Can We Reduce Overtreatment of Cervical High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions?

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the cytology, colposcopic, and pathological factors associated with the absence of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL)/cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2-3 lesion on loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) specimens in women with high-grade cytology and/or HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy and the risk of disease persistence/recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two-center retrospective study of women undergoing LEEP for high-grade cervical disease between January 2014 and December 2019. Clinical, cytology, colposcopy, and pathology results were evaluated to identify independent predictive factors associated with CIN 1/negative LEEP results. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were performed. Follow-up data was evaluated to assess the risk of HSIL/CIN 2-3 persistence/recurrence. RESULTS: Six hundred thirty-nine of 801 women (79.8%) had high-grade cytology and 631 (78.8%) HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy. High-risk human papillomavirus test was positive in 98% of women. Loop electrosurgical excision procedure specimen showing CIN 1 or less was found in 27%-31%. Normal/low-grade colposcopy (odds ratio [OR] = 2.17, CI = 1.39-3.39, p = .001) and CIN 1/negative biopsy (OR = 3.25, CI = 2.12-4.99, p < .001) were predictors of negative/CIN 1 LEEP result in women with high-grade cytology. Normal/low-grade cytology (OR = 1.77, CI = 1.19-2.64, p = .005), normal/low-grade colposcopy (OR = 1.66, CI = 1.11-2.49, p = .013), and CIN 2 biopsy (OR = 2.75, CI = 1.73-4.39, p < .001) were predictors in women with HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy. Women with a negative/CIN 1 LEEP had lower recurrence/persistence than those with confirmed HSIL/CIN 2-3(1 vs 31, p = .002). Positive endocervical margin (OR = 2.85, CI = 1.10-7.36, p = .03) and high-risk human papillomavirus persistence (OR = 41.3, CI = 16-106.7, p < .01) were predictors of HSIL/CIN 2-3 persistence/recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: A CIN 1/negative LEEP specimen in women with high-grade cytology and/or HSIL/CIN 2-3 biopsy is associated with negative/low-grade cytology, normal/low-grade colposcopic findings and CIN 2 biopsy result before treatment. The HSIL/CIN 2-3 disease persistence/recurrence is low when LEEP specimen does not confirm HSIL/CIN 2-3.

Does Lepidium meyenii (Maca) improve seminal quality?

Maca (Lepidium meyenii) is a herbaceous plant grown at over 4,000 m in Peru. It has been studied worldwide for its properties on fertility. Previous studies have assessed maca effects on semen quality, but there is need of randomised, double-blind trials in order to make clinical decisions. The objective of this study was to assess the effect of maca on seminal parameters in infertile adult men. This is a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial in which sixty-nine patients diagnosed with mild asthenozoospermia and/or mild oligozoospermia were supplied by maca (n = 35) or placebo (n = 34) (2 g/day) for a period of 12 weeks. When compared patients treated with maca and patients treated with placebo, there were no significant differences in semen volume (2.95 ± 0.52 vs. 2.90 ± 0.52; p = .392), sperm motility (22.34 ± 2.22 vs. 23.05 ± 2.22; p = .462) and normal sperm morphology (7.89 ± 1.89 vs. 7.04 ± 2.28; p = .801), but there was a significant difference in sperm concentration (15.04 ± 5.61 vs. 10.16 ± 3.59, respectively; p = .011). In conclusion, patients treated with 2 g of maca for a period of 12 weeks showed a significant improvement in seminal concentration compared with patients treated with placebo. There were no significant differences in semen volume, sperm mobility and morphology when compared both groups.

Intraoperative Human Papillomavirus Test Predicts 24-Month High-Grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion Recurrence Saving Costs: A Prospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: The human papilloma virus (HPV) test is recommended in the posttreatment follow-up of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. The aim of the study was to assess whether the intraoperative HPV (IOP-HPV) test had a similar diagnostic accuracy that HPV test performed at 6 months to predict high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, 304 women diagnosed with HSIL by biopsy and/or endocervical curettage before treatment and/or confirmation in the histological specimen were included. Immediately after surgery, HPV testing was performed. This test was compared with the test at 6 months and other predictors of recurrence. Patients were followed for 24 months. An economic analysis was performed to compare the costs of IOP-HPV and HPV test at 6 months. RESULTS: Recurrence rate of HSIL was 6.2% (19 patients). The diagnostic accuracy of the IOP-HPV test to predict HSIL recurrence at 24 months was similar to the HPV test at 6 months, with comparative sensitivities of 100% versus 86.7%, specificities of 82.0% versus 77.9%, positive predictive values of 27.1% versus 18.1%, and negative predictive values of 100% versus 99.0%. Direct economic saving per high-grade intraepithelial lesion patient was 172.8 &OV0556;. CONCLUSIONS: The HPV test performed after loop electrosurgical resection procedure predicted recurrence of HSIL at 24 months with a similar diagnostic accuracy than the HPV test at 6 months. The use of the IOP-HPV test in the management of HSIL will allow early detection of the risk of recurrent disease and to save costs because of potential suppression of the need of HPV and follow-up controls at 6 months.

Estimation of tumor size in breast cancer comparing clinical examination, mammography, ultrasound and MRI-correlation with the pathological analysis of the surgical specimen.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the best method in our center to measure preoperative tumor size in breast tumors, using as reference the tumor size in the postoperative surgical specimen. We compared physical examination vs. mammography vs. resonance vs. ultrasound. There are different studies in the literature with disparate results. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. All the included patients have been studied by clinical examination performed by gynecologist or surgeon specialists in senology, and radiological tests (mammography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging). The correlation of mammary examination, ultrasound, mammography and resonance with pathological anatomy was studied using the Pearson index. Subsequently, the results of such imaging tests were compared with the tumor size of the infiltrating component measured by anatomopathological study using a student's t test for related variables. The level of significance was set at 95%. Statistical package R. was used. RESULTS: A total of 73 cases were collected from October 2015 to July 2016 with diagnosis of infiltrating breast carcinoma. Twelve cases of carcinoma in situ and seven cases of neoadjuvant carcinoma are excluded. Finally, a total of 56 cases were included in the analysis. The mean age of the patients is 57 years. The histology is of infiltrating ductal carcinoma in 46 patients (80.7%), lobular in 8 (14%) and other carcinomas in 3 cases (5.2%). We verified the relationship between preoperative tumor size by physical examination, mammography, ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and the final size of the surgical specimen by applying a Pearson correlation test. A strong correlation was found between the physical examination results 0.62 (0.43-0.76 at 95% CI), ultrasound 0.68 (0.51-0.8 at 95% CI), mammography 0.57 (0.36-0.72 at 95% CI) and RM 0.51 (0.29-0.68 at 95% CI) with respect to pathological anatomy. The mean tumor size of the surgical specimen was 16.1 mm. Mean of tumor size by physical examination was 12.1 mm (P<0.05), by 14 mm US (P<0.05), by mammography of 14.3 (P<0.05) and by MRI of 22.53 mm (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasonography is the best predictor of tumor size in breast cancer, compared with clinical examination, mammography, and resonance. Our work could help the decision-making process such as the type of conservative surgery, the possible need for oncoplastic surgery or the decision to start treatment with neoadjuvant therapy, in patients with unifocal tumors.

Surgery improves breast cancer-specific survival in octogenarians with early-stage breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: No consensus exists on optimum therapy for older cancer patients. This singlecentre study was conducted to review the treatment and outcomes for octogenarian women treated for breast cancer. METHODS: Data of all elderly breast cancer patients (≥80 years) with primary breast cancer treated at out institution between 1990 and 2009. Patients with carcinoma in-situ (stage 0) and advanced breast cancer (stage IV) were excluded. Breast cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival for the different patient groups were analysed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 259 patients (median age 84 years). There were 189 (73%) patients with early stage disease (I, IIA, IIB) and 70 (27%) with locally advanced disease (IIIA, IIIB, IIIC). A total of 175 (67.7%) patients underwent surgical treatment and 84 (32.4%) received primary endocrine treatment. Patients were followed for a median of 65 months. In patients with early stages, the mean breast cancer-specific survival was 108 months (95% CI 101-115) in the surgical group and 50 months (95% CI 39-61) in the non-surgical group (P < 0.01), whereas patients with locally advanced breast cancer breast cancer-specific survival was similar for the surgical and non-surgical groups. Breast cancer-specific survival and disease-free survival were significantly better among patients who underwent standard surgical treatment than among those with suboptimal surgery. CONCLUSION: In women ≥80 years with early-stage breast cancer, standard surgical treatment as compared with non-surgical therapy was associated with a better breast cancer-specific.