[Recommendations for the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units]. / Recomendaciones para el manejo de los pacientes críticos con COVID-19 en las Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the admission of a high number of patients to the ICU, generally due to severe respiratory failure. Since the appearance of the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, at the end of 2019, in China, a huge number of treatment recommendations for this entity have been published, not always supported by sufficient scientific evidence or with methodological rigor necessary. Thanks to the efforts of different groups of researchers, we currently have the results of clinical trials, and other types of studies, of higher quality. We consider it necessary to create a document that includes recommendations that collect this evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19, but also aspects that other guidelines have not considered and that we consider essential in the management of critical patients with COVID-19. For this, a drafting committee has been created, made up of members of the SEMICYUC Working Groups more directly related to different specific aspects of the management of these patients.

Recommendations of the Working Groups from the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) for the management of adult critically ill patients. / Recomendaciones para el tratamiento de los pacientes críticos de los Grupos de Trabajo de la Sociedad Española de Medicina Intensiva, Crítica y Unidades Coronarias (SEMICYUC).

The standardization of the Intensive Care Medicine may improve the management of the adult critically ill patient. However, these strategies have not been widely applied in the Intensive Care Units (ICUs). The aim is to elaborate the recommendations for the standardization of the treatment of critical patients. A panel of experts from the thirteen working groups (WG) of the Spanish Society of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC) was selected and nominated by virtue of clinical expertise and/or scientific experience to carry out the recommendations. Available scientific literature in the management of adult critically ill patients from 2002 to 2016 was extracted. The clinical evidence was discussed and summarised by the experts in the course of a consensus finding of every WG and finally approved by the WGs after an extensive internal review process that was carried out between December 2015 and December 2016. A total of 65 recommendations were developed, of which 5 corresponded to each of the 13 WGs. These recommendations are based on the opinion of experts and scientific knowledge, and are intended as a guide for the intensivists in the management of critical patients.

Recommendations for the management of critically ill patients with COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units.

The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the admission of a high number of patients to the ICU, generally due to severe respiratory failure. Since the appearance of the first cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection, at the end of 2019, in China, a huge number of treatment recommendations for this entity have been published, not always supported by sufficient scientific evidence or with methodological rigor necessary. Thanks to the efforts of different groups of researchers, we currently have the results of clinical trials, and other types of studies, of higher quality. We consider it necessary to create a document that includes recommendations that collect this evidence regarding the diagnosis and treatment of COVID-19, but also aspects that other guidelines have not considered and that we consider essential in the management of critical patients with COVID-19. For this, a drafting committee has been created, made up of members of the SEMICYUC Working Groups more directly related to different specific aspects of the management of these patients.

Preoperative skin antisepsis. / Antisepsia cutánea antes de la cirugía.

Surgical wound infection is one of the main complications of patients undergoing surgery and has significant clinical and economical consequences, especially when it affects prosthetic implants or is caused by multidrug resistant bacteria. Cutaneous preparation is one of the main preventive measures. Clinical practice guidelines recommend not to remove the hair from the surgery site unless it interferes with the operation, and that if removal proves necessary, it should be done with a single-use cutter, as close as possible to the time of surgery. With regard to preoperative showering, the current recommendation is to perform it with a soap (whether antimicrobial or otherwise) or an antiseptic product, at least the night before surgery. Regarding preparation of the incision area and surrounding zone, the use of an alcohol-based antiseptic is generally advised, preferably alcoholic chlorhexidine, due to its high antibacterial activity and prolonged residual effect, respecting the evaporation drying time. This article is part of a supplement entitled "Antisepsis in the critical patient", which is sponsored by Becton Dickinson.

Antisepsis for blood culture extraction. Blood culture contamination rate. / Antisepsia en la extracción de hemocultivos. Tasa de contaminación de hemocultivos.

Blood cultures are the gold standard for the etiological diagnosis of bacteremia, though false-positive results are relatively frequent primarily due to contamination from skin flora during sample extraction. Correct skin antisepsis is important for reducing the bacterial load and opportunities for contamination. However, there is currently no solid consensus on the best antiseptic method. Alcohol has a potent immediate bactericidal effect, and there is some scientific evidence in favor of its combination with chlorhexidine, but most studies on this issue are heterogeneous and with inconclusive results. Some authors even suggest that the chosen antiseptic is irrelevant to the contamination rate, provided the blood culture extraction method is adequate and is performed by a trained professional. This article is part of a supplement entitled "Antisepsis in the critical patient", which is sponsored by Becton Dickinson.

Practical document on the management of hyponatremia in critically ill patients. / Documento práctico del manejo de la hiponatremia en pacientes críticos.

Hyponatremia is the most prevalent electrolyte disorder in Intensive Care Units. It is associated with an increase in morbidity, mortality and hospital stay. The majority of the published studies are observational, retrospective and do not include critical patients; hence it is difficult to draw definitive conclusions. Moreover, the lack of clinical evidence has led to important dissimilarities in the recommendations coming from different scientific societies. Finally, etiopathogenic mechanisms leading to hyponatremia in the critical care patient are complex and often combined, and an intensive analysis is clearly needed. A study was therefore made to review all clinical aspects about hyponatremia management in the critical care setting. The aim was to develop a Spanish nationwide algorithm to standardize hyponatremia diagnosis and treatment in the critical care patient.

[Changes in spirometric parameters and arterial oxygen saturation during a mountain ascent to over 3000 meters]. / Cambios espirométricos y en la saturación arterial de oxígeno durante la ascensión a una montaña de más de 3.000 metros.

OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether climbing a mountain over 3000 meters high produces any alterations in ventilation, whether such alterations are modified by acclimatization, and whether they correlate with changes in arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) or the development of acute mountain sickness (AMS). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The following parameters were measured in 8 unacclimatized mountaineers who climbed Aneto (3404 m) and spent 3 days at the summit: forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), airway response to inhaled terbutaline, SaO2, and the symptoms of AMS. RESULTS: At the summit, mean (SD) FEV1 declined by 12.3% (5.7%) and mean FVC by 7.6% (6.7%) while the ratio of FEV1 to FVC remained normal. The means for both parameters were higher on the following day. No airway response to bronchodilator treatment was observed. The restriction disappeared entirely on descent. At the peak, SaO2 increased progressively as the climbers became acclimatized. During the ascent, FEV1 correlated with SaO2 (r=0.79). One participant who suffered from AMS had a ratio of FEV1 to FVC less than 70% and the worst SaO2 during the 3 days on the summit. Obstruction preceded the AMS symptoms, did not respond to bronchodilator treatment, and disappeared when the climber descended. CONCLUSIONS: The mountaineers who climbed over 3000 meters presented restriction that correlated with hypoxemia. This restriction did not respond to bronchodilator treatment, improved with acclimatization, and disappeared on descent. One person with AMS presented obstruction that did not respond to terbutaline and disappeared on descent.