Coexistence of Lung Cancer and Neurocysticercosis: A Rare Case.

Lung cancer with brain metastasis has a high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Neurocysticercosis is a parasitic infection commonly found in regions with poor sanitation. We present a case with the coexistence of lung cancer and neurocysticercosis. A 57-year-old Caucasian female, with a history of secondhand smoke exposure, presented with a cough. Further evaluation revealed a lesion in the right upper lobe of the lung on a CT scan, a frontal lobe lesion on brain MRI, and hypermetabolic lymph nodes on a PET scan. Biopsies confirmed invasive moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma, indicating stage 4 lung cancer with a solitary brain metastasis. The patient underwent stereotactic radiosurgery for the brain lesion and subsequently received chemoradiation therapy. Upon completion of therapy, the patient showed improvement in both lung and brain lesions. Durvalumab maintenance therapy was initiated. However, a follow-up MRI of the brain revealed a new lesion in the right lateral ventricle. Stereotactic radiosurgery was performed to target this lesion. Five months later, a repeat MRI showed growth of the brain lesion. Given the atypical image finding, a biopsy of the right lateral ventricle lesion was performed, revealing an unexpected diagnosis of calcified parenchymal neurocysticercosis. The patient was referred to an infectious disease specialist who started the patient on dexamethasone without antiparasitic treatment. The co-occurrence of metastatic lung cancer to the brain and neurocysticercosis presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic complexities. Despite stereotactic radiosurgery, the patient's neurologic symptoms failed to improve, and subsequent radiographic assessments yielded inconclusive results. Consequently, a brain biopsy was performed, deviating from the usual practice in cancer management, revealing the unexpected presence of neurocysticercosis. This unforeseen diagnosis underscores the critical significance of contemplating alternative etiologies in patients exhibiting atypical clinical manifestations, particularly in regions devoid of prevalent parasitic infections. This case highlights the challenges in identifying and managing complex cases involving lung cancer and neurocysticercosis, where treatment decisions must balance the need for oncologic control and the management of parasitic infection.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: is more better?

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation is now considered the clear preferable adjuvant standard of care in the management of stage II/III rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant fluorouracil (5-FU) plus radiation results in a decrease in local relapse rates and a favorable toxicity profile in comparison with postoperative adjuvant 5-FU plus radiation therapy. Recent nonrandomized comparative studies have shown that capecitabine (Xeloda) plus radiation result in downstaging and pathologic complete responses equivalent to those of 5-FU plus radiation, making this combination an acceptable alternative neoadjuvant treatment. The addition of oxaliplatin (Eloxatin) or irinotecan (Camptosar) to 5-FU or capecitabine concurrently with radiation therapy appears to result in more favorable pathologic responses in phase I/II trials. These combinations should be investigated further in larger phase III studies before they are endorsed in the routine neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer. This article will review the progress of chemoradiation over the past 2 decades, current standards of care, and investigational treatments in the neoadjuvant treatment of rectal cancer.

Resolution of Crizotinib-Associated Fulminant Hepatitis following Cessation of Treatment.

Targeted cancer treatments offer the prospect of precise inhibition of tumor growth without the untoward off-target toxicity of traditional chemotherapies. Still, unintended, often idiosyncratic side effects, such as drug-induced liver injury, can occur. We discuss the case of a 26-year-old female with a history of ROS1-rearranged lung adenocarcinoma, undergoing treatment with the tyrosine kinase inhibitor crizotinib, who presented to our hospital with abdominal pain and scleral icterus. Liver chemistries were notable for hyperbilirubinemia (5 mg/dL total) and marked transaminasemia (AST 1736 U/L, ALT >3500 U/L); liver biopsy demonstrated acute hepatitis with extensive necrosis. There was no evidence of an infectious or autoimmune etiology. It was discovered that the patient was taking a 500 mg once daily dose of crizotinib, in lieu of the intended dose of 250 mg twice daily. After immediate cessation of crizotinib therapy upon hospital admission, there was complete biochemical resolution of the hepatitis. This case highlights the potential reversibility of fulminant crizotinib-associated hepatoxicity, possibly related to supratherapeutic dosing, when managed with abrupt stoppage of the drug and initiation of supportive care.

Safety and efficacy of first-line chemotherapy in unresected metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Primary tumor resection in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer is considered highly controversial. Historical data suggest a low risk of primary tumor-related complications in patients treated with first-line 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) chemotherapy. However, there are very limited data on the safety and efficacy of first-line combination chemotherapy in this unresected-primary population, especially in the setting of rectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective study to evaluate the primary tumor-related complication rate and outcome of patients with unresected metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line chemotherapy. Estimation of the overall and progression-free survival distributions were done using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were identified: 26 had primary colon cancers and 12 had primary rectal cancers. Thirty-one patients were treated with first-line FOLFOX (oxaliplatin/leucovorin/5-FU) with or without bevacizumab. In patients with colon tumors, only 2 (7%) required surgery, both for obstruction. In patients with rectal tumors, 3 (25%) developed progressive obstructive symptoms, and 2 developed worsening pain. Four of these patients were adequately palliated with chemoradiation; only 1 patient required a diverting colostomy. The median progression-free survival was 7 months, and overall survival was 17.3 months. Twenty-two patients died because of disease progression, only 3 of whom developed obstructive symptoms at the primary tumor site before death. CONCLUSION: First-line chemotherapy is feasible and safe in patients with unresected colon and nonirradiated rectal cancer. The rate of bowel obstruction requiring surgical intervention in this population was < 10%. These results support an approach that defers surgery in non-obstructed, noncurable patients in favor of systemic chemotherapy as initial treatment.

Serological immune responses to influenza vaccine in patients with colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The immune responses to influenza vaccination in patients with colorectal cancer on surveillance or active chemotherapy have not been previously reported. We conducted a prospective influenza vaccination study to determine the serological immune response rate in patients with colorectal cancer. METHODS: During the 2006-2007 influenza season, patients with colorectal cancer treated at Roswell Park Cancer Institute were offered vaccination with the trivalent influenza vaccine (Fluzone, 2006-2007). Blood samples for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay titers were collected before and 3 months after vaccination. Response to vaccination was determined using an endpoint of ≥ 1:40 HI titer ratio or a fourfold HI increase at 3 months from vaccination. A response in HI to at least one of the 3 strains was considered an immune response. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients with colorectal cancer participated in the study. The immune response in the overall population was 70.6%. No differences in response were noted between the 58 patients on active chemotherapy and the 27 patients on surveillance [Odds Ratio (OR) = 0.78; P = 0.8]. The odds of response did not vary by chemotherapy regimen or by chemotherapy-vaccination timing. HI response in all 3 titers concurrently were low in both the chemotherapy (12.1%) and surveillance groups (11.1%) (OR = 1.10; P = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with colorectal cancer mount an immune response to influenza vaccination irrespective of their chemotherapy regimen or timing. However, concurrent responses to all three strains in the individual patient with colorectal cancer are uncommon. The investigation of a booster vaccine in this population is warranted.

Targeted therapies in the management of colorectal carcinoma: role of bevacizumab.

Colorectal cancer continues to be an important public health concern, despite improvements in screening and better systemic chemotherapy. The integration of targeted therapies in the treatment of colon cancer has resulted in significant improvements in efficacy outcomes. Angiogenesis is important for tumor growth and metastasis and is an important target for new biological agents. Bevacizumab is a humanized recombinant antibody that prevents vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor binding, and inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth. The addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, with or without irinotecan or oxaliplatin, in both the first- and second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, significantly increased median progression-free survival and overall survival in select randomized phase III studies. Ongoing studies are evaluating the role of bevacizumab in the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer. Common toxicities associated with bevacizumab include hypertension, bleeding episodes, and thrombotic events. This review will focus on the integration of bevacizumab in the treatment paradigm of colon cancer and the management of its side effects.

A phase II study of first-line biweekly capecitabine and bevacizumab in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase II study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of capecitabine and bevacizumab in untreated elderly metastatic colorectal cancer patients. METHODS: Patients received 1500 mg/m(2)/dose of capecitabine twice daily x 7 days and bevacizumab at 5mg/kg on day 1, in 2 week-cycles. RESULTS: The study was closed early, due to poor accrual, after a total of 16 patients enrolled. Four patients had an objective response and 11 patients had stable disease. The median time to progression and overall survival were 9.5 and 21.2 months, respectively. The most common grade >or= 3 toxicities included diarrhea (13%) and hand and foot syndrome (25%). Three patients had an arterial thrombotic event and one patient developed a bowel perforation. CONCLUSIONS: In this underpowered phase II study in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, capecitabine plus bevacizumab was associated with considerable clinical activity but at an increased risk of hand and foot syndrome and arterial thrombotic events.

Phase II study of weekly intravenous oxaliplatin combined with oral daily capecitabine and radiotherapy with biologic correlates in neoadjuvant treatment of rectal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of a combination of capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and radiotherapy (RT) in the neoadjuvant treatment of Stage II and III rectal cancers. METHODS: Capecitabine was given at 725 mg/m(2) orally twice daily Monday through Friday concurrently with RT. Oxaliplatin was given intravenously at 50 mg/m(2) once weekly five times starting the first day of RT. The radiation dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions (1.8 Gy/fraction), five fractions weekly. Endorectal tumor biopsies were obtained before treatment and on the third day of treatment to explore the effects of treatment on thymidine phosphorylase, thymidylate synthase, excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency complementation group 1 (ERCC1), and apoptosis. RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were enrolled in this study; 6 patients (24%) had a complete pathologic response. T-downstaging occurred in 52% of patients, and N-downstaging occurred in 53%. Grade 3 diarrhea was the most common Grade 3-4 toxicity, occurring in 20% of patients. Only 2 patients experienced disease recurrence, with a median of 20 months of follow-up. Thymidylate synthase, thymidine phosphorylase, ERCC1, and apoptosis did not vary significantly between the pretreatment and Day 3 tumor biopsies, nor did they predict for T-downstaging or a complete pathologic response. CONCLUSION: Capecitabine at 725 mg/m(2) orally twice daily, oxaliplatin 50 mg/m(2)/wk, and RT at 50.4 Gy is an effective neoadjuvant combination for Stage II and III rectal cancer and results in a greater rate of complete pathologic responses than historically shown in fluoropyrimidine plus RT controls.