Evaluation of modified frailty index for predicting post-operative outcomes after lower-extremity free-flap reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Risk stratification for complex procedures such as microsurgical reconstruction of the lower extremities is an important part of preoperative planning and counseling. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the modified five-item frailty index (5-mFI) score, a validated tool for assessing risk in surgical patients, in predicting postoperative complications after lower extremity (LE) free flap reconstruction. METHODS: A retrospective review of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was conducted from 2010 to 2020 on patients who underwent LE free-flap reconstruction. 5-mFI scores were calculated and patients were categorized as 5-mFI ≥2 or <2. The primary endpoint was the presence of 30-day overall complications. The secondary endpoints included 30-day readmission, need for reoperation, and need to discharge to a care facility. Comparisons were made using one-way analysis of variances, Pearson's chi-squared test, or Fisher's extract test. Multivariable logistic regression models were performed for sex, age, BMI, smoker status, operative time, and ASA classification. RESULTS: Total of 294 (61.6% males) patients were identified. Univariate analysis showed 5-mFI ≥2 had higher rates of overall complications (p = .043) and hematologic complications (p = .033). In this population, there were also higher rates of reoperation (p = .003) and discharge to care facility (p < .001). Multivariable regression models further substantiated that 5-mFI ≥2 was independently associated with increased overall complications [2.46, CI: 1.10-5.59, p = .031], hematologic complications [2.55, 1.02-6.35, p = .046], reoperation [4.55, 1.54-13.3, p = .006], and discharge to facility [2.86, 1.27-6.45, p = .011]. CONCLUSIONS: There is a strong association of 5-mFI ≥2 with adverse post-operative outcomes in male patients undergoing LE free-flap reconstruction. This can be a valuable adjunct in the counsel of patients for whom lower extremity salvage is feasible.

The Experience of Virtual Interviews in Resident Selection: A Survey of Program Directors in Surgery.

BACKGROUND: MATCH 2021 was short of the classic "in-person" component. Herein, we assess the impact of virtual interviews (VIs) on resident selection, from the perspectives of program directors (PDs) across all surgical specialties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey-based study of ACGME-accredited US residency program directors (PDs) of all surgical specialties. The survey was designed based on a review of relevant literature and inquired about the strengths, limitations, and overall utility of VIs. RESULTS: A total of 365 PDs responded to our survey. Almost all respondents (90%) found VIs to be less expensive than in-person interviews, while only 34% agree that VIs were less time-consuming. Only a median of 5% of interviews was complicated by technical difficulties. Most PDs found it more challenging to assess applicants' fit (75%), personality and communication skills (71%), and commitment to specialty (60%). Only 14% found VIs to be overall better for assessing residency applicants. In future cycles, most PDs are planning to host both virtual and in-person interviews (57%), while 35% and 8% will host exclusive in-person and virtual interviews, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: VIs are a novel way of dealing with the restrictions imposed by COVID-19. Despite their cost and time benefit, they present particular challenges in evaluating residency applicants. A combination of both virtual and in-person interviews will likely be implemented in the coming cycles.

Obesity Stratification Predicts Short-Term Complications After Parastomal Hernia Repair.

INTRODUCTION: While previous studies have documented adverse outcomes among obese patients undergoing ventral and inguinal hernia repairs, there is a lack of literature regarding the impact of obesity on parastomal hernia (PSH) repair. This retrospective study aims to determine the value of obesity stratification in predicting postoperative complications in patients undergoing PSH repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Outcomes of elective PSH repairs from 2010 to 2020 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were analyzed. Patient demographics, preoperative characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared using bivariate analysis and multivariable regression models. RESULTS: A total of 2972 patients were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariable regression found, compared to nonobese patients, patients of obesity class ≥ II were 1.37 times more likely to develop complications overall (P = 0.006) and 1.55 times more likely to develop wound complications (P < 0.001). This group also yielded a 1.60 times higher risk of developing superficial wound infection (P = 0.007) and a 1.63 times greater risk of developing postoperative sepsis (P = 0.044). Total length of stay was longer for patients of obesity class ≥ II but not for obesity class I when compared to patients with body mass index <30.0 kg/m2. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with a body mass index ≥35.0 kg/m2 are more susceptible to an increased rate of complications after PSH repairs. The findings of this study will allow surgeons to stratify obese patients who would benefit from preoperative weight loss interventions prior to PSH repair and discuss associated risks with patients to facilitate informed consent.

Deep Venous Arterialization for Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia in Atherosclerosis Patients - A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Venous arterialization is an upcoming and novel alternative in chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) patients in the absence of standard revascularization options. The aim of this study is to systematically review and analyze outcomes of venous arterialization. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in 5 databases using the PRISMA methodology. Inclusion criteria were English language original research papers on CLTI patients treated with venous arterialization. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: absence of CLTI due to atherosclerosis, duplicate study or reporting of patients, meeting abstract only. Quality and risk of bias were evaluated. Meta-analysis was performed using random effects model on articles that have a sample size of equal or greater than 10. RESULTS: Twelve studies included 442 patients that underwent treatment for 445 limbs (374 patients and 377 limbs underwent venous arterialization while remainder underwent traditional bypass and served as control subjects). Average age was 66 [18 studies, range 37 -91 years], 68% were male [271/366, 15 studies] and 67% diabetic [271/406, 16 studies]). Most limbs (88%, 352/398, 16 studies) had tissue loss. Pooled 30-day mortality was 3.7% (95%-confidence interval [CI] 0.8 -6.6%), 30-day morbidity was 15.5% (95%-CI 3.2 -27.8%), 30-day major adverse cardiovascular event was 5.2% (95%-CI 1.7 -8.6%) and 30-day major adverse limb event was 16.7% (95%-CI 1.5 -31.9%). Pooled 1-year limb-salvage rate was 79.0% (95%-CI 68.7 -90.7) and 1-year survival rate was 85.7% (95%-CI 76.2 -96.4). Studies quality varied significantly across studies. CONCLUSION: Venous arterialization has an acceptable a 1-year limb salvage rate of 79%, however, this is based on low levels of evidence. More randomized controlled trials or high-quality cohort studies are needed to further define the effectiveness of this procedure for CLTI.

Addressing Surgical Care Disparities: Residents' Involvement in Global Mission Trips.

ABSTRACT: Humanitarian mission trips have been organized by several residency programs and organizations to cater to surgical care in underdeveloped countries. While there is cross-talk on the existence of such opportunities, there is a paucity of guidance to residents on participation in such trips, their benefits, and the myriad of intangibles to consider while planning to pursue such opportunities. Through this article, the authors highlight the background and utility of humanitarian surgical missions and summarize the clinical and surgical experiences that these trips offer for residents choosing to embark on these altruistic journeys.

Alternative Strategies for Evaluating General Surgery Residency Applicants and an Interview Limit for MATCH 2021: An Impending Necessity.

The COVID-19 pandemic has posed unique challenges for evaluating general surgery residency applicants to MATCH 2021. In the absence of away rotations, programs are likely to afford greater importance to objective data to stratify the applicant pool and medical students are likely to experience difficulty in thoroughly assessing each program. Virtual rotations, meet-and-greet events conducted before the application submission deadline, personality testing before extending interviews, standardized letters of recommendation, and skills testing can serve as valuable adjuncts for determining the best applicant-program fit. Finally, an interview limit which sets the bar for the maximum number of accepted interviews per applicant per specialty can offer a level playing field in the absence of time and cost limitations associated with travel.

Termination of the USMLE Step 2 CS: Perspectives of Surgical Residents with Diverse Medical Backgrounds.

As the decision to permanently suspend the USMLE Step 2 Clinical Skills exam resonates across the medical education landscape, it has different implications for the graduates of American allopathic (US-MD), osteopathic (DO) medical schools and international medical graduates (IMGs). Through this perspective, we as authors who represent each of these three diverse cohorts highlight the changes that resulted from the COVID-19 pandemic and delve into the multitude of ramifications that could ensue as a result of this decision. Our propositions are geared towards a standardized objective structured clinical examination for evaluating US-MDs and DOs, and a call for novel evaluation strategies to assure the minimum clinical standards of IMGs.

International Medical Graduates are Comparable to American Medical Graduates as General Surgery Interns.

BACKGROUND: International medical graduates (IMGs) are often relegated to preliminary positions in general surgery (GS) owing to uncertainties about the candidate's performance in the American healthcare setting. We aimed to determine the comparative performance of IMGs and American medical graduates (AMGs) at baseline and assess these trends over the course of their GS internship. METHODS: Evaluations of all IMG preliminary and AMG categorical interns from 2013 to 2017 at our GS residency program were obtained from three faculty members to score overall performance, technical skills, interpersonal communication, and medical knowledge on a 10-point Likert scale. Scores on the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam, an in-house preparation test, United States Medical Licensing Exam, and performance during the biannual multistation objective assessments were compared between the two resident groups. RESULTS: Seventy-two interns (28 [39%] AMG categorical and 44 [61%] IMG preliminary) met inclusion criteria. The AMG group had significantly higher median Step 1 and Step 2 scores compared with our IMG group (243 versus 231, P = 0.002, and 250 versus 246, P = 0.03, respectively).Although in-house preparation test scores were higher among IMGs (median [interquartile range] of 36 [33-40] among AMGs and 38 [34-45] among IMGs; P = 0.002), there were no statistically significant differences between the American Board of Surgery In-Training Exam scores of the two groups. The median scores for the four faculty evaluation components were similar between the AMG (7, 8, 7, 7) and IMG resident groups (7, 7, 7, 7; P = nonsignificant). IMGs scored significantly higher in both biannual multistation objective assessments than AMGs (median [interquartile range] July: 59 [47-91] versus 55 [37-62], P = 0.005; January: 103 [86-116] versus 91 [87-104], P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: It is reassuring to confirm that no matter where they are from, great candidates can perform well as surgical interns in a GS training program.

Gender Disparity in Abstract Presentation at Plastic Surgery Meetings.

BACKGROUND: Medical and surgical fields continue to be marred by gender disparities. The "leaky pipeline" effect, representing a gradual decline in female representation along the academic ladder, has been well documented in plastic surgery. However, gender differences in abstract presentation at national plastic surgery meetings and subsequent publications remains elusive. METHODS: We reviewed abstracts presented at the 2014 and 2015 annual meetings of the American Association of Plastic Surgeons (AAPS); American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS), and the Plastic Surgery Research Council (PSRC). Several abstract characteristics including the names of the first and last authors were extracted. Genderize.io and Google search were used to identify the authors' gender. RESULTS: We identified 1174 abstracts presented at the three identified meetings. Females comprised 29% of the presenters and 16% of abstract senior authors (ASAs). No gender differences were identified between the meetings, type of presentation (oral versus poster), and year of presentation. The only difference was in the subspecialty of the abstracts. Successful conversion to full-text articles was similar for male and female presenters (68% versus 62%, P = 0.065) but higher for male ASAs (68% versus 59%, P = 0.01). When an author change occurred, female presenters and ASAs were more likely to be replaced by males (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Gender differences continue to be evident in academic plastic surgery with women constituting a minority of both presenters and senior authors on abstracts presented at national plastic surgery meetings. Future work should assess whether flexible and supportive work policies can foster greater female representation in academic plastic surgery.

The Evolving Trends in the Impact Factor of Plastic Surgery Journals: A 22-Year Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The journal impact factor (IF) is one of the most widely adopted metrics to assess journal value. We aimed to investigate the trends in the IF and ranking of plastic surgery journals (PSJs) over a 22-year period. METHODS: The Journal Citation Report 2018 was used to identify all journals within the field of plastic surgery from 1997 to 2018. We analyzed the IF of PSJs and that of the category surgery. RESULTS: A total of 34 PSJs were identified. The mean IF increased from 0.584 (median, 0.533) in 1997 to 1.58 (median, 1.399) in 2018 (P < 0.0001). Over the same time, the median IF of the journals in the category surgery increased from 0.914 to 1.883. The mean journal IF percentile of PSJs within surgery remained fairly stable (P = 0.999). A strong positive correlation was identified between the IF of PSJs and both the 5-year IF (r = 0.943, P < 0.0001) and the immediacy index (r = 0.736, P < 0.0001). The percentage of self-citations across the study period was fairly stable at a mean of 19.2%. A weak positive correlation was found between the IF and the percentage of self-citations (r = 0.171, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The mean journal IF in PSJs has been trending upward over the last 22 years. Ranking of PSJs IF within the category surgery has remained unchanged. The self-citation rate has been fairly stable and correlated weakly with the IF. A strong positive correlation exists between the IF and both the immediacy index and the 5-year IF.

Prophylactic Bronchial Stump Support With Intrathoracic Muscle Flap Transposition.

BACKGROUND: Bronchopleural fistula (BPF) is a dreaded complication of pulmonary resection. For high-risk patients, bronchial stump coverage with vascularized tissue has been recommended. The goal of this study was to report our experience with intrathoracic muscle transposition for bronchial stump coverage. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent intrathoracic muscle flap transposition as a prophylactic measure at our institution between 1990 and 2010 was conducted. Demographics, surgical characteristics, and complication rates were abstracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 160 patients were identified. The most common lung resections performed were pneumonectomy (n = 69, 43%) and lobectomy (n = 60, 38%). A total of 168 flaps were used where serratus anterior was the most common flap (n = 136, 81%), followed by intercostal (n = 14, 8%), and latissimus dorsi (n = 12, 7%). Ten patients (6%) developed BPF, and empyema occurred in 13 patients (8%). Median survival was 20 months, and operative mortality occurred in 7 patients (4%). CONCLUSIONS: Reinforcement of the bronchial closure with vascularized muscle is a viable option for potentially decreasing the incidence of BPF in high-risk patients. Further randomized studies are needed to determine the efficacy of this technique for BPF prevention.

Surgical Outcomes after Abdominoperineal Resection with Sacrectomy and Soft Tissue Reconstruction: Lessons Learned.

BACKGROUND: Abdominoperineal resection (APR), which involves resection of the rectum, anal canal, and perianal skin, results in a large dead space in the pelvis, devascularized tissues, and high bacterial loads. This predisposes to wound complications, especially in the setting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Additional sacral resection further compounds these effects. We aimed to assess perineal wound outcomes and complications in patients who underwent flap reconstruction for APR with sacrectomy (APRS) at our institution. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent flap reconstruction for APRS over a 20-year period (1999-2018). Medical comorbidities, details of the surgical procedure, and major and minor wound complications were recorded and analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-six patients underwent flap reconstruction following APRS-28 (60%) for colorectal cancer, 8 (17%) for sacral chordoma, and 10 diagnosed with other malignant histologies. Rectus abdominis myocutaneous (RAM) flap reconstruction was used in 42 patients (91%). The median time to the first major perineal complication was 111 days (interquartile range: 22-660 days). Half of our cohort (n = 23) experienced a major perineal complication. No significant differences were found in major or minor perineal or abdominal wall complications between RAM flap and other flaps. APR with high sacrectomy was performed in 27 patients (59%) and was associated with significantly increased full-thickness dehiscence in the perineal region when compared with APR with low sacrectomy, 33 versus 0%, respectively (p = 0.0076). Complete flap loss occurred in one patient. CONCLUSION: The RAM flap was the workhorse flap for pelvic reconstruction following APRS in our cohort. Wound complications are common following APRS. High sacrectomy is associated with higher incidence of complications compared with low sacrectomy. Optimal surgical planning and patient counseling is fundamental to improve current surgical outcomes.

Altmetrics in Plastic Surgery Journals: Does It Correlate With Citation Count?

BACKGROUND: Altmetrics (alternative metrics) have become one of the most commonly utilized metrics to track the impact of research articles across electronic and social media platforms. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify whether the Altmetric Attention Score (AAS) is a good proxy for citation counts and whether it can be employed as an accurate measure to complement the current gold standard. METHODS: The authors conducted a citation analysis of all articles published in 6 plastic surgery journals during the 2016 calendar year. Citation counts and AAS were abstracted and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 1420 articles were identified. The mean AAS was 11 and the median AAS was 1. The journal with the highest mean AAS was Aesthetic Surgery Journal (31), followed by Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (19). A weak positive correlation was identified (r = 0.33, P < .0001) between AAS and citations. Articles in the top 1% in terms of citation counts showed strong positive correlation between AAS and citation counts (r = 0.64, P = .01). On the contrary, articles in the top 1% of AAS had no significant correlation with citation counts (r = -0.31, P = .29). CONCLUSIONS: Overall correlation between citations and AAS was weak, and therefor AAS may not be an accurate early predictor of future citations. The 2 metrics seem to measure different aspects of the impact of scholarly work and should be utilized in tandem for determining the reach of a scientific article.

Citation Skew in Plastic Surgery Journals: Does the Journal Impact Factor Predict Individual Article Citation Rate?

BACKGROUND: Citation skew refers to the unequal distribution of citations to articles published in a particular journal. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess whether citation skew exists within plastic surgery journals and to determine whether the journal impact factor (JIF) is an accurate indicator of the citation rates of individual articles. METHODS: We used Journal Citation Reports to identify all journals within the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The number of citations in 2018 for all individual articles published in 2016 and 2017 was abstracted. RESULTS: Thirty-three plastic surgery journals were identified, publishing 9823 articles. The citation distribution showed right skew, with the majority of articles having either 0 or 1 citation (40% and 25%, respectively). A total of 3374 (34%) articles achieved citation rates similar to or higher than their journal's IF, whereas 66% of articles failed to achieve a citation rate equal to the JIF. Review articles achieved higher citation rates (median, 2) than original articles (median, 1) (P < 0.0001). Overall, 50% of articles contributed to 93.7% of citations and 12.6% of articles contributed to 50% of citations. A weak positive correlation was found between the number of citations and the JIF (r = 0.327, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Citation skew exists within plastic surgery journals as in other fields of biomedical science. Most articles did not achieve citation rates equal to the JIF with a small percentage of articles having a disproportionate influence on citations and the JIF. Therefore, the JIF should not be used to assess the quality and impact of individual scientific work.

Eye-Tracking Technology in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: The use of eye-tracking technology in plastic surgery has gained popularity over the past decade due to its ability to assess observers' visual preferences in an objective manner. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to provide a comprehensive review of eye-tracking studies in plastic and reconstructive surgery, which can aid in the design and conduct of high-quality eye-tracking studies. METHODS: Through application of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a comprehensive search of articles published on eye-tracking across several databases was conducted from January 1946 to January 2019. Inclusion criteria included studies evaluating the use of eye-tracking technology in the field of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The resulting publications were screened by 2 independent reviewers. RESULTS: A total of 595 articles were identified, 23 of which met our inclusion criteria. The most common application of eye-tracking was to assess individuals with cleft lip/palate (9 studies). All 19 studies that evaluated fixation patterns among conditions vs controls reported significant differences between the 2 groups. Five out of 7 studies assessing visual data between preoperative and postoperative patients identified significant differences between the preoperative and postoperative groups, whereas 2 studies did not. Nine studies examined the relation between severity indices, attractiveness scores, or personality ratings and gaze patterns. Correlation was found in 7 out of the 9 studies. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review demonstrates the utility of eye-tracking technology as a quantifiable objective assessment and emerging research tool for evaluating outcomes in several domains of plastic and reconstructive surgery.

Albucasis: A Pioneer Plastic Surgeon.

The middle ages in the Arab world etched medical advancements that laid the foundations of modern medical practice. Among the several renowned physicians of historical importance, Abu Alkasem al-Zahrawi (Albucasis) left his mark in the fields of medicine and surgery. He is notably famous for his 30-volume compendium Kitab-al Tasreef, which served as his magnum opus. The last volume of this work was reserved for surgery. During his lifetime, Albucasis made contributions of unparalleled luminosity to the field of surgery. He described surgical techniques for a range of procedures encompassing several subspecialties that comprise modern plastic surgery. Beyond just a physician and surgeon, Albucasis was a remarkable teacher who taught medical students with fervor and emphasized the importance of affording treatment to patients of all social classes and the value of physician-patient relationships. The focus of this review is to explore the contributions of Albucasis to the field of plastic surgery.