[Methadone maintenance programs with supplementary services: a cost-effectiveness study]. / Programas de mantenimiento de metadona con servicios auxiliares: un estudio de coste-efectividad.

OBJECTIVE: Methadone maintenance programs (MMP) currently offer the best treatment for opioid-addicted patients. The aim of this study was to examine the cost-effectiveness of three MMPs that offered varying levels of supplementary services. Health-related quality of life was used as a measure of effectiveness. METHODS: A 12-month follow-up study of 586 patients beginning methadone treatment in Drug Care Centers in Barcelona was performed. The Nottingham Health Profile was used to measure quality of life. Standard unit costs and total cost per patient were calculated from activity registries. Sociodemographic, health-related and toxicological data were collected through a semi-structured interview. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed through two multiple linear regressions with the same adjusting variables. RESULTS: The greater the number of supplementary services involved, the higher the costs. The adjusted models revealed a significant increase in health-related quality of life (an increase of 8% in the Nottingham Health Profile) and in costs (17%) between low- and medium-intensity programs. CONCLUSION: The medium-intensity program showed the best cost-effectiveness ratio. However, the study's limitations preclude categoric generalization of the data.

Validation in Spanish population of the family objective and subjective burden interview (ECFOS-II) for relatives of patients with schizophrenia.

INTRODUCTION: The family burden experienced by caregivers of people with schizophrenia is one of the most relevant consequences of this disorder. This paper aims to show the validity and reliability of the Spanish version of the Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS) designed to assess objective and subjective family burden for people with schizophrenia. DESIGN: cross sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: 356 patients fulfilling DSM-IV criteria for schizophrenia from four Spanish geographic areas (Barcelona, Madrid, Pamplona and Granada) and 205 main caregivers of these patients were assessed. MATERIAL: caregivers were assessed with the Family Burden Interview Schedule (FBIS) Spanish version (ECFOS-II), which assesses family burden in eight different modules: activities of daily living, disrupted behaviors restraint, expenses, caregiver's routine, concern, help, repercussions on health, and assessment of general burden. Patients were also assessed with PANSS, DAS-sv and GAF. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: in order to assess internal consistency, parametrical tests of Cronbach's alpha were undertaken. To compute test-retest reliability Cohen's kappa and Weighted kappa were used. A principal component analysis was undertaken for assessing construct validity. Convergent validity was assessed with Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients respectively, relating the instrument with the psychopathological (PANSS) and disability scale (DAS-sv) and general functioning (GAF). Moreover, a description of the viability of the ECFOS-II was described by a questionnaire especially designed for this purpose. RESULTS: Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.85 for the global assessment. Test-retest coefficients were very high, both for Cohen's kappa and for Weighted kappa, most values being between 0.61 and 1. Principal component analysis detected four factors that coincide with the modules of the original schedule. In the convergent validity we found that these factors are related with the symptom, disability and global functioning characteristics of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: ECFOS-II results in a valid and reliable instrument for assessing family burden experienced by caregivers of people with schizophrenia.