with CM1 tend to have a benign natural history. For symptomatic Chiari malformation, headache is the most common presenting symptom and the majority of patients that present with headache will have symptom improvement after foramen magnum decompression. This improvement is most reliable for patients with classic Chiari-type headache, which are described as occipital or cervical and tussive in nature, but has also been shown in patients with atypical headaches who have undergone surgery. SUMMARY: CM1 is a common radiographic finding and associated symptoms can be variable. The relevance of this finding to a particular patient and need for intervention must be made on an individual basis.

Pediatric Neurocritical Care: Evolution of a New Clinical Service in PICUs Across the United States.

OBJECTIVES: Pediatric neurocritical care as a conceptual service is relatively new, and implementation of such specialized services may improve outcomes for children with disorders of the brain or spinal cord. How many pediatric neurocritical care services currently exist in the United States, and attitudes about such a service are unknown. DESIGN: Web-based survey, distributed by e-mail. SETTING: Survey was sent to PICU Medical Directors and Program Directors of Pediatric Neurosurgery fellowship and Child Neurology residency programs. PATIENTS: None. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 378 surveys were distributed; 161 respondents representing 128 distinct hospitals completed the survey (43% response rate). Thirty-five percent (45/128) reported having a pediatric neurocritical care service. The most common type of service used a consultation model (82%; 32/39 responses). Other types of services were intensivist-led teams in the PICU (five hospitals) and dedicated PICU beds (two hospitals). Hospital characteristics associated with availability of pediatric neurocritical care services were level 1 trauma status (p = 0.017), greater numbers of PICU beds (χ [6, n = 128] = 136.84; p < 0.01), and greater volume of children with pediatric neurocritical care conditions (χ [3, n = 128] = 20.16; p < 0.01). The most common reasons for not having a pediatric neurocritical care service were low patient volume (34/119 responses), lack of subspecialists (30/119 responses), and lack of interest by PICU faculty (25/119 responses). The positive impacts of a pediatric neurocritical care service were improved interdisciplinary education/training (16/45 responses), dedicated expertise (13/45 responses), improved interservice communication (9/45 responses), and development/implementation of guidelines and protocols (9/45 responses). The negative impacts of a pediatric neurocritical care service were disagreement among consultants (2/45 responses) and splitting of the PICU population (2/45 responses). CONCLUSIONS: At least 45 specialized pediatric neurocritical care services exist in the United States. Eighty percent of these services are a consultation service to the PICU. Hospitals with level 1 trauma status, greater numbers of PICU beds, and greater numbers of patients with pediatric neurocritical care conditions were associated with the existence of pediatric neurocritical care as a clinical service.

C2 Translaminar Screw Fixation in Children.

BACKGROUND: Axis (C2) screw fixation has been shown to be effective in treating disorders that necessitate cervical stabilization. Although translaminar C2 screws have demonstrated clinical efficacy in adults, this technique has not yet been thoroughly investigated in children. This study describes the indications, technique, and results of translaminar C2 screw fixation in a case series of pediatric cervical spine disorders. METHODS: We searched the orthopaedic database at our institution for patients who had undergone a cervical spinal fusion that encompassed C2 between 2007 and 2017. Operative records were reviewed to determine if C2 screw fixation was performed and, if so, the type of C2 screw fixation. Clinical data with regard to patient age at surgery, diagnosis, procedure details, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative computer tomographic scans were reviewed to determine laminar measurements and containment, respectively. RESULTS: In total, 39 C2 translaminar screws were placed in 23 patients that met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 12.6 years (range, 5.2 to 17.8 y) with a mean of 2 levels fused (range, 1 to 6). Diagnoses included 7 patients with instability related to skeletal dysplasia, 6 os odontoideum, 4 congenital deformities, 3 basilar invaginations, 2 cervical spine tumors, and 1 fracture. Indications for C2 translaminar screws included 14 cases with distorted anatomy favoring C2 translaminar screws, 6 cases without explicit reasoning for translaminar screw usage in the patient records, and 3 cases with intraoperative vertebral artery injury (1 sacrificed secondary to tumor load and 2 others injured during exposure because of anomalous anatomy). The vertebral artery injuries were not due to placement of any instrumentation. There were no screw-related intraoperative or postoperative complications and no neurological injuries. All patients demonstrated clinical union or healing on follow-up with no episodes of nonunion. CONCLUSIONS: Translaminar C2 screw fixation can be reliably used in the pediatric population. Our series contained no screw-related complications, no neurological injuries, and all patients demonstrated clinical union or healing. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-Case series.

The Temporal Region in Unilateral Coronal Craniosynostosis: Fronto-orbital Advancement Versus Endoscopy-Assisted Strip Craniectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative temporal expansion in patients treated with fronto-orbital advancement or endoscopy-assisted craniectomy with cranial orthotic therapy. DESIGN: This is a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients with unilateral coronal craniosynostosis (UCS). SETTING: Computed tomographic (CT) scans were drawn from UCS patients treated at Boston Children's Hospital or St Louis Children's Hospital. PATIENTS: The study included 56 patients with UCS after fronto-orbital advancement (n = 32) or endoscopic repair (n = 24) and 10 age-matched controls. INTERVENTION: Fronto-orbital advancement entails a craniotomy of the frontal bone and superior orbital rim followed by reshaping and forward advancement. Endoscopic repair is the release of the synostotic suture and guidance of further growth of the cranium using a molding orthotic. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures included posterior temporal width, anterior temporal width, orbital width, and anterior cranial fossa area taken preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Linear regression was performed to assess 1 year postoperative improvement in symmetry; covariates included preoperative symmetry and type of surgery. RESULTS: Both treatments showed improvement in orbital width and anterior cranial fossa area symmetry 1 year postoperatively ( P < .001), but no significant improvement in posterior or anterior temporal width symmetry. Linear regression revealed no difference between the 2 procedures in any of the 4 measurements (.096 ≤ P ≤ .898). CONCLUSIONS: Fronto-orbital advancement and endoscopic repair show equivalent outcomes 1 year postoperatively in all 3 width measurements and anterior cranial fossa area. Neither procedure produced significant improvement in temporal width.