Three-Year Overall Survival with Tebentafusp in Metastatic Uveal Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Tebentafusp, a T-cell receptor-bispecific molecule that targets glycoprotein 100 and CD3, is approved for adult patients who are positive for HLA-A*02:01 and have unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. The primary analysis in the present phase 3 trial supported a long-term survival benefit associated with the drug. METHODS: We report the 3-year efficacy and safety results from our open-label, phase 3 trial in which HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive tebentafusp (tebentafusp group) or the investigator's choice of therapy with pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine (control group), with randomization stratified according to the lactate dehydrogenase level. The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS: At a minimum follow-up of 36 months, median overall survival was 21.6 months in the tebentafusp group and 16.9 months in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.54 to 0.87). The estimated percentage of patients surviving at 3 years was 27% in the tebentafusp group and 18% in the control group. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade in the tebentafusp group were rash (83%), pyrexia (76%), pruritus (70%), and hypotension (38%). Most tebentafusp-related adverse events occurred early during treatment, and no new adverse events were observed with long-term administration. The percentage of patients who discontinued treatment because of adverse events continued to be low in both treatment groups (2% in the tebentafusp group and 5% in the control group). No treatment-related deaths occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This 3-year analysis supported a continued long-term benefit of tebentafusp for overall survival among adult HLA-A*02:01-positive patients with previously untreated metastatic uveal melanoma. (Funded by Immunocore; IMCgp100-202 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03070392; EudraCT number, 2015-003153-18.).

Treatment of atopic dermatitis with tralokinumab, an anti-IL-13 mAb.

BACKGROUND: IL-13 has an important role in atopic dermatitis (AD) pathogenesis. Tralokinumab is a fully human mAb that potently and specifically neutralizes IL-13. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in adults with moderate-to-severe AD. METHODS: In this phase 2b study (NCT02347176), 204 adults were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive 45, 150, or 300 mg of subcutaneous tralokinumab, or placebo, every 2 weeks for 12 weeks with concomitant topical glucocorticoids. Coprimary end points were change from baseline in Eczema Area Severity Index score and percentage of participants with an Investigator's Global Assessment response (0/1 score and reduction of ≥2 grades from baseline) at week 12. RESULTS: At week 12, 300 mg of tralokinumab significantly improved change from baseline in Eczema Area Severity Index score versus placebo (adjusted mean difference, -4.94; 95% CI, -8.76 to -1.13; P = .01), and a greater percentage of participants achieved an Investigator's Global Assessment response (26.7% vs 11.8%). Greater responses were found in participants with greater concentrations of biomarkers of increased IL-13 activity. Participants treated with 300 mg of tralokinumab demonstrated improvements in SCORAD, Dermatology Life Quality Index, and pruritus numeric rating scale (7-day mean) scores versus placebo. Upper respiratory tract infection was the most frequent treatment-emergent adverse event reported as related to study drug in the placebo (3.9%) and pooled tralokinumab (3.9%) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tralokinumab treatment was associated with early and sustained improvements in AD symptoms and an acceptable safety and tolerability profile, thereby providing evidence for targeting IL-13 in patients with AD.

A Sputum Proteomic Signature That Associates with Increased IL-1ß Levels and Bacterial Exacerbations of COPD.

PURPOSE: Activation of the interleukin-1ß (IL-1ß) signaling pathway has been implicated in COPD, but the proportion of COPD subjects whose disease is principally driven by activation of this pathway is poorly understood. In this study, we sought to differentiate an IL-1ß-associated sputum signature from other inflammation-associated COPD phenotypes. METHODS: Luminex-multiplex assays were used to study IL-1ß-mediated signature proteins within airway epithelium, smooth muscle, and vascular endothelial cell cultures. The IL-1ß-mediated signature was tested in a longitudinal study comprising of 35 paired stable-COPD and acute exacerbation (AECOPD) sputum samples. The presence of respiratory pathogens (H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, S. pneumoniae, and P. aeruginosa) was evaluated by sputum cultures. RESULTS: Five proteins namely TNF-α, GCSF, IL-6, CD-40L, and MIP-1ß were found to be IL-1ß-regulated across all donors and cell types. All five of these IL-1ß-mediated proteins were significantly increased (p < 0.05) in sputum corresponding to AECOPD events showing at least a twofold increase in IL-1ß (IL-1ß(+) events, 18 of 35 total events), relative to preceding stable-COPD state. Sputum IL-1ß levels showed no significant association (p > 0.05, spearman) with known markers of other major COPD inflammation phenotypes. In addition, there was a significant association with bacterial presence in sputum culture with an odds ratio of 9 (95 % CI 1.56, 51.9) in IL-1ß(+) events versus IL-1ß(-) events. CONCLUSION: Our findings provide insights into potential markers of IL-1ß-associated AECOPD, and reaffirm association between IL-1ß pathway activation and airway bacterial infection in COPD. Taken together, our findings could help identify COPD patient subsets who may benefit from therapies targeting IL-1ß pathway.

Increased IR-A/IR-B ratio in non-small cell lung cancers associates with lower epithelial-mesenchymal transition signature and longer survival in squamous cell lung carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the insulin receptor isoform mRNA expression status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS: RNA-seq data from 614 NSCLC [355 adenocarcinomas (LUAD) and 259 squamous cell carcinomas (LUSC)] and 92 normal lung specimens were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to evaluate the mRNA expression of insulin receptor isoform A (IR-A) and insulin receptor isoform B (IR-B). The differential expression status of the insulin receptor isoforms in NSCLC patients was confirmed using qRT-PCR assays with lung cancer cDNA arrays and primary tumor samples. RESULTS: The mRNA expression levels of IR-B were significantly lower in some NSCLC samples compared to normal lung specimens, including both LUAD and LUSC. Notably, no IR-B transcripts were detected - only the IR-A isoform was expressed in 11% of NSCLC patients. This decrease in IR-B expression contributed to an elevated IR-A/IR-B ratio, which was also associated with lower epithelial-mesenchymal transition gene signatures in NSCLC and longer patient survival under standard of care in LUSC. In addition to NSCLC, RNA-seq data from TCGA revealed a similar increase in IR-A/IR-B ratio in many other cancer types, with high prevalence in acute myeloid leukemia, glioblastoma multiforme, and brain lower grade glioma. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate a common reduction of the mRNA expression level of IR-B and an increased IR-A/IR-B mRNA ratio in NSCLC and other tumor types. The relationship of altered IR-A/IR-B ratios with cancer progression and patient survival should be prospectively explored in future studies.

Clinical and molecular response to tebentafusp in previously treated patients with metastatic uveal melanoma: a phase 2 trial.

In patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, the historical 1 year overall survival rate is 37% with a median overall survival of 7.8 months. We conducted a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase 2 study of tebentafusp, a soluble T cell receptor bispecific (gp100×CD3), in 127 patients with treatment-refractory metastatic uveal melanoma (NCT02570308). The primary endpoint was the estimation of objective response rate based on RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours) v1.1. Secondary objectives included safety, overall survival, progression-free survival and disease control rate. All patients had at least one treatment-related adverse event, with rash (87%), pyrexia (80%) and pruritus (67%) being the most common. Toxicity was mostly mild to moderate in severity but was greatly reduced in incidence and intensity after the initial three doses. Despite a low overall response rate of 5% (95% CI: 2-10%), the 1 year overall survival rate was 62% (95% CI: 53-70%) with a median overall survival of 16.8 months (95% CI: 12.9-21.3), suggesting benefit beyond traditional radiographic-based response criteria. In an exploratory analysis, early on-treatment reduction in circulating tumour DNA was strongly associated with overall survival, even in patients with radiographic progression. Our findings indicate that tebentafusp has promising clinical activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated metastatic uveal melanoma, and data suggesting ctDNA as an early indicator of clinical benefit from tebentafusp need confirmation in a randomized trial.

A New Pipeline to Predict and Confirm Tumor Neoantigens Predict Better Response to Immune Checkpoint Blockade.

Mutations that drive oncogenesis in cancer can generate neoantigens that may be recognized by the immune system. Identification of these neoantigens remains challenging due to the complexity of the MHC antigen and T-cell receptor interaction. Here, we describe the development of a systematic approach to efficiently identify and validate immunogenic neoantigens. Whole-exome sequencing of tissue from a patient with melanoma was used to identify nonsynonymous mutations, followed by MHC binding prediction and identification of tumor clonal architecture. The top 18 putative class I neoantigens were selected for immunogenicity testing via a novel in vitro pipeline in HLA-A201 healthy donor blood. Naïve CD8 T cells from donors were stimulated with allogeneic dendritic cells pulsed with peptide pools and then with individual peptides. The presence of antigen-specific T cells was determined via functional assays. We identified one putative neoantigen that expanded T cells specific to the mutant form of the peptide and validated this pipeline in a subset of patients with bladder tumors treated with durvalumab (n = 5). Within this cohort, the top predicted neoantigens from all patients were immunogenic in vitro. Finally, we looked at overall survival in the whole durvalumab-treated bladder cohort (N = 37) by stratifying patients by tertile measure of tumor mutation burden (TMB) or neoantigen load. Patients with higher neoantigen and TMB load tended to show better overall survival. IMPLICATIONS: This pipeline can enable accurate and rapid identification of personalized neoantigens that may help to identify patients who will survive longer on durvalumab.

A Blood-based Assay for Assessment of Tumor Mutational Burden in First-line Metastatic NSCLC Treatment: Results from the MYSTIC Study.

PURPOSE: Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been shown to be predictive of survival benefit in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Measuring TMB in the blood (bTMB) using circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers practical advantages compared with TMB measurement in tissue (tTMB); however, there is a need for validated assays and identification of optimal cutoffs. We describe the analytic validation of a new bTMB algorithm and its clinical utility using data from the phase III MYSTIC trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The dataset used for the clinical validation was from MYSTIC, which evaluated first-line durvalumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) ± tremelimumab (anticytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 antibody) or chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC. bTMB and tTMB were evaluated using the GuardantOMNI and FoundationOne CDx assays, respectively. A Cox proportional hazards model and minimal P value cross-validation approach were used to identify the optimal bTMB cutoff. RESULTS: In MYSTIC, somatic mutations could be detected in ctDNA extracted from plasma samples in a majority of patients, allowing subsequent calculation of bTMB. The success rate for obtaining valid TMB scores was higher for bTMB (809/1,001; 81%) than for tTMB (460/735; 63%). Minimal P value cross-validation analysis confirmed the selection of bTMB ≥20 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb) as the optimal cutoff for clinical benefit with durvalumab + tremelimumab. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of the GuardantOMNI ctDNA platform for quantifying bTMB from plasma samples. Using the new bTMB algorithm and an optimal bTMB cutoff of ≥20 mut/Mb, high bTMB was predictive of clinical benefit with durvalumab + tremelimumab versus chemotherapy.

Association between ADAMTS1 matrix metalloproteinase gene variation, coronary heart disease, and benefit of statin therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the Ala227Pro polymorphism in the ADAMTS1 metalloproteinase gene and coronary heart disease and benefit from statin therapy in 2 independent cohorts. METHODS AND RESULTS: The frequency of the ADAMTS1 227Pro minor allele was 0.24 in 2421 male subjects from CARE, a randomized trial of pravastatin versus placebo. In the placebo arm, homozygotes (6.3% of study population) had a significantly increased risk of fatal coronary disease or nonfatal myocardial infarction (D/MI) compared with noncarriers (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.19, P=0.03), and in the entire study the benefit of pravastatin in reducing the risk of D/MI was greater in these subjects (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.69) than in heterozygotes (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.14) or noncarriers (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.42; P(interaction)=0.044). Results were tested in 1565 male subjects from WOSCOPS, also a randomized trial of pravastatin versus placebo. Similar to the results in CARE, in the placebo arm subjects homozygous for the minor allele were at increased risk of D/MI (OR 1.72, P=0.052) and in the entire study the benefit of pravastatin in reducing D/MI was greater in these subjects (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.09 to 0.68) than in heterozygotes (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.11) or noncarriers (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.20 to 2.09) (P(interaction)=0.029). CONCLUSIONS: In men not on pravastatin, those homozygous for the 227Pro allele of ADAMTS1 have a nearly 2-fold increased risk of coronary heart disease events compared with noncarriers. In this high-risk group, treatment with pravastatin is highly efficacious, reducing the odds of fatal coronary disease or nonfatal MI by approximately 75%, as compared with 25% in noncarriers or heterozygotes.

Prognostic Significance of Liver Metastasis in Durvalumab-Treated Lung Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Two clinical studies (Study 1108 and ATLANTIC) were analyzed to evaluate the prognostic value of baseline liver metastases (LMs) in advanced/metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients treated with durvalumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted; covariates included performance status, tumor stage, histology, sex, age, smoking status, and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) status. RESULTS: In all, 569 patients were included. LMs were present in 31.6% (96/304) of Study 1108 patients and 17.9% (47/263) of ATLANTIC patients. Median overall survival (OS) was shorter in patients with LMs than in those without in both studies. In both studies, LMs were an independent negative prognostic factor for OS and progression-free survival. Objective response rates were also significantly lower. PD-L1 independently predicted benefit across all patients. CONCLUSION: Liver metastases were associated with worse outcomes irrespective of PD-L1 status, but PD-L1 status predicted benefit from durvalumab irrespective of LMs.

Automated image analysis of NSCLC biopsies to predict response to anti-PD-L1 therapy.

BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint therapies (ICTs) targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) pathway have improved outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly those with high PD-L1 expression. However, the predictive value of manual PD-L1 scoring is imperfect and alternative measures are needed. We report an automated image analysis solution to determine the predictive and prognostic values of the product of PD-L1+ cell and CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) densities (CD8xPD-L1 signature) in baseline tumor biopsies. METHODS: Archival or fresh tumor biopsies were analyzed for PD-L1 and CD8 expression by immunohistochemistry. Samples were collected from 163 patients in Study 1108/NCT01693562, a Phase 1/2 trial to evaluate durvalumab across multiple tumor types, including NSCLC, and a separate cohort of 199 non-ICT- patients. Digital images were automatically scored for PD-L1+ and CD8+ cell densities using customized algorithms applied with Developer XD™ 2.7 software. RESULTS: For patients who received durvalumab, median overall survival (OS) was 21.0 months for CD8xPD-L1 signature-positive patients and 7.8 months for signature-negative patients (p = 0.00002). The CD8xPD-L1 signature provided greater stratification of OS than high densities of CD8+ cells, high densities of PD-L1+ cells, or manually assessed tumor cell PD-L1 expression ≥25%. The CD8xPD-L1 signature did not stratify OS in non-ICT patients, although a high density of CD8+ cells was associated with higher median OS (high: 67 months; low: 39.5 months, p = 0.0009) in this group. CONCLUSIONS: An automated CD8xPD-L1 signature may help to identify NSCLC patients with improved response to durvalumab therapy. Our data also support the prognostic value of CD8+ TILS in NSCLC patients who do not receive ICT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01693562 . Study code: CD-ON-MEDI4736-1108. Interventional study (ongoing but not currently recruiting). Actual study start date: August 29, 2012. Primary completion date: June 23, 2017 (final data collection date for primary outcome measure).

Early Reduction in ctDNA Predicts Survival in Patients with Lung and Bladder Cancer Treated with Durvalumab.

PURPOSE: Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of many solid tumors, with some patients deriving long-term benefit, but how to identify such patients remains unclear. Somatic mutations detected in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma can be an indicator of disease progression, response to therapy, and clonality of primary and metastatic lesions. Hence, ctDNA analysis can provide a valuable noninvasive and tumor-specific marker for longitudinal monitoring of tumor burden. We explored the use of ctDNA to predict survival on durvalumab, an anti-PD-L1 therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Variant allele frequencies (VAF) of somatic mutations in 73 genes were assessed in ctDNA using targeted sequencing in a discovery cohort consisting of 28 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and two validation NSCLC and urothelial cancer (UC) cohorts of 72 and 29 patients, respectively, to correlate ctDNA changes with clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Somatic variants were detected in 96% of patients. Changes in VAF preceded radiographic responses, and patients with reduction in VAF at 6 weeks had significantly greater reduction in tumor volume, with longer progression-free and overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: ctDNA VAF changes are strongly correlated with duration of treatment, antitumor activity, and clinical outcomes in NSCLC and UC. Early on-treatment reduction in ctDNA VAF may be a useful predictor of long-term benefit from immunotherapy. Prospective studies should validate these findings and the value of utilizing early changes in ctDNA for therapeutic decision making by identifying nonresponders to checkpoint inhibitor monotherapies and guiding combination therapies.

Interferon Gamma Messenger RNA Signature in Tumor Biopsies Predicts Outcomes in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma or Urothelial Cancer Treated with Durvalumab.

Purpose: To identify a predictive biomarker for durvalumab, an anti-programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) mAb.Experimental Design: RNA sequencing of 97 advanced-stage non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) biopsies from a nonrandomized phase Ib/II clinical trial (1108/NCT01693562) were profiled to identify a predictive signature; 62 locally advanced or metastatic urothelial cancer tumors from the same study were profiled to confirm predictive utility of the signature. Thirty NSCLC patients provided pre- and posttreatment tumors for messenger RNA (mRNA) analysis. NSCLC with ≥25% tumor cells and urothelial cancer with ≥25% tumor or immune cells stained for PD-L1 at any intensity were scored PD-L1 positive (PD-L1+). Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analyses were used to adjust for gender, age, prior therapies, histology, ECOG status, liver metastasis, and smoking. Tumor mutation burden (TMB) was calculated using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA).Results: In the NSCLC discovery set, a four-gene IFNγ-positive (IFNγ+) signature comprising IFNγ, CD274, LAG3, and CXCL9 was associated with higher overall response rates, longer median progression-free survival, and overall survival compared with signature-low patients. IFNγ+-signature NSCLC patients had improved survival regardless of IHC PD-L1 status. These associations were replicated in a urothelial cancer cohort. The IFNγ+ signature was induced 2-fold (P = 0.003) by durvalumab after 8 weeks of therapy in patients with NSCLC, and baseline signature was associated with TMB but not survival in TCGA data.Conclusions: The IFNγ+ mRNA signature may assist in identifying patients with improved outcomes with durvalumab, independent of PD-L1 assessed by IHC. Clin Cancer Res; 24(16); 3857-66. ©2018 AACR.

Baseline Plasma Cell Gene Signature Predicts Improvement in Systemic Sclerosis Skin Scores Following Treatment With Inebilizumab (MEDI-551) and Correlates With Disease Activity in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

OBJECTIVE: B cells impact the progression of systemic sclerosis (SSc; scleroderma) through multiple pathogenic mechanisms. CD19 inhibition in mice reduced skin thickness, collagen production, and autoantibody levels, consistent with CD19 expression on plasma cells (PCs), the source of antibody production. PC depletion could effectively reduce collagen deposition and inflammation in SSc; therefore, we investigated the effects of PC depletion on SSc disease activity. METHODS: A PC gene signature was evaluated in SSc skin biopsy samples in 2 phase I clinical trials. We assessed microarray data from tissue from public studies of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), dermatomyositis (DM), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and atopic dermatitis, as well as blood from a phase IIb clinical trial in SLE. RESULTS: The PC signature was elevated in SSc skin specimens compared to healthy donor skin (P = 2.28 × 10-6 ) and correlated with the baseline modified Rodnan skin thickness score (MRSS) (r = 0.64, P = 0.0004). Patients with a high PC signature at baseline showed greater improvement in the MRSS (mean ± SD change 35 ± 16%; P = 6.30 × 10-4 ) following anti-CD19 treatment with inebilizumab (MEDI-551) than did patients with a low PC signature at baseline (mean ± SD change 8 ± 12%; P = 0.104). The PC signature was overexpressed in tissue from patients with SLE, DM, COPD, interstitial lung disease, and IPF relative to controls (all fold change >2; P < 0.001). The PC signature also differed significantly between SLE patients with mild-to-moderate disease and those with severe disease (SLE Disease Activity Index cutoff at 10) (fold change 1.44; P = 3.90 × 10-3 ) and correlated significantly with the degree of emphysema in COPD (r = 0.53, P = 7.55 × 10-8 ). CONCLUSION: Our results support the notion that PCs have a role in the pathogenesis of SSc and other autoimmune or pulmonary indications. An elevated pretreatment PC signature was associated with increased benefit from MEDI-551 in SSc.

Development of a new ARCHITECT automated periostin immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Periostin is being investigated as a potential biomarker for T-helper-2 (Th2)-driven asthma or eosinophilic inflammation and may help to identify patients more likely to benefit from interleukin-13-targeted treatments. We report the development and analytic performance of the investigational use only ARCHITECT Periostin Immunoassay, a new automated assay developed to detect serum periostin concentrations. METHODS: We assessed assay performance in terms of precision, sensitivity, linearity, interference from classical immunoassay interferents and representatives of common asthma medications, specimen handling, and isoform reactivity. The assay was also used to assess the biological variability of serum periostin concentrations in samples from healthy volunteers and from subjects with uncontrolled asthma (the intended use population). RESULTS: The percentage CVs for 5-day total precision, assessed using two instruments, was <6% across 2 controls and one serum-based panel. Limit of quantitation was 4ng/mL (dilution adjusted concentration), suiting the needs for this application. Dilution analysis yielded linear results and no endogenous sample or drug interferences were observed. All known periostin isoforms expressed in the mature human lung were detected by the assay. CONCLUSION: Our studies provide support that the ARCHITECT Periostin Immunoassay is a reliable and robust test for measuring serum periostin concentrations.

Development and analytical performance of a new ARCHITECT automated dipeptidyl peptidase-4 immunoassay.

BACKGROUND: Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) may be a suitable biomarker to identify people with severe asthma who have greater activation of the interleukin-13 (IL-13) pathway and may therefore benefit from IL-13-targeted treatments. We report the analytical performance of an Investigational Use Only immunoassay and provide data on the biological range of DPP-4 concentrations. METHODS: We assessed assay performance, utilising analyses of precision, linearity and sensitivity; interference from common endogenous assay interferents, and from asthma and anti-diabetic medications, were also assessed. The assay was used to measure the range of serum DPP-4 concentrations in healthy volunteers and subjects with diabetes and severe, uncontrolled asthma. RESULTS: The total precision of DPP-4 concentration measurement (determined using percentage coefficient of variation) was ≤5% over 20 days. Dilution analysis yielded linear results from 30 to 1305 ng/mL; the limit of quantitation was 19.2 ng/mL. No notable endogenous or drug interferences were observed at the expected therapeutic concentration. Median DPP-4 concentrations in healthy volunteers and subjects with asthma or Type 1 diabetes were assessed, with concentrations remaining similar in subjects with diabetes and asthma across different demographics. CONCLUSION: These analyses indicate that the ARCHITECT DPP-4 Immunoassay is a reliable and robust method for measuring serum DPP-4 concentration.

High-throughput genotyping of single nucleotide polymorphisms using new biplex invader technology.

The feasibility of large-scale genome-wide association studies of complex human disorders depends on the availability of accurate and efficient genotyping methods for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We describe a new platform of the invader assay, a biplex assay, where both alleles are interrogated in a single reaction tube. The assay was evaluated on over 50 different SNPs, with over 20 SNPs genotyped in study cohorts of over 1500 individuals. We assessed the usefulness of the new platform in high-throughput genotyping and compared its accuracy to genotyping results obtained by the traditional monoplex invader assay, TaqMan genotyping and sequencing data. We present representative data for two SNPs in different genes (CD36 and protein tyrosine phosphatase 1beta) from a study cohort comprising over 1500 individuals with high or low-normal blood pressure. In this high-throughput application, the biplex invader assay is very accurate, with an error rate of <0.3% and a failure rate of 1.64%. The set-up of the assay is highly automated, facilitating the processing of large numbers of samples simultaneously. We present new analysis tools for the assignment of genotypes that further improve genotyping success. The biplex invader assay with its automated set-up and analysis offers a new efficient high-throughput genotyping platform that is suitable for association studies in large study cohorts.

Reductions in eosinophil biomarkers by benralizumab in patients with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic inflammation is frequently associated with increased asthma severity. Benralizumab is a humanized, afucosylated, anti-interleukin-5Rα monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes eosinophils and basophils through enhanced antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. OBJECTIVE: To study effects of benralizumab on eosinophil counts and activity following administration to asthma patients. METHODS: Sera were collected from asthma patients enrolled in two clinical studies. Placebo or benralizumab was subcutaneously administered to patients in Phase I (100 or 200 mg, multiple doses; N = 14; NCT00659659) and Phase IIa (25, 100, or 200 mg every 4 weeks; N = 24; NCT00783289) studies. Sera were also collected from healthy volunteers (N = 20) for comparison. Blood eosinophils, IL-5, eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eotaxin/chemokine (C-C motif) 11 (CCL11), eotaxin-2/CCL24, tumor necrosis factor (TNF), and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) were measured at baseline and post-treatment. RESULTS: Increased EDN concentrations were observed in sera of patients from both studies relative to healthy volunteers (p < 0.05). At baseline, sera EDN concentrations correlated with blood eosinophil counts (rs = 0.5; p < 0.05). Benralizumab reduced blood eosinophil numbers and sera EDN and ECP relative to baseline (p < 0.05). No changes in TNF or IFN-γ were observed, while serum IL-5, eotaxin/CCL11, and eotaxin-2/CCL24 increased after benralizumab administration vs. placebo (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In two independent studies, serum IL-5, EDN, and ECP were modulated following benralizumab. Eosinophil depletion after benralizumab also resulted in significant reductions in EDN and ECP concentrations, suggesting that cytotoxic granule proteins were not released after eosinophil reduction.

Evaluation of the paraoxonases as candidate genes for stroke: Gln192Arg polymorphism in the paraoxonase 1 gene is associated with increased risk of stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The paraoxonases are involved in protecting low-density lipoprotein (LDL) from lipid oxidation. Paraoxonase 1 (PON1) was implicated in susceptibility to coronary artery disease and stroke in previous studies. We evaluated, in a comprehensive way, all 3 paraoxonase genes for association with stroke observed in the Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) trial. METHODS: Over 2500 subjects enrolled in the CARE trial were genotyped for 14 single nucleotide polymorphisms, including 7 newly identified in this study, in the 3 paraoxonase genes. RESULTS: A glutamine (Gln)/arginine (Arg) polymorphism at amino acid residue 192 in PON1 was significantly associated with stroke (P=0.003 in multivariate analysis, including age, sex, LDL, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and pravastatin treatment as covariates). The odds ratios were 2.28 (95% CI, 1.38 to 3.79) for Gln/Arg heterozygotes and 2.47 (95% CI, 1.18 to 5.19) for Arg/Arg homozygotes compared with Gln/Gln homozygotes. These results are consistent with 2 of 3 other published studies. In combined analysis of all 4 studies, the association between Gln192Arg SNP and stroke was highly significant (chi2(8df)=45.58, P<0.000001). Sequence analysis of the PON1 gene from seventy stroke cases revealed a novel nonsense mutation at codon 32 in one stroke case, which was not detected in over 2500 unaffected individuals. Polymorphisms in the PON2 and PON3 genes were not associated with stroke. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Gln192Arg genotype is an important risk factor for stroke.

Efficacy and safety of tralokinumab in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial.

BACKGROUND: Interleukin 13 is a central mediator of asthma. Tralokinumab is a human interleukin-13 neutralising monoclonal antibody. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of two dosing regimens of tralokinumab in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre, phase 2b study at 98 sites in North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. Patients aged 18-75 years with severe asthma and two to six exacerbations in the previous year were randomly assigned (1:1), via an interactive voice-response or web-response system, to one of two dosing regimen groups (every 2 weeks, or every 2 weeks for 12 weeks then every 4 weeks) and further randomised (2:1), via computer-generated permuted-block randomisation (block size of six), to receive tralokinumab 300 mg or placebo for 1 year. All participants received high-dose fluticasone and salmeterol and continued other pre-study controller drugs. Treatment was administered by an unmasked study investigator not involved in the management of patients; all other study site personnel, patients, the study funder, and data analysts were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the annual asthma exacerbation rate at week 52 in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary endpoints included prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), Asthma Control Questionnaire-6 (ACQ-6), and Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire-Standardised Version (AQLQ[S]). This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01402986. FINDINGS: Between Oct 4, 2011, and Feb 22, 2014, we randomly assigned 452 patients to receive placebo (n=151) or tralokinumab every 2 weeks (n=150) or every 4 weeks (n=151), of whom 383 (85%) completed the treatment period up to week 52. The annual asthma exacerbation rate at week 52 was similar between patients receiving tralokinumab every 2 weeks (0.91 per patient per year [95% CI 0.76-1.08]) and every 4 weeks (0.97 [0.81-1.14]), and those receiving placebo (0.90 [0.75-1.08]). At week 52, percentage changes in annual asthma exacerbation rate were not significant with tralokinumab every 2 weeks or every 4 weeks versus placebo (6% [95% CI -31 to 33; p=0.709] and -2% [-46 to 29; p=0.904], respectively), with positive changes showing a decrease in exacerbation rate and negative changes showing an increase. Prebronchodilator FEV1 was significantly increased compared with placebo for tralokinumab every 2 weeks (change from baseline 7.3% [95% CI 2.6-12.0]; p=0.003), but not every 4 weeks (1.8% [-2.9 to 6.6]; p=0.448); however, we did not identify significant changes in the other key secondary endpoints. In a post-hoc subgroup analysis of patients not on long-term oral corticosteroids and with baseline FEV1 reversibility of 12% or greater, we noted a non-significant improvement in asthma exacerbation rate (44% [95% CI -22 to 74]; p=0.147) and significant improvements in key secondary endpoints (FEV1 12.2% [1.7-22.7]; p=0.022; ACQ-6 -0.55 [-1.07 to -0.04]; p=0.036; and AQLQ[S] 0.70 [0.12-1.28]; p=0.019) in patients given tralokinumab every 2 weeks (n=33) compared with placebo (n=48). In patients in this subgroup who also had baseline serum dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) higher than the population baseline median, we noted additional improvements in prebronchodilator FEV1, ACQ-6, and AQLQ(S), and, in those with periostin concentrations higher than the median, we noted improvements in asthma exacerbation rate, prebronchodilator FEV1, and ACQ-6. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between the tralokinumab and placebo groups. Treatment-emergent serious adverse events regarded as related to the study drug were pneumonia (one [1%] patient in the placebo group), pneumococcal pneumonia (one [1%] in the tralokinumab every 2 weeks group), angioedema (one [1%] in the placebo group), and worsening asthma (one [1%] in the tralokinumab every 2 weeks group and two [1%] in the tralokinumab every 4 weeks group). INTERPRETATION: In this phase 2b study, both tralokinumab regimens had an acceptable safety and tolerability profile but did not significantly reduce asthma exacerbation rates in patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. Improvement in FEV1 with tralokinumab given every 2 weeks and results of post-hoc subgroup analyses suggested a possible treatment effect in a defined population of patients with severe uncontrolled asthma. This effect is being further investigated in ongoing phase 3 trials, along with the potential utility of DPP-4 and periostin as biomarkers of interleukin-13 pathway activation. FUNDING: MedImmune.