Community-associated Clostridium difficile infection: experience of a veteran affairs medical center in southeastern USA.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing recognition of the importance of community-associated Clostridium difficile infection (CA-CDI) despite little being known about its epidemiology. METHODS: We performed routine, active laboratory surveillance for CDI at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center between January and December 2005 and extracted data from the electronic medical record for this investigation. Bivariable analyses were performed using the chi-square test, and continuous variables were compared using two sample t test and Wilcoxon rank sums. RESULTS: We identified 108 CDI cases during the study period; 38 (35%) had onset of disease in the community and, of these, 31 (82%) met the definition for CA-CDI. A comparison of CA- versus healthcare facility-associated (HCFA)-CDI revealed that CA-CDI patients were younger (median age 58 vs. 69 years, respectively; p = 0.01), with the majority being <65 years, but had similar co-morbidities to HCFA-CDI patients. CA-CDI patients were reportedly exposed less frequently to an antimicrobial or a proton pump inhibitor than HCFA-CDI patients, while the latter showed a trend towards a higher 60-day all-cause mortality (3 vs. 17%, respectively; p = 0.06). CONCLUSIONS: CA-CDI is the primary reason for community-onset CDI in our community. Compared to patients with HCFA-CDI, those with CA-CDI were younger, had fewer reported exposures to antimicrobials or PPIs, and had lower mortality. Further study is needed to identify unrecognized risk factors of CDI in the community.

Risk factors for biopsy-proven advanced non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the Veterans Health Administration.

BACKGROUND: With its increasing incidence, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is of particular concern in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). AIMS: To evaluate risk factors for advanced fibrosis in biopsy-proven NAFLD in the VHA, to identify patients at risk for adverse outcomes. METHODS: In randomly selected cases from VHA databases (2005-2015), we performed a retrospective case-control study in adults with biopsy-defined NAFLD or normal liver. RESULTS: Of 2091 patients reviewed, 399 met inclusion criteria. Normal controls (n = 65) had normal liver function. The four NAFLD cohorts included: NAFL steatosis (n = 76), nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) without fibrosis (n = 68), NAFLD/NASH stage 1-3 fibrosis (n = 82), and NAFLD/NASH cirrhosis (n = 70). NAFLD with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was separately identified (n = 38). Most patients were older White men. NAFLD patients with any fibrosis were on average severely obese (BMI>35 kg/m2 ). Diabetes (54.4%-79.6%) and hypertension (85.8%-100%) were more common in NAFLD with fibrosis or HCC. Across NAFLD, 12.3%-19.5% were enrolled in diet/exercise programs and 0%-2.6% had bariatric surgery. Hispanics exhibited higher rates of NASH (20.6%), while Blacks had low NAFLD rates (1.4%-11.8%), particularly NAFLD cirrhosis and HCC (1.4%-2.6%). Diabetes (OR 11.8, P < .001) and BMI (OR 1.4, P < .001) were the most significant predictors of advanced fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In the VHA, diabetes and severe obesity increased risk for advanced fibrosis in NAFLD. Of these patients, only a small proportion (~20%) had enrolled in diet/exercise programs or had bariatric surgery (~2%). These results suggest that providers should focus/tailor interventions to improve outcomes, particularly in those with diabetes and severe obesity.

Depression symptom trends and health domains among lung cancer patients in the CanCORS study.

OBJECTIVES: Among lung cancer patients depression symptoms are common and impact outcomes. The aims of this study were to determine risk factors that contribute to persistent or new onset depression symptoms during lung cancer treatment, and examine interactions between depression symptoms and health domains that influence mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective observational study in five healthcare systems and 15 Veterans Affairs medical centers. Patients in the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) Consortium with lung cancer were eligible. The 8-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CES-D) scale was administered at baseline and follow-up. Scores ≥4 indicated elevated depressive symptoms. Health domains were measured using validated instruments. We applied logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards modeling to explore the association between depression symptoms, health domains, and mortality. RESULTS: Of 1790 participants, 38% had depression symptoms at baseline and among those still alive, 31% at follow-up. Risk factors for depression symptoms at follow-up included younger age (OR=2.81), female sex (OR=1.59), low income (OR=1.45), not being married (OR=1.74) and current smoking status (OR=1.80); high school education was associated with reduced odds of depression symptoms at follow-up, compared with lesser educational attainment (OR=0.74) (all p values <0.05). Patients with depression symptoms had worse health-related quality of life, vitality, cancer-specific symptoms, and social support than patients without depression symptoms (all p<0.001). The association between depression symptoms and increased mortality is greater among patients with more lung cancer symptoms (p=0.008) or less social support (p=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patient risk factors for depression symptoms at follow-up were identified and these subgroups should be targeted for enhanced surveillance. Patients with depression symptoms suffer across all health domains; however, only more lung cancer symptoms or less social support are associated with worse mortality among these patients. These potentially modifiable health domains suggest targets for possible intervention in future studies.

Economic analysis of endoscopic procedures.

Economic analysis is becoming an important tool for the evaluation of new technologies. In this era of rapidly rising health care costs, we are required to demonstrate that our procedures are effective and cost-efficient. This article provides a glossary of terms for the evaluation and performance of an economic analysis and outlines the steps for performing an economic evaluation of an endoscopic procedure. The reader is provided with the skills to critically evaluate economic analyses of endoscopic technologies, and to determine their relevance to their practice.

Hospital credentialing and quality of care.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of hospital credentialing standards on surgical outcomes for selected procedures. The study used hospital credentialing practices from a 1996 survey of North Carolina community hospitals, with surgical outcomes derived from a statewide database of inpatient surgical discharges in 1995. Hospital mortality, complications and elevated lengths of stay were used as outcome indicators in an analysis of 6 surgical procedures. Multivariate logit analysis was used to calculate the effects of hospital credentialing stringency and nine credentialing practices on outcomes, controlling for patient demographic characteristics, type of admission, severity of illness and hospital characteristics. Teaching hospitals adopted more stringent credentialing practices, with almost no difference between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan nonteaching facilities in their use of various credentialing policies. Surgical outcomes typically were not related to stringency of the hospital credentialing environment. Generally, the effect of specific practices was inconsistent (associated with improved outcomes for certain procedures and significantly worse outcomes for others) or counterintuitive (showing worse outcomes for selected surgical procedures where effects were statistically significant). More stringent hospital credentialing does not appear likely to improve patient outcomes.

Development of a scoring system to predict mortality from upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

Despite the widespread application of endoscopy in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, there is little evidence of improved survival among those who undergo the procedure. To select high-risk patients who might benefit most from diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopy, the authors developed and validated a scoring system based on prognostic indicators of increased mortality. The scoring system was developed from the best clinical predictors of mortality, determined in a prospective study of consecutive bleeding patients. The model was then tested in a prospective validation phase at three hospitals. Three main factors in the model predict mortality: bleeding, including hematochezia, drop in hematocrit of 5%, short duration of bleeding, absence of melena, and hypotension; liver disease, manifested by prolonged prothrombin time and encephalopathy; and renal disease. Patients determined to be at high risk for death using the scoring system might be candidates for aggressive management and for therapeutic endoscopy.

Improvement of gastroesophageal reflux disease after initiation of a low-carbohydrate diet: five brief case reports.

The 5 individuals described in these case reports experienced resolution of GERD symptoms after self-initiation of a low-carbohydrate diet. Their observations suggest that carbohydrate restriction may have contributed to their symptom relief. However, this conclusion is confounded by concurrent reduction of caffeine intake in 3 of the individuals and reduction of acidic and high-osmolal food intake in all of them. Observations from some of these individuals suggest that carbohydrates may be a precipitating factor for GERD symptoms and that other classic exacerbating foods such as coffee and fat may be less pertinent when a low-carbohydrate diet is followed. However, these conclusions are preliminary. These findings primarily suggest that prospective research should be performed on the effect of low-carbohydrate diets on GERD symptoms. Trials that control for all of the confounders mentioned above and that contain objective endpoints are needed to further investigate these issues.

Economic considerations for the hepatologist.

This is an era of rapid change in health care systems and clinical practice. In the face of increasing national health care expenditures, physicians are confronted with an increased demand to justify practices and to show the value of their services. Hepatologists are being required to show that their practices are both effective and cost-effective. This has led to an expanding body of literature examining the cost-effectiveness of medical practices. To evaluate these economic analyses the reader must be familiar with the concepts used in economic analysis and have a clear understanding of both how these analyses are performed and how the results can be applied to clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to provide the reader with the essential concepts for evaluating economic analyses in the medical literature and to provide published criteria for performing and critiquing an economic analysis. The terms used in economic analysis are outlined and defined. The criteria for performing an economic analysis are listed. Examples are given to emphasize the key points.

A reader's guide to economic analysis in the GI literature.

UNLABELLED: To evaluate economic analyses and determine their value for clinical practice, the reader must have a clear understanding of how these analyses are performed and how the results can be applied to clinical practice. This second article in the "Primer on Economic Analysis for the Gastroenterologist" focuses on the critical assessment of economic evaluations in the gastrointestinal literature. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this article is (1) to review the criteria for the critical appraisal of an economic analysis, and (2) to apply these criteria to two recent articles that examine the cost-effectiveness of screening for hemochromatosis. METHODS: The criteria for the critical appraisal of an economic analysis are outlined. To demonstrate the application of these criteria to the gastroenterology literature, they are used to evaluate two recent articles that examine the cost-effectiveness of screening for hemochromatosis. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS: The reader of economic analyses in the gastroenterology literature is provided with a framework for the evaluation of such analyses and how they apply to gastroenterology. A systematic method for examining economic analyses and determining their value for the reader is illustrated.

Cost-effectiveness: definitions and use in the gastroenterology literature.

UNLABELLED: In this era of rapid change in our health care system, we will be required to demonstrate that our practices and procedures in gastroenterology are both effective and cost-effective. In the face of rising national health care expenditures, the medical profession confronts an increased demand to justify practices and to demonstrate the value of its services. This has led to both an expansive literature examining the cost-effectiveness of practices and procedures and an alarming disparity in the definition and use of the term "cost-effectiveness." Many reports may be lacking appropriate documentation of costs and benefits, the critical components for the determination of cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article was to define what is meant by a "cost-effective" intervention, with special reference to gastroenterology. METHODS: The varied use of the term "cost-effective" in the gastroenterology literature is illustrated. Accepted definitions of the term are provided, and suggested uses are outlined. The value judgements that must be made in funding decisions are presented, and the parameters that may be used to determine the cost-effectiveness of a procedure or practice are discussed. SUMMARY: Cost-effectiveness as it applies to GI medicine is defined, and appropriate and inappropriate uses of the term are illustrated. It is only through effective communication and precise definitions that we will be able to determine the cost-effectiveness of our practices in gastroenterology.

Surveillance issues in inflammatory bowel disease: ulcerative colitis.

This review article on the surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis provides an overview of the criteria for evaluating screening and surveillance programs and applies the criteria to the available evidence to determine the effectiveness of the surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis. We examine the clinical outcomes associated with surveillance, the additional clinical time required to confirm the diagnosis of dysplasia and cancer, compliance with surveillance and follow-up, and the effectiveness of the individual components of a surveillance program, including colonoscopy and pathologist's interpretation. The disability associated with colectomy is considered, as are the cost and acceptability of surveillance programs. Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis are at risk for developing colorectal cancer. Recommended surveillance colonoscopy should be supported. New endoscopic and histopathologic techniques to improve the identification of high-risk patients may enhance the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surveillance practices.

Health-related quality of life and severity of symptoms in patients with Barrett's esophagus and gastroesophageal reflux disease patients without Barrett's esophagus.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were: 1) to compare the health-related quality of life (HRQL) of patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE) to that of patients with GERD who did not have BE; 2) to compare HRQL of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients to that of normative data for the US general population; and 3) to examine the impact of GERD symptom frequency and severity on HRQL. METHODS: The SF-36 and a validated GERD questionnaire were administered to 107 patients with biopsy-proven BE and to 104 patients with GERD but no BE by endoscopy. Frequent symptoms were defined as symptoms that occurred at least once weekly. Severity of symptoms was rated on a scale from 1 to 4 (mild to very severe). RESULTS: In all, 85% of the GERD patients and 82% of BE patients completed the questionnaires. There was no difference in the scores of the eight subscales of the SF-36 between BE patients and those with GERD but without BE (p > 0.05). However, both groups scored below average on all subscales of the SF-36 compared to published US norms for an age- and gender-matched group. Using multivariable linear regression, the social functioning subscale of the SF-36 correlated with the presence of heartburn or acid regurgitation, severity of acid regurgitation, frequency of heartburn, frequency of acid regurgitation, and number of comorbidities. Similarly, the physical functioning subscale correlated with age, frequency of heartburn, and number of comorbidities. The bodily pain subscale correlated with the frequency of heartburn and number of comorbidities. The bodily pain subscale correlated with the frequency of heartburn and the severity of dysphagia, whereas the role emotional subscale correlated with the frequency of heartburn and the presence of dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Although there were no differences in HRQL between BE and GERD patients, both groups scored below average on the subscales of the SF-36 compared to normal controls. GERD symptom frequency and severity were associated with bodily pain and with impaired social, emotional, and physical functioning, suggesting a profound impact on daily living.

Patient preferences and quality of life associated with colorectal cancer screening.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to describe the attitudes of patients toward colorectal cancer screening, colon cancer, and colostomy. METHODS: Using the time trade-off technique, we interviewed four groups of patients at a veterans' hospital: 1) 46 patients with colorectal cancer, 2) 24 patients undergoing screening sigmoidoscopy, 3) 114 subjects participating in a screening colonoscopy study, and 4) 62 patients who have never undergone endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. Using this technique, we measured quality of life for six scenarios pertaining to screening for colorectal cancer, the patient's current health, colorectal cancer, and colostomy. RESULTS: Unscreened patients were willing to give up significantly more time to avoid screening sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy (median 91 days and 183 days, respectively) than were patients undergoing screening sigmoidoscopy (median 0 days and 7 days, respectively), screening colonoscopy (median 0 days and 0 days, respectively), or patients with colorectal cancer (median 0 days and 0 days, respectively). Cancer patients rated their current health state lower than volunteers for screening. Colon cancer and colostomy were rated similarly by all four groups. Substantial variation in patient attitudes was present in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients are generally very accepting of endoscopic screening for colorectal cancer. However, decisions regarding recommendations for colorectal cancer screening must take into account the variability in patient preferences. Effective alternative strategies should be available for those whose preferences do not comply with standard recommendations. The effect of patient education and physician recommendations on subjects' attitudes toward screening warrants further investigation.