Adolescent eating disorder treatment outcomes of an in-person partial hospital program versus a virtual intensive outpatient program.

OBJECTIVE: Though virtual outpatient psychotherapy for eating disorders is likely effective, less is known about virtual higher levels of care. The current study examined the clinical outcomes of a family-based virtual intensive outpatient program (vIOP) for youth with eating disorders which was developed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, compared to the same institution's in-person partial hospital program (PHP). METHODS: Treatment outcomes were assessed via chart review in 102 patients between the ages of 9-23 (M = 15.2, SD = 2.5) who were predominantly cisgender female (84.3%) and primarily diagnosed with anorexia nervosa (64.7%) or atypical anorexia (23.5%). Participants were either treated in the in-person PHP before the pandemic (n = 49) or the vIOP during the pandemic (n = 53). Percent expected body weight (%EBW) was examined at baseline, end of treatment, 3-months post-treatment, and 6-months post-treatment, as well as the frequency of medical, psychiatric, and residential admissions before, during, and after vIOP or PHP participation. RESULTS: Linear mixed models demonstrated no effect of treatment modality (in-person versus virtual) on %EBW over time. The duration of the vIOP was, on average, 12 calendar days longer, though the amount billed for the vIOP was lower. Survival analyses and Cox regression models did not suggest differences in the frequency of hospital and residential treatment admissions during treatment (vIOP: 9.4%, PHP: 10.0%) or post-treatment (vIOP: 15.0%, PHP: 10.2%). DISCUSSION: Findings support virtual family-based programs as suitable alternatives to in-person treatment and underscore the potential cost-effectiveness of a family-based IOP versus PHP. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study demonstrates that a virtual, family-based, intensive outpatient program for youth with eating disorders had similar treatment outcomes to an in-person partial hospitalization program. Specifically, the virtual and in-person programs had similar weight restoration outcomes and rates of medical, psychiatric, or residential treatment admissions during or after treatment initiation. Findings support the use of virtual treatment, even for youth requiring a high level of intervention.

Early weight gain predicts treatment response in adolescents with anorexia nervosa enrolled in a family-based partial hospitalization program.

OBJECTIVE: Improved treatment outcome in family-based treatment (FBT) for anorexia nervosa (AN) is predicted by weight gain occurring early in the course of treatment (i.e., about 4 lbs by week 4). Although prior work suggests that early weight gain in higher levels of care (e.g., partial hospitalization programs [PHP]) predicts weight restoration at discharge, no study has examined the specific rate of gain within FBT-informed PHP programs that best predicts treatment response. METHOD: This study examined rate of weight gain in pounds and percent expected body weight (EBW) that predicts positive outcome in 70 patients (M age = 15.49 years, SD = 2.56) with AN who were enrolled in a family-based PHP. RESULTS: Receiver operator characteristic analyses demonstrated that changes in %EBW during weeks 2-5 were more useful than changes in weight in predicting positive outcome. Gaining at least 8.9 pounds or over 8% of EBW in the first 4 weeks of treatment significantly predicted positive outcome. DISCUSSION: Findings suggest that positive outcome in an FBT-informed PHP is predicted by rapid weight gain in the initial weeks of treatment. Research is needed to identify specific family and patient characteristics that facilitate weight gain and to develop corresponding interventions to improve outcome.

Medical Admissions Among Adolescents With Eating Disorders During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Emerging data suggest the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been associated with worsening symptoms of eating disorders (EDs) among both adults and adolescents. With this study, we sought to determine if medical admission patterns among adolescents admitted to our institution for restrictive EDs changed during the pandemic, relative to prepandemic counts of admissions per month. METHODS: We performed a chart review of patients aged 10 to 23 years admitted to our children's hospital for restrictive EDs from March 2017 through March 2021 and completed an interrupted time series analysis of admission counts per month. Demographic variables for admitted patients were compared by using χ2, Fisher's exact, and 2-sample t tests. RESULTS: ED-related medical admissions at our institution increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. The total number of admissions during the first 12 months of the COVID-19 pandemic (April 1, 2020, through March 31, 2021, n = 125) was more than double the mean number of admissions per year for the same time frame (April 1 through March 31) for the previous 3 years (mean = 56). Patient demographics were similar before and during the pandemic, with the exception that patients admitted during the COVID-19 pandemic were less likely than those admitted before the pandemic to have public insurance. CONCLUSIONS: Medical admissions related to restrictive EDs among adolescents increased significantly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Pediatric providers in a variety of settings should be prepared to care for adolescents with restrictive EDs during the pandemic.