Usefulness of three-dimensional computed tomography for patellofemoral measurement.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to establish the normal values for knee patellofemoral alignment as measured using 3-dimensional computed tomography (3D CT), to standardize the technique, and to show the inter- and intra-observer reliability of this measurement. METHODS: The present study included 62 asymptomatic volunteers (124 knees). 3D CT scanning was performed with each volunteer in the supine position with 15° of knee flexion, and consistent 3D axial images of the patellofemoral joint were obtained with alignment in the desired stereographic baseline direction in anterior-posterior, lateral, and axial rotations. Two independent observers measured patellofemoral alignment parameters, including the sulcus angle, congruence angle, lateral patellofemoral angle, condyle-patellar angle, and lateral trochlear inclination angle. RESULTS: Based on 3D CT measurement, the mean values of the parameters were 145.9° ± 9.2° for the sulcus angle, 12.6° ± 22.6° for the congruence angle, 9.2° ± 4.6° for the lateral patellofemoral angle, 14.1° ± 6.4° for the condyle-patellar (lateral facets) angle, - 8.5° ± 8.4° for condyle-patellar (patellar axis) angle, and 16.5° ± 6.3° for the lateral trochlear inclination angle. A statistically significant difference was observed between men and women in the sulcus and condyle-patellar (patellar axis) angles (p = 0.045, 0.011, respectively). All parameters showed excellent inter- and intra-observer reliability. CONCLUSION: The normal values and ranges for patellofemoral alignment parameters were evaluated using 3D CT. The results of this study provide reference information that may facilitate diagnosis and treatment planning of patellofemoral disorders in skeletally mature non-pathologic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Preoperative varus alignment and postoperative meniscus extrusion are the main long-term predictive factors of clinical failure of meniscal root repair.

PURPOSE: No studies have been conducted to determine long-term predictors of clinical failure after surgical root repair. This study identified long-term prognostic factors of clinical failure after pull-out repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) at a minimum of 10 year follow-up. METHODS: A total of 37 patients who underwent MMPRT pull-out repair and had been observed for more than 10 years were recruited for this study. The mean follow-up period was 125.9 ± 21.2 months. Clinical failure of the procedures was defined as conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Participants were categorized into two groups: non-failure and failure groups. Various factors, including demographic features and radiologic findings, were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Meniscus extrusion was assessed at coronal magnetic resonance imaging preoperatively and 1 year postoperatively. Independent risk factors were determined by univariate analysis and logistic regression analysis. To determine the cut-off value for risk factors, the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: In total, eight patients (22%) were converted to TKA during the follow-up period. With univariate analysis, statistically significant differences between two groups were observed in mechanical varus alignment (P = 0.018), rate of the number of patient with more meniscal extrusion values after surgery (P = 0.024), and the difference between the preoperative and 1-year postoperative value of meniscus extrusion (mm) (P = 0.010). In a logistic analysis, OR of mechanical varus alignment and differences in meniscus extrusion value before and 1 year after surgery was 1.5 (P = 0.048) and 3.7 (P = 0.034). The cut-off values of mechanical varus alignment and differences in meniscus extrusion values were 5 degrees and 0.7 mm. CONCLUSION: Clinically, preoperative varus alignment and increased meniscal extrusion after surgery were found to be predictive for a clinical failure after meniscal root repair in a long-term perspective. Thus, these negative prognostic factors should be taken into consideration for performing root repair in MMPRTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Comparative clinical outcomes of anterolateral ligament reconstruction versus lateral extra-articular tenodesis in combination with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Anterolateral augmentation procedures can be divided into traditional lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and modern anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction. Nevertheless, no studies have compared the clinical results between LET and ALL reconstruction, when combined with intra-articular ACL reconstruction. This study was therefore designed to compare the clinical results, including the anterior translation, rotational laxity, and patient-reported outcomes, in a group of patients who underwent ACL reconstruction combined with LET or ALL reconstruction. METHODS: All studies systematically searched until March 2018 without any language restriction that reported the results of a lateral extra-articular stabilization procedure using either LET or ALL reconstruction methods combined with ACL reconstruction were evaluated. Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size, improvement in Lysholm score, and the number of patients with each grade of knee laxity using Lachman and pivot shift tests. RESULTS: The pooled results of ten studies showed that the postoperative proportion of knees with grade 2 or 3 on the Lachman test was significantly higher following LET compared with ALL reconstruction in combination with ACL reconstruction (10.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.6-17.1% vs. 1.5%, 95% CI 0.5-4.5%; p = 0.001). However, the pooled results of 12 studies showed that the proportion of knees that belonged to grade 2 or 3 on the pivot shift test, indicating poor rotational stability, was similar between these two techniques (4.9%, 95% CI 2.0-11.5% vs. 2.3%, 95% CI 1.1-4.5%; p = 0.101). The pooled improvements in Lysholm scores in these two groups were also similar (32.3, 95% CI 26.8-37.9 vs. 25.7, 95% CI 16.7-34.7, p = 0.218). CONCLUSION: LET could lead to worse anterior instability than with ALL reconstruction when these two approaches were combined with single-bundle ACL reconstruction. However, rotational stability and patient-reported outcomes were similar between the techniques.

National Trends of Meniscectomy and Meniscus Repair in Korea.

BACKGROUND: Meniscus surgeries are frequently performed in orthopaedics. However, their current status is not well known in many countries, including Korea. This study aimed to investigate the national trends of meniscus surgery in Korea. METHODS: Information from the national database was acquired through the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service from 2010 to 2017. All cases coded as meniscectomy or meniscus repair were included. The total number and incidence of cases of meniscus surgery per 100,000 persons were determined, and the results were stratified by age and gender. The meniscus repair ratio for the total number of meniscus surgeries was evaluated. RESULTS: The total number and incidence of meniscectomy cases were 65,752 and 137, respectively, in 2010, which increased to 74,088 and 154, respectively, in 2017. The number of meniscectomies increased by 12.67% in 8 years. The total number and incidence of meniscus repair cases were 9,055 and 18, respectively, in 2010, which increased to 14,947 and 31 in 2017. The number of meniscus repairs increased by 65.04%. The meniscus repair ratio was 12.1% in 2010, which increased to 16.8% in 2017. The highest peak was noted for patients who underwent meniscus surgeries in their 50s and 60s. Meniscectomy was performed more frequently in women (57%) than in men (43%), whereas repair was performed more frequently in men (54%) than in women (46%) over the study period. CONCLUSION: The total number and incidence of meniscus surgeries increased from 2010 to 2017; the number and incidence of meniscus repair procedures increased more rapidly than those of meniscectomy, with the peak treatment age for both surgeries being in the 50s and 60s. The current study will contribute to understanding the epidemiology of meniscus surgery, its prevention, and cost-saving measures in Korea.

Femoral tunnel widening is similar between anteromedial portal and transtibial techniques following single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: In anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there is concern regarding the potential risk of femoral tunnel widening in the anteromedial portal (AMP) technique due to the acute graft-bending angle at the aperture and the more elliptical aperture shape of the femoral tunnel compared to the transtibial (TT) techniques. Therefore, the aim of the current systematic review and meta-analysis was to compare the femoral tunnel widening between the AMP and TT techniques in patients who underwent ACL reconstruction. METHODS: It should be included the studies that reported on femoral tunnel widening in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction, using soft-tissue tendon graft, with AMP and/or TT techniques. Two reviewers independently recorded data from each study, including the sample size and magnitude of tunnel widening after ACL reconstruction. RESULTS: Twenty-one studies were finally included in this meta-analysis. The pooled changes of absolute millimeters of tunnel widening from the immediate postoperative status to the last follow-up did not differ significantly between the AMP and TT techniques at both the aperture [3.31 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.7-5.0. mm versus 2.9 mm, 95% CI 2.4-3.4 mm, P = n.s.] and the midportion (3.5 mm, 95% CI 0.8-6.3 mm versus 3.0 mm, 95% CI 2.2-3.9 mm, P = n.s.) of the femoral tunnel. No significant difference was observed between the two techniques in the relative percentage of femoral tunnel widening (AMP; 28.8%, 95% CI 14.8-42.9% vs. TT; 29.7%, 95% CI 15.6-43.7%, P = n.s.). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in femoral tunnel widening was observed between the AMP and TT techniques, both in absolute millimeter and relative percentage, in patients who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction. This finding could alleviate the potential concerns associated with femoral tunnels being wider for the AMP than for the TT technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears: clinical results were not age-dependent, but osteoarthritis progressed.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the outcomes of pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) in patients ≤ 60 years old versus patients > 60 years old. It was hypothesized that older patients would demonstrate results comparable with those of younger patients. METHODS: Patients with pullout fixation who were followed-up for more than 5 years were included. Patients were categorized into two groups based on age (group A, ≤ 60 years; group B, > 60 years). The Lysholm score, Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L, 0/1/2/3/4) grade, and medial joint space width were evaluated retrospectively. Preoperative results were compared with the final results in each group, which were compared between groups. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients in group A (mean age, 54.7 ± 3.8 years) and 22 patients in group B (mean age, 65.6 ± 4.4 years) were recruited. The mean follow-up duration was 70.9 months. The Lysholm score (group A, 53.0 ± 9.1 to 86.0 ± 12.1, P < 0.001; group B, 51.1 ± 7.1 to 82.9 ± 9.7, P < 0.001) improved significantly. However, the joint space width (group A, 4.7 ± 1.1 to 3.9 ± 1.1 mm, P < 0.001; group B, 4.7 ± 0.9 to 3.8 ± 0.9 mm, P < 0.001) and K-L grade (group A, 3/17/5/0/0 to 0/7/11/7/0, P < 0.001; group B, 2/14/6/0/0 to 0/3/14/5/0, P < 0.001) worsened significantly. No significant differences between groups were observed in final outcomes, including Lysholm score (n.s.), K-L grade (n.s.), and joint space narrowing (n.s.). No case with operation failure that require total knee arthroplasty was not observed. CONCLUSION: MMPRT fixation did not prevent the progression of arthrosis completely. However, clinical outcomes were not age-dependent. Thus, age may not be a critical factor to consider when applying fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective case-control study; Level of evidence, IV.

Survivorship Analysis and Clinical Outcomes of Transtibial Pullout Repair for Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A 5- to 10-Year Follow-up Study.

PURPOSE: This study investigated the clinical outcomes and mid- to long-term survival rates in patients undergoing transtibial pullout repair of medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) after a minimum follow-up of 5 years. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2011, patients with MMPRTs who had been followed for at least 5 years after undergoing transtibial pullout repair were recruited. Participants were identified using medical records and information in a prospectively collected database. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on a comparison of patient preoperative Lysholm scores and their scores at the final follow-up. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to investigate the survival rates of repair procedures. Clinical failures were defined as cases requiring conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) or having final Lysholm score <65 or less than their preoperative scores. RESULTS: Overall, 91 patients (mean age, 58.7 ± 9.7 years) were included: the mean follow-up duration was 84.8 ± 13.8 months. Among these patients, the mean Lysholm score improved significantly from 51.8 ± 7.9 preoperatively to 83.0 ± 11.1 at the final follow-up (P < .001). Overall, 4 patients failed due to conversion to TKA (n = 1) or having final Lysholm scores <65 or less than the preoperative scores (n = 3). The overall Kaplan-Meier probabilities of survival after repair were 99% at 5 years, 98% at 6 years, 95% at 7 years, and 92% at 8 years. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with MMPRTs, transtibial pullout repair demonstrated a high clinical survival rate and the patients demonstrated clinical improvement, based on mid- and long-term follow-up examinations. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective uncontrolled case series.

Effects of salmon DNA fraction in vitro and in a monosodium iodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis rat model.

PRF001 is a fragmented DNA polymer extracted from the testes of salmon. The purpose of this study was to assess the anti-inflammatory effect of PRF001 in vitro as well as the protective effect of PRF001 intake against arthritis in a rat model. In vitro, cell survival and inflammatory markers after H2O2 treatment to induce cell damage were investigated in CHON-001 cells treated with different concentrations of PRF001. In vivo, osteoarthritis was induced by intra-articular injection of monosodium iodoacetate (MIA) into the knee joints of rats. After consumption of PRF001 (10, 50, or 100 mg/kg) for 4 weeks, inflammatory mediators and cytokines in articular cartilage were investigated. In vitro, the levels of inflammatory markers, IL-1ß, TNF-α, COX-2, iNOS, and PGE2, were significantly suppressed by PRF001 treatment. In vivo, the inflammatory mediators and cytokines, IL-1ß, p-Erk1/2, NF-κB, TNF-α, COX-2, and PGE2, as well as MMP3 and MMP7, which have catabolic activity in chondrocytes, were decreased in the MIA-induced osteoarthritic rats following intake of PRF001. Histological analysis revealed that PRF001 had a protective effect on the articular cartilage. Altogether, these results demonstrated that the anti-inflammatory property of PRF001 contributes to its protective effects in osteoarthritis through deregulating IL-1ß, TNF-α, and subsequent signals, such as p-Erk1/2, NF-κB, COX-2, PGE2, and MMPs.

Corrigendum to: Effects of salmon DNA fraction in vitro and in a monosodium iodoacetate-induced osteoarthritis rat model.

[This corrects the article on p. 163 in vol. 22, PMID: 29520169.].

Does Release of the Superficial Medial Collateral Ligament Result in Clinically Harmful Effects After the Fixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears?

PURPOSE: To investigate pain and tenderness, stress testing, clinical outcome scores, complications, and operation time at 24 months and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis at 12 months after the release of the distal attachment of the superficial medial collateral ligament (sMCL) during medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) fixation. METHODS: Patients who received MMPRT fixation with a follow-up of at least 2 years were included. During fixation, the release of the distal attachment of the sMCL on the proximal tibia was performed to improve visualization and provide sufficient working space. Pain and tenderness at the released area, manual valgus stress tests of 30° and 0° flexion (grade 0/1/2/3), and subjective instability during weight bearing were evaluated serially at postoperative 3, 6, 12, and 24+ months. The contour of detachment area was assessed using MRI 12 months postoperatively. As a subgroup analysis, tourniquet time (minutes) and final clinical scores were compared between release and nonrelease groups. RESULTS: The numbers of participants in the release and nonrelease groups were 118 and 20 patients, and their mean follow-up durations were 42.4 ± 19.3 (24-95) and 37.2 ± 7.8 (30-55) months, respectively. In the release group, percentages of patients with pain and tenderness at 3 months were 15% and 18%, respectively; however, no patients had symptoms at 12 months. In valgus stress tests (30°, 0°), 12% and 2% of patients showed grade 1 laxity at 3 months, and 7% had grade 1 laxity in only 30° flexion at the final follow-up. However, no patients had subjective valgus laxity. An intact contour was confirmed in all cases among 94 patients checked by performing follow-up MRI. Tourniquet time was significantly shorter in the release group (42.4 ± 19.3) than in the nonrelease group (58.5 ± 9.5; P < .001). Between release and nonrelease groups, Lysholm (84.4 ± 12.1, 88.1 ± 12.8; P = .117) and International Knee Documentation Committee scores (73.6 ± 11.2, 77.5 ± 11.9; P = .112) did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: The release of the distal attachment of the sMCL during fixation of MMPRT did not result in pain and tenderness, residual instability, and complication. An intact contour of the sMCL was confirmed in all cases with MRI. This procedure reduced operation time and showed similar clinical results when compared between the release and nonrelease groups. However, this study had low power to detect the difference for clinical scores between the 2 groups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.

Does synovialization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction have a positive effect on functional performance, outcomes scores, stability and muscle strength? A 2-year follow-up study after reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the effect of synovialization of graft following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) on functional performance test (FPT) and clinical outcomes. METHODS: Eighty-four male patients who underwent second-look arthroscopy at 2-year follow-up after unilateral ACLR using hamstring autograft were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized by synovial coverage into A group (42 subjects, poor synovial coverage) and B group (42 subjects, good synovial coverage). FPT results, including those of single leg hop test (cm) of the involved limb, co-contraction test (s), shuttle run test (s), and carioca test (s), were compared between groups. Clinical scores, including Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, and Tegner activity score; stability assessments including Lachman test, Pivot-shift test, and side-to-side differences (cm) measured using a KT-2000 arthrometer were also compared between groups. RESULTS: Based on FPT results, no difference was evident between groups. Single leg hop test results were 144.3 ± 25.5 in A group and 145.4 ± 24.7 in B group (P = 0.849). Co-contraction test results were 17.1 ± 2.9 in A group and 16.9 ± 3.6 in B group (P = 0.827). Shuttle run test results were 9.3 ± 1.9 in A group and 9.3 ± 1.9 in B group (P = 0.935). Carioca test results were 11.4 ± 2.9 in A group and 10.5 ± 2.5 in B group (P = 0.149). Clinical scores and stability assessments did not differ between groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Based on functional performance results, well-synovialized grafts did not yield better functional performance outcomes following ACLR compared to poorly synovialized grafts at 2-year follow-up. The same was true of clinical outcomes. Thus, the success of synovialization does not improve functional performance and clinical outcomes following ACL reconstruction in an all-male population.

Erratum to: Betulin suppressed interleukin-1b-induced gene expression, secretion and proteolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinase in cultured articular chondrocytes and production of matrix metalloproteinase in the knee joint of rat.

[This corrects the article on p. 19 in vol. 21, PMID: 28066137.].

Betulin suppressed interleukin-1ß-induced gene expression, secretion and proteolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinase in cultured articular chondrocytes and production of matrix metalloproteinase in the knee joint of rat.

We investigated whether betulin affects the gene expression, secretion and proteolytic activity of matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) in primary cultured rabbit articular chondrocytes, as well as in vivo production of MMP-3 in the rat knee joint to evaluate the potential chondroprotective effect of betulin. Rabbit articular chondrocytes were cultured and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was used to measure interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß)-induced gene expression of MMP-3, MMP-1, MMP-13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs-4 (ADAMTS-4), ADAMTS-5 and type II collagen. Effect of betulin on IL-1ß-induced secretion and proteolytic activity of MMP-3 was investigated using western blot analysis and casein zymography, respectively. Effect of betulin on MMP-3 protein production was also examined in vivo. The results were as follows: (1) betulin inhibited the gene expression of MMP-3, MMP-1, MMP-13, ADAMTS-4, and ADAMTS-5, but increased the gene expression of type II collagen; (2) betulin inhibited the secretion and proteolytic activity of MMP-3; (3) betulin suppressed the production of MMP-3 protein in vivo. These results suggest that betulin can regulate the gene expression, secretion, and proteolytic activity of MMP-3, by directly acting on articular chondrocytes.

Prognostic Factors in the Midterm Results of Pullout Fixation for Posterior Root Tears of the Medial Meniscus.

PURPOSE: To identify predictors of unfavorable clinical and radiologic outcomes a minimum of 5 years after pullout fixation for medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs). METHODS: In total, 40 patients who were followed for >5 years after pullout fixation in MMPRT were recruited. The mean follow-up duration was 71.1 months. Clinical outcomes, including Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, and radiographic results, including Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L; 0/1/2/3/4) grade and medial joint space width, were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. Preoperative prognostic factors, including age, sex, body mass index, degree of varus alignment, K-L grade, medial joint space width, meniscal extrusion, and cartilage status, by the modified Outerbridge classification (grades 1 or 2 v 3 or 4), for relatively unfavorable (fair or poor grade) Lysholm or IKDC score, and progression of K-L grade were investigated by multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The mean Lysholm score (52.1 ± 8.8 to 83.8 ± 11.9) and IKDC score (40.1 ± 7.6 to 73.3 ± 10.9) were improved significantly (P < .001), although the loss of medial joint space width (4.8 ± 1.1 to 3.9 ± 1.1 mm) and K-L grade (6/25/9/0/0 to 0/11/20/9/0) progressed significantly (P < .001). Unfavorable prognostic factors of the Lysholm score were grade ≥3 chondral lesions (odds ratio [OR] = 5.993; P = .028) and varus mechanical alignment (OR = 1.644; P = .017), for IKDC score were grade ≥3 chondral lesions (OR = 11.146; P = .038) and older age (OR = 1.200; P = .017). Preoperative chondral lesion grade ≥3 increased the risk of K-L grade progression (OR = 11.000; P = .031). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, modified Outerbridge classification grade ≥3 chondral lesions, varus alignment, and older age were found to predict a poor prognosis after MMPRT fixation. In terms of radiographic K-L grade progression, grade ≥3 chondral lesions were identified as a poor prognostic factor. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

A meta-analysis of clinical and radiographic outcomes of posterior horn medial meniscus root repairs.

PURPOSE: Although interest in medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) repair has increased, few case series have been reported. This meta-analysis aimed to examine the clinical and radiological effects of MMPRT repair by pooling pre- and post-operative data from case-series reports. METHODS: A literature search was performed using MEDLINE/PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and EMBASE databases. Pre- and post-operative data were pooled to investigate the effects of MMPRT repair, including the Lysholm score improvement, meniscal extrusion (mm) reduction, progression of the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade, and cartilage status according to the Outerbridge classification. Treatment effects included paired standardized mean differences (difference in the pre- and post-operative mean outcomes divided by the standard deviation) for the Lysholm score and meniscal extrusion, as well as the pooled event rates of progression of K-L grade and cartilage status. RESULTS: As treatment effects, the Lysholm score increased by as much as 3.675 (P < 0.001), whereas meniscus extrusion was not reduced (n.s.). The overall pooled event rates of progression of K-L grade and cartilage status were 10.6 and 17.3 % (P < 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the current literature, MMPRT repair resulted in significant improvements in the post-operative clinical subjective scores compared with the preoperative status. However, meniscus extrusion was not reduced. Considering the occurrence of progression of K-L grade and cartilage status, it did not prevent the progression of arthrosis completely. Based on these results, repair results in favourable outcomes for MMPRT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Meta-analysis, Level IV.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Results Between Partial Meniscectomy and Refixation of Medial Meniscus Posterior Root Tears: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical and radiologic results of partial meniscectomy with those of refixation in patients with medial meniscus posterior root tears (MMPRTs) at a minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Between 2005 and 2009, patients with MMPRTs who had been followed up for at least 5 years after a partial meniscectomy (group M, n = 20) or pullout repair (group R, n = 37) were recruited. The mean follow-up duration was 67.5 months in group M and 72.0 months in group R. Clinical assessments, including the Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Form score, and radiographic assessments, including the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade and medial joint space width, were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. We compared the preoperative results with the final results in each group, and we compared the final results of groups M and R. Five-year survival rates were also evaluated. RESULTS: The mean Lysholm score (P = .039) and IKDC score (P = .037) improved significantly. However, the width of the medial joint space (P < .001) and K-L grade (P < .001) worsened significantly in both groups. When we compared the final results, group R had significantly better Lysholm scores (P = .002) and IKDC scores (P < .001) than group M. Group R showed less K-L grade progression (P = .005) and less medial joint space narrowing (P < .001) than group M. The rate of conversion to total knee arthroplasty was 35% in group M, whereas there was no conversion to total knee arthroplasty in group R. The 5-year survival rates in groups M and R were 75% and 100%, respectively (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: For MMPRTs, refixation was more effective than partial meniscectomy in terms of the clinical and radiologic outcomes and survival for at least 5 years' follow-up. Refixation slowed the progression of arthritic changes compared with partial meniscectomy, although it did not prevent the progression of arthrosis completely. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Traumatic posterior root tear of the medial meniscus in patients with severe medial instability of the knee.

PURPOSE: To examine the incidence and diagnostic rate of traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear associated with severe medial instability and to evaluate the effectiveness of pullout repair. METHODS: From 2007 to 2011, 51 patients who underwent operation due to multiple ligament injuries including medial collateral ligament rupture were reviewed retrospectively. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and Lysholm score were evaluated pre- and postoperatively. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed, and if indicated, a second-look arthroscopic examination was conducted. RESULTS: Fourteen out of 51 patients were associated with severe medial instability. Seven patients were diagnosed with traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear and underwent arthroscopic pullout repair. Five of them were missed at initial diagnosis using MRI. In seven patients, the mean Lysholm and IKDC subjective scores improved from 74.6 ± 10.3 and 47.6 ± 7.3 to 93.0 ± 3.7 and 91.6 ± 2.6, respectively. All showed complete healing of meniscus root on follow-up MRI and second-look arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Medial meniscus posterior root tear may occur in severe medial instability from trauma. It is a common mistake that surgeons may not notice on the diagnosis of those injuries using MRI. Therefore, a high index of suspicion is required for the diagnosis of medial meniscus posterior root tear in this type of injuries. The traumatic medial meniscus posterior root tear could be healed successfully using arthroscopic pullout repair technique. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The possibility of the medial meniscus posterior root tear should be considered in severe medial instability and arthroscopic pullout repair can be an effective option for treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Arthroscopic inside-out repair of complete radial tears of the meniscus with a fibrin clot.

PURPOSE: To report on the results of 12 complete radial tears of the meniscus treated using arthroscopic inside-out repair with fibrin clots, the results showed good meniscal healing and excellent clinical outcomes. METHODS: From 2007 to 2009, 12 patients with complete radial tears of the meniscus were treated by arthroscopic inside-out repair with fibrin clots. In all patients, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee form and Lysholm score were determined pre- and post-operatively. We performed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and if indicated, we performed a second-look arthroscopic examination. RESULTS: At a mean of 30 ± 4 postoperative months, the Lysholm score and IKDC subjective knee score had improved from 65 ± 6 and 57 ± 7 to 94 ± 3 and 92 ± 3, respectively. Eleven of 12 cases showed complete healing on follow-up MRI. Six of 7 patients undergoing a second-look arthroscopic examination had healed completely. CONCLUSION: This study shows successful meniscal repairs using fibrin clots in complete radial tears. This surgical procedure appears to be a good treatment method for complete radial tear of the meniscus. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case series, level IV.

Tibiofemoral contact mechanics following posterior root of medial meniscus tear, repair, meniscectomy, and allograft transplantation.

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the effect on tibiofemoral contact mechanics of repair of the posterior root of the medial meniscus and the effect of meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT) with medial collateral ligament (MCL) release at different flexion angles. METHODS: Ten fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees (five pairs) were used. A digital pressure sensor was inserted by capsulotomy, and experiments were performed serially under the following six conditions, that is, with an intact medial meniscus (normal controls), with a root tear, after root repair, after total meniscectomy, after MAT, and after MAT plus MCL release. During each experiment, knees were positioned at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, and peak pressure (kPa) and contact area (cm2) were measured. RESULTS: At 0° of flexion, contact pressure did not differ among the six experimental settings. However, at 30° and 60° of flexion, contact pressure differed significantly between root tear and root repair specimens (p = 0.04 and 0.03, respectively), and between total meniscectomy and MAT specimens (p = 0.02 and 0.03, respectively). On the other hand, mean contact pressures were different between normal (476.7 ± 473.1 and 573.3 ± 479.1 kPa) and root repair (575.7 ± 357.8 and 598.6 ± 415.8), and between normal and MAT (635.7 ± 437.4 and 674.3 ± 533.2). At 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of flexion, contact areas differed significantly between normal and total meniscectomy specimens (p = 0.02, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.02, respectively), and between MAT and total meniscectomy specimens (p = 0.03, 0.02, 0.02, and 0.03, respectively). Contact areas differed significantly between root tear and root repair specimens at 60° of flexion (p = 0.04), and between normal control and root repair specimens at 60° and 90° of flexion (p = 0.03 and 0.04, respectively). The effects of MAT plus MCL release on contact mechanics were not different from the effects of MAT alone (n.s.). CONCLUSIONS: Both meniscal root repair and transplantation of meniscus improved contact mechanics, but it did not appear that repair of the meniscal root or transplantation of meniscus restores the biomechanical function back to normal level. The MAT plus MCL release was similar to those after MAT alone. Therefore, it is better to preserve meniscus and MCL release could be done during the MAT.