The Reflective Fostering Programme-Adapting a group parenting programme for online delivery in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: In the context of the Covid-19 pandemic and subsequent lockdown restrictions, service providers faced significant challenges in delivering programmes to support their vulnerable service users. Foster carers-an already often isolated group of caregivers - were offered an adapted remote-delivery model of the Reflective Fostering Programme (Redfern et al., Adopt. Foster., 42, 2018, 234) from March 2020. METHOD: This paper outlines the adaptation process of the original programme to online-remote delivery and describes the feedback from participants in the programme. RESULTS: The adaptation of the Reflective Fostering programme to online, remote delivery had both strengths and weaknesses - including wider access to foster carers who might struggle to attend in person and challenge a to maintaining a Mentalizing space online and ensuring confidentiality within a therapeutic space. The programme was overwhelmingly well received by foster carers in this format. CONCLUSIONS: There are opportunities and challenges in the delivery of online therapeutic services, particularly those with a group format. This paper contributes initial reflections to what we hope will be a rapidly developing literature on best practice of supporting group services in an online format.

The Reflective Fostering Programme-improving the wellbeing of children in care through a group intervention for foster carers: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The needs of children in care are a government priority, yet the evidence base for effective interventions to support the emotional wellbeing of children in care is lacking. Research suggests that supporting the carer-child relationship, by promoting the carer's reflective parenting, may be an effective approach to improving the wellbeing of these children. METHODS: The study comprises a definitive, superiority, two-armed, parallel, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial, with embedded process evaluation and economic evaluation, and an internal pilot, to evaluate the effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness, of the Reflective Fostering Programme. Randomisation is at the individual level using a 1:1 allocation ratio. The study is being conducted in local authority sites across England, and is targeted at foster carers (including kinship carers) looking after children aged 4 to 13. Consenting participants are randomly allocated to the Reflective Fostering Programme (intervention arm) in addition to usual support or usual support alone (control arm). The primary outcome is behavioural and emotional wellbeing of the child 12 months post-baseline, and secondary outcomes include the following: foster carer's level of stress, quality of life, reflective capacity, compassion fatigue and burnout, placement stability, the quality of the child-carer relationship, child's capacity for emotional regulation, and achievement of personalised goals set by the carer. DISCUSSION: A feasibility study has indicated effectiveness of the Programme in improving the child-carer relationship and emotional and behavioural wellbeing of children in care. This study will test the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of implementing the Reflective Fostering Programme as an additional aid to the support already available to local authority foster carers. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN 70832140 .

Health for all? A qualitative study of NGO support to migrants affected by structural violence in northern France.

France hosts approximately 368,000 'persons of concern' (e.g. refugees, stateless, people in refugee-like situations, asylum-seekers). Northern France has become a focal area, due to its proximity to the Dover entry-point to the UK and larger numbers of migrants. This study used a structural violence lens to explore the provision of health services to migrants in Calais and La Linière in northern France, to contribute to discourse on the effects of structural violence on non-state service providers and migrants in precarious conditions and inform service provision policies. Our qualitative study design used semi-structured key-informant interviews, conducted in summer 2017 with 20 non-governmental service-providers, 13 who had worked in Calais and 7 in La Linière migrant camp. We analysed interviews thematically, using inductive coding. Themes from analysis were: (i) power dynamics between NGOs and the state; (ii) resource allocation and barriers to accessing services; and (iii) effects of structural violence on social determinants of health. NGO service provision varied due to tense power dynamics between state and NGOs, shifting state requirements, and expanding roles. Interviewees described ongoing uncertainties, and inherent disempowerment associated with humanitarian aid, as negatively affecting migrant health and wellbeing, increasing illness risks, and providing unequal life chances. Structural realities including violence appeared to negatively affect migrant social determinants of health, reducing healthcare access, social inclusion, and sense of empowerment. The role of NGOs in providing migrant health services in northern France was complex and contested. Structural violence negatively affected migrant wellbeing through restricted services, intentional chaos, and related disempowerment. The violence exerted on migrants appeared to diminish their life chances while being an ineffective deterrent, indicating better approaches are needed.