Impact of Hospital Affiliation With a Flagship Hospital System on Surgical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare general surgery outcomes at flagship systems, flagship hospitals, and flagship hospital affiliates versus matched controls. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: It is unknown whether flagship hospitals perform better than flagship hospital affiliates for surgical patients. METHODS: Using Medicare claims for 2018 to 2019, we matched patients undergoing inpatient general surgery in flagship system hospitals to controls who underwent the same procedure at hospitals outside the system but within the same region. We defined a "flagship hospital" within each region as the major teaching hospital with the highest patient volume that is also part of a hospital system; its system was labeled a "flagship system." We performed 4 main comparisons: patients treated at any flagship system hospital versus hospitals outside the flagship system; flagship hospitals versus hospitals outside the flagship system; flagship hospital affiliates versus hospitals outside the flagship system; and flagship hospitals versus affiliate hospitals. Our primary outcome was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: We formed 32,228 closely matched pairs across 35 regions. Patients at flagship system hospitals (32,228 pairs) had lower 30-day mortality than matched control patients [3.79% vs. 4.36%, difference=-0.57% (-0.86%, -0.28%), P<0.001]. Similarly, patients at flagship hospitals (15,571/32,228 pairs) had lower mortality than control patients. However, patients at flagship hospital affiliates (16,657/32,228 pairs) had similar mortality to matched controls. Flagship hospitals had lower mortality than affiliate hospitals [difference-in-differences=-1.05% (-1.62%, -0.47%), P<0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated at flagship hospitals had significantly lower mortality rates than those treated at flagship hospital affiliates. Hence, flagship system affiliation does not alone imply better surgical outcomes.

Health Care Use Among Patients Retroactively Insured via a Hospital-Based Insurance Linkage Program.

OBJECTIVE: Over 25% of the 27 million uninsured individuals in the United States are eligible for Medicaid. Many hospitals have insurance linkage programs that assist eligible patients with enrollment, but little is known about the impact of these programs on care utilization. This research assessed health care utilization and health outcomes among patients enrolled in Medicaid via a hospital-based insurance linkage program. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adults aged 18-64 admitted to the hospital from 2016 to 2021. Those who obtained insurance retroactively via insurance linkage (RI) were compared with those who presented with Medicaid (MI) or remained uninsured (UI). The primary outcome was the presence of at least one visit with a primary care provider (PCP) in the 12 months following index admission. Secondary outcomes included having an assigned PCP, ED revisits, and hospital readmissions. For patients with diabetes and hypertension, 12-month hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and blood pressure (BP) readings were tracked. RESULTS: Of 3882 patients admitted with no insurance, 2905 (74.8%) were enrolled in insurance (RI). In multivariable analysis, RI patients were 14% more likely (OR 1.14, p = 0.020) to have completed at least one PCP visit by 12 months after index admission compared to those with preexisting Medicaid (MI), and uninsured patients were 29% less likely (OR 0.71, p = 0.003). MI and RI patients also had more ED revisits (p < 0.001) and greater 12-month reductions in blood pressure (p < 0.001) compared with uninsured patients. CONCLUSION: Hospital-based insurance linkage reached three-quarters of uninsured patients and was associated with increased utilization of acute and outpatient health care services. An acute care encounter represents an opportunity to connect patients to insurance, a key step toward improving their health outcomes.

Efficacy of therapeutic plasma exchange in patients with severe COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the existing evidence and to quantitatively synthesise evidence on the impact of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) on severe COVID-19 patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis protocol was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022316331). We systemically searched six electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, clinicaltrial.gov, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) from inception until 1 June 2022. We included studies comparing patients who received TPE versus those who received the standard treatment. For risk of bias assessment, we used the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool, the ROBINS1 tool, and the Newcastle Ottawa scale for RCTs, non-RCTs, and observational studies, respectively. Continuous data were pooled as standardized mean difference (SMD), and dichotomous data were pooled as risk ratio in the random effect model with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI). Thirteen studies (one randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 12 non-RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis, with a total of 829 patients. There is a moderate-quality evidence from one RCT that TPE reduces the lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels (SMD -1.09, 95% CI [-1.59 to -0.60]), D-dimer (SMD -0.86, 95% CI [-1.34 to -0.37]), and ferritin (SMD -0.70, 95% CI [-1.18 to -0.23]), and increases the absolute lymphocyte count (SMD 0.54, 95% CI [0.07-1.01]), There is low-quality evidence from mixed-design studies that TPE was associated with lower mortality (relative risk 0.51, 95% CI [0.35-0.74]), lower IL-6 (SMD -0.91, 95% CI [-1.19 to -0.63]), and lower ferritin (SMD -0.51, 95% CI [-0.80 to -0.22]) compared to the standard control. Among severely affected COVID-19 patients, TPE might provide benefits such as decreasing the mortality rate, LDH, D-dimer, IL-6, and ferritin, in addition to increasing the higher absolute lymphocyte count. Further well-designed RCTs are needed.

Factors Associated with Urgent Amputation Status and Its Impact on Mortality.

BACKGROUND: Thirty-day mortality is higher after urgent major lower extremity amputations compared to elective lower extremity amputations. This study aims to identify factors associated with urgent amputations and to examine their impact on perioperative outcomes and long-term mortality. METHODS: Patients undergoing major lower limb amputation from 2013 to 2020 in the Vascular Quality Initiative were included. Urgent amputation was defined as occurring within 72 hr of admission. Associations with sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, and outcomes including postoperative complication, inpatient death, and long-term survival were compared using univariable tests and multivariable logistic regression. Long-term survival between groups was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Of the 12,874 patients included, 4,850 (37.7%) had urgent and 8,024 (62.3%) had elective amputations. Non-White patients required urgent amputation more often than White patients (39.8% vs. 37.9%, P = 0.03). A higher proportion of Medicaid and self-pay patients presented urgently (Medicaid: 13.0% vs. 11.0%; self-pay: 3.4% vs. 2.5%, P < 0.001). Patients requiring urgent amputation were less often taking aspirin (55.6% vs. 60.1%, P < 0.001) or statin (62.2% vs. 67.2%, P < 0.001), had fewer prior revascularization procedures (41.0% vs. 48.8%, P < 0.001), and were of higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 4-5 (50.9% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001). Urgent amputations were more commonly for uncontrolled infection (48.1% vs. 29.4%, P < 0.001) or acute limb ischemia (14.3% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). Postoperative complications were higher after urgent amputations (34.7% vs. 16.6%, P < 0.001), including need for return to operating room (23.8% vs. 8.4%, P < 0.001) and need for higher revision (15.2% vs. 4.5%, P < 0.001). Inpatient mortality was higher after urgent amputation (8.9% vs. 5.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed non-White race, self-pay, homelessness, current smoking, ASA class 4-5, and amputations for uncontrolled infection or acute limb ischemia were associated with urgent status, whereas living in a nursing home or prior revascularization were protective. Furthermore, urgent amputation was associated with an increased odds of postoperative complication or death (odds ratio 1.86 [1.69-2.04], P < 0.001) as well as long-term mortality (odds ratio: 1.24 [1.13-1.35], P < 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis corroborated that elective status was associated with improvement of long-term survival. CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring urgent amputations are more often non-White, uninsured, and less frequently had prior revascularization procedures, revealing disparities in access to care. Urgency was associated with a higher postoperative complication rate, as well as increased long-term mortality. Efforts should be directed toward reducing these disparities to improve outcomes following amputation.

Impact of Medicaid expansion on outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Lack of insurance has been independently associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, possibly due to worse control of comorbidities and delays in diagnosis and treatment. Medicaid expansion has improved insurance rates and access to care, potentially benefiting these patients. We sought to assess the association between Medicaid expansion and outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Databases data from 14 states between 2012 and 2018 was conducted. The sample was restricted to first-record abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs in adults under age 65 in states that expanded Medicaid on January 1, 2014 (Medicaid expansion group) or had not expanded before December 31, 2018 (non-expansion group). The Medicaid expansion and non-expansion groups were compared between pre-expansion (2012-2013) and post-expansion (2014-2018) time periods to assess baseline demographic and operative differences. We used difference-in-differences multivariable logistic regression adjusted for patient factors, open vs endovascular repair, and standard errors clustered by state. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were stratified by insurance type. RESULTS: We examined 8995 patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, including 3789 (42.1%) in non-expansion states and 5206 (57.9%) in Medicaid expansion states. Rates of Medicaid insurance were unchanged in non-expansion states but increased in Medicaid expansion states post-expansion (non-expansion: 10.9% to 9.8%; P = .346; expansion: 9.7% to 19.7%; P < .001). One in 10 patients from both non-expansion and Medicaid expansion states presented with ruptured aneurysms, which did not change over time. Rates of open repair decreased in both non-expansion and Medicaid expansion states over time (non-expansion: 25.1% to 19.2%; P < .001; expansion: 25.2% to 18.4%; P < .001). On adjusted difference-in-differences analysis between expansion and non-expansion states pre-to post-expansion, Medicaid expansion was associated with a 1.02% absolute reduction in in-hospital mortality among all patients (95% confidence interval, -1.87% to -0.17%; P = .019). Additionally, among patients who were either on Medicaid or were uninsured (ie, the patients most likely to be impacted by Medicaid expansion), a larger 4.17% decrease in in-hospital mortality was observed (95% confidence interval, -6.47% to -1.87%; P < .001). In contrast, no significant difference-in-difference in mortality was observed for privately insured patients. CONCLUSIONS: Medicaid expansion was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair among all patients and particularly among patients who were either on Medicaid or were uninsured. Our results provide support for improved access to care for patients undergoing abdominal aortic aneurysm repair through Medicaid expansion.

The Safety of Performing Surgery at Ambulatory Surgery Centers Versus Hospital Outpatient Departments in Older Patients With or Without Multimorbidity.

BACKGROUND: Surgery for older Americans is increasingly being performed at ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) rather than hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), while rates of multimorbidity have increased. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether there are differential outcomes in older patients undergoing surgical procedures at ASCs versus HOPDs. RESEARCH DESIGN: Matched cohort study. SUBJECTS: Of Medicare patients, 30,958 were treated in 2018 and 2019 at an ASC undergoing herniorrhaphy, cholecystectomy, or open breast procedures, matched to similar HOPD patients, and another 32,702 matched pairs undergoing higher-risk procedures. MEASURES: Seven and 30-day revisit and complication rates. RESULTS: For the same procedures, HOPD patients displayed a higher baseline predicted risk of 30-day revisits than ASC patients (13.09% vs 8.47%, P < 0.0001), suggesting the presence of considerable selection on the part of surgeons. In matched Medicare patients with or without multimorbidity, we observed worse outcomes in HOPD patients: 30-day revisit rates were 8.1% in HOPD patients versus 6.2% in ASC patients ( P < 0.0001), and complication rates were 41.3% versus 28.8%, P < 0.0001. Similar patterns were also found for 7-day outcomes and in higher-risk procedures examined in a secondary analysis. Similar patterns were also observed when analyzing patients with and without multimorbidity separately. CONCLUSIONS: The rates of revisits and complications for ASC patients were far lower than for closely matched HOPD patients. The observed initial baseline risk in HOPD patients was much higher than the baseline risk for the same procedures performed at the ASC, suggesting that surgeons are appropriately selecting their riskier patients to be treated at the HOPD rather than the ASC.

Mortality Among Older Medical Patients at Flagship Hospitals and Their Affiliates.

BACKGROUND: We define a "flagship hospital" as the largest academic hospital within a hospital referral region and a "flagship system" as a system that contains a flagship hospital and its affiliates. It is not known if patients admitted to an affiliate hospital, and not to its main flagship hospital, have better outcomes than those admitted to a hospital outside the flagship system but within the same hospital referral region. OBJECTIVE: To compare mortality at flagship hospitals and their affiliates to matched control patients not in the flagship system but within the same hospital referral region. DESIGN: A matched cohort study PARTICIPANTS: The study used hospitalizations for common medical conditions between 2018-2019 among older patients age ≥ 66 years. We analyzed 118,321 matched pairs of Medicare patients admitted with pneumonia (N=57,775), heart failure (N=42,531), or acute myocardial infarction (N=18,015) in 35 flagship hospitals, 124 affiliates, and 793 control hospitals. MAIN MEASURES: 30-day (primary) and 90-day (secondary) all-cause mortality. KEY RESULTS: 30-day mortality was lower among patients in flagship systems versus control hospitals that are not part of the flagship system but within the same hospital referral region (difference= -0.62%, 95% CI [-0.88%, -0.37%], P<0.001). This difference was smaller in affiliates versus controls (-0.43%, [-0.75%, -0.11%], P=0.008) than in flagship hospitals versus controls (-1.02%, [-1.46%, -0.58%], P<0.001; difference-in-difference -0.59%, [-1.13%, -0.05%], P=0.033). Similar results were found for 90-day mortality. LIMITATIONS: The study used claims-based data. CONCLUSIONS: In aggregate, within a hospital referral region, patients treated at the flagship hospital, at affiliates of the flagship hospital, and in the flagship system as a whole, all had lower mortality rates than matched controls outside the flagship system. However, the mortality advantage was larger for flagship hospitals than for their affiliates.

Defining Multimorbidity in Older Patients Hospitalized with Medical Conditions.

BACKGROUND: The term "multimorbidity" identifies high-risk, complex patients and is conventionally defined as ≥2 comorbidities. However, this labels almost all older patients as multimorbid, making this definition less useful for physicians, hospitals, and policymakers. OBJECTIVE: Develop new medical condition-specific multimorbidity definitions for patients admitted with acute myocardial infarction (AMI), heart failure (HF), and pneumonia patients. We developed three medical condition-specific multimorbidity definitions as the presence of single, double, or triple combinations of comorbidities - called Qualifying Comorbidity Sets (QCSs) - associated with at least doubling the risk of 30-day mortality for AMI and pneumonia, or one-and-a-half times for HF patients, compared to typical patients with these conditions. DESIGN: Cohort-based matching study PARTICIPANTS: One hundred percent Medicare Fee-for-Service beneficiaries with inpatient admissions between 2016 and 2019 for AMI, HF, and pneumonia. MAIN MEASURES: Thirty-day all-location mortality KEY RESULTS: We defined multimorbidity as the presence of ≥1 QCS. The new definitions labeled fewer patients as multimorbid with a much higher risk of death compared to the conventional definition (≥2 comorbidities). The proportions of patients labeled as multimorbid using the new definition versus the conventional definition were: for AMI 47% versus 87% (p value<0.0001), HF 53% versus 98% (p value<0.0001), and pneumonia 57% versus 91% (p value<0.0001). Thirty-day mortality was higher among patients with ≥1 QCS compared to ≥2 comorbidities: for AMI 15.0% versus 9.5% (p<0.0001), HF 9.9% versus 7.0% (p <0.0001), and pneumonia 18.4% versus 13.2% (p <0.0001). CONCLUSION: The presence of ≥2 comorbidities identified almost all patients as multimorbid. In contrast, our new QCS-based definitions selected more specific combinations of comorbidities associated with substantial excess risk in older patients admitted for AMI, HF, and pneumonia. Thus, our new definitions offer a better approach to identifying multimorbid patients, allowing physicians, hospitals, and policymakers to more effectively use such information to consider focused interventions for these vulnerable patients.

The Differential Impact of Medicaid Expansion on Disparities in Outcomes Following Peripheral Vascular Intervention.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) disproportionately affects nonwhite, Hispanic/Latino, and low socioeconomic status patients, who are less likely to have insurance and routine healthcare visits. Medicaid expansion (ME) has improved insurance rates and access to care, potentially benefitting these patients. We sought to assess the impact of ME on disparities in outcomes after peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) for PAD. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively-collected Vascular Quality Initiative PVI procedures between 2011 and 2019 was conducted. The sample was restricted to first-record procedures in adults under the age 65 in states that expanded Medicaid on January 1, 2014 (ME group) or had not expanded before January 1, 2019 (non-expansion [NE] group). ME and NE groups were compared between pre-expansion (2011-2013) and post-expansion (2014- 2019) time periods to assess baseline demographic and operative differences. We used difference-in-differences multivariable logistic regression adjusted for patient factors and clinical center and year fixed effects. Our primary outcome was 1-year major amputation. Secondary outcomes included trends in presentation, 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, and 1-year primary and secondary patency. Outcomes were stratified by race and ethnicity. RESULTS: We examined 34,313 PVI procedures, including 20,378 with follow-up data. Rates of Medicaid insurance increased post-expansion in ME and NE states (ME 16.7% to 23.0%, P < 0.001; NE 10.0% to 11.9%, P = 0.013) while rates of self-pay decreased in ME states only (ME 4.6% to 1.8%, P < 0.001; NE 8.1% to 8.4%, P = 0.620). Adjusted difference-in-differences analysis revealed lower odds of urgent/emergent PVI among all patients and all nonwhite patients in ME states post-expansion compared to NE states (all: odds ratio [OR] 0.53 [95% confidence interval 0.33-0.87], P = 0.011; nonwhite: OR 0.41 [0.19-0.88], P = 0.023). No differences were observed for 1-year major amputation (OR 0.70 [0.43-1.14], P = 0.152), primary patency (OR 0.93 [0.63-1.38], P = 0.726), or secondary patency (OR 1.29 [0.69-2.41], P = 0.431). Odds of 1-year mortality were higher in ME states post-expansion compared to NE states (OR 2.50 [1.07-5.87], P = 0.035), although 30-day mortality was not different (OR 2.04 [0.60-6.90], P = 0.253). Notably, odds of 1-year major amputation among Hispanic/Latino patients decreased in ME states post-expansion compared to NE states (OR 0.11 [0.01-0.86], P = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS: ME was associated with lower odds of 1-year major amputation among Hispanic/Latino patients who underwent PVI for PAD. ME was also associated with lower odds of urgent/emergent procedures among patients overall and nonwhite patients specifically. However, 1-year mortality increased in the overall cohort. Further study is needed to corroborate our findings that ME may have benefits for certain underserved populations with PAD.

Kidney transplantation and donation in the transgender population: A single-institution case series.

The medical needs of the transgender population are increasingly recognized within the US health care system. Hormone therapy and gender-affirming surgery present distinct anatomic, hormonal, infectious, and psychosocial issues among transgender kidney transplant donors and recipients. We present the first reported experience with kidney transplantation and donation in transgender patients. A single-center case series (January 2014-December 2018) comprising 4 transgender kidney transplant recipients and 2 transgender living donors was constructed and analyzed. Experts in transplant surgery, transplant psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, pharmacy, and endocrinology were consulted to discuss aspects of care for these patients. Four transgender patients identified as male-to-female and 2 as female-to-male. Three of 6 had gender-affirming surgeries prior to transplant surgery, 1 of whom had further procedures posttransplant. Additionally, 4 patients were on hormone therapy. All 6 had psychiatric comorbidities. The 4 grafts have done well, with an average serum creatinine of 1.45 mg/dL at 2 years (range 1.01-1.85 mg/dL). However, patients encountered various postoperative complications, 1 of which was attributable to modified anatomy. Thus, transgender kidney transplant patients can present novel challenges in regard to surgical considerations as well as pre- and posttransplant care. Dedicated expertise is needed to optimize outcomes for this population.

Left Vocal Process Avulsion.

Vocal fold process avulsion results from trauma that detaches the vocal process and thyroarytenoid muscle from the body of the arytenoid cartilage. Vocal fold laxity often causes severe dysphonia. Findings can be subtle. A high index of suspicion often permits diagnosis and effective surgical repair.

Assessing the Ambulatory Surgery Center Volume-Outcome Association.

Importance: In surgical patients, it is well known that higher hospital procedure volume is associated with better outcomes. To our knowledge, this volume-outcome association has not been studied in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) in the US. Objective: To determine if low-volume ASCs have a higher rate of revisits after surgery, particularly among patients with multimorbidity. Design, Setting, and Participants: This matched case-control study used Medicare claims data and analyzed surgeries performed during 2018 and 2019 at ASCs. The study examined 2328 ASCs performing common ambulatory procedures and analyzed 4751 patients with a revisit within 7 days of surgery (defined to be either 1 of 4735 revisits or 1 of 16 deaths without a revisit). These cases were each closely matched to 5 control patients without revisits (23 755 controls). Data were analyzed from January 1, 2018, through December 31, 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: Seven-day revisit in patients (cases) compared with the matched patients without the outcome (controls) in ASCs with low volume (less than 50 procedures over 2 years) vs higher volume (50 or more procedures). Results: Patients at a low-volume ASC had a higher odds of a 7-day revisit vs patients who had their surgery at a higher-volume ASC (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% CI, 1.09-1.36; P = .001). The odds of revisit for patients with multimorbidity were higher at low-volume ASCs when compared with higher-volume ASCs (OR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.27-1.94; P < .001). Among patients with multimorbidity in low-volume ASCs, for those who underwent orthopedic procedures, the odds of revisit were 84% higher (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.36-2.50; P < .001) vs higher-volume centers, and for those who underwent general surgery or other procedures, the odds of revisit were 36% higher (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.01-1.83; P = .05) vs a higher-volume center. The findings were not statistically significant for patients without multimorbidity. Conclusions and Relevance: In this observational study, the surgical volume of an ASC was an important indicator of patient outcomes. Older patients with multimorbidity should discuss with their surgeon the optimal location of their care.

Evaluating patient experience with a surgical navigation program for under-resourced patients.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to characterize patient satisfaction with navigators and surgical care accessed through a novel navigation program for under-resourced communities. METHODS: PSN-I and PSQ-18 questionnaires assessed satisfaction with navigators and care, respectively. Primary outcomes were PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores. Secondary analyses tested associations between satisfaction and patient factors and between PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores. RESULTS: Of 294 patients contacted, 88 (29.9 â€‹%) responded. Most were Hispanic/Latinx (76.1 â€‹%), Spanish-speaking (71.5 â€‹%), and uninsured (85.2 â€‹%). Participants were highly satisfied with navigators (mean 38.5, SD 7.6; max. 45) and most care domains except Financial Aspects (mean 3.2, SD 1.0; max. 5) and Accessibility/Convenience (mean 3.5, SD 0.6; max. 5). Higher navigator satisfaction was associated with post-consultation need for surgery (coeff. 5.6, 95 â€‹% CI[0.9, 10.3]) and increased the odds of care satisfaction (OR 1.1, 95 â€‹% CI[1.0, 1.2]). CONCLUSIONS: Patients are satisfied with navigation services-a previously unstudied aspect of this unique surgical equity program.

Diagnostic accuracy of ePOS score in predicting DNR labeling after ICU admission: A prospective observational study (ePOS-DNR).

Background: Resuscitation can sometimes be futile and making a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) decision is in the best interest of the patient. The electronic poor outcome screening (ePOS) score was developed to predict 6-month poor outcomes of critically ill patients. We explored the diagnostic accuracy of the ePOS score in predicting DNR decisions in the intensive care unit (ICU). Methods: This study was conducted at the ICU of a tertiary referral hospital in Saudi Arabia between March and May 2023. Prospectively, we calculated ePOS scores for all eligible consecutive admissions after 48 h in the ICU and recorded the DNR orders. The ability of the score to predict DNR was explored using logistic regression. Youden's ideal cut-off value was calculated using the DeLong method, and different diagnostic accuracy measures were generated with corresponding 95 % confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We enrolled 857 patients, 125 received a DNR order and 732 did not. The average ePOS score of DNR and non-DNR patients was 28.2±10.7 and 15.2±9.7, respectively. ePOS score, as a predictor of DNR order, had an area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve of 81.8 % (95% CI: 79.0 to 84.3, P <0.001). Youden's ideal cut-off value >17 was associated with a sensitivity of 87.2 (95% CI: 80.0 to 92.5, P <0.001), specificity of 63.9 (95% CI: 60.3 to 67.4, P <0.001), positive predictive value of 29.2 (95% CI: 24.6 to 33.8, P <0.001), negative predictive value of 96.7 (95% CI: 95.1 to 98.3, P <0.001), and diagnostic odds ratio 12.1 (95% CI: 7.0 to 20.8, P <0.001). Conclusions: In this study, the ePOS score performed well as a diagnostic test for patients who will be labeled as DNR during their ICU stay. A cut-off score >17 may help guide clinical decisions to withhold or commence resuscitative measures.

Association Between Diagnosis-to-Limb Revascularization Time and Clinical Outcomes in Outpatients With Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: Insights From the CLIPPER Cohort.

BACKGROUND: The extent and consequences of ischemia in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) may change rapidly, and delays from diagnosis to revascularization may worsen outcomes. We sought to describe the association between time from diagnosis to endovascular lower extremity revascularization (diagnosis-to-limb revascularization [D2L] time) and clinical outcomes in outpatients with CLTI. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the CLIPPER cohort, comprising patients between 66 and 86 years old diagnosed with CLTI betweeen 2010 and 2019, we used Medicare claims data to identify patients who underwent outpatient endovascular revascularization within 180 days of diagnosis. We described the risk-adjusted association between D2L time and clinical outcomes. Among 1 130 065 patients aged between 66 and 86 years with CLTI, 99 221 (8.8%) underwent outpatient endovascular lower extremity revascularization within 180 days of their CLTI diagnosis. Among patients with D2L time <30 days, there was no association between D2L time and all-cause death or major lower extremity amputation. However, among patients with D2L time >30 days, each additional 10-day increase in D2L time was associated with a 2.5% greater risk of major amputation (hazard ratio, 1.025 [95% CI, 1.014-1.036]). There was no association between D2L time and all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: A delay of >30 days from CLTI diagnosis to lower extremity endovascular revascularization was associated with an increased risk of major lower extremity amputation among patients undergoing outpatient endovascular revascularization. Improving systems of care to reduce D2L time could reduce amputations.

Emergency Medicaid enrollment after traumatic injury predicts long-term health care utilization.

BACKGROUND: Injured patients have high rates of uninsurance, which is associated with worse outcomes. Insurance linkage programs that connect patients to Medicaid coverage can prevent catastrophic costs for patients. Less is known about the long-term impact of insurance enrollment. We examined health care utilization for previously uninsured patients, hypothesizing that newly insured patients postinjury would use health care more than those remaining uninsured. METHODS: We linked institutional trauma registry data to the electronic medical record to identify injured patients aged 18 to 64 years from 2017 to 2021. Patients admitted without insurance and then retroactively insured (RI) during hospitalization were compared with patients with preestablished Medicaid (Medicaid insured [MI]) and those remaining uninsured. We compared demographic and injury characteristics and future health care utilization, including hospitalizations, emergency department (ED) visits, and clinic visits, among groups at 30 days and 12 months postinjury. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) 6 months after injury were compared by group for a subset of patients participating in an ongoing study of long-term PROs. RESULTS: We compared 494 RI patients with 1,706 MI and 148 uninsured patients. Retroactively insured patients were younger, more likely to have penetrating injuries, and longer hospitalization than other groups. There was a significant increase in ED and clinic visits and hospital admissions at 30 days and 12 months between RI and uninsured patients (p < 0.001). Using multivariable logistic regression, RI was associated with higher future ED utilization, hospital admissions, and specialist visits at 30 days and 12 months compared with uninsured patients. Of the 265 patients with 6-month PROs, Medicaid coverage was not associated with any significant difference in physical function or anxiety. CONCLUSION: Patients enrolled in insurance postinjury are more likely to use health care in the future than patients without insurance, but the downstream effects are less clear. Health insurance is a necessary step but not independently sufficient to optimize care and improve health outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiological; Level IV.

Sex disparities in patients with acute aortic dissection: A scoping review.

Disparities in outcomes for patients with cardiovascular disease and those undergoing cardiac or vascular operations are well-established. These disparities often span several dimensions and persist despite advancements in medical and surgical care; sex is among the most pervasive. Specifically, females sex has been implicated as a predictor of poor outcomes in both patients with acute type A aortic dissections (ATAADs) and type B aortic dissections (TBADs). For instance, one study, using the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection database, found that females with acute aortic dissection-including ATAAD and TBAD that were either medically or surgically managed-had 40% higher odds of in-hospital mortality than men. Notably, both types of acute aortic dissections affect men more commonly than females and can be life-threatening without prompt, appropriate treatment. The underlying mechanisms for these disparities are unclear but are thought to be multifactorial. The association of sex with patterns of disease and outcomes in patients with ATAAD or TBAD remains unclear, with conflicting reports from different studies. Thus, we sought to review the literature regarding sex disparities in patients with ATAAD and TBAD.

Incorporation and Utilization of an Additional Needs Screener by Surgical Trainees for Comprehensive Care of Underserved and Underinsured Surgical Patients.

OBJECTIVE: Comprehensive, socially-minded healthcare has historically been delivered in the primary care setting. For underserved patient populations, however, a surgical care episode may serve as the health care access point. To maximize patient wellbeing during the perioperative period, our surgical center developed the Additional Needs Screener (ANS). Operationalized into practice by GME and UME trainees, this tool screens surgical patients across 3 domains (social, emotional, and immigration needs) and connects patients to partner organizations if appropriate. This study describes the pilot utilization of the ANS among underserved and underinsured surgical patients. DESIGN: Clinical quality improvement and retrospective cohort study of patients completing the ANS from implementation in September 2021 to September 2022. SETTING: The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, PA-a tertiary care center. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and 10 underinsured and/or underserved patients completed at least 1 ANS domain. RESULTS: Patients were majority female (55F, 53M, 2 other) and Hispanic/Latinx (72%) with a median age of 38 (IQR = 34-48). Most patients spoke a primary language other than English (77%), and nearly all were either uninsured (82%) or received emergency medical assistance or Medicaid (14%) at referral. Patients demonstrated significant needs; 39% endorsed difficulty affording housing, 32% endorsed difficulty paying for food, 29% endorsed experiencing current life-interfering distress, and 75% had undocumented immigration status. Ultimately, 57% of screened patients accepted referrals to our needs response teams. CONCLUSIONS: Underserved and underinsured patients presenting for surgical care face significant challenges relating to social, emotional, and immigration needs. Through adoption of the ANS, trainees gained competency identifying and addressing these barriers in the perioperative period. Future works will focus on categorizing referral outcomes, developing interventions to increase patient trust, and improving screener dissemination.

The Safety and Efficacy of the 445-nm Blue Laser for Operative Management of Benign Nonvascular Laryngeal Lesions.

The 445-nm blue laser combines the features of photocoagulative vascular lasers and cutting lasers in one device. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the 445-nm blue laser for the treatment of benign laryngeal pathologies, other than vascular lesions. Outcomes were compared to those when already-established therapies were used. METHODS: Adult voice center patients who underwent surgical intervention for vocal fold (VF) mass, VF scar, laryngeal stenosis, laryngeal web, or Reinke's edema were included in this retrospective study. Outcomes were compared to those achieved when traditional treatment modalities were used, including cold steel, CO2 laser, potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser, and coblator. Strobovideolaryngoscopy footage was evaluated using a previously described model at four time points: postoperative visit #1: 1-14 days, postoperative visit #2: 30-60 days, postoperative visit #3: 61-365 days, postoperative visit #4: >365 days. RESULTS: Eighty cases using the blue laser and 153 controls (n = 78 cold steel, n = 51 KTP laser, n = 22 CO2 laser, n = 2 coblator) were included in this study. Procedures performed using blue laser included VF mass excision (n = 45), VF scar reduction (n = 16), laryngeal stenosis resection/repair (n = 25), laryngeal web excision (n = 7), and reduction of Reinke's edema (n = 1). On postoperative strobovideolaryngoscopy examination, the surgical objective score did not differ significantly between the blue laser cohort and all controls at any postoperative visit. VF edema did not differ significantly between the blue laser cohort and all controls at any postoperative visit. VF hemorrhage scores were significantly lower in the blue laser cohort compared to all controls at the first postoperative visit, but hemorrhage had resolved almost entirely by the second postoperative visit in all groups. Postoperative VF stiffness was worse in the blue laser group at the third postoperative visit compared to controls, but both groups had improved to similar levels by the fourth postoperative visit. The rate of lesion recurrence (24.29% versus 17.19%) did not differ significantly between the blue laser cohort and controls on multivariate analysis (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.081 [0.461-2.536]). The complication rate (12.50% versus 10.46%) did not differ significantly between the blue laser cohort and all controls on multivariate analysis (OR = 0.992 [0.375-2.624]). The blue laser was associated with a lower rate of revision surgery (30.00% versus 34.64%) on multivariate analysis (OR = 0.380 [0.168-0.859]). CONCLUSION: The 445-nm blue laser is safe and effective for the management of benign laryngeal lesions. It has efficacy and safety similar to those of traditional treatment modalities (including cold steel, CO2 laser, and KTP laser). Use of the blue laser may lead to lower rates of early postoperative hemorrhage and revision surgery. No adverse effects attributed directly to the use of the blue laser were observed in this study. Further research is encouraged to confirm or refute these findings.